Hi Paul,
Am Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:23:12PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > I'm constantly checking the tracker page of r-bioc-biocgenerics[1] to
> > follow the transition status. I realised that debci picks old, not yet
> > fixed package versions like:
> >
> >
Hi Andreas,
On 28-11-2022 13:22, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm constantly checking the tracker page of r-bioc-biocgenerics[1] to
follow the transition status. I realised that debci picks old, not yet
fixed package versions like:
r-bioc-biocfilecache/2.4.0+dfsg-1 while 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is in
Hi,
I'm constantly checking the tracker page of r-bioc-biocgenerics[1] to
follow the transition status. I realised that debci picks old, not yet
fixed package versions like:
r-bioc-biocfilecache/2.4.0+dfsg-1 while 2.4.0+dfsg-2 is in unstable
r-bioc-biocsingular/1.12.0+ds-1 while
Am Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:46:31AM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > >r-bioc-bitseq - should be removed from testing immediately bug just
> > > filed)
Bug #1024661
> > >r-bioc-multiassayexperiment
#1024748
> > >r-bioc-demixt (bug #1024597 was just filed)
> > >r-bioc-scater
On 2022-11-24 07:52:37 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other
> > transitions. I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages
> > r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss,
Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other
> transitions. I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages
> r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss, r-bioc-biocbaseutils and r-cran-ggrastr.
> The following packages are
Control: block -1 by 1024582
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:16:14PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > However, to make us understand your suggestion better: Is there any
> > drawback on your side if the transition of a closed set of packages if
> > the transition is delayed by new processing?
>
Hi Nilesh,
Le lun. 21 nov. 2022 à 18:29, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
>
> Lastly I also want to higlight that: while bioc transition is in theory a
> transition (I agree)
> but to my understanding, there is no _real_ API change. It is just the tool
> taking the
> API field from DESCRIPTION file into
On 2022-11-21 16:39:26 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > > Control: block -1 by
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Adrian and others,
>
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:33:52PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > > packages from the transition. I actually injected two
Hi Adrian and others,
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 06:33:52PM +0200 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
> > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
> > higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > > Control: block -1 by 1024567
On 11/21/22 17:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
higher levels manually to be able to build
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 04:49:43PM +0100 schrieb Sebastiaan Couwenberg:
> > This is really hard to do, thought. The new packages are needing those
> > packages from the transition. I actually injected two packages from
> > higher levels manually to be able to build one of the new packages. So
>
On 11/21/22 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
As this
On 21 November 2022 at 16:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
| Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
| > On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
| > > Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
| > > I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP
Hi Sebastian,
Am Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 03:05:26PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 1024563
> > Control: block -1 by 1024565
> > Control: block -1 by 1024567
> >
> > Some of the BioConductor packages need new
On 2022-11-21 15:02:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 1024563
> Control: block -1 by 1024565
> Control: block -1 by 1024567
>
> Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
> I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
> blocker.
As this is happening
Control: block -1 by 1024563
Control: block -1 by 1024565
Control: block -1 by 1024567
Some of the BioConductor packages need new dependencies.
I have pushed these to new queue and set the ITP bugs as
blocker.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
19 matches
Mail list logo
