Hi Samuel,
I forwarded the bug to the GCC tracker and they said that your
interpretation of the docs is correct. I doubt whether they are willing
to change the behaviour, but we'll see.
Best,
Fabian
forwarded 945133 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93419
Hello,
On 20.11.19 11:43, Fabian Kloetzl wrote:
> Recently, the build of one of my packages failed on hurd-i386 and
> kfreebsd-* due to unsupported ifuncs [1]. However, I had that code guarded
> by __has_attribute(ifunc) which, unfortunately, evaluates to 1 on said
> platforms. A minimal testcase
Forwarded ...
On 20.11.19 11:43, Fabian Kloetzl wrote:
> Package: gcc-9
> Version: 9.2.1-17
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Recently, the build of one of my packages failed on hurd-i386 and
> kfreebsd-* due to unsupported ifuncs [1]. However, I had that code guarded
> by
Package: gcc-9
Version: 9.2.1-17
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Recently, the build of one of my packages failed on hurd-i386 and
kfreebsd-* due to unsupported ifuncs [1]. However, I had that code guarded
by __has_attribute(ifunc) which, unfortunately, evaluates to 1 on said
platforms. A
5 matches
Mail list logo