Source: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: dmtcp
Version: 2.3.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.1-19
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: mariadb-10.0
Version: 10.0.14-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: djangorestframework
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: clam
Version: 1.4.0-5.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.6.0
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: witty
Version: 3.3.3+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
As said on https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737840#c4 this
affects the building process of KDE documentation.
--
Vincent Lefèvre vinc...@vinc17.net - Web: https://www.vinc17.net/
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: https://www.vinc17.net/blog/
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic
Source: gnat-gps
Followup-For: Bug #768547
Control: tags -1 pending
I have modified the com.adacore.gps.debian and org.debian.gnat-gps
branches of the VCS so that the new license is unchanged and mentioned
in debian/copyright. To minimize changes during the freeze, I have
not removed the
Hello!
Pacemaker was compiled in unstable to a newer version of libqb0 (0.14 or 0.17).
In testing/jessie there's only libqb0 (0.11).
fix would be to add a libqb0 (=0.14) as dependency in package libcrmcommon3.
manually updating libqb0 to the version in unstable and restart of pacemaker
fixes
Control: reassign -1 cmake 3.0.2-1
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 9:50 PM, carandraug carandraug+...@gmail.com wrote:
$ cmake --find-package -DNAME=GDCM -DLANGUAGE=CXX -DCOMPILER_ID=GNU
-DMODE=COMPILE
GDCM not found.
CMake Error: Problem processing arguments. Aborting.
I do not believe the issue is
Aha, looks like I've found the culprit responsible for Cinnamon indirectly
depending on Qt libs :-/
$ aptitude why libqtgui4
i cinnamon Depends caribou
i A caribouDepends python-pyatspi
i A python-pyatspi Depends qt-at-spi
i A qt-at-spi
Am Mittwoch, den 12.11.2014, 01:56 -0300 schrieb Felipe Sateler:
It appears that one needs to write to a file
cgroup/cpu.rt_runtime_us (and all the way up the cgroup tree).
However that requires a CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED enabled kernel, which
debian doesn't have.
Is this option available in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package subtitleeditor
due to changed handling of how to add interfaces to custom classes in glib(mm)
2.4.2.0 subtitleeditor is completely useless at the moment - it's not
Package: serverspec-runner
Version: 0.2.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
for the record,
serverspec-runner searches its templates path relatively from its command
script's, and
assumes bad place for debian's FHS.
# This package doesn't places templates, so users can't
Lucas Nussbaum wrote (11 Nov 2014 16:50:23 GMT) :
I can confirm that it builds fine with a newer kernel.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.11-1+b1
Severity: normal
On three different PCs (Debian unstable, i386, 32 bit) i'm frequently
encountering a problem, where aptitude (curses interface), without any
error to the user, leaves some package in an incomplete state.
I usually follow these steps:
- run
Package: python-cinder
Version: 2014.1.3-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
An issue was found trying to delete a volume and it remains in Error Deleting
state.
The relevant part of cinder-volume log file is:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 -wontfix
On 11/11/14 22:51, David Prévot wrote:
That seems accurate right now, but I believe the wording of the freeze
policy has been changed recently: point iv. used to read “translation
updates and documentation fixes, (until the 5th of January 2015);”
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg ebo...@apache.org
* Package name: noggit
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com
* URL : http://github.com/yonik/noggit
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
Am Mittwoch, den 12.11.2014, 02:10 +0100 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Am 11.11.2014 um 23:49 schrieb Paul Menzel:
Am Dienstag, den 11.11.2014, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Sounds like dbus is not installed. Paul, can you confirm that?
It is installed. The failure happened with 1.8.8-2,
Here is my current situation, before i run dpkg --configure -a.
Hello,
Andreas Beckmann a...@debian.org writes:
Package: python-persistent,python-zodb
Version: 4.0.8-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Control: found -1 1:3.9.7-2
First of all, thanks for finding and reporting such issues, it's greatly
Package: file-roller
Version: 3.14.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Using unar with file-roller, on the rar file, if there is a file or directory
compressed with the character [ on the name, file-roller don't works.
With only command unar in console without file-roller, works perfectly.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:45:17AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 2014-11-03 10:24, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
#767672: libvirt-daemon-system: fails to purge: rmdir: failed to remove
'/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/save': No such file or directory
It has been closed by Guido Günther
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 08:37:04PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Source: libvirt
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: security upstream patch fixed-upstream
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for libvirt, opening a but
in the BTS to have track of it in BTS
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package plastimatch
Add needed cmake dependencies to enable parallel builds
Closes: #768769
debdiff attached
unblock plastimatch/1.5.16+dfsg-2
-- System
Control: clone 767909 -2
Control: reassign -2 udev 215-5
Control: retitle -2 udevadm shows debug messages by default on ARM
Control: severity -2 minor
Julien Cristau [2014-11-03 14:12 +0100]:
your package no longer builds on the arm64 buildd:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-chameleon
python-chameleon binary package has been split up into python-chameleon
and python-chameleon-doc but the latter does not define Breaks/Replaces
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 02:58 PM, Robie Basak wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 09:28:00PM +0300, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
I don't see the package in unstable yet, and Jessie release freeze is coming
soon. Is there something needed?
Thanks for the reminder.
I was hoping that Gabriel would
Hello
yesterday forgotten: I had also before directly installed from
jessie/sid the newer libecj-java paket
(libecj-java_3.10.1-1_all.deb ) which is also needed for backports then.
Bests
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 08:53:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: dpkg
Version: 1.17.21
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2014-11-11 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in
Package: udev
Version: 215-5
Severity: minor
This was an attempted clone from #767909 but that doesn't work as it's
a merged bug. So filing as a new one.
Julien Cristau [2014-11-03 14:12 +0100]:
your package no longer builds on the arm64 buildd:
Package: fai-client
Version: 4.2.5
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/sbin/fai
Dear Maintainer,
I installed via fai a system with an lvm2-disk layout. When i did FAI
ACTION sysinfo after the installation, sysinfo could not find /etc/fstab
due to the lvm2 partitioning.
-- System Information:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 08:57:12AM CET, Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org said:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the tshark package:
#769210: tshark refuses a simple capture filter
It has been closed by Bálint Réczey
Package: xul-ext-adblock-plus
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
atm, the current versions of xul-ext-adblock-plus 2.1-1+deb7u1 in stable (and
the same in stable-security) isin't compatible with iceweasel
31.2.0esr-2~deb7u1 in stable-security.
Upgrading from testing/unstable fix the problem.
Package: isenkram-cli
Version: 0.15
Severity: important
Tags: patch
The firmware map included in isenkram-cli is outdated after the
intel-microcode package renamed some of its files from X to X.initramfs.
This make the map incorrect for machines where this is relevant. The
package in Jessie
I'm having the same problem in Wheezy (logrotate version 3.8.1-4).
Hi,
Could you please help here.
-Thanks and Regards,
Deepak Kumar
From: Deepak Kumar
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:41 AM
To: '742...@bugs.debian.org'; 'car...@systemhalted.org'; 'mgilb...@debian.org';
'sub...@bugs.debian.org'
Cc: Shobhit Shingla
Subject: Re: Bug#742925: eglibc:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libcatalyst-perl.
Version 5.90075-2 removes an obsolete dependency on
libcatalyst-engine-psgi-perl, which will be removed from the archive
because it is obsolete
Hi Felipe,
My kernel has been updated since the first mail I sent.
root@pc-jean-debian:/home/jean# uname -a
Linux pc-jean-debian 3.16-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.5-1 (2014-10-10) x86_64
GNU/Linux
The volume issue remains.
Element Front Mic Boost volume is already off. I tried to set
Glibc Pakage :- 2.3.6.tar.bz2
From: Deepak Kumar
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 2:47 PM
To: Deepak Kumar; '742...@bugs.debian.org'; 'car...@systemhalted.org';
'mgilb...@debian.org'; 'sub...@bugs.debian.org'
Cc: Shobhit Shingla
Subject: RE: Re: Bug#742925: eglibc: CVE-2013-4357
Hi,
Could
Control: forcemerge 769102 766386 769222
Hi Cesare,
Cesare Leonardi wrote:
On three different PCs (Debian unstable, i386, 32 bit) i'm frequently
encountering a problem, where aptitude (curses interface), without any
error to the user, leaves some package in an incomplete state.
[...]
I'm not
Hello
2014/10/27 15:36 (Mon) eguna,
Dave Vehrs dve...@gmail.com(e)k idatzi zuen:
I've released an
updated version on Sourceforge, and submitted it to Debian Mentors where
I hope it will be soon accepted.
Well. I tested the new version (0.7.4-1) at sourceforge:
FIY
Pull Request: Added AARCH64 support to gcconfig.h (libgcroots)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/uim-en/fxixLmHXcq0
Added AARCH64 to gcconfig.h
https://github.com/ctyler/libgcroots/commit/da6e6884a1119e2cf6be88b4cf5eb9091c52beeb
--
Regards,
dai
GPG Fingerprint = 0B29 D88E
I'm attaching another patch on top of the previous one.
Barak will review it and I'll remove the moreinfo tag as soon as it is uploaded
on unstable.
(I was requesting for permission to upload on unstable)
debian/changelog | 1 +
debian/control | 11 +--
2 files changed, 6
Control: reassign -1 src:python-defaults
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Am 11.11.2014 um 12:38 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Package: python2.7-minimal
Version: 2.7.8-11
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your
I've had the same issue since a recent GNOME upgrade, I'm tracking
jessie. It just hangs and does nothing, but manually mounting it
works, in my case:
sudo cryptsetup luksOpen /dev/sdb1 teracaddy-manual sudo mount
/dev/mapper/teracaddy-manual /media/avar/teracaddy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 04:55:32PM +0100, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
ASCIIpOrtal is a terminal game where you have a gun that shoots doors.
I recently installed ASCIIpOrtal on my N900 running Maemo. Since I like
the game, I would like to have access to it in Debian. It seems Peter
Pentchev
Package: wine-binfmt
Version: 1.6.2-16
Please automatically register wine as part of a post-install rules
and/or describe steps in README.Debian.
Eg:
You'll need to manually register wine yourself:
$ sudo /usr/sbin/update-binfmts --import wine
This is a simplification of #733556, which I'll
Martin Pitt [2014-11-12 10:10 +0100]:
So it seems this is a problem on armhf/arm64 with udevadm in the
first iteration?
My initial hunch was that cmd-debug was nonzero as it doesn't get explicitly
initialized anywhere. But that isn't the case, and the static structs get
zeroed properly on ARM
Control: forwarded -1 http://bugs.python.org/issue22851
Control: tags -1 + upstream
Am 02.11.2014 um 00:19 schrieb Jonas Kölker:
Package: python2.7
Version: 2.7.8-1
Severity: normal
Run the following script:
def foo(): yield
gen = foo()
print gen.gi_frame.f_restricted
for i in gen:
Package: wine-binfmt
Version: 1.6.2-16
Back on wheezy `wine` shell script used to do the following trick to
decide to call wine32 or wine64 using:
[...]
wine=/usr/bin/wine32
if test $(file -b -L $1 | cut -d\ -f1) = PE32+ -o $WINEARCH =
win64; then
wine=/usr/bin/wine64
fi
[...]
This made it
On 11/12/2014 05:24 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 wontfix
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 05:16:56AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Please unblock package cinder 2014.1.3-6. Changelog:
* Fixed debconf translation nl.po encoding (Closes: #766904).
* Updated debconf translation
Source: gnuplot5
Version: 5.0.0~rc+dfsg2-1
Severity: normal
Hi :)
I see you added a lintian override to this package to override
build-depends-on-metapackage error, triggered by a buil-dep on qt5-default.
Well, there is a solution you may consider, attached to this email.
I run a test build
Hello,
I must confess that I fail to reproduce your bug.
it seems to me that the bug comes from a strange setting in LC_ALL.
before the java compiler, msggrep complains that ANSI_X3.4-1968 is not
a valid value for UTF-encoded files.
Did your chroot have any unconventional settings with that
Source: kgb-bot
Version: 1.33-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: libcatalyst-controller-formbuilder-perl
Version: 0.06-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot
Source: xaos
Version: 3.5+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: python-crypto
Version: 2.6.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: android-platform-frameworks-base
Version: 21-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your
Source: mipp
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: samba
Version: 2:4.1.13+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libcatmandu-perl
Version: 0.9206-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libcatmandu-store-lucy-perl
Version: 0.0101-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your
Source: android-platform-build
Version: 21-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libcatmandu-mab2-perl
Version: 0.07-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libcatmandu-importer-getjson-perl
Version: 0.40-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your
Source: gf2x
Version: 1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386
Source: python-dugong
Version: 3.3+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libcatmandu-rdf-perl
Version: 0.18-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libcatmandu-atom-perl
Version: 0.02-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: androidsdk-tools
Version: 22.2+git20130830~92d25d6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your
Source: libcatmandu-wikidata-perl
Version: 0.06-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 08:52:21AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
rm menu-policy.html/index.html perl-policy.html/index.html
Source: flufl.lock
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: libcatmandu-sru-perl
Version: 0.037-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
¡Hola joachim!
El 2014-11-11 a las 11:38 +0100, joachim escribió:
Package: ark
Version: 4:4.14.2-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
The simplest possible testcase is:
- creating two textfiles
- making a zip-archive of one of these file
- using 'right-click-functionality' in dolphin
Control: tags -1 upstream
I need gccxml for activiz.net. This provides a VTK+C# binding for GDCM.
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 moreinfo unreproducible
On 2014-11-12 11:21:47, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: python-crypto
Version: 2.6.1-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package shinken
The new version fixes an RC detected by piuparts:
Remove /var/log/shinken in purge. (Closes: #739791).
Debdiff is one line (except d/changelog). Attached.
Le 10/11/2014 07:04, Martin Pitt a écrit :
Hey Martin,
The downside is that we loose the return code, indeed (we could
concatenate it if needed).
Yes, I think it should save the return code if it's != 0 and return
that. I. e. the script will fail if processing any unit fails.
done,
On 11/12/2014 01:20 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
Control: severity 757037 grave
Control: tags 757037 + patch
I'm bumping this bug up to grave severity, because it seems it makes
this liblzo2 version entirely useless on a fairly common armel CPU (my armel
has a Marvell Kirkwood armv5tel, as
Source: python-tblib
Version: 0.1.0-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: golang-testify
Version: 0.0~git20140717-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: openturns
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: sawfish
Version: 1:1.5.3-2.4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: libmarpa-r2-perl
Version: 2.086000~dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: glide
Version: 2002.04.10ds1-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: canl-java
Version: 2.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: freebirth
Version: 0.3.2-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: sslh
Version: 1.16-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386
Source: javamail
Version: 1.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: serf
Version: 1.3.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: shortuuid
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: metamonger
Version: 0.20141008-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: oasis
Version: 0.4.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Package: bsdutils
Version: 1:2.25.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.5
Dear Maintainer,
libsystemd0 dependancy violates constraint at the end of section 2.5
of the policy manual that requires packages not depend on packages
with lower priority..
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Source: rep-gtk
Version: 1:0.90.0-2.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20141112 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
1 - 100 of 459 matches
Mail list logo
