On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:23:15AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:32:17PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:14:18AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10.3+squeeze1
Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:14:18AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10.3+squeeze1
Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
I have a test repository containing a Packages.bz2 file with different
checksums than what is listed in the signed Release file. However,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:32:17PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:14:18AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10.3+squeeze1
Severity: important
Thanks for your bugreport.
I have a test repository containing a Packages.bz2 file with different
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:23:15AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:32:17PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 04:14:18AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10.3+squeeze1
Severity: important
[..]
I can verify this for
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 02:04:27PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 07:23:15AM -0400, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
The test-bz2-hash-error.tar that is attached to the bug does not have
a Release.gpg file. With this unsigned archive there is indeed no
hashsum check.
So it is, my
Package: apt
Version: 0.8.10.3+squeeze1
Severity: important
I have a test repository containing a Packages.bz2 file with different
checksums than what is listed in the signed Release file. However,
'apt-get update' does not report any error and shows the resulting
packages in the output of
6 matches
Mail list logo
