Hi,
I think that what valgrind does is a plain (_minor_) mistake
that makes libexec hard to audit and should not be used
as a good practice reference.
So I filed #1043527 against Valgrind.
I think this will/would require some change in V's upstream;
I'll have a look again at it later.
> *
also seen in gcc-13, dh_fixperms "fixes" the permissions for liblto_plugin.so,
and then lintian complains about that.
Simon McVittie:
> Package: debhelper
> Version: 13.4
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/bin/dh_fixperms
>
> In debhelper 13.4, usr/libexec was added to the array @executable_files_dirs
> of directories in which all files are to be made executable.
>
> I'm not sure that this is necessarily
Package: debhelper
Version: 13.4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/dh_fixperms
In debhelper 13.4, usr/libexec was added to the array @executable_files_dirs
of directories in which all files are to be made executable.
I'm not sure that this is necessarily appropriate: several packages install
files
4 matches
Mail list logo
