I hit this issue after yesterday upgrade from testing to the new stable
too. There was an old file libglib-2.0.so.0.4200.1 from April 2014. Once
I've removed it, mpd worked again.
I think that a simple consistency check about obsolete libraries might
be helpful.
So far I've used this to
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 at 19:57:39 -0800, Xilin Sun wrote:
> my /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 was a symlink to
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.4800.1
> my /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 was a symlink to
> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0.5800.1
I wondered
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 17:47:56 +0100 Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 at 17:11:11 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > @smcv: Do you think this is a failure of dpkg/apt cleaning up old
> > versions? My suspicion is rather, that there is some old copy of libglib
> > lying around in
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:43:47 -0400 rektide de la faye
wrote:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.56.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop, via
> aptitude
> and included in that
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 at 01:33:02 -0400, rektide wrote:
> Hi sorry for the delay. Per request:
>
> $ ls -il {,/usr}/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so*
> 42488866 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Mar 22 05:08
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 -> libglib-2.0.so.0.5600.0
> 3373718 -rw-r--r--
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 at 17:11:11 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> @smcv: Do you think this is a failure of dpkg/apt cleaning up old
> versions? My suspicion is rather, that there is some old copy of libglib
> lying around in /lib/x86_64-linux which was copied there by some 3rd
> party installer,
Am 23.04.2018 um 14:12 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
>
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 at 13:02:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> On 2018-04-18 14:43:47 -0400, rektide de la faye wrote:
>>> I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop,
>>> via
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 at 13:02:26 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2018-04-18 14:43:47 -0400, rektide de la faye wrote:
> > I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop,
> > via aptitude and included in that upgrade to satisfy
On 2018-04-18 14:43:47 -0400, rektide de la faye wrote:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.56.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop,
> via aptitude and included in that
Am 18.04.2018 um 20:43 schrieb rektide de la faye:
> Package: libglib2.0-0
> Version: 2.56.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop, via
> aptitude
> and included in that upgrade
Package: libglib2.0-0
Version: 2.56.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I recently updated a number of packages on my Debian/testing laptop, via
aptitude
and included in that upgrade to satisfy dependencies was libglib-2.0-0.
Since installing, many many
11 matches
Mail list logo
