Bug#1066182: erlang-jiffy: please add support for loongarch

Source: erlang-jiffy Version: 1.1.1-2 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn User: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Usertags: loong64 Dear Maintainer, Erlang-jiffy has a compilation error in the loong64 architecture. The attached patch solves the problem. Please refer to it supports

Bug#1060000: e2fsprogs NMU for /usr-move

Hi Ted, On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 09:56:46PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I've uploaded this to experimental directly to clear NEW and to get a > dumat report quickly. Barring your opposition, I'll NMU this to unstable > as well. Given reviews from Michael Hudson-Doyle, Matthias Klose and Steve

Bug#1066183: mate-equake-applet FTBFS due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Source: mate-equake-applet Version: 1.3.8.2-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Due to the time64 transition -Werror=implicit-function-declaration was turned on by default in unstable. This change makes mate-equake-applet fail to build from source. Relevant snippet: | equake_processdata.c: In

Bug#990451: (no subject)

I concur and also request `--no-all-versions` apply to `apt-cache policy` command as well. Perhaps, instead, a new option with argument `--versions=N` could be implemented, allowing a limited number of versions to be returned, with `--versions=0` or `--versions=none` being the equivalent of

Bug#904233: Adoption of persp-projectile

Control: tags -1 pending Sean Whitton writes: > Hello, > > On Tue 12 Mar 2024 at 08:47pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Sean Whitton writes: >> >>> Hello Xiyue, >>> >>> Do you still intend to adopt persp-projectile? >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> Yes. And it seems I forgot to close this ITA bug in the

Bug#1066185: pekwm: New upstream version available: 0.3.0

Package: pekwm Version: 0.1.18-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: a.t.chadw...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, A new version of pekwm, 0.30.0, has been available from upstream since Jan 2023. I understand that it comes with a bunch of desktop-focused utilities now. Please can you consider updating

Bug#1066186: setup mastadon2irc bot

package: jenkins.debian.org not strictly a jenkins.d.o topic, but it would be nice to have mastadon mentions on #reproducible-builds again in that channel. https://github.com/hackspace-marburg/troet is a Mastodon plugin for Sopel IRC bots, sopel is available in Debian. -- cheers,

Bug#1063380: ITP: libuio -- Linux Kernel UserspaceIO helper library

> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 05:02:29PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 03:25:01PM +0100, Manuel Traut wrote: >>> On 7 Feb 2024, at 18:27, Dima Kogan wrote: >>> >>> Hi. Thanks for your contribution. I looked at the upstream code a tiny >>> bit, and it looks like it might

Bug#904233: Adoption of persp-projectile

Hello, On Tue 12 Mar 2024 at 08:47pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> Hello Xiyue, >> >> Do you still intend to adopt persp-projectile? >> >> Thanks. > > Yes. And it seems I forgot to close this ITA bug in the Changelog. Can > we close this directly instead? We could, but I

Bug#1034771: generate_firmware_patterns failed: 512 at ./tmp/debian-cd/tools/make_disc_trees.pl line 1257

> This is because reprepro does not generate or support these > dep11/Components-*.ym.gz files... My workaround was to download Components files: ${YOUR_MIRROR}/dists/bookworm/main/dep11/Components-amd64.yml.gz and ${YOUR_MIRROR}/dists/bookworm/non-free-firmware/dep11/Components-amd64.yml.gz

Bug#1066117: FTBFS: missing build-dep on libnsl-dev

Hi, On 2024-03-12 23:22, Preuße, Hilmar wrote: > On 12.03.2024 21:59, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Hi Aurelien, > > > Starting with glibc 2.31, support for NIS (libnsl library) has been > > moved to a separate libnsl2 package. In order to allow a smooth > > transition, a libnsl-dev has been added

Bug#1065742: dh_install: cannot use empty lines or comments in substitution

Control: tags -1 wontfix Andreas Metzler: On 2024-03-10 Niels Thykier wrote: Andreas Metzler: [...] supporting build-profiles like nodoc with dh_install seems to cumbersome. Any reason for not using dh_installdocs, which does `nodoc` out of the box? Hello Niels Because for this

Bug#1066137: [pkg-gnupg-maint] Bug#1066137: gnupg2: -Werror=implicit-function-declaration failure testing for ldap_open

On Tuesday, March 12, 2024 11:56:48 PM CET Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Source: gnupg2 > Version: 2.2.40-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: ftbfs > X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de > > Trying to binNMU gnupg2 to make it installable during t64 transition, > I notice the following configury output:

Bug#1065831: document package specifiers for `upgrade`

Hi there, > If "apt upgrade" is saying that it removes packages, that is a bug, yes. @david: it is not a bug, apparently. To put everything in a nutshell: - "apt upgrade" can remove packages - "apt upgrade" accepts specific packages to be upgraded Therefore, this behaviour is expected

Bug#1054822: opam: FTBFS: sed: can't read opam.install: No such file or directory

Hi, On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 21:42:50 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: opam > Version: 2.1.5-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20231027 ftbfs-trixie > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package

Bug#1051202: docker.io: Please upgrade to upstream version 24 or later

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 07:28:06AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > I'll try to patch podman to use the older API, but it seems to me the > docker.io package in debian is lagging several upstream releases behind > anyways. > > any plans to upgrade it soon? Echoing Reinhard here. Lots of external

Bug#1066007: qm-dsp: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: hmm/hmm.c:703:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dgetrf_’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 11:19:48PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > hmm/hmm.c: In function ‘invert’: > hmm/hmm.c:703:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘dgetrf_’ > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 703 | ret = dgetrf_(, , a, , ipiv, ); /* ret should > be zero,

Bug#1065973: kmod: FTBFS due to time64 transition

The patch below builds for me on the hppa platform. Testcases needs verifying on physical hardware though. Helge diff -up ./testsuite/path.c.org ./testsuite/path.c --- ./testsuite/path.c.org 2024-03-13 07:01:04.610222544 + +++ ./testsuite/path.c 2024-03-13 07:11:16.630339502 + @@

Bug#1065435: aptitude: FTBFS on armhf and armel (probably -Werror=implicit-function-declaration related)

On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:34:06PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > Not really, these arches now default to a 64-bit time_t and therefore > you get the conflicting types (suseconds_t is a long int, > __suseconds64_t a long long int). This has nothing to do with implicit > function declarations. It's

Bug#1066134: FTBFS due -Werror=implicit-function-declaration

Christoph Biedl wrote... > So, assuming this is the cause here, the fix is pretty simple: (...) > +#ifdef INET6 > if (if6_is_up) > sif6down(0); > +#endif This was silently done as part of commit 80b8744eb42c7493794f3e3fe0bf1ce14f53e6dd Author: Eivind Næss Date: Fri Aug 6

Bug#990451: (no subject)

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:35:14AM -0700, Chandler Sobel-Sorenson wrote: > I concur and also request `--no-all-versions` apply to `apt-cache > policy` command as well. What would this achieve; what is the use case? I literally see no point in having 'policy' limited to a single version (and

Bug#1066139: podman: Cannot create a network with dns_enabled

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:17:12AM +0100, Antoine Sirinelli wrote: > When I create a new custom network, the dns is not enabled: > > $ podman network create test > test > $ podman network inspect test > > [...] > > The outcome should have "dns_enabled" to true. Per

Bug#1066184: ITP: networking-generic-switch -- OpenStack virtual network service - networking-generic-switch

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Thomas Goirand X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org * Package name: networking-generic-switch Version : 7.2.0 Upstream Contact: OpenStack Foundation * URL : https://github.com/openstack/networking-generic-switch *

Bug#1065779: libcdk5: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: configure:7804:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'tgoto' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 05:51:43AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote: > | configure:7811: gcc -c -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration > | -ffile-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong > | -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fPIE > | -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE

Bug#1065778: libcdio: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: _cdio_stdio.c:53:20: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fseeko64’; did you mean ‘fseeko’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 09:54:29PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../lib/driver > -I../../include -I../../include/ -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 > -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 >

Bug#1065792: libspf2: FTBFS on arm{el,hf}: spf_utils.c:207:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘memset’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 10:42:33PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. > -I../.. -I../../src/include -I../../src -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_TIME_BITS=64 -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g > -O2

Bug#1066121: ionos 5/6/15/16 loosing network

[22:39] * | h01ger filed a bug about 5/6/15/16 loosing network now [22:40] * | mapreri ponders the accuracy: the link was still up, so perhaps it only lost the IP somehow? [22:40] next time I will look up the dhcp lease if there is anything odd [22:40] mapreri: that pondering could be the

Bug#1066187: lacks dependency on libblaspp-dev

Package: liblapackpp-dev Version: 2023.11.05-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, liblapackpp-dev lacks a dependency on libblaspp-dev. The latter is needed as /usr/lib//cmake/lapackpp/lapackConfig.cmake has a ``find_dependency(blaspp)'' command. Cheers, -- Pierre -- System Information:

Bug#1066241: epm: FTBFS: mantohtml.c:230:27: error: implicit declaration of function ‘tolower’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: epm Version: 4.2-11 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066239: gnome-system-tools: FTBFS: shares-tool.c:113:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘table_add_share’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: gnome-system-tools Version: 3.0.0-9.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely

Bug#1066242: snacc: FTBFS: parse-asn1.c:2716:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: snacc Version: 1.3.1-9.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066234: php8.2: FTBFS: credits.c:130:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘php_print_packaging_credits’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: php8.2 Version: 8.2.16-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066233: libmpeg3: FTBFS: audio/synthesizers.c:36:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mpeg3audio_dct64’; did you mean ‘mpeg3audio_dopcm’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libmpeg3 Version: 1.8.dfsg-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066232: palp: FTBFS: class.c:313:27: error: implicit declaration of function ‘DB_to_Hodge’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: palp Version: 2.20-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066236: binutils-h8300-hms: FTBFS: ../../libiberty/regex.c:2314:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘free’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: binutils-h8300-hms Version: 2.16.1-10 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely

Bug#1066237: nas: FTBFS: main.c:125:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yyparse’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: nas Version: 1.9.4-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066238: dvbackup: FTBFS: dvconnect.c:264:33: error: implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: dvbackup Version: 1:0.0.4-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066230: tk707: FTBFS: tcl2c.c:57:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: tk707 Version: 0.8-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066231: code-saturne: FTBFS: src/mei/mei_parser.c:1310:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘yylex’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: code-saturne Version: 6.0.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066225: libtranscript: FTBFS: .config.c:12:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘puts’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libtranscript Version: 0.3.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066229: libtextwrap: FTBFS: textwrap.c:166:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘wcwidth’; did you mean ‘mbwidth’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libtextwrap Version: 0.1-16 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066240: lbzip2: FTBFS: xmalloc.c:36:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘xalloc_die’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: lbzip2 Version: 2.5-2.3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066348: hplip: FTBFS: scan/sane/hpaio.c:364:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘orblite_init’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: hplip Version: 3.22.10+dfsg0-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066349: ace-of-penguins: FTBFS: ./make-imglib.c:207:20: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isgraph’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: ace-of-penguins Version: 1.5~rc2-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066350: gcc-mingw-w64: FTBFS: enable-execute-stack.c:36:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘abort’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: gcc-mingw-w64 Version: 26.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066351: aalib: FTBFS: aainfo.c:12:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: aalib Version: 1.4p5-51 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066335: giac: FTBFS: quickjs.c:11282:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fesetround’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: giac Version: 1.9.0.93+dfsg2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066337: tightvnc: FTBFS: vncconnect.c:17:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘exit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: tightvnc Version: 1:1.3.10-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066339: catimg: FTBFS: catimg.c:181:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘usleep’; did you mean ‘sleep’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: catimg Version: 2.7.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066342: eterm: FTBFS: libscream.c:3231:16: error: implicit declaration of function ‘safe_print_string’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: eterm Version: 0.9.6-7.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066341: gtkam: FTBFS: gtkam-preview.c:443:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gp_setting_set’; did you mean ‘g_settings_set’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: gtkam Version: 1.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066338: emoslib: FTBFS: describe_input_field.c:463:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘jnumgg_’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: emoslib Version: 2:4.5.9-9 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066346: sc: FTBFS: sc.c:1301:46: error: implicit declaration of function ‘list_frames’; did you mean ‘list_ranges’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: sc Version: 7.16-4.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066347: jskeus: FTBFS: jpegmemcd.c:29:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘jpeg_memio_dest’; did you mean ‘jpeg_mem_dest’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: jskeus Version: 1.2.4+dfsg-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066345: libgdchart-gd2: FTBFS: ../gdc.c:284:74: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlen’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libgdchart-gd2 Version: 0.11.5-10 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066340: t4kcommon: FTBFS: linebreak.c:163:19: error: implicit declaration of function ‘u8_mbtouc_unsafe’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: t4kcommon Version: 0.1.1-11.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066343: wily: FTBFS: getrect.c:27:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sleep’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: wily Version: 0.13.42-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066344: fastforward: FTBFS: slurpclose.c:13:44: error: implicit declaration of function ‘close’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: fastforward Version: 1:0.51-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066414: pcb-rnd: FTBFS: ./util/bxl2txt/./util/bxl2txt/txt2bxl.c:43: multiple definition of `main'; /usr/lib/libgenht.a(mainsi.o):(.text+0x9d): first defined here

Source: pcb-rnd Version: 3.1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld: txt2bx

Bug#1066412: hdf-eos5: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-V'

Source: hdf-eos5 Version: 2:2.0-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc version 13.

Bug#1066416: granite-7: FTBFS: ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/lib/libgranite-7.so.7.4.0.p/Widgets/DatePicker.c:248:(.text+0x70c): undefined reference to `gtk_calendar_get_year'

Source: granite-7 Version: 7.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld: &g

Bug#1066415: node-sqlite3: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lnode: No such file or directory

Source: node-sqlite3 Version: 5.1.5+ds1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1066426: xshisen: FTBFS: main.C:149:71: error: ‘rand’ was not declared in this scope

Source: xshisen Version: 1:1.51-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > c++ -c -g -O2 -ff

Bug#1066429: eso-midas: FTBFS: ld: cannot find computer.o: No such file or directory

Source: eso-midas Version: 23.02pl1.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -Wl,-z,re

Bug#1066424: dcl: FTBFS: gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-V'

Source: dcl Version: 7.5.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > gcc version 13.2.0 (Deb

Bug#1066419: node-node-pty: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lnode: No such file or directory

Source: node-node-pty Version: 1.0.0+ds1+~6.3.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1066418: tinyssh: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lsocket: No such file or directory

Source: tinyssh Version: 20240101-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Enter

Bug#1066420: sendmail: FTBFS: ./debian/./debian/conftest.c:37:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference to `__res_query'

Source: sendmail Version: 8.18.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld: /

Bug#1066421: mpb: FTBFS: ././conftest.c:44:(.text.startup+0xb): undefined reference to `foobar'

Source: mpb Version: 1.11.1-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccEEtlw

Bug#1066423: sight: FTBFS: ld.gold: error: cannot find -lnsl

Source: sight Version: 23.1.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -g

Bug#1066422: plastimatch: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lnsl: No such file or directory

Source: plastimatch Version: 1.9.4+dfsg.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /usr/bi

Bug#1066425: node-libpq: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lnode: No such file or directory

Source: node-libpq Version: 1.8.12+~1.8.10-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1066427: atlas-ecmwf: FTBFS: Library.cc:63:10: fatal error: ectrans/transi.h: No such file or directory

Source: atlas-ecmwf Version: 0.36.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cd /<>/deb

Bug#1066428: node-leveldown: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lnode: No such file or directory

Source: node-leveldown Version: 5.6.0+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > mak

Bug#1066417: perdition: FTBFS: perditiondb_nis.h:32:10: fatal error: rpcsvc/ypclnt.h: No such file or directory

Source: perdition Version: 2.2-3.2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > /bin/b

Bug#1066518: fgetty: FTBFS: fgetty.c:278:12: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isdigit’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: fgetty Version: 0.7-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066520: ftools-fv: FTBFS: Visu_tkImgPict.c:1762:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘_XInitImageFuncPtrs’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: ftools-fv Version: 5.5.2+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066519: buildd.debian.org: giveback script doesn't allow to give-back packages in "Installed" state

Package: buildd.debian.org X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? giveback.cgi script doen't accept giveback action in "Installed" state. e.g. https://buildd.debian.org/auth/giveback.cgi?pkg=zeromq3=armhf=sid * What

Bug#1066521: weplab: FTBFS: analpfile.c:105:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘GetPacketBssid’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: weplab Version: 0.1.5-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066511: photopc: FTBFS: fnames.c:118:21: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlen’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: photopc Version: 3.07-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066512: latencytop: FTBFS: fsync.c:330:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘gettimeofday’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: latencytop Version: 0.5.0-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066513: libkal: FTBFS: kal_getdate.c:35:28: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: libkal Version: 0.9.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066523: lprng: FTBFS: auth/krb5_auth.c:55:24: error: implicit declaration of function ‘krb5_read_message’; did you mean ‘krb5_chpw_message’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: lprng Version: 3.8.B-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066524: yorick-imutil: FTBFS: imutil.c:404:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘srandom’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: yorick-imutil Version: 0.5.7-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066514: lrzsz: FTBFS: error.c:172:43: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strcmp’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: lrzsz Version: 0.12.21-10 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066515: pmount: FTBFS: luks.c:147:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘creat’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: pmount Version: 0.9.23-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066516: openwince-jtag: FTBFS: flash/cfi.c:84:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘printf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: openwince-jtag Version: 0.5.1-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066526: fitscut: FTBFS: colormap.c:132:27: error: implicit declaration of function ‘malloc’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: fitscut Version: 1.4.4-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066525: mlv-smile: FTBFS: src/allocateurs.c:45:39: error: implicit declaration of function ‘getpagesize’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: mlv-smile Version: 1.47-8 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066517: pd-hcs: FTBFS: stat.c:123:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: pd-hcs Version: 0.2.1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066522: netpipe: FTBFS: ./src/mpi2.c:110:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘sched_yield’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: netpipe Version: 3.7.2-8.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066569: python-bx: FTBFS: src/pwm_utils.c:11:27: error: implicit declaration of function ‘strlen’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: python-bx Version: 0.11.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066571: sane-frontends: FTBFS: sanei_init_debug.c:103:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘isfdtype’; did you mean ‘isctype’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: sane-frontends Version: 1.0.14-17 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066564: gamazons: FTBFS: moves.c:100:10: error: implicit declaration of function ‘countobst’; did you mean ‘count_bits’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: gamazons Version: 0.83-11 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066565: fvwm1: FTBFS: configure.c:2119:5: error: implicit declaration of function ‘mygetostype’; did you mean ‘mygethostname’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: fvwm1 Version: 1.24r-57 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066566: elektroid: FTBFS: editor.c:1166:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘g_unlink’; did you mean ‘unlink’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: elektroid Version: 3.0.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066567: easyh10: FTBFS: ucs2char_iconv.c:319:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘close’; did you mean ‘pclose’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: easyh10 Version: 1.5-5 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066568: pd-iemlib: FTBFS: src/FIR~.c:120:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘error’; did you mean ‘perror’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: pd-iemlib Version: 1.22.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused

Bug#1066570: ketm: FTBFS: main.c:81:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘hsc_save’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: ketm Version: 0.0.6-25 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

Bug#1066611: gmpc: FTBFS: Tools/gmpc-database-update-tracker.c:154:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘main_window_add_status_icon’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Source: gmpc Version: 11.8.16-20 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lu...@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240313 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-impfuncdef Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. This is most likely caused by a change

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >