Hi
On 18-12-2023 10:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-megadepth
d/tests/control has
Architecture: !s390x
Why is it considered failing on s390x anyway?
The log has this at the end:
127s run-unit-testSKIP Test declares architecture as not
supported:
Hi Graham,
Am Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 02:11:47PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> There are some packages that have still not migrated since the
> previous r-api-bioc-3.17 transition in July 2023.
>
> Links to their tracker pages, which should tell you what is needed, follow:
>
>
Hi Andreas
There are some packages that have still not migrated since the
previous r-api-bioc-3.17 transition in July 2023.
Links to their tracker pages, which should tell you what is needed, follow:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-cner
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/r-bioc-dada2
Hi Paul,
Am Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:56:14PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> > > Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by tille, a new
> > > source-only upload is needed to allow migration
> >
> > I do not understand this line. What exact package needs a source-only
> > upload?
>
> You
Hi,
On 13-12-2023 17:08, Andreas Tille wrote:
Not built on buildd: arch all binaries uploaded by tille, a new
source-only upload is needed to allow migration
I do not understand this line. What exact package needs a source-only
upload?
You uploaded binaries together with the source.
Hi Graham,
Am Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 12:13:54PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> I've added removal hints for r-bioc-dss and r-bioc-demixt. Please
> file an RC bug for r-bioc-dss to prevent it from migrating straight
> back (r-bioc-demixt already has #1058278).
Done for r-bioc-dss.
> One problem I
Hi Andreas
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 09:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> as you might have noticed the upstream source for r-bioc-dss and
> r-bioc-demixt are missing and upstream did not answered two mails about
> this. Since the transition looks clean for me so far[1] after I fixed
> two autopkgtest
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 11:43:56AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>...
> I'm worried
> about issues in r-rcan-rmarkdown[3] and r-cran-flextable[4] which are
> caused by pandoc errors on ppc64el architecture *only*. That's really
> strange and might mean that pandoc on this architecture is broken?
Hi,
as you might have noticed the upstream source for r-bioc-dss and
r-bioc-demixt are missing and upstream did not answered two mails about
this. Since the transition looks clean for me so far[1] after I fixed
two autopkgtest issues yesterday I (naively) think we could remove
r-bioc-dss and
9 matches
Mail list logo
