Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:44:27PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 22 August 2022 at 10:20, Bo YU wrote:
| Hi,
| On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:41:39AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| >| Oh, yes, It is applied to debian/rules and I forget to mention it.:)
| >
| >No worries :) Do you
On 22 August 2022 at 10:20, Bo YU wrote:
| Hi,
| On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:41:39AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| >| Oh, yes, It is applied to debian/rules and I forget to mention it.:)
| >
| >No worries :) Do you have easy-enough access to the platform? Could you
| >test this diff
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:41:39AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| Oh, yes, It is applied to debian/rules and I forget to mention it.:)
No worries :) Do you have easy-enough access to the platform? Could you
test this diff (and then also run 'autoconf' to regenerate 'configure'; else
On 21 August 2022 at 22:27, Bo YU wrote:
| Hi,
| On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >| >
| >| >So what is the proper architecture name for riscv64, and please remind me
| >| >what the best way to determine it is (uname -m ? Or uname -p ? Or uname
-i ?)
| >|
|
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| >So what is the proper architecture name for riscv64, and please remind me
| >what the best way to determine it is (uname -m ? Or uname -p ? Or uname -i
?)
|
| There is only usefully for $(uname -m) for riscv64
On 21 August 2022 at 10:57, Bo YU wrote:
| Hi,
| On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| >On 19 August 2022 at 07:21, Bo YU wrote:
| >| Source: tiledb-r
| >| Version: 0.15.0-1
| >| Severity: normal
| >| Tags: ftbfs, patch
| >| User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 19 August 2022 at 07:21, Bo YU wrote:
| Source: tiledb-r
| Version: 0.15.0-1
| Severity: normal
| Tags: ftbfs, patch
| User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: riscv64
| X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
On 19 August 2022 at 07:21, Bo YU wrote:
| Source: tiledb-r
| Version: 0.15.0-1
| Severity: normal
| Tags: ftbfs, patch
| User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
| Usertags: riscv64
| X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
|
| Dear Maintainer,
|
| The tiledb-r has a ftbfs on riscv64 due to
Source: tiledb-r
Version: 0.15.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: ftbfs, patch
User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: riscv64
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
The tiledb-r has a ftbfs on riscv64 due to missing -latomic explicitly
after 0.13.0-1:
9 matches
Mail list logo