Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-05-07 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 7 May 2018 20:13:32 +0200 Andreas Bilke wrote: > Evgeny Stambulchik found a nicer solution for this problem. The annotations > from the PDF are removed from the document (at least in the in-memory > version). > > Therefore we can use render() again and have nice pixel graphics. > > We

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-05-07 Thread Andreas Bilke
Evgeny Stambulchik found a nicer solution for this problem. The annotations from the PDF are removed from the document (at least in the in-memory version). Therefore we can use render() again and have nice pixel graphics. We released v4.1.2 to reflect this change. signature.asc Description:

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-05-04 Thread Andreas Bilke
> Perhaps as an interrim measure, maybe a command line option and/or hot > key to switch between modes would make sense? I implemented https://github.com/pdfpc/pdfpc/pull/342. Could you have a look if it satisfies your needs? If a page has annotations, it is rendered without visible icons of

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-05-01 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
So we have a choice right now: low resolution, or missing annotations. If I had to choose, I'd pick the missing annotations, because I use a lot of images in my talks and don't use annotations at all. That's just me, but following my compelling usage survey (n=1) I'll leave the package this way

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-05-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 1 May 2018 10:21:55 +0200 Andreas Bilke wrote: > I think this patch opens a new bug (see my previous post) and should not > count as a bug fix for this issue. Dear Andreas, I fully acknowledge that my single line patch is not a proper fix for the regression. I mean: it eliminates the

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-05-01 Thread Andreas Bilke
I think this patch opens a new bug (see my previous post) and should not count as a bug fix for this issue. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-04-30 Thread Barak A. Pearlmutter
Thanks for the patch. I uploaded a version with it incorporated; if you could confirm that this issue is fixed that would be great. Cheers, --Barak.

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-04-30 Thread Andreas Bilke
I can confirm that we have degraded quality for pixel graphics so far. The call to `render_for_printing_with_options` is the "cause" of the problem. If I switch back to `render` everything is fine. But: pdfpc supports notes from PDF annotations, and if we render a PDF with annotations with

Bug#888677: pdf-presenter-console: [regression] raster image rendering is really poor

2018-04-30 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: tags -1 + patch On Sun, 28 Jan 2018 16:43:39 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote: [...] > When the PDF presentation includes raster images, their rendering > on screen (at the final resolution, requiring a scaling in almost > all cases) looks very poor, as if some aliasing failed