Hi gregor,
On 24-12-2020 02:57, gregor herrmann wrote:
> So this looks like a potential for improvement for the tooling to
> detect "key packages", namely to take Provides into account.
Our tooling [1] already does that, but IIRC it prefers real packages
over Provides.
Paul
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 19:43:40 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 18-12-2020 16:47, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > It sounds like we should file a bug with the release team for
> > manual removal from testing instead in this case? What makes the package
> > "key" OOI? The package is provided by perl so
Hi,
On 18-12-2020 16:47, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> pkg-perl standard practice is to keep dual-lived packages in unstable
> for a release cycle to make it easier to bring back when they
> become newer than the version in perl again, which happens from time
> to time.
Ack. gregoa explained the
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:17:24PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2020 16:15:31 +0100 Dominic Hargreaves
> wrote:
> > Package: libhttp-tiny-perl
> > Version: 0.076-1
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: maintainer
> >
> > libhttp-tiny-perl at this version should
Hi Dominic,
On Fri, 22 May 2020 16:15:31 +0100 Dominic Hargreaves
wrote:
> Package: libhttp-tiny-perl
> Version: 0.076-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: maintainer
>
> libhttp-tiny-perl at this version should not be released with
> bullseye, since perl contains the same version.
This
Package: libhttp-tiny-perl
Version: 0.076-1
Severity: serious
Justification: maintainer
libhttp-tiny-perl at this version should not be released with
bullseye, since perl contains the same version.
6 matches
Mail list logo
