On 30/03/12 06:04, Thomas Weber wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 07:30:11PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
On 29/03/12 17:20, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Source: octave
Version: 3.6.1-4
octave-octcdf FTBFS on Alpha. (maybe on sh4 too.)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Russ Allbery r...@debian.org
This ITP probably needs some additional discussion. log4shib is a fork
of log4cpp (as described in the long description below) that is the
recommended logging library for the Shibboleth web authentication project.
Shibboleth is
Another possibility might be:
commit 11aad99af6ef629ff3b05d1c9f0936589b204316
Author: Eric Dumazet eric.duma...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Feb 15 20:43:11 2012 +
atl1c: dont use highprio tx queue
But so far as I can see that's only going to have an effect if some
application is using
Package: FPC
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I have recently produced a working port of freepascal to armhf. The
patch has been submitted upstream at
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21554 and has been accepted in
trunk http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revrevision=20660
Dear maintainer of arno-iptables-firewall and Debian translators,
Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the arno-iptables-firewall
Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation
update in the BTS.
I announced the intent to build and possibly
Package: sshuttle
Version: 0.54-1
Severity: normal
Hello,
in sshuttle(8) manpage, the double dash shoudl be escaped.
options like --auto-nets are displayed like —auto-nets :
-N, —auto-nets
in addition to the subnets provided on the command line, ask
the server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: deadbeef
Version: 0.5.2-0.1
Severity: wishlist
It would be very nice if deadbeef could set a bookmark to
continue playing this song on the next run.
Many thanx
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
forcemerge 662227 665067
retitle 662227 FTBFS in non-UTF-8 locales (such as C)
retitle 665067 FTBFS in non-UTF-8 locales (such as C)
tag 662227 pending
tag 665067 pending
thanks
On 03/30/2012 01:21 AM, Ralph Amissah wrote:
I Hope I claimed this bug too quickly.
thanks, however, like said
Package: liferea
Version: 1.8.3-0.1
Severity: normal
After the upgrade from 1.6.5-1.2+b1 to 1.8.3-0.1
my search folders that contain unread items are not bolded on the feed list
and are not included in the list when Reduced Feed List is checked in View.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Kenyon Ralph ken...@kenyonralph.com writes:
On 2012-03-23T11:32:46+0200, Arto Jantunen vi...@debian.org wrote:
Package: munin-node
Version: 1.4.5-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Currently the Perl-based tomcat_{access,threads,volume} plugins can only
monitor the http-connector they
Package: calendar-timezones
Version: 10.0.3-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Dear Maintainer,
After bump to version 10.x a link provided to iceowl is lost in which
case iceowl is broken. A quick fix is to reintroduce a link similar to
the link for icedove and
Hi,
[ I have no intention to sponsor this package. ]
Raoul Borenius boren...@dfn.de writes:
* License : custom license which is not considered free (see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/02/msg4.html)
but upstream is apparently
Package: mediawiki
Version: 1.18.1-1
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Release announcement:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2012-March/059230.html
Requested CVE-identifiers in here: http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q1/728
CVE-identifiers assigned in here:
Package: liferea
Version: 1.8.3-0.1
Severity: normal
I had a search folder that worked in 1.6.5 and before.
It was supposed to contain unread unflagged items.
.liferea_1.6/feedlist.opml
outline title=Nieprzeczytane text=Nieprzeczytane
description=Nieprzeczytane type=vfolder id=jccorka
Package: debdelta
Version: 0.45
Severity: normal
Lately I have been seeing these messages when running debdelta.
Downloaded, time 0.26sec, speed 3456B/sec,
libdrm-nouveau1a_2.4.30-1_2.4.32-1_amd64.debdelta
Created,time 0.60sec, speed 148kB/sec,
Hi
Any progress on this subject? The lack of consistency over the archive
is boring...
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
We need to find a DD that can do a binary only upload of the amd64
package. I can get an amd64 machine up, but it might not be for
another week.
I can do it.
I've requested that eagle be added to the non-free autobuilds three
times over the past 4 years and it hasn't been added, so
Hi Francois and Rob!
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:52:09AM +0200, Rob Caelers wrote:
Hi,
libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. -W
-I../../../backend/src -I../../../backend/include
-DWORKRAVE_PKGDATADIR=\/usr/share/workrave\ -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600
-I../../../common/include
severity 666237 important
thanks
Hi Andreas,
thanks for your bugreport, as usual! :-) Much appreciated!
On Donnerstag, 29. März 2012, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified
Package: keepnote
Version: 0.7.8-1
Severity: important
In keepnote You can not change the language even though they are
available. The program is still in English.
Error can be repeated as follows.
*choose it: Edit preferences language
*change language
*restart keepnote
--
To
Hi Jonathan,
unfortunately i dont know a reliable way to reproduce this. About a week ago
we did run some performance- and loadtests which caused very high load over a
period of more than 48 hours and nothing happened. This week we encountered
the described problem on the database system, but
You tagged these bugs as pending about a week ago. We (the armhf
porters) could really do with getting them fixed as it is leading to an
out of date package in armhf testing and we are trying to get to release
architecture status.
Any ETA on an upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: python-repoze.what-plugins
Version: 20090531-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch
*** /tmp/tmpgfoe_M/bug_body
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* deal with
I've contributed a patch upstream for a gtk/nautilus3 port of the
extension, and they've pushed it into the mercurial repository
(https://bitbucket.org/tortoisehg/thg/changeset/7017a49b612b).
Could this be reopened now that there's a chance of a real fix?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: schroot
Version: 1.4.25-1
Severity: minor
I have this warning about a chroot I setup:
$ LANG=C schroot -c squeeze -p
W: line 7 [sid-test]: Unknown key 'source-root-groups' used
I: This option may be present in a newer version
However man schroot.conf clearly documents this key:
On 03/30/2012 04:38 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hi!
So your best bet is to write to the author of cleveref and ask if
he can do something about this interoperability.
Will do, though I've thought you would do this. At least that's how I
maintain my packages - acting as a proxy between
DB == Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net writes:
DB create a 'default' wheezy container with 'lxc-create -t debian
DB -n foo'.
This doesn't work:
# lxc-create -t debian -n foo
Note: Usually the template option is called with a configuration
file option
* Ryan Tandy r...@nardis.ca [2012-03-29 22:50]:
Your patch is correct but insufficient. Apparently in the 3.4 release
upstream worked around the bashisms in /usr/sbin/micro-evtd.event and
/usr/sbin/microapl by changing the shebang to /bin/bash; it was
/bin/sh in both in 3.3.3. I feel pretty
Package: mc
Version: 3:4.8.1-3
Severity: normal
Usertags: malloc
While trying to delete a file using mc I got a random crash. I expect
this is because I set MALLOC_CHECK_ and MALLOC_PERTURB_, which turn on
heap consistency checks that help find memory allocation bugs. If the
below backtrace is
But the behavior of the newly created folder in 1.8.3 is still extremely
problematic:
* it started empty,
* stayed empty after Rebuild from context menu (even though there were unread
unflagged items in my feeds),
I can reproduce this.
* filled after Update All, but the count in parens
tag 665689 pending
thanks
applied, thanks. turned out later though, that the whole thing is not
needed anyway (the verbose stuff).
Regards,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:
With lxc 0.7.5-24 container creation works and the container startup
problem is the same:
# lxc-start -n foo
lxc-start: Invalid argument - pivot_root syscall failed
lxc-start: failed to setup pivot root
lxc-start: failed to set rootfs for 'foo'
lxc-start: failed to setup the container
Hi,
I'm attaching an updated patch, already prepared as NMU.
Feel free to upload yourself. I can do it also, if you want.
Thanks,
Roland
diff -ruN libmodbus-3.0.2.orig/debian/changelog libmodbus-3.0.2/debian/changelog
--- libmodbus-3.0.2.orig/debian/changelog 2012-02-20 17:18:40.0
severity 665677 serious
severity 665679 serious
severity 665666 serious
severity 665670 serious
severity 665671 serious
severity 665672 serious
severity 665675 serious
severity 665676 serious
severity 665678 serious
severity 665673 serious
thanks
glib 2.32.0 has been uploaded to unstable.
Bumping
i've fixed that in git some time ago but didn't upload it yet.
please redo with lxc built from the debian branch of
git://vcs.progress-linux.org/users/daniel/packages/lxc.git
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 07:39 +0100, peter green wrote:
Package: FPC
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I have recently produced a working port of freepascal to armhf. The
patch has been submitted upstream at
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=21554 and has been accepted in
trunk
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 06:50:28AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Dear maintainer of arno-iptables-firewall and Debian translators,
Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the
arno-iptables-firewall Debian
package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf
Hi,
It's been a month. Have you had a chance to look at this yet? I'm
going to change the severity to important, as it is going to mean that,
out of the box, syslog-ng does not work on machines using a local
recursor. As this is a reasonably common arrangement on servers, I
would think this
Hi Adrian,
Will do, though I've thought you would do this. At least that's how I
maintain my packages - acting as a proxy between upstream and
users.
Yes, between upstream, but upstream is the TeX Live team, whe the author of
cleveref is upupstream and with about several *thousands* of
tag 665673 fixed-upstream
quit
Just to make it clear in the bug report for people reviewing RC bugs, I
do have a fix for this in upstream SVN:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qof/trunk/qof/qof/qofutil.c?r1=1328r2=1327pathrev=1328
A new upstream release will be made this weekend with a
Author: tg
Date: 2012-03-30 08:43:27 + (Fri, 30 Mar 2012)
New Revision: 310
Added:
mediawiki/sid-sec/debian/patches/CVE-2012-1582.patch
Modified:
mediawiki/sid-sec/debian/changelog
mediawiki/sid-sec/debian/patches/series
Log:
first cut at #666269 for sid-security:
?\226?\128?\162
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:44:01PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:50:14 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
Maybe a simple rebuild attempt would fix it (CC'ing the wb-team)?
gb cctools_3.4.2-1 . kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
Done.
Error remains the same -- need to
Package: librsvg2-bin
Version: 2.36.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
$ convert iceweasel/debian/branding/iceweasel_logo.svg /tmp/test.png
sh: 1: rsvg: not found
convert: delegate failed `rsvg %i %o' @
error/delegate.c/InvokeDelegate/1058.
convert: unable to open
Hi,
Finally I compiled 1.3.8 from sources in squeeze, and it works !
Thanks !
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
$ 0ad
/usr/games/pyrogenesis: error while loading shared libraries:
libnvtt.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
If you don't compile with --with-system-nvtt it compiles with the built-in
nvtt and then you should also install libnv*.so. I'd really suggest to look at
tags 665344 = fixed-upstream
thanks
On 2012-03-30T10:08:51+0300, Arto Jantunen vi...@debian.org wrote:
Kenyon Ralph ken...@kenyonralph.com writes:
On 2012-03-23T11:32:46+0200, Arto Jantunen vi...@debian.org wrote:
Package: munin-node
Version: 1.4.5-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi Paul,
Thanks for detailed report.
I tried to reproduce the problem without success:
we have the same architecture, kernel and locale yet I successfully deleted
hundreds of files from tmpfs and ext4 using mc which I run as
'MALLOC_CHECK_=2 MALLOC_PERTURB_=21 mc'
Is there are anything else
On 30.03.2012 04:08, John David Anglin wrote:
For some reason, auto-detect isn't working.
Trying to enable multiarch support with --enable-multiarch also fails.
The variable withval is not defined in the configure hunk for
--enable-multiarch.
fixed in svn. the hunk in config.gcc was missing.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:53:30AM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote:
I have this warning about a chroot I setup:
$ LANG=C schroot -c squeeze -p
W: line 7 [sid-test]: Unknown key 'source-root-groups' used
I: This option may be present in a newer version
However man schroot.conf clearly
Source: openblas
Version: 0.1alpha2.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: polybori
Version: 0.5~rc1-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: ulogd
Version: 1.24-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: jlint
Version: 3.0-4.4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: unison2.32.52
Version: 2.32.52-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: pentobi
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: proftpd-mod-msg
Version: 0.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: avbin
Version: 7-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: garlic
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: yasr
Version: 0.6.9-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: vdr-plugin-infosatepg
Version: 0.0.11-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: uw-imap
Version: 8:2007e~dfsg-3.3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: espeakedit
Version: 1.46.02-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: xml2
Version: 0.4-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: infon
Version: 0~r198-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: libmecab-perl
Version: 0.98-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: dvi2ps
Version: 4.1j-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: octave-miscellaneous
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: scotch
Version: 5.1.12b.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: scmxx
Version: 0.9.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: openexr
Version: 1.6.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: qmk-groundstation
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: loadlin
Version: 1.6e-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: mendexk
Version: 2.6e-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: gurlchecker
Version: 0.13.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: darnwdl
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: ruby-mecab
Version: 0.98-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: python-mecab
Version: 0.98-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: canna
Version: 3.7p3-8
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: htp
Version: 1.16-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: qpdf
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
The bug is still present on the new upstream version (0.9)
--
José Luis Segura Lucas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Source: service-wrapper-java
Version: 3.5.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: dsdp
Version: 5.8-9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: freeradius
Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: unison
Version: 2.40.63-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: etherpuppet
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: unison2.27.57
Version: 2.27.57-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: nwchem
Version: 6.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: vdr-plugin-epgsearch
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64
Source: m-tx
Version: 0.60d-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: imlib2
Version: 1.4.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: wise
Version: 2.4.1-9
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: lilo
Version: 1:23.2-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: wkhtmltopdf
Version: 0.9.9-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: python-prctl
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: mp3splt-gtk
Version: 0.5.6-1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: libgfshare
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: uudeview
Version: 0.5.20-3.2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
Source: ilmbase
Version: 1.0.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done
Source: libmecab-java
Version: 0.98-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
