Bug#1061516: Please add a sshd@.service template for socket activation

2024-03-05 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 04, Colin Watson wrote: > Does this patch look workable? It mostly just resurrects the template > unit we used to ship, under a different name. Looks good to me! -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1061516: Please add a sshd@.service template for socket activation

2024-03-04 Thread Colin Watson
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 01:17:32AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jan 25, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > systemd currently expects the template to be named sshd@.service > > (because that is what Fedora uses), but if you prefer to keep the > > ssh@.service name then I suppose that we could patch

Bug#1061516: Please add a sshd@.service template for socket activation

2024-02-27 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 25, Marco d'Itri wrote: > systemd currently expects the template to be named sshd@.service > (because that is what Fedora uses), but if you prefer to keep the > ssh@.service name then I suppose that we could patch systemd as well. Is there any way I can help with this? The major issue

Bug#1061516: Please add a sshd@.service template for socket activation

2024-01-25 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: openssh-server Version: 1:9.6p1-3 Severity: normal Control: affects -1 systemd The next release of systemd will contain support to connect to the system with SSH over an AF_VSOCK socket: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/30777/files The server side of this uses what Ubuntu