On 03/01/2024 20.13, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
now that I know that BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0] and DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[0] break it,
I found other packages via codesearch.d.n that use that syntax and I was
wondering whether they break as well.
I did the same test after seeing your bug
Control: severity -1 serious
Hi,
now that I know that BUILT_MODULE_NAME[0] and DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[0] break it,
I found other packages via codesearch.d.n that use that syntax and I was
wondering whether they break as well.
The following packages fail to install in unstable right now:
Hi Andreas,
thank you so much for your fast reply!
Quoting Andreas Beckmann (2024-01-03 02:53:20)
> Which dkms package version was used to build the failing package? Does█
> it make a difference (or even ftbfs) if it gets rebuilt with 3.0.12-3?
According to the Installed-Build-Depends field of
Can you install dkms-test-dkms and/or dkms-noautoinstall-test-dkms ?
Andreas
Which dkms package version was used to build the failing package? Does
it make a difference (or even ftbfs) if it gets rebuilt with 3.0.12-3?
Andreas
Package: dkms
Version: 3.0.12-3
Severity: normal
Hi,
the problem appears since 3.0.12-3 and not with 3.0.12-1. The package that
fails since this change in the dkms package is not part of Debian but its
packaging source can be found here:
6 matches
Mail list logo
