(this reply has nothing to do with the bugreport in question)
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 10:00:56PM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> >> Julian provided an explanation in #74,
> 20240312113620.ga1944...@debian.org
>
> I can't access this link..
It isn't a link, it is a message id of an email.
Hi all,
>> No. Without a package as an argument it won't.
Thanks! You're right. Let me write it down here again:
- "apt upgrade" (no argument) will never remove a package, only upgrade
or install
- "apt upgrade pkg_name" will remove, upgrade or install the required
package to
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:44:02AM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> > If "apt upgrade" is saying that it removes packages, that is a bug, yes.
>
> @david: it is not a bug, apparently.
>
> To put everything in a nutshell:
>
>- "apt upgrade" can remove packages
No. Without a
Hi all,
>> (modifiers btw is not a good word. I guess it was never documented so
far partly as this is a rather advanced feature and mainly because naming
things is hard)
yes, we brought it up in our conversation but I agree it was not directly
related to the subject as it was an apt advanced
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:44:02AM +0100, Miguel Angel Rojas wrote:
> > If "apt upgrade" is saying that it removes packages, that is a bug, yes.
>
> @david: it is not a bug, apparently.
Yeah, but for different reasons. I know that exists & even use it
frequently… but its two different things for
Hi there,
> If "apt upgrade" is saying that it removes packages, that is a bug, yes.
@david: it is not a bug, apparently.
To put everything in a nutshell:
- "apt upgrade" can remove packages
- "apt upgrade" accepts specific packages to be upgraded
Therefore, this behaviour is expected
6 matches
Mail list logo
