Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-27 Thread Guido Günther
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:24:36PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:33 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: Did you remove gdm from plymouth's init script LSB header? Othwerise the init system will stop plymouth way before gdm. The init script is called gdm3 in the new

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 27 mars 2010 à 09:16 +0100, Guido Günther a écrit : On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:24:36PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: The init script is called gdm3 in the new package, so it isn't having any effect. You're right. I though it'd provide gdm and gdm3 but it doesn't. In this case you

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-27 Thread Guido Günther
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:04:04PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le samedi 27 mars 2010 à 09:16 +0100, Guido Günther a écrit : On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 10:24:36PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: The init script is called gdm3 in the new package, so it isn't having any effect. You're

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 27 mars 2010 à 13:29 +0100, Guido Günther a écrit : Launching plymouth directly on vt7 could indeed be a solution, but I wonder whether X will actually use vt7, or whether it will think it’s already occupied and launch itself on vt8. Fedora has this patch for that:

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-26 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 14:01 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: I'd be nice to have a newer gdm (maybe in expermental) since these versions handle interaction with plymouth (which currently also lives in experimental). Are there plans to include a newer gdm in squeeze? Cheers, I tried gdm3 from svn

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-26 Thread Guido Günther
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 03:18:06PM +0100, Sven Arvidsson wrote: On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 14:01 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: I'd be nice to have a newer gdm (maybe in expermental) since these versions handle interaction with plymouth (which currently also lives in experimental). Are there plans

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 26 mars 2010 à 15:18 +0100, Sven Arvidsson a écrit : I tried gdm3 from svn with plymouth, and there's still a very noticeable gap between plymouth and gdm. Seems like gdm needs additional patches (the plymouth-integration branch in git) to handle the transition. This also

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-26 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:33 +0100, Guido Günther wrote: Did you remove gdm from plymouth's init script LSB header? Othwerise the init system will stop plymouth way before gdm. The init script is called gdm3 in the new package, so it isn't having any effect. On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 17:42 +0100,

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-20 Thread Guido Günther
Package: gdm Version: 2.20.10-1 Severity: normal Hi I'd be nice to have a newer gdm (maybe in expermental) since these versions handle interaction with plymouth (which currently also lives in experimental). Are there plans to include a newer gdm in squeeze? Cheers, -- Guido -- System

Bug#562646: New upstream version

2010-03-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 14:01 +0100, Guido Günther a écrit : Package: gdm Version: 2.20.10-1 Severity: normal Hi I'd be nice to have a newer gdm (maybe in expermental) since these versions handle interaction with plymouth (which currently also lives in experimental). Are there plans to