Regarding the following, written by "Marc Haber" on 2023-08-15 at 14:11 Uhr
+0200:
I won't have time to recompile any time soon, and in part because I won't be
close to those systems in the foreseeable future. They are not important
Would you be willing to try a .deb delivered by me?
Yes of
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:29:33PM +1200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I won't have time to recompile any time soon, and in part because I won't be
> close to those systems in the foreseeable future. They are not important
Would you be willing to try a .deb delivered by me?
> It's probably time I
Regarding the following, written by "Marc Haber" on 2023-08-14 at 14:03 Uhr
+0200:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:36:54AM +1200, martin f krafft wrote:
Regarding the following, written by "Marc Haber" on 2023-08-08 at 14:57 Uhr +0200:
> Is this probably a duplicate of #1004894?
>
> If so, this
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 08:36:54AM +1200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Regarding the following, written by "Marc Haber" on 2023-08-08 at 14:57 Uhr
> +0200:
> > Is this probably a duplicate of #1004894?
> >
> > If so, this probably boils down on a GCC bug, see
> >
Regarding the following, written by "Marc Haber" on 2023-08-08 at 14:57 Uhr
+0200:
Is this probably a duplicate of #1004894?
If so, this probably boils down on a GCC bug, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104713
Thanks and sorry for the duplicate. Not sure it is. I did a
On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 12:09:50AM +1200, martin f krafft wrote:
> Anywhow, I cannot use sudo on either anymore, because if I do:
>
> ```
> emily:~% sudo -l
> #(132 pts/0) 08 14:05:20.790
> [1]29199 illegal hardware instruction sudo -l
Is this probably a duplicate of #1004894?
If so, this
Package: sudo
Version: 1.9.13p3-3
Severity: normal
I have two systems running the AMD Geode processor¹ and consequently
the non-PAE kernel:
```
Linux gig 5.10.0-23-686 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.179-2 (2023-07-14) i586 GNU/Linux
```
and
```
Linux emily 6.1.0-10-686 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian
7 matches
Mail list logo
