I've submitted a PR to get this change in as proposed by Axel:
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/merge_requests/455
--
Sincerely,
Brian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
publickey - brianrobt@proton.me - 688c834d.asc
Description:
I like the idea of keeping the spelling correction in place. I've never seen
"substract" being used. Keeping the correction reduces ambiguity and keeps
language consistent.
Motion to close.
Sincerely,
Brian
publickey - brianrobt@pm.me - 0xC8F2EC48.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Does anyone have time to review the patch that was submitted back in 2017?
2017 patch:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=695188;filename=0001-Fix-695188-intelligent-add-of-Bug-XX.patch;msg=60
--
Brian Thompson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 21:27 -0600, Anthony Fok wrote:
> NEW queueOn Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:45 PM Brian Thompson
> wrote:
> >
> > Since there is already a package that uses that binary name, who should
> > change it? D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Which pager are you using, or does this occur for all pagers in KDE
Konsole?
- --
Best regards,
Brian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE9fpVo96/flopdKOfgw2Ncu3Nhn0FAmEZ7d8THGJyaWFuQGhh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:18:34 -0400 =?utf-8?Q?Antoine_Beaupr=C3=A9?= <
anar...@orangeseeds.org> wrote:
>
> It's not on the package name, but there's already a clash on the
binary
> name, which we should be mindful of:
> gitsome provides direct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:11:57 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Package: apt-listchanges
> Version: 2.83
> Severity: important
>
> The GTK+ frontend has a very bad behavior: it will display a window
> and quickly close it if there is nothing to
On 0814, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>Could also add a Provides: gh so it is installable with the short name.
>
>I would definitely like to have this in Debian, but can't help with it.
>
This would be ideal. Is there any benefit of renaming the package to
something other than "gh"? I can help with this
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:34:27 -0500 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I must have completely overlooked the documentation fixes in your bug
> report; I thought you were just adding documentation for the option you
> added in your patch. I've applied them in CVS now, thanks.
>
> --
> - mdz
>
>
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:34:27 -0500 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I must have completely overlooked the documentation fixes in your bug
> report; I thought you were just adding documentation for the option you
> added in your patch. I've applied them in CVS now, thanks.
>
> --
> - mdz
>
>
I am unable to reproduce the fix that was mentioned in this bug. I
tried with less and running `export LESS="-r $LESS" and
`export LESS="-R $LESS"`.
Marking as unreproducible for now.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
There's two separate wishlist items in this bug, split them up into two
separate bugs if you still want this (or anyone for that matter) so that
each one is easier to track. I'm keeping this bug open for the original
request.
I'm going to tag this as wontfix for now.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
Since this OP has found another apt cron package to serve his needs,
I've tagged this bug as wontfix.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> I personally find that "gh" is quite short name for a package that
> will go into a general purpose software catalog like Debian repository. Would
> you mind choosing something like "github-cli" as source and binary
> package name and mentioning the sortcut "gh" in a package description?
> So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
retitle -1 ITA: docbook-xsl -- stylesheets for processing DocBook XML
- --
Best regards,
Brian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE9fpVo96/flopdKOfgw2Ncu3Nhn0FAmEPClETHGJyaWFuQGhh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
retitle -1 ITA: docbook-xml -- standard XML documentation system
- --
Best regards,
Brian T.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQJHBAEBCgAxFiEE9fpVo96/flopdKOfgw2Ncu3Nhn0FAmEPCekTHGJyaWFuQGhh
New version proposed for sponsorship at:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/apt-listchanges/
This is a new release of apt-listchanges where I incorporated an NMU commit into
the new version. I didn't think I would need to release this as an NMU version
since I also updated the maintainer. I
Since this is expected behavior, I am tagging as "wontfix".
I don't think it's a good idea to suppress the error message.
apt-listchanges gives an "Aborting" message prior to throwing the error.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
B.S. Computer Science 2014 (Truman State University)
signature.asc
I cloned this bug and assigned it to the aptitude maintainers.
The bug number is #990747.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
B.S. Computer Science 2014 (Truman State University)
Minor Stasitics
Minor Chemistry
Minor Mathematics
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
David,
I'm thinking about the first line in debian/apt.conf to:
```
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs { "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges --apt || test $? -lt
10 >/dev/null 2&>1"; };$
```
adding the ">/dev/null 2&>1" in order to suppress dpkg errors in
apt-listchanges during the Pre-Install-Pkgs hook. By doing
+Tia, the bug reporter for #989496.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
B.S. Computer Science 2014 (Truman State University)
Minor Stasitics
Minor Chemistry
Minor Mathematics
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
It was brought to my attention by David K. (thank you, David), that the
what you are seeing is intended functionality. I proposed in the email
thread with David that we could improve the error message, since right
now it may be confusing to users that it is actually expected behavior.
A cleaner,
On Sat, Jul 03, 2021 at 12:50:17PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 06:13:14PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
>> * Fix error message being thrown when choosing not to proceed on
>> confirmation (closes: #989496).
>
>If I understand y
On Tue, 03 Sep 2019 03:37:58 +0800 =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan
Jacobson wrote:
> Man page says 'The groups are sorted by the urgency of the most urgent
> change, and than by the package name.'
>
> Alas, that looks like
>
> A
> B
> C
> A
> B
> A
> B
>
> to the user. So perhaps add
>
>
Julian,
I didn't see that you cloned this bug and assigned it to dpkg and that
the bug is no longer in apt-listchanges. I still think that your
original proposal for apt-listchanges is relevant and is a change worth
making.
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> As reported in
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-listchanges/+bug/1854772,
> apt-listchanges
> fails to parse status files that contain carriage return characters, as
> Python normalizes the line endings.
I'm tracking the downstream bug in Ubuntu as well as this one.
> Instead of
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a package I made a fix for,
"apt-listchanges":
* Package name: apt-listchanges
Version : 3.24.1
Upstream Author : Brian Thompson
* URL : https://salsa.debian.org/
Tia,
Thank you for reporting this bug. I can confirm that this is an issue:
apt-listchanges: Do you want to continue? [Y/n] n
apt-listchanges: Aborting
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/apt-listchanges --apt || test $? -lt 10 returned an
error code (1)
E: Failure running script /usr/bin/apt-listchanges
Package: apt-listchanges
Version: 3.24
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
After performing an installation of a previously uninstalled package,
apt-listchanges reported an error:
"Invalid format text for mutt"
The package still installed, but no changelog or NEWS was shown or
emailed out.
The
tags 926175 moreinfo
thanks
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Every unexpected behavior is a potential bug. We shouldn't close this bug
yet. Nicholas, are you still seeing this behavior?
--
Best regards,
Brian T
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: libxrandr2
Version: 2:1.5.1-1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was
Is anyone getting the gh CLI tool ready for packaging? If not,
I can adopt it. I use it quite heavily and am fairly familiar
with its development team if I have any questions.
--
Best regards,
Brian
Garie,
TL;DR Use an IDE or text editor on your machine.
Local IDEs/text editors are used to develop the vast, vast majority of
software. Most developers develop on their own machines instead of in
the browser. It doesn't make sense to develop in a browser-based IDE
(at least not yet) since
> While I would love to package this myself, I do not work with
> JavaScript regularally (in part due to ecosystem problems like
> NPM's love of duplication).
I have some experience packaging JavaScript projects and could help you
out here.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:48:48 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No Body wrote:
> > Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced by something
> > else?
>
> There's nothing like it so far AFAIK. apt-src is close, but has a
> different focus (modification instead of compile-time
On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 01:06:04PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Source: mosquitto
> Version: 2.0.10-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> your autopkgtest appears to fail:
>
> autopkgtest [21:45:54]: test library: [---
> pkill: killing pid 1764 failed:
>Ideally a maintainer willing to help cron move forward would support the next>major task to be done: moving the Debian-specific patches into cronie and >providing an updated package for cronie replacement that can eventually>replace cron. I’d like to help out here if no one else has responded. I
gh time for this work.> @Axel Beckert This is the message I was referring to from “2016”. I would like to adopt this package if no one else has. Best regards, Brian Thompson
39 matches
Mail list logo
