On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:59:04PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
I think the check is broken. They should just create the lockfile
Well, there are issues with setuid()-binaries that need to do
their own access checks. A more common example would be the
sendmail binary.
I'm not sure I
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-13.11
Hi,
there are programs that stat() /var/lock to test permissions
instead of actually trying to create lockfiles, the java rxtx
library for example. Before making this symlink to the /run/lock
tmpfs, ownership was preserved on harddisk.
A simple chgrp
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
there are programs that stat() /var/lock to test permissions
instead of actually trying to create lockfiles, the java rxtx
library for example. Before making this symlink to the /run/lock
tmpfs, ownership was preserved on
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:15:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
A more general apporach is also welcome.
We have been discussing moving to having a lock group as used by
other distributions, but this hasn't happened yet.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:15:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
there are programs that stat() /var/lock to test permissions
instead of actually trying to create lockfiles, the java rxtx
library for example. Before making this
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:15:29AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:43:12AM +0200, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
there are programs that stat() /var/lock to test permissions
instead of actually trying to create
6 matches
Mail list logo
