Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm orphaning mod-spamhaus. Due to low popcon, this package probably
should be removed from archive.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm orphaning apf-firewall. Due to low popcon, this package probably
should be removed from archive.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
tags 652829 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano <iucul...@debian.org> on Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:50:29 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
tags 796599 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano <iucul...@debian.org> on Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:44:02 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
===
tags 740898 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:05:27 +0100.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Ignore
retitle -1 debian/copyright for smartmontools is too restrictive
severity -1 wishlist
Il 14/02/2015 06:57, Mark H Weaver ha scritto:
Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its
copyright information and distribution license in the file
/usr/share/doc/package/copyright.
On 11/12/2014 22:31, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Is this an intended rebuild in Jessie or sid?
In sid.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu smartmontools_6.3+svn4002-2 . ALL . -m Rebuild against new binutils see
#728113
As Kurt Roeckx suggested we need to rebuild smartmontools, see #728113
Cheers,
Giuseppe
--
To
tags 766178 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:28:29 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Correct
Il 18/10/2014 11:12, Osamu Aoki ha scritto:
I understand Mike's (long term) plan to separate APIKEY to different
package. But, at least for now, can we have functioning package in
testing without reading and manually tweeking the system? Any reason
not to update this? Then with next
tags 754684 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 18 Oct 2014 16:53:15 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fix FTBFS
tags 705946 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 18 Oct 2014 17:04:29 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed
Package: chromium
Version: 37.0.2062.120-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
debian/chromium.postinst line 12
Really you cannot remove /etc/default/chromium file without asking or warning
user...
You have to move in /etc/chromium-browser/default
This is what happens when you push huge commits and nobody
tags 765519 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:08:33 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Remove /etc
On 13/10/2014 03:09, Michael Gilbert wrote:
This has been the plan all along
Could I ask you where it was discussed? And why you decided to force
users to create their keys? What are wrong with the Debian keys?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Il 13/10/2014 20:13, Michael Gilbert ha scritto:
There will be no reason for users to generate keys. The Debian keys
will be used.
Then I really don't understand why you removed the keys in debian/rules
in 37.0.2062.120-4...
Cheers,
Giuseppe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: chromium
Version: 37.0.2062.120-3
Severity: grave
Hi,
debian/chromium.postinst line 12
Really you cannot remove /etc/default/chromium file without asking...
You have to move it in /etc/chromium-browser/default
This is what happens when you push huge commits and nobody can double
tags 639631 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 10:11:16 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Included
tags 710815 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 10:34:07 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
moved
tags 729842 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 10:43:26 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Removed
tags 764136 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:05:30 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Set
tags 764136 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:05:30 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Set
tags 761728 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:11:13 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Depends
tags 757758 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:28:19 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed sed
tags 659672 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:38:21 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
fixes
tags 693634 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 4 Oct 2014 19:46:43 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Added Multi
Hi,
Il 20/07/2014 10:08, Vincent Bernat ha scritto:
Does this mean that the API key won't be back when Chromium 36 will be
uploaded to unstable?
I just activated Google+ Api for the chromium Debian package, please let
me know if this fixed the issue.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Il 20/07/2014 11:32, Vincent Bernat ha scritto:
Mike disabled the message in this version but didn't add the API
keys. The version that Giuseppe is talking about did not hit the mirrors
yet.
I've not uploaded a new version (I'm still waiting Michael pushes his
changes on git...) but I enabled
Il 04/05/2014 00:41, Vincent Lefevre ha scritto:
On 5 tests, Chromium always downloads the CRLSet after 21 minutes.
Finally your chromium updated the CRLSet, so this bug can be closed.
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 745646 unreproducible
notfound 745646 34.0.1847.116-2
severity 745646 normal
thanks
Il 2014-04-30 20:30 Jonathan Nieder ha scritto:
However Vincent is right that the CRLSets[1] are a different mechanism
than OCSP revocation checking and that CRLSet checking is enabled by
default.
Yes,
Hi,
On 30/04/2014 02:28, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
No, Chromium developers tell users not to enable it, and consider
it as an obsolete option that will be removed. Indeed, in case of
real MITM attack, the attacker can block the OCSP server, in which
case Chromium will silently consider the
On 30/04/2014 19:49, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Bug 745646 is a different bug, specifically about the CRLSet system,
which is very broken.
What you write is not a bug, if you want to do revocation check you must
enable it in settings.
chromium --temp-profile
Go to settings and enable revocation
reopen 739054
found 739054 1:14.3~beta1.0-1
thanks
Hi,
I've the same crash with 1:14.3~beta1.0-1
[ 263.599] ukiOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
[ 263.599] ukiOpenDevice: Open failed
[ 263.599] ukiDynamicMajor: found major device number 249
[ 263.599] ukiOpenByBusid:
Hi Thomas,
On 17/03/2014 08:34, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I've been waiting for comments on my security upload for 5 months now.
The issue was supposed to be embargoed (in fact, just waiting on
Debian...). Please review the fixed packages!!! If you don't have time
to review it, just accept that I
On 22/01/2014 23:55, Craig Small wrote:
I talked to Raphael about it and he said he hadn't heard anything from
you at all about this so it seemed you weren't interested.
Perhaps you could ask me If I am or not interested...
Raphael has asked for someone to take over the package so removing
with a
positive conclusion, and the issue is of a technical nature, consider
bringing it to the attention of the technical committee (see the
technical committee web page for more information).
On 23/01/2014 12:55, Craig Small wrote: On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at
10:11:26AM +0100, Giuseppe Iuculano
On 23/01/2014 14:59, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
This discussion is absurd
This discussion is absurd because a simple sorry, I would have to ask
you would have been enough to close entire discussion.
Anyway, have fun with your new hijacked package.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please remove smbind, it has not been maintained upstream for many
years.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Hi,
commit 64b895bf23943f8c72a49216d24e36b128213167
Author: Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org
Date: Mon Oct 21 13:05:14 2013 +0200
Move chrome_sandbox to chrome-sandbox, chromium reads that file
Your -2 uploads didn't contain my -1 changes. Michael, please, please,
update your
Hi Dirk,
we marked this as minor issue and it would be nice to fix it through a
point update:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#upload-stable
Cheers,
Giuseppe
On 13/09/2013 12:04, Dirk Griesbach wrote:
Package: gajim
Followup-For: Bug #693282
Hi,
is
On 12/09/2013 14:11, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
Chromium writes several short-lived files to /var/tmp, but those
should be written to /tmp. Users with SSDs often mount a tmpfs on
/tmp to reduce writes to the SSD. But /var/tmp cannot be a tmpfs,
as it needs to be preserved across reboots.
tags 717567 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Thu, 5 Sep 2013 13:34:36 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fix FTBFS
tags 684617 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 10:20:01 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Trigger
tags 706909 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 2 Jun 2013 10:08:14 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Use /var/lib
On 04/03/2013 16:39, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2012-5153
Fix: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=13161
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2013-0836
Fix: https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=12543
Cheers,
On 02/03/2013 22:57, Michael Gilbert wrote:
The arm builds have been nothing but trouble so far, and without
upstream interest they are likely to continue to break with most
upstream releases.
My vote is removal, but its really Guiseppe's call.
I totally agree, we should drop arm support.
Hi Roland,
On 07/02/2013 22:58, Roland Stigge wrote:
I prepared a security upload for stable (attached debdiff). Should I
upload it to stable-security(security-master)?
Thanks for contacting us.
please upload to security-master (please make sure to include the
.orig.tar.gz in the upload, -sa
tags 686561 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Wed, 6 Feb 2013 15:29:50 +0100.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed
Hi Dominic,
On 04/02/2013 21:28, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I had no replies about this, so I think it's time to bite the bullet
and decide whether we should target this fix at
- stable-security
- stable
- neither of the above.
I think I'm leaning towards stable on the basis that that's
On 02/01/2013 12:15, David Prévot wrote:
I've prepared an NMU for chromium-browser (versioned as
22.0.1229.94~r161065+dfsg-0.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2.
No, you haven't uploaded it to DELAYED/2.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove kompozer, upstream is dead and the xulrunner codebase
beneath is it surely out of date and full of security holes.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package chromium-browser
debian/ diff can be found here:
On 06/08/2012 21:30, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Guiseppe, what are your plans for Chromium in Wheezy? Are you optimistic
to keep up with security triage and shall we include an additional
recommendation for Chromium?
As we (the security team) discussed some time ago, if we switch to a
model,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package chromium-browser
chromium-browser (20.0.1132.57~r145807-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Michael Gilbert ]
* New ustream stable security release:
-
On 07/22/2012 12:20 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
And the reason you're not replying to 681719 instead is?
Because I didn't know Michael already opened a bug.
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tags 677393 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:00:06 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed FTBFS
tags 677393 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Mon, 16 Jul 2012 14:30:09 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Really fix
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
please remove chromium-browser (armhf) 17.0.963.83~r127885-1 from
testing and force chromium-browser 20.0.1132.43~r143823-1 in testing.
We will try to fix FTBFS in armel and armhf in
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
please remove chromium-browser (armhf) 17.0.963.83~r127885-1 from
testing and unstable.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi Norbert!
On 07/02/2012 04:53 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
In short, everything that
starts with
chromium://
Did you mean chrome:// ?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
severity 677948 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
On 29/06/2012 22:08, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Right. Let's keep the actual severity and focus on fixing this.
please don't change the severity of this bug, Jonathan already explained
you that we consider this a feature request.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
tags 676142 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:29:49 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed FTBFS
tags 649515 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:34:58 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed
tags 676636 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:06:24 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Improved
tags 676636 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:16:37 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Applied
On 02/06/2012 08:15, shawn wrote:
I noticed this while trying to get this package to build on armel.
Could you patch debian/control and try to build on armel again please?
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ Build-Depends: cdbs,
libxt-dev,
libxtst-dev,
tags 674081 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Mon, 28 May 2012 10:41:13 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Support
tags 671994 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 19 May 2012 10:22:05 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Use gcc 4.6
tags 631075 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 12 May 2012 12:53:20 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Do
tags 649515 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 12 May 2012 12:56:51 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed check
Package: imagemagick
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
The original fixes for the ImageMagick issues CVE-2012-0247 and
CVE-2012-0248 are incomplete.
Please see:
http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2012/q1/685
Package: maradns
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It was reported that MaraDNS suffers from a flaw where it is susceptible to
spoofing attacks. Due to an error in the cache update policy, which
does not properly handle revoked domain names, a remote
tags 632119 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:11:13 +0100.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fix FTBFS
tags 642760 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:17:10 +0100.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Link
tags 660159 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:18:27 +0100.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Remove
On 17/02/2012 00:11, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
chromium has #660159 so the binNMUs were useless. I've just pinged
ftpmasters so that libvpx gets decrufted (ie. libvpx0 goes away). Baring
chromium's uninstallability in sid, migration should happen. And libvpx0
will be kept in testing until
On 16/01/2012 09:43, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
This is not for libv8, CVE description is wrong, this affects webkit:
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/93495
Or better, the issue is in the V8 binding source in webkit. We use that
code only in chromium, I will check if stable is affected.
Cheers
tag 654534 patch
thanks
CVE-2011-3892
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=107489
CVE-2011-3893
this is due to http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7554
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=106599
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=106621
Dear Sergiusz,
it seems my reply to your private email didn't convince you, so replying
again on behalf of the Security Team.
Dear Security Team,
CVE-2008-4392 has Candidate status and is being reviewed for almost
three years now, and still must accepted by the CVE Editorial
Board[0].
On 12/10/2011 02:27 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for smbind (versioned as 0.4.7-5.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Gregor, thanks for your NMU. Please upload to DELAYED/0
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
severity 631075 normal
thanks
On 10/22/2011 04:39 PM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Any status for this bug? If you want I can do a NMU to fix it
I will fix this in the next release. Demoted severity, important seems
excessive to me.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On 09/28/2011 05:51 PM, Igor Goryachev wrote:
It seems the most simple way to reproduce this bug (or to get a strange
behaviour may be with the same roots for this bug) is to load a simple
xml-file with 'windows-1251' encoding defined (which is validated as
good xml-file by xmllint):
?xml
Package: libxml2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
two libxml2 issues were fixed in the latest chrome updates:
CVE-2011-2821
Double free vulnerability in libxml2, as used in Google Chrome before
13.0.782.215, allows remote attackers to cause a
Hi,
On 09/04/2011 09:20 PM, Raphael Geissert wrote:
NSS now ships modified certs of DigiNotar, their name is Explicitly Disabled
DigiNotar rest of the original CN here
In chromium, for example, if you browse a DigiNotar-signed website and check
the certificate chain you will see the
tags 639733 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On 08/29/2011 08:43 PM, Laurens Blankers wrote:
Upgrading from 3.0.5+dfsg-1 to 3.2.1+dfsg-1 causes plugin files to be written
to
/usr/share/tinymce
which is partily symlinked from
/usr/share/wordpress/wp-includes/js/tinymce/
this
Package: libv8
Version: 3.4.14.13-2
Severity: important
Tags: experimental patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm preparing chromium 14 for experimental, and it FTFBS with this:
LINK(target) out/Release/chrome
On 08/28/2011 03:31 PM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Shouldn't the solution be to move v8::internal::I18NExtension::get() to v8
(not internal) namespace ?
Yes, but I suspect there are a lot of v8::internal() needed by chromium.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tag 616662 -moreinfo
thanks
On 08/27/2011 03:41 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
tag 616662 moreinfo
thanks
This looks like an embedded ffmpeg issue. Submitter, can you try
building with USE_SYSTEM_FFMPEG:=1 set on line 10 in debian/rules? It
looks like libav builds fine on armel already.
Package: libv8-dev
Version: 3.4.14.13-1
Severity: important
Tags: experimental
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
there is a wrong include in /usr/include/i18n-extension.h
#include include/v8.h
it should be:
#include v8.h
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
tags 639126 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:25:06 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed
Version: 13.0.782.107~r94237-1
Hi,
On 08/04/2011 09:17 AM, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Hi all,
Google Chrome released 13.0.782.107 and one can find the relevant
posting here :-
Uploaded some minutes ago :)
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/changelog
--- libmikmod-3.1.11/debian/changelog
+++ libmikmod-3.1.11/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+libmikmod (3.1.11-6.4) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fixed regression introduced by CVE-2007-6720.patch
+(Closes: #631009)(LP: #194916)
+
+ -- Giuseppe Iuculano iucul
tags 628873 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:43:57 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Use linux
Hi Robert,
On 07/10/2011 12:14 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
Here's a new patch. I made a few small adjustments to make it less intrusive.
Btw, it'd be very nice to have this for fuse4bsd (RFP #631657), which
is intended to be DKMS-based. Do you plan an upload of DKMS soon?
I just uploaded
tags 631657 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:48:09 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Run depmod
tags 631657 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:11:22 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
s/uname_s
tags 631657 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:11:22 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
s/uname_s
On 07/15/2011 04:35 PM, Robert Millan wrote:
There are two instance of $uname_s in dkms file. One of them was
already in that file before my last patch.
Fixed, thanks!
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/29/2011 01:50 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Could you please update the security tracker?
Updated, thanks.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
In my case, reinstalling didn't fix the issue (Derbian testing i386)
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 963 matches
Mail list logo
