Source: strace
Followup-For: Bug #896016
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: fixed -1 strace/4.26-0.1
Control: close -1
James Addison wrote:
> Unfortunately there are plenty of FTBFS failures -- mostly test timeouts on
> some architectures, alongside libfaketime errors that seem to affect i386 --
> but those seem like separate problems. Perhaps we could close this bug?
Sure thing: as in, I agree that the FTBFS's
Source: strace
Followup-For: Bug #896016
X-Debbugs-Cc: la...@debian.org, reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Looking at the Reproducible Builds build history[1] for strace on Debian,
all _successful_ builds I see between Y2019 and today, across all four
architectures listed (amd64, arm64,
Chris Lamb wrote:
> A quick glance suggests like this was fixed upstream in Apr 2018:
>
> https://github.com/strace/strace/pull/68#ref-commit-fc8294c
>
> Can you confirm? Unfortunately, your package FTBFS in our
> infrastructure (something to do with libfaketime, as yet
> uninvestigated).
>
>
> Would you consider applying this patch and uploading?
A quick glance suggests like this was fixed upstream in Apr 2018:
https://github.com/strace/strace/pull/68#ref-commit-fc8294c
Can you confirm? Unfortunately, your package FTBFS in our
infrastructure (something to do with libfaketime, as
forwarded 896016 https://github.com/strace/strace/pull/68
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://github.com/strace/strace/pull/68
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
Source: strace
Version: 4.21-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that strace could not be built
7 matches
Mail list logo
