Package: mpv
Version: 0.6.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #763736
Sorry for stupid suggestion, but why not to try add alternative dependencies?
Like as libavcodec56 | libavcodec-ffmpeg56?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500,
Am Sonntag, den 09.11.2014, 20:13 +0600 schrieb Charles Malaheenee:
Sorry for stupid suggestion, but why not to try add alternative dependencies?
Like as libavcodec56 | libavcodec-ffmpeg56?
Pretty sure the libavcodec libraries from libav and from ffmpeg do not
export the same symbols and are
Package: mpv
Version: 0.6.2-2+ffmpeg
Followup-For: Bug #763736
On every version bump, I end up with the non ffmpeg build. Now that
ffmpeg is in testing/unstable, would you please consider a different
package name? Or maybe a better versioing scheme.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On gio, ott 02, 2014 at 11:13:04 +0200, Milan Straka wrote:
Package: mpv
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Now that ffmpeg is in experimental (via #729203), would you consider
creating a mpv-ffmpeg package, which would be identical to mpv, but
instead of linking libav would link ffmpeg?
-Original message-
From: Alessandro Ghedini gh...@debian.org
Sent: 4 Oct 2014, 17:33
On gio, ott 02, 2014 at 11:13:04 +0200, Milan Straka wrote:
Now that ffmpeg is in experimental (via #729203), would you consider
creating a mpv-ffmpeg package, which would be identical to mpv, but
Package: mpv
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Now that ffmpeg is in experimental (via #729203), would you consider
creating a mpv-ffmpeg package, which would be identical to mpv, but
instead of linking libav would link ffmpeg?
According to mpv documentation, FFmpeg is preferred over Libav
6 matches
Mail list logo
