* Harald Dunkel (harald.dun...@aixigo.de) wrote:
Now that Wheezy is out, wouldn't it be nice to get this off the
table? This bug report is almost 5 years old.
Are there any concerns?
I'd still like to do it. I've just uploaded a new version that splits
out gpgv2 into its own package so this
Now that Wheezy is out, wouldn't it be nice to get this off the
table? This bug report is almost 5 years old.
Are there any concerns?
Regards
Harri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi.
Yes I know that I'm impatient,... ;) .. but anything new here? :-)
Cheers,
Chris.
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi Eric.
Sorry for that ultra long delay.
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 17:35 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
I want to see it get done, and I'd definitely want to get it in for
squeeze, but I've had a harder time finding time for my Debian work
lately due to real work so I don't want to make promises I
* calestyo-webm...@scientia.net (calestyo-webm...@scientia.net) wrote:
Hi Eric.
Would it be possible to do this now, and not wait for lenny to release? Or
perhaps making the necessary modifications just for experimental?
Unfortunately we're in a deep freeze right now, and it's a fairly
Hi Eric.
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 16:54 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
Unfortunately we're in a deep freeze right now, and it's a fairly
non-trivial thing to do even to get it put into experimental. Patches
are certainly welcome though :)
Ok I see,...
I'd really like to help you but I'm stuck with
* Christoph Anton Mitterer (cales...@scientia.net) wrote:
Hi Eric.
On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 16:54 -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
Unfortunately we're in a deep freeze right now, and it's a fairly
non-trivial thing to do even to get it put into experimental. Patches
are certainly welcome though
Hi Eric.
Would it be possible to do this now, and not wait for lenny to release? Or
perhaps making the necessary modifications just for experimental?
The reason is that I'm about to write some OpenPGP decryption scripts for
cryptsetup where I'd like to use the gnupg or gnupg2 and it would make
forcemerge 483724 503921
thanks
* Harald Dunkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.9-3.1
Severity: wishlist
Do you think it would be possible for gnupg2 to provide
gnupg? AFAICS gnupg2 provides more configuration options
and is backward compatible to gnupg. That
Package: gnupg2
Version: 2.0.9-3.1
Severity: wishlist
Do you think it would be possible for gnupg2 to provide
gnupg? AFAICS gnupg2 provides more configuration options
and is backward compatible to gnupg. That should be sufficient
to resolve the dependencies of other packages, e.g. dpkg-dev
and
10 matches
Mail list logo
