Bug#906337: Any clue how to circumvent issues with MPI on autobuilders

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi, > > in the bug log of #906337 the test suite aborts with > > ... > -- > MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD >

Bug#863828: python3-instant: undefined symbol: PyClass_Type during interpolate

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Drew Parsons wrote: > It's still failing, with python-ffc 2016.2.0-3 and libdolfin-dev > 2016.2.0-4 (with UseDOLFIN.cmake patched). Oh, sorry I forgot that this patch is needed for instant:

Bug#863828: python3-instant: undefined symbol: PyClass_Type during interpolate

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Drew Parsons wrote: > Should the vtk section in UseDOLFIN.cmake be controlled with some > python3 test, so VTK is still pulled in for python2? Yes, we can do that, although I believe the vtk section in UseDOLFIN.cmake is not important. I will

Bug#863829: python2: dolfin 'module' object has no attribute 'cpp'

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Drew Parsons wrote: > Weird, the new python3 module seems to have broken the python2 dolfin > module. That's not good. > > Importing dolfin gives the error: > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'cpp' The problem is that the

Bug#863828: python3-instant: undefined symbol: PyClass_Type during interpolate

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Drew Parsons wrote: > $ instant-clean-3 > $ ipython3 > Python 3.5.3 (default, Jan 19 2017, 14:11:04) > In [1]: from fenics import * # dolfin module behaves the same > In [2]: mesh = UnitSquareMesh(2, 2) > In [3]: V = FunctionSpace(mesh, 'P',

Bug#851183: fenics: Misses important 'mshr' module

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Hagen Fuchs wrote: > Fenics/Dolfin contains the core module 'mshr' which deals in meshes. > All current examples seem to be employing 'mshr', eg. > https://fenicsproject.org/qa/9414/fenics-mesh-generation-mark-inner-region No, not really - none

Bug#850020: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This is my annual ping. Cheers, Johannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWil0mAAoJEIsTRN6fgH8U2twP/0N8gADMlOGttkebIKd8mtZb

Bug#846512: ITP: dijitso -- distributed just-in-time building of shared libraries

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Johannes Ring <joha...@simula.no> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: dijitso Version: 2016.2.0 Upstream Author: Martin Sandve Alnæs <marti...@simula.no>

Bug#809820: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This is my annual ping. Cheers, Johannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWil0mAAoJEIsTRN6fgH8U2twP/0N8gADMlOGttkebIKd8mtZb

Bug#804465: dolfin: FTBFS: wants ufc 1.5.0

dolfin version 1.6.0 will fix this problem. It is currently sitting in the new queue. Johannes On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 8:09 PM Chris West (Faux) < solo-debianb...@goeswhere.com> wrote: > Source: dolfin > Version: 1.5.0-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > Tags: sid

Bug#787796: fenics fresh installation is broken

On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:03 AM Massimiliano Leoni leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com wrote: Versions of packages fenics depends on: ii dolfin-bin 1.5.0-2 ii dolfin-doc 1.5.0-2 ii libdolfin-dev 1.5.0-2 ii python-dolfin 1.5.0-2 I can't reproduce this with the latest dolfin

Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: Ok, please go ahead now. To upload to unstable from experimental, just add a changelog entry with Upload to unstable and an incremented version. Thank you, I have uploaded dolfin to unstable now. Your only r-dep is

Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote: On 2015-05-12 09:07, Johannes Ring wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel joachim.reic...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What

Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel joachim.reic...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What are the options? (1) Fix dolfin without causing another transition (2) Remove dolfin from testing (3) Upload 1.5.0-1 from

Bug#780359: Options w.r.t. libcgal11 transition

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Joachim Reichel joachim.reic...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, dolfin is now the only reverse dependency holding up the libcgal11 transition. What are the options? (1) Fix dolfin without causing

Bug#774575: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This is my annual ping. Thanks for your attention, Johannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUqWIJAAoJEIsTRN6fgH8UOFsQANh6RTof48pbLh9iJ7iL95Si

Bug#766584: fenics: Fenics to be removed with recent dist-upgrade

Hi Massimiliano, Do you still have this problem? If so, can you please give us some more information? For instance, what do you get when you run the following command? # apt-get -s dist-upgrade Johannes On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Massimiliano Leoni leoni.massimilia...@gmail.com wrote:

Bug#739697: src:dolfin: FTBFS on armhf and mips: virtual memory exhausted: Cannot allocate memory

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:35 AM, peter green plugw...@p10link.net wrote: peter green wrote: I've been doing some tests on this interestingly it failed for me much earlier than on the buildd, maybe different systems give slightly different ammounts of usable address space or something. Anyway

Bug#734037: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This is my annual ping. Thanks for your attention, Johannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSxn6JAAoJEIsTRN6fgH8U8SkP/2g1/f+5DcBjHi2CU1MPM8c6

Bug#722234: fenics: can't install fenics on unstable

On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Michael Strobel strob...@vfemail.net wrote: i tried to install fenics on unstable. It failed due to a conflict. This is not a bug in in the fenics package but rather a problem as a result of the ongoing transition to openmpi 1.6:

Bug#697590: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, This is my annual ping. Thanks for your attention, Johannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ6pc0AAoJEIsTRN6fgH8UOPkQAI59V/ciku+VcdMzestMAE8p

Bug#679762: Please give back dolfin (hurd-i386 and i386)

Ping? Johannes On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote: Hi, dolfin 1.0.0-7 failed to build on hurd-i386 and i386 due to a bug in gcc-4.7. This bug was fixed in gcc-4.7 4.7.1-6, so please rebuild dolfin on those architectures: gb dolfin_1.0.0-7 . hurd-i386

Bug#679762: Please give back dolfin (hurd-i386 and i386)

Hi, dolfin 1.0.0-7 failed to build on hurd-i386 and i386 due to a bug in gcc-4.7. This bug was fixed in gcc-4.7 4.7.1-6, so please rebuild dolfin on those architectures: gb dolfin_1.0.0-7 . hurd-i386 i386 This would clear the FTBFS bug #679762 (CCed). Thanks, Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#679762: dolfin: FTBFS: Armadillo could not be found. Be sure to set ARMADILLO_DIR. (missing: ARMADILLO_TEST_RUNS)

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Kumar Appaiah aku...@debian.org wrote: #680931 has been fixed by the latest gcc download, so I don't believe that the workaround upload for Armadillo is necessary. Thanks Kumar. The latest gcc-4.7 package (version 4.7.1-6) fixed the problem. I guess a binNMU for

Bug#679762: dolfin: FTBFS: Armadillo could not be found. Be sure to set ARMADILLO_DIR. (missing: ARMADILLO_TEST_RUNS)

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote: Your package failed to build on the buildds: -- Performing Test ARMADILLO_BLAS_TEST_RUNS - Failed -- Performing Test ARMADILLO_GFORTRAN_TEST_RUNS -- Performing Test ARMADILLO_GFORTRAN_TEST_RUNS - Failed CMake Error

Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:32:56 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against

Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: If dolfin only works with the version of swig it was built against, that needs to be reflected in the package dependencies. Okay, but I'm unsure how to do that. Currently I have Build-Depends: swig2.0 in the source

Bug#667599: dolfin-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - apt does not find an upgrade path

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:10 AM, David Kalnischkies kalnischkies+deb...@gmail.com wrote: In bug #667599 we have a report from piuparts that APT is unable to upgrade delfin-dev from squeeze to wheezy. The problem is that APT has to decide in this process if it wants to have libhdf5-1.8 (=

Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Logg l...@simula.no wrote: Does it work if you remove those checks in    dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py    dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/jit.py ? Yes, it works fine, but I also had to remove the check in

Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Johan Hake hake@gmail.com wrote: On 06/14/2012 09:46 AM, Johannes Ring wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Anders Loggl...@simula.no  wrote: Does it work if you remove those checks in    dolfin/site-packages/dolfin/compilemodules/compilemodule.py

Bug#675207: [Dolfin] Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Anders Logg l...@simula.no wrote: Does this break because we check the SWIG version in the JIT compiler, or because it actually breaks (with some link error)? It is the version check that makes it break. This is the error message: OSError: PyDOLFIN was not

Bug#676596: vmtk: builds against vtk 5.6, not 5.8

Thanks Jeremy. This has already been fixed in the svn repository and I am waiting for it to be uploaded to unstable. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#675207: Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Jun  4, 2012 at 08:43:54 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no (31/05/2012): python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against

Bug#675207: Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no (31/05/2012): python-ufc needs to be rebuilt against the latest swig (2.0.7). Please binNMU it.   nmu python-ufc_2.0.5-2 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against swig 2.0.7, see #675207

Bug#675207: Please binNMU python-ufc against latest swig

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Mathieu Malaterre mathieu.malate...@gmail.com wrote: If I may, I believe this is due to: http://bugs.debian.org/674263 Any binary build with swig 2.0.5 or 2.0.6 should be rebuild IMHO. I agree, considering the regressions in SWIG 2.0.5 and 2.0.6, however, the

Bug#675207: python-dolfin: Problem with SWIG

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com wrote: Traceback (most recent call last):  File vcp2D.py, line 20, in module    V = FunctionSpace(mesh, 'Lagrange', 1)  File /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/dolfin/functions/functionspace.py, line 353, in __init__

Bug#675303: [Python-modules-team] Bug#675303: python-scitools: Bug in BoxField.py

Hi Torquil, Thanks for your bug report. I'm both Debian maintainer and upstream for this package and we plan to do a new release soon, which should fix this issue. Best regards, Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe.

Bug#674014: python-dolfin: Doesn't find python-scientific

Hi Torquil, Thanks for the report. On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen torq...@gmail.com wrote: However, python-scientific is installed, and import Scientific works fine when I run it myself in the python shell. Yes, but does it work if you do import

Bug#672952: FTBFS: compile errors

On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com wrote: On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:04:05 PM Johannes Ring wrote: [Cc'ing debian-python] ... @debian-python: Since DOLFIN does not work with Python 3 (yet) maybe a Build-Conflicts should be added? And what about X-Python

Bug#673768: error: 'PropagationSpeed' was not declared in this scope

Package: libinsighttoolkit3-dev Version: 3.20.1-8 vmtk depends on itk and when trying to build the latest vmtk release, the build ends with the following error: In file included from /usr/include/InsightToolkit/Algorithms/itkCurvesLevelSetImageFilter.h:21:0, from

Bug#672952: FTBFS: compile errors

[Cc'ing debian-python] Hi LaMont, Thanks for the report but I'm wondering why python3.2 is installed on this build machine? From looking at the build log [1], it seems that it has been pre-installed? Is that intentional? DOLFIN Build-Depends on python-all-dev (= 2.6.6-3~) and FWICT only

Bug#667411: Another patch

The same fix should also be applied to Code/Algorithms/itkCurvesLevelSetFunction.h. Johannes --- insighttoolkit-3.20.1.orig/Code/Algorithms/itkCurvesLevelSetFunction.h 2012-05-14 19:55:57.353934793 +0200 +++ insighttoolkit-3.20.1/Code/Algorithms/itkCurvesLevelSetFunction.h 2012-05-14

Bug#672208: python-dolfin: Extension module cpp not found/built

Hi ST, Thanks for the report. On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:22 AM, LUK ShunTim shuntim@polyu.edu.hk wrote: It seems that in the current (1.0.0-4+b2) version of python-dolfin, the extension module cpp is somehow not built. Correct. The build log [1] tells us why: CMake Warning at

Bug#529807: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#529807: libtrilinos: Missing library links

Hi Adam, Trilinos 10.8.5 has been packaged in svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-science/packages/trilinos/trunk Please check if this bug is still present there. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#654313: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal Hello, This is my annual ping. Thanks for your attention, Johannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#651997: python-dolfin: unknown symbol: wrapper_dgesv_

[Adding Kumar (maintainer of Armadillo) in Cc] On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Julien Cristau julien.cris...@logilab.fr wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:46:46 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner inf...@tiker.net wrote: This being as it is, could

Bug#651997: python-dolfin: unknown symbol: wrapper_dgesv_

Hi Andreas, Thank you for your report, but I couldn't reproduce your bug. On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Andreas Kloeckner inf...@tiker.net wrote: When I run any one of the simple fenics demos, I get this error message: ImportError: /usr/lib/libdolfin.so.1.0: undefined symbol:

Bug#651997: python-dolfin: unknown symbol: wrapper_dgesv_

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Andreas Kloeckner inf...@tiker.net wrote: Did, and it helped. Thanks very much! Good! This being as it is, could you upload a new package with tightened dependencies? The dependency on libarmadillo2 is added automatically by ${shlibs:Depends}. I guess I

Bug#651997: python-dolfin: unknown symbol: wrapper_dgesv_

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Andreas Kloeckner inf...@tiker.net wrote: Hmm, I feel like automatic shared library dependencies should have been able to catch this, i.e. someone is supposed to have done something with the soname at some point--I'm just not sure what... :) Yes, I agree. It is

Bug#651502: ImportError: No module named Scientific_numerics_package_id

Package: python-scientific Version: 2.8-3 When importing Scientific.Functions.Derivatives I get the following error: $ python -c import Scientific.Functions.Derivatives Traceback (most recent call last): File string, line 1, in module File

Bug#642712: dolfin: FTBFS: g++: error: =format-security: No such file or directory

Mònica, Thanks for the report. This issue has been fixed upstream: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dolfin-core/dolfin/main/revision/6306 Upstream plans to do a new release soon so I will hold on a few more days before I patch and upload. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#643600: libsyfi1.0: Please update the description

Hi Sylvestre, Thanks for your suggestion. This is fixed in SVN now. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#641304: ITP: ptex2tex -- easy generation of (possibly complex) LaTeX environments

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: ptex2tex Version: 0.4 Upstream authors: Hans Petter Langtangen and Ilmar Wilbers URL: http://ptex2tex.googlecode.com/ License: BSD-3-clause Description: easy generation of (possibly complex) LaTeX

Bug#636869: vmtk: FTBFS on all plateforms: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libpng.so'

Hi! This is no longer a problem with the latest CMake and VTK packages in Debian. What is the correct way to close this bug? Thanks, Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#628243: syfi: FTBFS: syfi/swig/SyFi_wrap.cc:3109:50: error: 'const class GiNaC::basic' has no member named 'tinfo'

Hi Luca, On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote: I uploaded swig2.0 2.0.4-2.1 which provides the fix in order to let syfi to build again. Could you please look whether it's OK now? Yes, the problem with swig2.0 is resolved with the 2.0.4-2.1 upload. Thank

Bug#631589: python-dolfin: python -c import dolfin fails with MPI error

Hi Luk, thanks for the report and sorry for the late reply. On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:57 AM, LUK ShunTim shuntim@polyu.edu.hk wrote: $ python -c import dolfin *** The MPI_comm_size() function was called before MPI_INIT was invoked. *** This is disallowed by the MPI standard. *** Your MPI

Bug#631589: python-dolfin: python -c import dolfin fails with MPI error

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:00 PM, LUK ShunTim shuntim@polyu.edu.hk wrote: Yes, it does. Good. I will add import PyTrilinos at the top of dolfin/__init__.py to make sure that it will be imported before dolfin. Now an OT bug. :-) I added the import PyTrilinos to demo_poisson.py and got a

Bug#636869: vmtk: FTBFS on all plateforms: No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libpng.so'

Hi Sylvestre, Thanks for your report. On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org wrote: Your patckage FTNFS on all plateforms: :) [snip] make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libpng.so', needed by `bin/libvtkvmtkComputationalGeometry.so.0.9.0'.  Stop.

Bug#628243: syfi: FTBFS: syfi/swig/SyFi_wrap.cc:3109:50: error: 'const class GiNaC::basic' has no member named 'tinfo'

Hi, Thanks for the report and sorry for the late reply. This bug has been fixed upstream some time ago [1] and I was going to patch and reupload. However, there is a problem building syfi with swig 2.0.4 [2] which is currently unresolved. The bug could very well be in swig and not in syfi. [1]

Bug#629564: fenics: not installable in sid

Hi Ralf, Thanks for your report. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Ralf Treinen trei...@free.fr wrote: fenics is not installable in sid on any architecture. On amd64 (I didn't check the other architectures) this is the case since May 19. Explanation: fenics (= 11.5-1) depends on syfi-doc (=

Bug#628915: ITP: doconce -- document once, include anywhere

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: doconce Version: 0.5 Upstream authors: Hans Petter Langtangen h...@simula.no URL: http://doconce.googlecode.com/ License: BSD-3-clause Description: document once, include anywhere Doconce is two things:

Bug#627297: ffc: remove debug output

Package: python-ffc Version: 0.9.10-1 The debug output produced by the latest FFC package is annoying. Please apply this patch from upstream development repository: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ffc-core/ffc/main/diff/1637 Thanks, Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#627172: dolfin: FTBFS on lam architectures

Package: src:dolfin Version: 0.9.10-2 DOLFIN is FTBFS on lam architectures: armel, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc cd /build/buildd-dolfin_0.9.10-2-armel-IdTpL5/dolfin-0.9.10/obj-arm-linux-gnueabi/dolfin /usr/bin/g++ -Ddolfin_EXPORTS -DBOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG -DHAS_UMFPACK -DHAS_CHOLMOD -DHAS_ZLIB

Bug#621037: scotch: missing inter-library links

Hi Adam, On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Just put a fix in alioth, let me know if it gives you trouble.  I plan to upload within 4-5 hours. Sorry, I tried your fix but it gives me trouble because libptscotch is linked against libscotch. This is the

Bug#621037: scotch: missing inter-library links

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Thanks very much Johannes. On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 16:11 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Hi Johannes, On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:37 +0200

Bug#621037: scotch: missing inter-library links

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Hi Johannes, On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 14:37 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: Hi Adam, On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Just put a fix in alioth, let me know if it gives you

Bug#621070: python-vmtk: searches libvtkCommonPythonD.so.5.4

Hi Gerber, Thanks for your report. The problem is that vmtk is not currently being auto-built on the buildd's because it's a non-free package. AFAIK, one can request for non-free packages to be auto-built and I will look into that tomorrow. In the meantime, I will prepare a new package and

Bug#620701: ITP: preprocess -- a portable multi-language file preprocessor

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org Package name: preprocess Version: 1.1.0 Upstream authors: Trent Mick tre...@gmail.com URL: http://preprocess.googlecode.com/ License: MIT Description: a portable

Bug#612621: Bugs #619935 #612621 : most debian/* files rewritten + patches

Hi Adam and Pierre, On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: * I noticed that you removed -I/usr/include/lam from the CCS and CCD commands. I don't remember the exact reasons, but those were required for the LAM architectures.

Bug#619935: src:scotch: FTBFS on several arches due to lex issue

Hi Pierre, On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Pierre Saramito pierre.saram...@imag.fr wrote: Hi Adam and Johannes, From Adam: parser_ll.l:123:31: error: 'yylval' undeclared (first use in this function) From Johannes: I couldn't (for some unknown reason) reproduce this in a pbuilder I

Bug#612621: ERROR: SCOTCH_dgraphInit: linking with both libScotch and libPTScotch is not allowed

Hi Pierre, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Pierre Saramito pierre.saram...@imag.fr wrote: Hello ! Despite the recent patch applied in version 5.1.11.dfgs-4, the bug seems to be still present on sid/amd64 : Yes, I also noticed that. I have reopened the bug now.    uname -a        Linux

Bug#612621: ERROR: SCOTCH_dgraphInit: linking with both libScotch and libPTScotch is not allowed

On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:07 PM, trophime christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:56 +0200, Pierre Saramito wrote:     mpic++ -o ptscotch_test ptscotch_test.cpp -DSCOTCH_PTSCOTCH -I/usr/include/scotch -lptscotch -lptscotcherr     ./ptscotch_test         (0): ERROR:

Bug#619935: src:scotch: FTBFS on several arches due to lex issue

Hi Adam, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Package: src:scotch Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-4 Severity: serious Scotch FTBFS on i386, ia64, kfreebsd-i386, mips[el] and sparc: (flex parser_ll.l                    \                                        

Bug#612621: ERROR: SCOTCH_dgraphInit: linking with both libScotch and libPTScotch is not allowed

Hi Adam, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Hi Johannes, On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 13:44 +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Pierre Saramito pierre.saram...@imag.fr wrote: Hello ! Despite the recent patch applied

Bug#612606: SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH not defined in ptscotch.h

This bug was introduced in 5.1.11.dfsg-3 by the patch no-extra-clean.patch. I don't see what benefits this patch adds (other than a somewhat reduced build time) so please remove it in the next upload. Thanks, Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#612621: ERROR: SCOTCH_dgraphInit: linking with both libScotch and libPTScotch is not allowed

Hi! The attached patch fixes this issue. Please apply and reupload such that we can get PT-SCOTCH working again in Debian. Thank you very much! Best regards, Johannes diff --git a/debian/Makefile.inc b/debian/Makefile.inc index 45dfab8..dbdc97c 100644 --- a/debian/Makefile.inc +++

Bug#612606: SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH not defined in ptscotch.h

Package: libptscotch-dev Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-3 Hi, The file /usr/include/scotch/ptscotch.h does not define SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH as it should. When I build SCOTCH and PT-SCOTCH manually I see the following in ptscotch.h: #ifndef SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH #define SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH #endif /* SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH

Bug#612602: dolfin: FTBFS: error: 'SCOTCH_Dgraph' was not declared in this scope

Jakub, Thanks for your report. This error is because ptscotch.h in libptscotch-dev does not define SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH as it did before. I have filed a bug report for that package (#612606). Thanks again, Johannes On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: Source: dolfin

Bug#612606: SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH not defined in ptscotch.h

On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:28 PM, trophime christophe.troph...@lncmi.cnrs.fr wrote: On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:56 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: Package: libptscotch-dev Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-3 Hi, The file /usr/include/scotch/ptscotch.h does not define SCOTCH_PTSCOTCH as it should. When I build

Bug#612621: ERROR: SCOTCH_dgraphInit: linking with both libScotch and libPTScotch is not allowed

Package: libptscotch-dev Version: 5.1.11.dfsg-3 Hi, Compiling and running a simple program (see below) for testing PT-SCOTCH results in the following error: $ mpic++ -o ptscotch_test ptscotch_test.cpp -DSCOTCH_PTSCOTCH -I/usr/include/scotch -lptscotch -lptscotcherr $ ./ptscotch_test

Bug#608472: Annual ping for Johannes Ring

Package: debian-maintainers Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, This is my annual ping. Thanks for your attention, Johannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNHZf5AAoJEIsTRN6fgH8UrKkQAK+MJYHmlFZJG1uTSPTjetuf

Bug#606857: vmtk: Depends on hard-coded Python version

Hi Stefano, thanks for your report. On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Stefano Rivera stef...@rivera.za.net wrote: Package: vmtk Version: 0.9.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Is there any reason that this package states XS-Python-Version: 2.6 ? Well, I thought that it was only necessary to

Bug#603477: fenics: homepage link is outdated

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Francesco Poli (t1000) f...@firenze.linux.it wrote: Package: fenics Version: 10.09-1 Severity: minor Hi FEniCS Debian package maintainers! Thanks for packaging these libraries and applications! I've just noticed that the homepage URL is outdated, since the

Bug#584551: libpetsc3.1 empty on non-amd64 architectures

Package: libpetsc3.1 Version: 3.1.dfsg-3 The package libpetsc3.1 is empty on all architectures except on amd64. $ dpkg -L libpetsc3.1 /. /usr /usr/lib /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/libpetsc3.1 /usr/share/doc/libpetsc3.1/changelog.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/libpetsc3.1/copyright --

Bug#584222: ITP: vmtk -- the Vascular Modeling Toolkit

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Package name: vmtk Version: 0.9 Upstream authors: Luca Antiga, David Steinman URL: http://www.vmtk.org License: BSD, Modified MIT Description: the Vascular Modeling

Bug#581897: python-ffc: ffc -l dolfin gives an error

Hi Francis, Thanks for your report. You need to install python-dolfin when using the '-l dolfin' option. I will add python-dolfin to Suggests in python-ffc. Johannes On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Francis Russell francis+d...@unchartedbackwaters.co.uk wrote: Package: python-ffc Version:

Bug#576865: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#576865: python-pytrilinos: PyTrilinos modules not linking to correct libraries.

Hi, This bug does not affect this package in Debian since version 9.0.3.dfsg-1 is no longer in Debian. Johannes On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Nuno Sucena Almeida slug.bugrep...@aeminium.org wrote: Package: python-pytrilinos Version: 9.0.3.dfsg-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders

Bug#571780: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#571780: python-pydolfin0: Cannot import dolfin from python.

Hi, Thanks for your report. On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Guillaume Yziquel guillaume.yziq...@citycable.ch wrote: Package: python-pydolfin0 Version: 0.9.7-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Recently upgraded to the newest packaging of dolfin. I cannot import

Bug#559287: Please add Johannes Ring as DM

Package: debian-maintainers Version: 1.64 Severity: normal Please accept my Debian Maintainer application. The jetring changeset is attached. Regards, Johannes add-8B1344DE9F807F14 Description: Binary data

Bug#543097: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#543097: Bug#543097: dolfin: FTBFS: Please install SWIG version 1.3.36 or recompile UFC with present SWIG.

Hi, UFC and DOLFIN are now built with the same version of SWIG and the bug reported here is no longer an issue. Could you please close this bug? Thanks, Johannes On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Johannes Ring joha...@simula.no wrote: Hi Lucas, Thanks for the report. The problem is that both

Bug#541974: [libsuitesparse-metis-3.1.0] Dynamic libraries missing in package

This can be resolved by renaming debian/libsuitesparse-metis.install to debian/libsuitesparse-metis-3.1.0.install. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#543097: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#543097: dolfin: FTBFS: Please install SWIG version 1.3.36 or recompile UFC with present SWIG.

Hi Lucas, Thanks for the report. The problem is that both UFC and DOLFIN has to be built with the same version of SWIG. In this case, UFC has been built with SWIG 1.3.36 while DOLFIN was rebuilt with SWIG 1.3.39. The proper fix in this situation would be to rebuild UFC with the current SWIG and

Bug#530625: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#530625: libslepc3.0.0-dev: Paths broken so petsc is unable to find slepc

I am unable to reproduce this error. Could you please provide a simple test case where you get this error? Also please read the README.Debian file for instructions on how to build programs against SLEPc. Johannes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Bug#528122: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#528122: libslepc3.0.0: missing link to parpack

Hi Adam, On Sun, May 10, 2009 17:47, Adam C Powell IV wrote: The slepc shared lib needs to be linked with -lparpack . Without that link, building against it results in: /usr/lib/slepc/linux-gnu-c-opt/lib/libslepc.so: undefined reference to `pdneupd_'

Bug#538853: ITP: scitools -- Python library for scientific computing

Hi Guillaume, On Tue, July 28, 2009 16:47, Guillaume Pellerin wrote: Johannes Ring wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: scitools You need to name your package as describe by the Debian Python Policy : http://www.debian.org/doc

Bug#538854: ITP: swiginac -- Python interface to GiNaC

On Tue, July 28, 2009 16:48, Guillaume Pellerin wrote: Johannes Ring wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: swiginac Version: 1.5.1 Upstream authors: Ola Skavhaug and Ondrej Certik URL: http://swiginac.berlios.de/ License: GPL

Bug#538853: ITP: scitools -- Python library for scientific computing

Hi Sandro, On Wed, July 29, 2009 09:12, Sandro Tosi wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 08:25, Johannes Ringjoha...@simula.no wrote: Hi Guillaume, On Tue, July 28, 2009 16:47, Guillaume Pellerin wrote: Johannes Ring wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de

Bug#538853: ITP: scitools -- Python library for scientific computing

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: scitools Version: 0.6 Upstream authors: Hans Petter Langtangen, Johannes H. Ring, Ilmar Wilbers, and Rolv E. Bredesen URL: http://scitools.googlecode.com/ License: BSD Description: Python library for

Bug#538854: ITP: swiginac -- Python interface to GiNaC

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: swiginac Version: 1.5.1 Upstream authors: Ola Skavhaug and Ondrej Certik URL: http://swiginac.berlios.de/ License: GPL Description: Python interface to GiNaC Swiginac is a Python interface to GiNaC, built

Bug#528633: ITP: syfi -- finite element engine based on symbolic mathematics

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org Package name: syfi Version: 0.6.0 Upstream authors: Martin Sandve Alnæs and Kent-Andre Mardal URL: http://www.fenics.org/wiki/SyFi License: GPL Description: finite element engine based on symbolic mathematics The finite

  1   2   >