Maybe leave this bug opened, and retitle it as a RFH? (it was the case before)
--
Mathieu
Control: tag -1 + pending
So, should we add something like "pending" tag to this bug? ;)
I'm in the process of helping with samba package maintenance
for quite some time now... ;))
I come across this bug report because it popped up in tracker.d.o
page for another package I maintain, with a
21.03.2022 14:08, Mathieu Parent wrote:
[]
Mathieu, can you please give me some little guide in importing the new upstream
version, what is usually required, how did you done this before?
This is documented in debian/README.source
Yeah, I've seen it. It just looks way too simple compared
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:45 AM Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> Ok. Let's try to step on this one.
Hi Michael,
Thanks for coming here ;-)
> I grabbed the package from salsa, applied the fix for #1005642. it built okay
> (I use the fixed packages here for about a month already).
>
> Mathieu, can
Ok. Let's try to step on this one.
I grabbed the package from salsa, applied the fix for #1005642. it built okay
(I use the fixed packages here for about a month already).
Mathieu, can you please give me some little guide in importing the new upstream
version, what is usually required, how did
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-samba-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hello everybody,
I don't have the time to keep samba, cifs-utils and [related] packages
in good shape, and I don't use it anymore as file server or AD/DC (I
only use it as domain member and cifs
retitle 814382 RFA: samba -- SMB/CIFS file, print, and login server for Unix
thanks
Hi,
I'm retitling this bug as "request for adoption", I don't have the
time to keep this package in good shape, and I don't use it anymore as
file server or AD/DC (I only use it as domain member and other client
7 matches
Mail list logo