Hi,
This issue appears to be caused by the openssl fix[1].
Best Regards,
Vladimir.
[1] https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.html#CVE-2023-5363
Package: perdition
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* d/patches/remove-strcasestr.patch:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
I'm unable to reproduce this issue. Probably fixed elsewhere during
time_t transition
Could you install the debug packages so as to get a more complete
stacktrace? (I believe nvidia ones at least)
Cheers
Alban
On Sun, 18 Feb 2024 10:11:32 +0100 Nicolas Patrois
wrote:
> Package: tracker-extract
> Version: 3.4.6-3
> Severity: important
> Tags: upstream
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>
Dear Maintainer,
the bug in the gnome-shell process is still there in Debian/testing as
of the 2024-03-21.
The gnome-shell process leaks memory in a tremendous way. The process
can get up to 4-8 Gigabyte large.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Sincerely,
Adrian Kieß
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: python-fake-headers
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Contact: TheDevFromKer
* URL :
Package: x11vnc
Followup-For: Bug #1067076
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Control: tags -1 patch
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
*
Package: trantor
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Drop spurious Depends on libssl3 as
Hello,
The package builds fine on my armhf VM as well as a Raspberry Pi 2
running armhf Debian bare metal. Maybe some transitioning library caused
this issue? If xmrig gets binNMU'd, it will probably build successfully.
I would do it, but I'm not a Debian Developer. Could you do it?
Thanks,
Hello,
On Wed 22 Feb 2023 at 05:21pm -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Right, but the pile of Emacs addons I maintain using dgit-maint-merge(7)
> will never hit any of those behaviours. So it's a high cost to impose
> on someone in a position such as mine.
>
I still regret that this change went
Hello,
On Wed 20 Mar 2024 at 06:12pm GMT, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> Having thought about it, I propose the following changes to try to
> help with this:
>
> 1. Provide an alias for --overwrite (without version) called
>something like --trust-changelog, and make
Hello,
On Thu 21 Mar 2024 at 10:16am +08, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> How about --with-non-dgit ?
Or, combining suggestions, --collab-non-dgit .
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: src:bash
Version: 5.2.21-2
Tags: patch
Dear bash maintainer,
currently d/rules sets "SHELL = /bin/bash". This may create problems
during bootstrapping.
Please find a at
https://salsa.debian.org/gioele/bash/-/compare/rrr-no...shell-sh
a couple of small commits that remove this
Package: openjdk-17-jre
Version: 17.0.11~6ea-1
Severity: serious
Justification: uninstallable
Depends: openjdk-17-jre-headless (= 17.0.11~6ea-1),
libglib2.0-0t64 (>= 2.24), […], libcups2, […]
This must of course be libcups2t64.
found 421591 5.2.21-2
thanks
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:20:25 +0100 Vincent Lefevre
wrote:
As a summary, the following test at least does not behave correctly:
vlefevre@vin:~$ test \( ! -e \) ; echo $?
bash: test: `)' expected
2
And I think this one is also buggy:
vlefevre@vin:~$ test true -a
Control: block 1067041 by 1067132
On Tue, 2024-03-19 at 15:47 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I realize that the current Debian package doesn't seem to set INCUS_UI.
>
> Do you plan to set it to `/var/lib/incus/ui`? I think that is better place to
> put web page for distribution if it ever happens.
Package: python3-numpy
Version: 1:1.26.4+ds-5
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: none, Dima Kogan
Hi.
Many of my packages just started to FTBFS. For instance this:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067270
This is due to the
/usr/include/python3.11/numpy (and/or other
Control: block 1067262 by -1
Control: block 1067274 by -1
Control: block 1067286 by -1
Control: block 1067293 by -1
Control: block 1067300 by -1
Control: block 1067360 by -1
On Wed 20 Mar 2024 10:13:20 AM -04, Doug Torrance
wrote:
The binary package libflint18t64 ships libflint.so.19, so it
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: pysocks5
Version : 0.1
Upstream Contact: pandolia
* URL : https://github.com/pandolia/pysocks5
* License
Package: parallel
Version: 20231122+ds-1
Severity: wishlist
Please update package to newest release:
GNU Parallel 20240222 released [stable]
https://savannah.gnu.org/news/?id=10602
NOTE: The 'testing' version of parallel displays
perl notice bug:
/usr/bin/parallel --version
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Josenilson Ferreira da Silva
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, nilsonfsi...@hotmail.com
* Package name: teraboxutility
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Contact: Thanh Dung
* URL : https://github.com/nguyenThanhDg/TeraBox
*
Package: src:bash
Version: 5.2.21-2
Tags: patch
Dear bash maintainer,
please find at
https://salsa.debian.org/gioele/bash/-/compare/nodoc...rrr-no
a series of commits that enable `Rules-Requires-Root: no` and implement
all the minor but necessary changes to d/rules needed to support it.
Control: reassign 1067356 libamdhip64-dev 5.7.1-1
Control: affects 1067356 hipsolver
Control: fixed 1067356 5.7.1-2
On 2024-03-20 15:00, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering
I think you're missing the point of this package.
Firstly, it is a _library_, not a daemon, so it is intended to be
compiled / linked into other Go applications. It provides an easy
jumping-off point for developers to customize the output of logs,
particularly with respect to color and syntax
I can confirm that courier-webadmin does not work.
On a fresh Debian 12.4.0 install (32-bit, server setup), after immediately
installing courier-webadmin, when trying to access the webadmin frontend thru
http://localhost/cgi-bin/courierwebadmin as stated in the install wizard, I get
a 404.
Thanks @birger for packaging pipectl.
I have published wl-mirror 0.16.2-1 to close this bug.
@simon, it would be great if you could upload it again if that is ok for
you.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:39 AM Arthur Diniz wrote:
>
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Arthur Diniz
>
> * Package name: watcher
There is already a package named watcher https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/watcher.
Maybe you can use go-watcher or golang-watcher for the package name.
It turned out to just be a test expecting the 32 bit limit. This is
patched in the newest version which I have just uploaded. Build fixed!
--
Ben Westover
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:46:45 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Indeed. It seems to have regressed with
> libtest-json-schema-acceptance-perl_1.022-1, and specifically
> by the removal of some of its dependencies. Just installing
> libcpanel-json-xs-perl makes it pass again.
D'oh!
Thanks, nice find :)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:17:54PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:00:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > Source: libjson-schema-modern-perl
> > Version: 0.582-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: FTBFS
> > Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> > User: lu...@debian.org
> >
[Added the correct mailing list, fsver...@lists.linux.dev]
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 03:20:07AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Dixi quod…
>
> >Please split the package so that the part that requires pandoc is
> >done in an arch:all build. Normally, pandoc is needed only for
> >documentation,
Control: reassign -1 sdcc
This is going to be a result of the 4.4.0 sdcc upload I did over the
weekend.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:04:12PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw
> Version: 0.1.7-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User:
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:00:40 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: libjson-schema-modern-perl
> Version: 0.582-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During
Source: fastdds
Version: 2.11.2+ds-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org, Debian Security Team
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for fastdds.
CVE-2024-28231[0]:
| eprosima Fast DDS is a C++ implementation of the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
X-Debbugs-Cc: alleg...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:allegro5
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
Older versions of Allegro5 contains a no-dsa security vulnerability
(CVE-2021-36489,
Package: bitlbee-facebook
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu noble ubuntu-patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: michael.hud...@ubuntu.com
Dear Maintainer,
In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
* Remove explicit depedency on
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arthur Diniz
* Package name: watcher
Version : 1.0.7-1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Radovsky
* URL : https://github.com/radovskyb/watcher
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Go
Description : watch for files
Le mer. 20 mars 2024 à 22:14, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> Source: node-ajv
> Version: 8.12.0~ds+~2.1.1-4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
> User: lu...@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your
Source: scapy
Version: 2.5.0+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
It would allow team uploads when other python modules
are upgraded. It makes sense, scapy being a python module.
Currently there's python-cryptography 42 that has been
uploaded too soon, and fixing scapy requires an upstream patch,
see merge
Source: prometheus-homeplug-exporter
Version: 0.3.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: anymarkup-core
Version: 0.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-escript
Version: 5.6-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-ajv
Version: 8.12.0~ds+~2.1.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: paraview
Version: 5.11.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-vega-embed
Version: 6.23.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: snapd-glib
Version: 1.63-5.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-measurement
Version: 3.2.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-docs-theme
Version: 2024.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: amp
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering directory
Source: prometheus-haproxy-exporter
Version: 0.15.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gforth
Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-9
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: blasr
Version: 5.3.5+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /usr/bin/ld:
>
Source: starlette
Version: 0.31.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-glib-sys
Version: 0.18.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: nncp
Version: 8.10.0-8
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering directory
Source: cowsql
Version: 1.15.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: cross-toolchain-base
Version: 68
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ngspetsc
Version: 0.0~git20240130.0c8a05b-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mirrorbits
Version: 0.5.1+git20240203.4e34d9b+ds1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: mathgl
Version: 8.0.1-7.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[4]: Entering
Source: rust-gdk-sys
Version: 0.18.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: libnginx-mod-http-modsecurity
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pymdown-extensions
Version: 9.5-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: polymake
Version: 4.11-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: hylafax
Version: 3:6.0.7-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: macaulay2
Version: 1.22+ds-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]: Entering
Source: rbldnsd
Version: 1.0~20210120-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: budgie-desktop-view
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc
Source: python-flexmock
Version: 0.11.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rust-gdk4-wayland-sys
Version: 0.7.2-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: hipsolver
Version: 5.5.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: mtail
Version: 3.0.0~rc52-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: ibus-client-clutter
Version: 0.0+git20090728.a936bacf-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: anet
Version: 0.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-gdk4-wayland
Version: 0.7.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: asterisk-prompt-fr-armelle
Version: 20070613-2.3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: gl-image-display
Version: 0.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> g++ -Wall -Wextra
Source: seahorse
Version: 43.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Isrc/seahorse.p -Isrc
Source: mrgingham
Version: 1.24-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Wall -Wextra -g -O2
Source: ahven
Version: 2.8-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyspectral
Version: 0.13.0+ds-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: cross-toolchain-base-ports
Version: 64
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-gtk-sys
Version: 0.18.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: deal.ii
Version: 9.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-rollup-plugin-sass
Version: 1.12.16-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: libdevel-mat-perl
Version: 0.52-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-iconv-lite
Version: 0.6.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: rust-gdk-pixbuf
Version: 0.18.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: golang-github-dchest-uniuri
Version: 0.0~git20200228.7aecb25-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: rust-gdk
Version: 0.18.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: gnucap-python
Version: 0.0.2-1.2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> /bin/bash
Source: autosuspend
Version: 6.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-django-storages
Version: 1.14.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-dtcwt
Version: 0.12.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: hdmi2usb-fx2-firmware
Version: 0.0.0~git20151225-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: websockify
Version: 0.10.0+dfsg1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rust-gtk
Version: 0.18.1-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: mkdocstrings
Version: 0.24.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-stdlib-list
Version: 0.10.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: mrcal
Version: 2.4.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240319 ftbfs-trixie
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> cc -Wall -Wextra -g -O2
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
