Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-28 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On 5/9/07, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required changes to configure.in to detect xulrunner-plugin and remove MOZILLA_LIBS from the LDFLAGS. I had done exactly

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 09:40:26PM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/9/07, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required changes to

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-28 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On 5/28/07, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch looks good to me, though I'd recommend putting a versioned build dependency on libxul-dev. Ah, yes. I should have done that in the first place. BTW, do you think it's a good idea to retain build-dep on firefox-dev? Was it intended for

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-28 Thread David Schleef
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:22:38AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: On 5/28/07, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch looks good to me, though I'd recommend putting a versioned build dependency on libxul-dev. Ah, yes. I should have done that in the first place. I'll apply

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-28 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On 5/29/07, David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:22:38AM +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan wrote: On 5/28/07, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch looks good to me, though I'd recommend putting a versioned build dependency on libxul-dev. Ah, yes. I

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:00:12PM -0700, David Schleef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd had to

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-10 Thread David Schleef
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 08:46:31AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd had to first check in what directory they all look for plugins. It would be a good idea to

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-09 Thread Mike Hommey
It will do nothing good to have a dependency on libnspr4-0d. And the plugin should also depend on epiphany, kazehakase and galeon, but you'd had to first check in what directory they all look for plugins. It would be a good idea to check whether konqueror can use it, too, in which case it would be

Bug#418837: swfdec-mozilla NMU

2007-05-09 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
On 5/9/07, Mike Hommey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As for build dependencies, i would use libxul-dev, make the required changes to configure.in to detect xulrunner-plugin and remove MOZILLA_LIBS from the LDFLAGS. I had done exactly that before getting back to the package's current approach,