Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2020-01-24 Thread Boyuan Yang
Control: tags -1 + help 在 2020-01-24五的 10:22 +0100,Laurent Bigonville写道: > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:16:42 +0800 Trafire Arcanegrin > wrote: > > > Hello, > > 1.3.3-20090920 is here: > > ftp://invisible-island.net/mawk > > > > Please consider update it. :-) > > > > Hello, > > Now that the

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2020-01-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 22:16:42 +0800 Trafire Arcanegrin wrote: > Hello, > 1.3.3-20090920 is here: > ftp://invisible-island.net/mawk > > Please consider update it. :-) > Hello, Now that the package has been salvaged, are there any plans to update mawk to the latest release? I've at least one

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2019-09-18 Thread Dima Kogan
Guillem Jover writes: > At this point I think the best course of action is to start a Package > Salvaging process. OK. I'm going to do this. Steve: do you have strong opinions about the specific way this should be done? I have thoughts, but you should weigh in, as the maintainer. Thanks. dima

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2019-02-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2018-12-28 at 11:24:44 -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > I just hit a bug in Debian's mawk that turned out to have been fixed > upstream long ago. Can we please update the mawk we ship to our users? > Can I help? What needs to happen? At this point I think the best course of action is to

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2010-03-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Steve Langasek wrote: I've not yet reviewed the changes in the new upstream version. Once I've reviewed the delta, I'll certainly let you know about any problems I find. Until then, yes - I don't know your work either and am not going to take your word for the correctness of the changes,

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2009-12-14 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: Until then, yes - I don't know your work either and am not going to take On the other hand, you do (more than likely) use my work. your word for the correctness of the changes, and I'm not in a hurry to integrate that new version into Debian given

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2009-12-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: In that context, since I haven't worked with you, I'm not going to take your word for the correctness of any of the changes - not for something like the first new upstream version of mawk in 12 years; so I don't foresee any way that this would be a

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2009-12-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: In that context, since I haven't worked with you, I'm not going to take your word for the correctness of any of the changes - not for something like the first new upstream version of

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2009-12-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 06:47:06PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Sun, 13 Dec 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: In that context, since I haven't worked with you, I'm not going to take your word for the correctness of any of the changes - not for something like the first new upstream version of mawk

Bug#554167: New mawk upstream version

2009-12-09 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi vorlon, Building a Linux kernel requires an awk with some features v1.3.3 does not have, so I put together an updated mawk package to use for this purpose. Maybe it could be of some use: - http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/mawk.git - git.debian.org:git/collab-maint/mawk.git The