Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions.

2023-08-23 Thread Andre Naujoks
For anyone stumbling upon this. A simple workaround is to '#include ' before '#include ' utility is the header that declares std::exchange this does not look like a C++20 problem but a simple missing include in the boost headers. Maybe this is actually worth a small patch in debian, since its

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-04-19 Thread Olaf van der Spek
Op wo 19 apr 2023 om 06:04 schreef Anton Gladky : > > Hi, > > boost-defaults_1.81.0 is in experimental. But boost1.81 > is also available in the Debian Bookworm [1]. > > [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/boost1.81 Hi Anton, Ah, it's even available in bpo, thanks a lot! -- Olaf

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-04-18 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, boost-defaults_1.81.0 is in experimental. But boost1.81 is also available in the Debian Bookworm [1]. [1] https://packages.debian.org/source/testing/boost1.81 Regards Anton Am Di., 18. Apr. 2023 um 09:27 Uhr schrieb Olaf van der Spek : > ... > 1.81 is in experimental, not in bookworm,

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-04-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 bookworm-ignore Hi Anton, On 08-04-2023 10:07, Anton Gladky wrote: I think there is a risk that something needs to be fixed, as there are no RC bugs against libboost-dev. You mean, no *other* RC bugs. It seems like boost1.81 is not affected by this problem. So, if somebody

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-04-08 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi, I think there is a risk that something needs to be fixed, as there are no RC bugs against libboost-dev. It seems like boost1.81 is not affected by this problem. So, if somebody needs a newer library, they can take libboost1.81-dev, which is available for bookworm. I would not fix anything in

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-04-06 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi Paul, Yes i will do it. Paul Gevers schrieb am Do., 6. Apr. 2023, 14:36: > Hi, > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:58:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Jan 2023 00:26:39 +0100 Andreas Beckmann > wrote: > > > This happens with g++-12 but not with g++-11. > > > It is fixed in the boost

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-04-06 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:58:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: On Sun, 08 Jan 2023 00:26:39 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: > This happens with g++-12 but not with g++-11. > It is fixed in the boost version in experimental. Any chance for a *targeted* fix in bookworm? Ping. (No is also an

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-03-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On Sun, 08 Jan 2023 00:26:39 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote: This happens with g++-12 but not with g++-11. It is fixed in the boost version in experimental. Any chance for a *targeted* fix in bookworm? Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-01-07 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #1028104 Control: tag -1 sid bookworm experimental Control: close -1 1.81.0.1~exp1 This happens with g++-12 but not with g++-11. It is fixed in the boost version in experimental. Andreas

Bug#1028104: libboost-dev: Boost with C++20 uses unavailable std functions

2023-01-06 Thread R4SAS
Package: libboost-dev Version: 1.74.0.3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: r4...@i2pd.xyz When I'm trying to build upstream i2pd, which uses Boost ASIO using g++ with C++20 enabled