Package: gphoto2
Version: 2.4.14-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
shotwell, importing pictures from a Galaxy Nexus via gphoto2, is super
slow and fails to import some pictures properly with messages like this:
(tracker-miner-fs:4042): Tracker-WARNING **: Got extraction DBus error on
Package: google-mock
Version: 1.5.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: unstable
google-mock version 1.5 is incompatible with libgtest-dev version 1.6
(currently in Debian): attempting to compile the attached program (which
does nothing but include mock.h) results in screenfuls of errors along
the lines
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:40:22AM +0530, shirish शिरीष shirisha...@gmail.com
was heard to say:
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I have seen this many a time and more so now when I am trying to
upgrade from stable to testing. What happens is many a time there is a
library which
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:18:49AM +0100, Gabor Nagy linu...@freemail.hu was
heard to say:
When in the list of upgradable packages I select a package or a package group
for upgrade, aptitude forgets that the package (or all automatically installed
packages in the group) was automatically
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:22:11PM -0500, Nik Johnson nikjohnso...@gmail.com
was heard to say:
After installing lbzip2 aptitude crashed with SIGSEGV when returning to
the menu. SIGSEGV's at start now.
GDB reports it at:
pkgDepCache::Update(OpProgress*) ()
from
This changed in revision 2085.1.1 of apt. rantFer crying out loud, if I
had the time I'd just ditch their handling of the auto flag and do it
myself/rant. What's especially frustrating is that they tried to
accommodate aptitude, but they didn't understand what they were doing.
Guess it's
So, there are two bugs here:
(1) aptitude crashes if you input a ?term pattern and
apt-xapian-index isn't installed.
(2) aptitude treats the string ~ as ?term(~), even though all other
bare strings are treated as ?name patterns.
The first one is a little subtle to fix,
Package: docbook-xsl
Version: 1.75.2+dfsg-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Docbook segmented lists are lists in which each element has one or
more segments. For instance, a synopsis of commands might look like
this:
Name: ls
Usage: ls [options] PATH ...
Description: List directory contents or
The immediate problem should be fixed with
4a021fb5d4963d4e0756fcc182223b05939062d6.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure that I can cut a security release before
the weekend (it'll take some time and I'm still decobwebbing my dev
box). Anyone who wants to cut a security NMU that cherry-picks the
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 04:53:54PM -0800, Kees Cook k...@debian.org was heard
to say:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.3-3.2ubuntu1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Usertags: origin-ubuntu natty
This bug report was also
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 10:56:34AM +0200, Nico Haase deb...@nicohaase.de was
heard to say:
In Version 0.6.1.5-3 (which was the latest I ran from unstable before
0.6.3-2),
all of the progress aptitude did was shown. Now, this output is shown for
little
time and disappears. I will provide
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:56:06AM +0200, Daniele Giglio gigli...@gmail.com
was heard to say:
When proceeding in the install/upgrade procedure (press the 'G' key) aptitude
crashes whit the following message:
Uncaught exception: ui.cc:1389: void auto_fix_broken(): Assertion
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:07:41AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer
christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de was heard to say:
Years later ^^ (forgot that issue sorry).
Me too. I'll reassign this to unhide -- I think it's agreed that it
belongs over there and not in aptitude?
Daniel
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 05:06:54PM +0930, Ron r...@debian.org was heard to
say:
Serious as per policy 2.5
Guess we'd better increase the priority of iostreams, then.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:29:50PM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill m...@atdot.cc was
heard to say:
quote who=Daniel Burrows date=Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:52:16AM -0700
The Chrome browser appears to read the X clipboard twice when you
paste a value, throwing away the first value it read. This makes
Package: pwsafe
Version: 0.2.0-3.0~dburrows
Severity: wishlist
The Chrome browser appears to read the X clipboard twice when you
paste a value, throwing away the first value it read. This makes it
difficult to use pwsafe with it. Obviously a fix in the browser is
ideal, but it would be nice
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:35:15PM -0700, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.org
was heard to say:
I ran aptitude, and saw a handful of packages to upgrade, including
glibc packages. I hit + on libc-bin, and several copies of the message
Internal error: found 2 (choice - promotion) mappings for
Version: 0.6.3-2
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:35:37AM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira
nao...@debian.org was heard to say:
With the last version of aptitude and using pt_BR.UTF-8 as my locale, I see
this for everything that I do with aptitude:
# aptitude update
E: Abrindo arquivo de configuração
I finally got around to looking at the image I took.
The encryption seems to be perfectly fine: there's a LUKS header in
the block device, and I can open it up using cryptsetup.
The trouble seems to be that it's not recognized as a physical LVM
volume. Comparing it to a working physical
It looks like the problem is that I switched to using separated build
directories in the Debian packaging (so that parallel builds work), but
some of the Makefiles pick up their data relative to . instead of
$(srcdir). Easy to fix.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: libboost1.42-dev
Version: 1.42.0-3
Severity: normal
This file doesn't compile with g++ -c:
--- cut here ---
#include boost/lambda/construct.hpp
--- cut here ---
I get these errors:
/usr/include/boost/lambda/construct.hpp: In static member function ‘static void
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:55:21PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode
nero...@gcc.gnu.org was heard to say:
Aptitude appears to have some hardcoded dependencies on the locale. Given
this,
it really needs to force the locale before starting. I have to start it up
with LANG=C aptitude in order to keep
I looked into this a bit today and I don't see how it can be happening.
The code in question is basically doing this, if you rip out some STL
and de-factor it:
int where = idx;
try
{
if(isspace(s[idx]))
++idx;
else
throw ParseException();
}
catch(ParseException )
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: minor
For technical reasons, installing or removing packages while solving
dependencies will reset the resolver, returning to its first solution
and discarding the user's carefully chosen rejects and approvals.
aptitude offers the ability to do this
So, it turns out this is surprisingly tricky. The problem is that the
aptitude initialization process runs a mark-and-sweep before the whole
package system is ready. That seems very dicey to me, but the comments
seem to indicate that it's necessary to force apt to behave properly
with auto
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:34:49PM -0400, Celejar cele...@gmail.com was heard
to say:
FWIW, I just installed the package on another Sid machine, and the
problem appears there, too.
OK, I looked through the logs for this bug, and it sounds like an apt
problem (since apt-get does the same
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:49:03AM +0100, Stuart Prescott
stuart+deb...@nanonanonano.net was heard to say:
aptitude search '?archive(now)'
matches all packages that are in installed or removed (not purged) states.
Naturally,
aptitude search '?archive(foobar)'
matches 0 packages and
Sorry, I lost a few emails four weeks ago. Anyway, I'm assuming you
wanted me to check if this still happens? I don't see it in konsole any
more. I do actually see the bug with my test program in
gnome-terminal...go figure.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.2.1-2
aptitude's resolver will *still* upgrade held packages, due to an
interaction between the dependency solver and unused package removal.
Unused packages are removed before dependencies get solved, and
sometimes the dependency solver has to put a package back
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 02:53:06AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer
cales...@scientia.net was heard to say:
It would be really nice to have a config option which tells
aptitude to never _clear_ the A flag of packages.
I mean even if there are no packages which depend/recommend/suggest/etc.
the
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 02:45:52AM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer
cales...@scientia.net was heard to say:
It seems that Apt::AutoRemove::Recommends-Important and
Apt::AutoRemove::Suggests-Important do not work.
I've observed many many different cases, where aptitude _clears_
the A flag
Package: scons
Version: 1.2.0.d20100117-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: upstream
The documentation of Custom deciders gives as an example a situation
where you want to check only part of a file (e.g., to ignore a date
stamp). Unfortunately, *how* to do this is not documented anywhere.
The example
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:55:21PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode
nero...@gcc.gnu.org was heard to say:
Aptitude appears to have some hardcoded dependencies on the locale. Given
this,
it really needs to force the locale before starting. I have to start it up
with LANG=C aptitude in order to keep
moo should never crash; it just prints a bunch of stuff and exits.
It really shouldn't crash sporadically. And in fact it doesn't. Based
on core dumps, the crash is clearly happening due to something in
log4cxx. Here thread 2 is the one that actually crashed.
Thread 2 (Thread 13246):
#0
I think the problem is that while there's a syntax to turn
autoexpansion of a column *on*, there isn't a syntax to turn it *off*.
%t is autoexpanded by default, so no matter what you do, it will eat
all the available space. You can see that aptitude is at least reading
the width information by
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 02:13:44PM +0200, Regid Ichira
gl2n30y06a...@hotmail.com was heard to say:
aptitude update prints progress information to the screen.
Within that information, it mention rred. Shouldn't that meant
to be read?
I *think* you're saying that you think that it should
I'm preparing an upload for this now.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Version: 0.6.2-1
This should have been closed by 0.6.2-1, but I typed the wrong bug number. :(
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: live-helper
Version: 2.0~a9-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
I noticed that live-helper defaults to using a mirror in Germany. It seems
like
it would be better to use the same mirror that the user's system is taking its
packages from. Obviously we can't know that in general (well,
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-3-amd64
Version: 2.6.32-9
Severity: important
I set up unstable on a new laptop last week, using the same
configuration that I had on my last laptop: a single LVM physical
volume, encrypted (with the configuration created by the installer),
divided into two logical
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 04:52:56PM +0200, Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr was
heard to say:
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:54 +0200, Sven Joachim a écrit :
- The submitter of #575137 uses btrfs which reportedly may cause severe
corruption of dpkg's database and other data:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0200, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de was
heard to say:
On 2010-04-03 17:53 +0200, Benjamin Cama wrote:
Le samedi 03 avril 2010 à 08:13 -0700, Daniel Burrows a écrit :
I can't find it anywhere on the Web. But since it's just a bin-NMU
of the lenny
So, I haven't had time to do actual work on this bug yet, but I've
mulled it over a bit. Here's what I think we know for sure:
1) On some people's systems, /usr/bin/aptitude isn't being restored
after the upgrade.
2) On other people's systems, it is.
3) I don't know why.
4) Even
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:33:53PM +0100, Benjamin Cama ben...@free.fr was
heard to say:
I just updated from aptitude 0.4.11.11-1+b2 to version 0.6.1.5-3 and
lost the 'aptitude' command. It is no more listed in 'dpkg -L aptitude'
too.
Have you ever had aptitude version 0.5+ installed on
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 04:33:39PM -0800, Elliott Mitchell e...@m5p.com was
heard to say:
Updating the display of packages behind the search box while typing
characters is nice, it is also rather sluggish. Worse, it appears that
aptitude updates its display after each character pressed, not
Package: alsa-base
Version: 1.0.21+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
I have a USB webcam plugged into my computer that I use occasionally.
It's a USB audio device, but as alsaconf succinctly puts it:
This sound device does not have any playback controls.
Sometimes (presumably depending on the
Package: libboost-doc
Version: 1.40.0.1
Severity: minor
In the section mpl sequence, the Fusion documentation states that:
Including the module header makes all MPL sequences fully
conforming fusion sequences.
In fact, it works the other way around as well, turning Fusion
sequences
If I run aptitude search as nobody, I get an error about not
being able to create .aptitude, but the search goes ahead anyway.
Does that fix this bug for you? I don't know if I want to suppress
that error, since it indicates a real problem most of the time.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:40:40PM +0100, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl was
heard to say:
On Friday 12 March 2010, Daniel Burrows wrote:
I think a backtrace with -dbg packages would be useful. So would
a backtrace of all threads (thread apply all backtrace); I'd like
to see what the main
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:14:54PM +0800, Paolo Scarabelli pa...@msw.it was
heard to say:
Aptitude always segfaults everytime I quit, with one exception: if I open it
and close it without updating (or doing anything else) it exits just fine.
I wonder if valgrind would show anything useful.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 01:54:31PM +0100, Frans Pop f...@debian.org was heard
to say:
aptitude runs fine on my sparc64 box for upgrading and installing packages,
but segfaults always when I quit the application.
Does this happen just with the 0.6 series of aptitude, or did you
see this in
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:43:23PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson
sgunder...@bigfoot.com was heard to say:
It seems that recently, aptitude changed behavior such that a command-line
such as
aptitude full-upgrade ed+
will only upgrade ed -- earlier, it would install ed and then full a
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 02:09:09PM +0100, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl was
heard to say:
The problem is only reproducible after e.g. installing a package; just
starting aptitude and quitting straight away does not reproduce it.
A backtrace for this issue looks as follows:
Just from
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 02:40:25AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org was heard to say:
1) gimp
2) gnome-user-guide
3) libgstreamer-plugins-base0.10-0
4) libwebkit-1.0-2
5) midori
6) yelp
Tier: Safe actions, Remove packages (1)
Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?] 3
Package: libapt-pkg-dev
Version: 0.7.25.2
Severity: serious
Since the latest apt upload, no source file that includes
apt-pkg/error.h will compile:
In file included from temp.cc:30:
/usr/include/apt-pkg/error.h:56:20: error: system.h: No such file or directory
In file included from temp.cc:30:
The attached patch should fix this problem. In addition to installing
system.h in apt-pkg, it's necessary to update all the #includes to refer
to it as apt-pkg/system.h instead of just system.h.
Daniel
diff -Nru --exclude configure --exclude changelog --exclude '*.pot' --exclude '*.po'
I have an upload prepared to fix these bugs, but I can't upload it
because the apt includes are broken (just filed a bug about it).
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:08:14AM -0500, Rick Thomas
rbtho...@dillserver.rcthomas.org was heard to say:
Remove the following packages:
1) fast-user-switch-applet
2) gedit
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 01:11:19PM -0800, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org was
heard to say:
The mechanism exists to do a non-mutative upgrade calculation, I just
hadn't hooked it up to the command-line. That could solve half the
problem. I'd also like to see why the resolver isn't just
Hi there. I figured the cause out a few days ago, then had an attack
of family...
Anyway, this is a side-effect of aptitude calculating upgrades
mutatively -- that is, it sets its internal state to where the upgrade
would go (which causes unused packages to be removed, including the
old
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 07:22:35PM +0100, Martin martin.m...@desineo.com was
heard to say:
I wanted tu upgrade Debian Lenny stable to Squeeze testing. The system was
fairly new, there were packages almost from stable (without hplip and
virtualbox (VB was from another repository)).
So, I
Could you run aptitude -s --show-resolver-actions safe-upgrade and
paste the output?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Unfortunately, packages.debian.org lags behind the archive a bit,
usually by a couple days or so. I can download the new changelog from
the appropriate place, but it doesn't look like packages.d.o/aptitude
links to it yet.
The lag at the moment is at least four days now, though, which seems
Are you 100% sure that the changelog is never displayed? In my tests,
it looks like the bug is actually not that the changelog isn't
downloaded, but that the progress bar isn't shown (so it *looks* like
nothing is happening until the changelog appears).
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:05:52PM +0100, r.ductor r.duc...@gmail.com was
heard to say:
search
Searches for packages matching one of the patterns supplied on the command
line.
All packages which match any of the given patterns will be displayed;
for instance, “aptitude search ´~N´
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:44:08AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org was
heard to say:
Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org (18/01/2010):
It looks like the build succeeded on all the release
architectures, so I think I might downgrade this so that aptitude
can get into testing
In the 0.6 series, the aptitude resolver is a lot more conservative
than it used to be, due to repeated complaints by users that it was
removing too many packages in the first solution that was presented.
It looks like maybe I overcompensated, though (this is not the first
report along these
If you have a machine where aptitude is doing this, it would be
helpful if you could run aptitude-create-state-bundle and send me the
resulting file.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Weird thing is: I get the same failure, but it doesn't kill the build.
It should. So by my count that's two bugs here :-/.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ah, I got fooled by some garbage printed by the cppunit test. The
actual problem is the double-free in the Boost tester. D'oh.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
OK, I can't see any sign of a double-free in either valgrind or
libefence, which are usually pretty good about catching this sort of
thing. Can you run something similar on FreeBSD and see what it says?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 03:32:36AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org was
heard to say:
Only keeping the #include line is sufficient, I can't reproduce this
issue double free issue.
Weird.
It looks like the build succeeded on all the release architectures, so
I think I might downgrade
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.1.1-14
Severity: normal
It's really annoying to start an upgrade of 300 packages, then
discover that it failed because OpenOffice was one of the 300 and it
detected a running session. This results in a dialog box telling me
that I need to stop the session
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 07:56:01PM +, peter green plugw...@p10link.net
was heard to say:
The attatched patch resolves the FTBFS by taking the simple approach
of building with -fno-strict-aliasing .
That obviously avoids this, but I'd rather fix the bug directly
(besides, doesn't
I can't reproduce this with the latest cwidget and g++ versions
(0.5.16 and 4.4.2 respectively). Can anyone else?
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 11:15:29PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski
artu...@hell.pl was heard to say:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:17:27PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
Debian policy section 7.7 clearly states that Build-Depends must be
satisfied before clean is invoked.
[cut]
It might be enough
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 10:46:16PM +0200, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net
was heard to say:
Hi, the following patch fixes that crash on amd64.
--- src/gtk/gui.cc.orig 2009-12-05 22:43:21.0 +0200
+++ src/gtk/gui.cc 2009-12-05 22:43:40.0 +0200
@@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:27:18AM +0100, Thomas Frauendorfer
fraue...@in.tum.de was heard to say:
When using the curses interface, pressing + on a section still marks all
packages for update, even those that are held.
Hi, Thomas. When you press + on a section, aptitude treats it as
I'm 99.99% sure this has nothing to do with aptitude. aptitude
doesn't do any of the actual mechanical installation of packages; it
just asks libapt to invoke dpkg with appropriate command line arguments.
One thing that could cause this problem would be if that directory
already existed on
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 01:36:19PM +0100, Petr Salinger
petr.salin...@seznam.cz was heard to say:
IMHO, yet better would be patch below, some library might use some
other signal internally, you really want to only block SIGWINCH.
Sounds good to me.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
This is a bug about apt-get (and, IMO, specifically its delayed
handling of autoremove -- it looks like the reporter got a lot of
cruft on his system without noticing until he ran autoremove).
It's true that aptitude won't let you remove a package without also
removing packages that depend on
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 06:07:33PM +0100, Artur R. Czechowski
artu...@hell.pl was heard to say:
clean target of debian/rules runs ./configure script, which fails if there
are no development libraries installed. That means it is unable to build
source package, which result with failing the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
was heard to say:
reopen 557982
kthxbye
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:28:31 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
With any luck, this is fixed in 0.5.16-1 in unstable. I addressed the
problem by having the tests query
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:58:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
was heard to say:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:28:31 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote:
With any luck, this is fixed in 0.5.16-1 in unstable. I addressed the
problem by having the tests query for the system limit
OK, well, I'll reassign this to apt in any event since it's really
in that package that this happens.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Since basically nothing changed between the last version and this
one, that's (more than) a little weird, particularly since this built
and passed its unit tests on every other architecture. In particular,
none of the code invoked by testBox has changed at all since 0.5.13.
Daniel
--
To
Apparently an upstream bug has been created for this:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=587256
No indication on that bug when it will be fixed, but a user posted a
workaround on the bug (a script that edits your Glade file so Glade can
understand it). I had to add GtkVPaned to the
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org
was heard to say:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 16:21:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
See e.g. bug#554218, which also corresponds to EAGAIN returned by
pthread_create.
So apparently hppa has trouble running thread stress
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:45:26AM -0800, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
was heard to say:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 04:28:10PM +0100, Julien Cristau
jcris...@debian.org was heard to say:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 16:21:08 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
See e.g. bug#554218, which also
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 02:27:19PM -0500, Celejar cele...@gmail.com was heard
to say:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:30:44 -0800
Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
I can look into this, but AFAIK apt has supported resumes since more
or less forever, and I can't find notes about disabling
aptitude has its own replacement for pkgCacheFile that it uses to
initialize itself. Arguably this is bad; on the other hand, it seems
to be the only way to create a subclass of pkgDepCache during startup
instead of creating a straight pkgDepCache.
Anyway, it looks like the code to read the
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.1.3-3
Severity: normal
aptitude will crash on exit if the background thread that checks for
changelogs on the system is still running. The problem is that this
thread accesses global apt structures, which are destroyed during
shutdown. That thread should be
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:39:11PM +0100, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de was
heard to say:
On 2009-11-20 06:51 +0100, brian m. carlson wrote:
Okay, here's some more information that I think might be useful. I
marked packages for upgrade, and libsnmp-base and libsnmp15 are marked
for
Here's the patch.
Daniel
changeset: 3453:9e92aa37631a
tag: tip
user:Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
date:Thu Nov 19 15:33:11 2009 -0800
summary: Initialize the temporary file module *after* logging so its startup messages don't cause a spurious error (Closes
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:32:28PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira
nao...@debian.org was heard to say:
With the new aptitude version, I am getting this on any action that I call
(clean, full-upgrade, etc)
# aptitude update
log4cxx: No appender could be found for logger (aptitude.temp).
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:54:32AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
ivan@gmail.com was heard to say:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:45:26 -0800
Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
update-alternatives runs in the postinst of aptitude 0.6.0.1-1.
That package doesn't provide /usr/bin
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:54:32AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
ivan@gmail.com was heard to say:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:45:26 -0800
Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote:
update-alternatives runs in the postinst of aptitude 0.6.0.1-1.
That package doesn't provide /usr/bin
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:55:28PM +0100, Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de was
heard to say:
On 2009-11-18 12:25 +0100, Daniel Burrows wrote:
According to packages.debian.org, ia32-apt-get doesn't exist. I guess
this is some local package you built?
No, ia32-apt-get had been in unstable
Can you reproduce this crash with aptitude 0.6.0 from unstable?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Personally, I think that assuming that bar should be installed
without any more hints from the user is a bit of a stretch; they
asked to install foo, not bar, and it can't be installed. I don't
know that aptitude should be trying to second-guess its command line
here.
I do think that it
1 - 100 of 1580 matches
Mail list logo
