Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-21 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:44:27PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 22 August 2022 at 10:20, Bo YU wrote: | Hi, | On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:41:39AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | >| Oh, yes, It is applied to debian/rules and I forget to mention it.:) | > | >No worries :) Do you

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-21 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 22 August 2022 at 10:20, Bo YU wrote: | Hi, | On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:41:39AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | >| Oh, yes, It is applied to debian/rules and I forget to mention it.:) | > | >No worries :) Do you have easy-enough access to the platform? Could you | >test this diff

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-21 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:41:39AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | Oh, yes, It is applied to debian/rules and I forget to mention it.:) No worries :) Do you have easy-enough access to the platform? Could you test this diff (and then also run 'autoconf' to regenerate 'configure'; else

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-21 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 21 August 2022 at 22:27, Bo YU wrote: | Hi, | On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | >| > | >| >So what is the proper architecture name for riscv64, and please remind me | >| >what the best way to determine it is (uname -m ? Or uname -p ? Or uname -i ?) | >| |

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-21 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | >So what is the proper architecture name for riscv64, and please remind me | >what the best way to determine it is (uname -m ? Or uname -p ? Or uname -i ?) | | There is only usefully for $(uname -m) for riscv64

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-21 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 21 August 2022 at 10:57, Bo YU wrote: | Hi, | On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | >On 19 August 2022 at 07:21, Bo YU wrote: | >| Source: tiledb-r | >| Version: 0.15.0-1 | >| Severity: normal | >| Tags: ftbfs, patch | >| User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-20 Thread Bo YU
Hi, On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: On 19 August 2022 at 07:21, Bo YU wrote: | Source: tiledb-r | Version: 0.15.0-1 | Severity: normal | Tags: ftbfs, patch | User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: riscv64 | X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-20 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 19 August 2022 at 07:21, Bo YU wrote: | Source: tiledb-r | Version: 0.15.0-1 | Severity: normal | Tags: ftbfs, patch | User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org | Usertags: riscv64 | X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org | | Dear Maintainer, | | The tiledb-r has a ftbfs on riscv64 due to

Bug#1017684: tiledb-r: ftbfs on riscv64("undefined symbol: __atomic_compare_exchange_1")

2022-08-18 Thread Bo YU
Source: tiledb-r Version: 0.15.0-1 Severity: normal Tags: ftbfs, patch User: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Usertags: riscv64 X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ri...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainer, The tiledb-r has a ftbfs on riscv64 due to missing -latomic explicitly after 0.13.0-1: