Hi Petr,
On Monday 29 September 2008 17:31:36 Petr Rockai wrote:
Hi,
I have verified that the fix in -7 indeed fixes the problem and I have
bumped build-depends of darcs to = -7. That should make everything
However, trying to rebuild in a clean sid results in:
ghc-pkg: cannot find package
Hi,
I have verified that the fix in -7 indeed fixes the problem and I have bumped
build-depends of darcs to = -7. That should make everything
However, trying to rebuild in a clean sid results in:
ghc-pkg: cannot find package regex-base-0.93.1
dpkg: error processing libghc6-regex-base-dev
Hi,
just FYI, a new ghc6 (6.8.2-7) was uploaded an hour ago, which should fix the
problem if darcs is rebuilt with it.
Cheers,
Stefan.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 03:51:46PM +0200, Stefan Potyra wrote:
Just FYI, a new ghc6 (6.8.2-7) was uploaded an hour ago, which
should fix the problem if darcs is rebuilt with it.
Hi, thanks for the heads-up!
Unfortunately I have no direct control over what GHC is used to build
binary packages,
Hi guys,
From the darcs-user list, it seems this might be an issue with how GHC
6.8.2 handles mtimes and symlinks:
http://bugs.darcs.net/issue973
If this is the case, building darcs with GHC 6.8.3 should fix the
issue. Brian / Zooko, should I link this bug (#491799) to the
upstream bug
Hi.
I get this, with cache enabled:
darcs get http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk-hashedformat trunk-hashed-1
8,08s user 0,72s system 79% cpu 11,062 total
I presume quite a bit of that time is due to network delays. I am running 2.0.2
from Debian here. I guess that rules Debian bugs out?
Package: darcs
Version: 2.0.0-5
Severity: minor
This is twb; I'm unilaterally moving this private discussion into the
Debian BTS so I can track it more easily. I'll bounce messages to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list when this message creates it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Dear TWB:
Are you the Debian maintainer for darcs?
My co-worker complained that darcs 2.0.0 pull took more than 60
seconds, and when I did the same thing on my machine it took a mere 5
seconds or so.
I installed darcs-2.0.2, compiled locally, and that one takes a mere
8 seconds or so to
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:34:21PM -0600, zooko wrote:
Are you the Debian maintainer for darcs?
Yup!
Petr Rockai (mornfall) is also involved; he's my sponsor.
My co-worker complained that darcs 2.0.0 pull took more than 60
seconds, and when I did the same thing on my machine it took a mere
Trent:
Thanks much!
Brian is now experiencing the same slowdown with the sid package on a
different Linux machine. I'm Cc:'ing him so that he can read your
suggestions about how to proceed.
By the way, you can access the repo in question at http://
10 matches
Mail list logo
