Bug#1007205: Please consider (re)including my start-stop-daemon.runit script

On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 01:05:34AM +0100, Lorenzo wrote: > [1] I'll deal with this in a separate bug, but just to give you an idea: > why divert start-stop-daemon is better than diverting invoke-rc.d > and update-rc.d? Or, another example, why not abuse the ancient > policy-rc.d hack? I think

Bug#1007205: Please consider (re)including my start-stop-daemon.runit script

Sorry, naturally I found a typo in the script just after sending it: Index: start-stop-daemon.runit === --- start-stop-daemon.runit (revision 1347) +++ start-stop-daemon.runit (working copy) @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ read -A cmdline

Bug#1007205: Please consider (re)including my start-stop-daemon.runit script

Package: runit Version: 2.1.2-45 Severity: wishlist Hi, Back in 2012 I sent Gerrit a start-stop-daemon.runit script (see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678985) that could be used as a drop-in replacement for the real start-stop-daemon. It's a fairly feature complete wrapper