Package: foomatic-gui
Severity: serious
Version: 0.7.4.6
From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
fakeroot debian/rules clean
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp
#rm -rf build
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
rm -f `find -name
Hi Esteban,
Is this bug being investigated?
Yes. It's already pending. I just haven't put the tag for the upload is
ready and we're just holding the userland until all buildds have
openh323.
So, why don't you upload it to unstable and close this bug? Any reason?
It will be later today.
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:02:07 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298178: fixed in rxvt-unicode 5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:32:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298267: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.4.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:54:42 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: capi4hylafax
Version: 1:01.02.03-7
Followup-For: Bug #291559
The same problem occurs with version 1:01.02.03-9.
For now I'll stick with 1:01.02.03-7 and use my wrapper script
as workaround for bug #293808.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy:
Package: gcjwebplugin
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When using gcjwebplugin, I can't run Mozilla-firefox, as I get an
GLib-error** : The thread system is not yet initialized
However, the same problem goes with Mozilla-1.7.5
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:09:30 +0900
Hideki Yamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sat, 05 Mar 2005 17:35:02 +0100, Ricardo Mones
Re: Bug#298173: sylpheed: [security] buffer overflow (= 1.0.2), now
1.0.3 is released
Thanks for reminding but I've already done it, just waiting for my
sponsor to
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:30:29PM +0100, Thibauld Manson wrote:
Package: gcjwebplugin
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
When using gcjwebplugin, I can't run Mozilla-firefox, as I get an
GLib-error** : The thread system is not yet initialized
However, the
Package: libparse-recdescent-perl
Version: 1.94-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.5
The package currently depends on perl = 5.6something, but doesn't
include the Text::Balanced module anymore. The package is thus unusable
on woody systems. If this is intentional, please depend on perl
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298298: fixed in libparse-recdescent-perl 1.94-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:12:45 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #298294,
regarding non-free icons
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(NB: If you are a system
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:47:50 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#249234: fixed in libxtm-perl 0.36-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#196400: fixed in flwm 1.00-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:32:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#191982: fixed in flwm 1.00-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:45:18 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line gorm: GNUstep Mass Bug Breaks Policy Section 9.1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:50:15 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
gksu gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor
- authenticates gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor, then
- /usr/bin/env -u XAUTHORITY=/tmp/libgksu1.2-zWXKDc/.Xauthority
gnome-cups-manager -p D1_HPColor
- this is the right one !
Are you sure that this doesn't break special printer names like $TERMtt?
cups
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 291500 - unreproducible sarge sid
Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS
Tags were: unreproducible sid
Tags removed: unreproducible, sarge, sid
End of message, stopping
Hello
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.203-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Hi,
please see http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=pkg=util-vserver
for the full build log
I actually think this is a bug in gcc or
Package: cryptsetup
Version: 20050111-2.1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Cryptsetup fails to build (tested on mipsel), caused by a follow-on
error to:
configure.in: 5: required file ./config.h.in]' not found
Makefile.am:1: AM_GNU_GETTEXT in configure.in' but intl' not in SUBDIRS
Hello
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:20:06AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:23:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Package: util-vserver
Version: 0.30.203-1
Severity: serious
Tags:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 291500 sarge sid
Bug#291500: cryptsetup_20050111-2(arm): FTBS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 297985 important
Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from
gnat-gps
Severity set to `important'.
tag 297985 = upstream moreinfo
Bug#297985: xserver-xfree86: X server crashes when compiling a program from
Package: rake
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'rake' in a clean chroot,
I get the following error:
ruby -I ./lib bin/rake rdoc
rm -r debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html
rdoc -o debian/rake/usr/share/doc/rake/html --line-numbers --inline-source
--main README --title 'Rake -- Ruby
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:32:13 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#293079: fixed in aolserver4 4.0.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
tags 298339 sid
Bug#298339: rake: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'rdoc'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: sid
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Package: request-tracker3.2
Version: 3.2.2-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Apache2 MPM prefork begins to leek memory at an alarming rate - forks reach
around
35MB each at start up expanding to around 50MB in some cases in a few
minutes even when request-tracker is
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:02:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#297661: fixed in iso-codes 0.45-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 271313 normal
Bug#271313: On ftp.debian.org ia64 has to be removed for all packages depending
on xview
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
severity 269523 normal
Bug#269523: RM: mono:mono-common [!i386 !powerpc !s390] -- RoM; NBS (ANAIS);
unsupported upstream
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping
Kenshi Muto [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
I put tetex-bin 2.99.12.20050203-beta-1 to my arm buildd queue.
Thank you for trying!
As you mentioned ago, I installed tetex-base 2.99.9.20050111-beta-2.
For what it's worth, with 0.3.3.cvs.20031022-3, on i386 with current
sid, I see the problem with pbuilder (i.e., the build fails), but not
when building directly outside pbuilder or any chroot.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:17:17 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298339: fixed in rake 0.4.15-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 241497 kernel
Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for
real i386 architecture
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `kernel'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: udev
Version: 0.053-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
After boot, udev creates all device nodes with owner and group root, and
permissions rw-rw, so noone can read nor write in any device. Thus
it is impossible to login to KDE (screen disappears and then KDM
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
reassign 241497 module-init-tools,modutils,initrd-tools
Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for
real i386 architecture
Bug reassigned from
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:47:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298114: fixed in nvi 1.79-22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of
versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing
is13194-bn.cset file.
Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but
jaldhar: I'm cc'ing you since you've made the last couple of
versions/uploads and might have a clue about finding the missing
is13194-bn.cset file.
Not knowing any Bengali whatsoever, I don't know if this is helpful, but
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/aspell/dict/bn/ has a tarball that contains
reopen 298351
thanks
Please don't close bugs without even waiting to know if the solution you
give is helpful!
mv /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist /etc/udev/udev.rules
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist
ls: /etc/udev/udev.rules.dpkg-dist: No such file or directory
Quickly,
On Mar 07, Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't close bugs without even waiting to know if the solution you
give is helpful!
It was a very good bet.
Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/
directory.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 297992 + fixed
Bug#297992: dcraw: No longer installable.
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:47:44 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#222664: fixed in signing-party 0.3.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
retitle 241497 need upgrade directories for hppa64, sparc sun4m and 80386
Bug#241497: sarge needs upgrade-i386 directory which gives us upgrade-path for
real i386 architecture
Changed
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 294163 = moreinfo
Bug#294163: libdb4.3: build failed on hppa
Tags were: patch
Tags set to: moreinfo
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Sun, 06 Mar 2005 21:02:35 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#298233: fixed in kernel-patch-adamantix 1.7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Please report the content of /etc/udev/udev.rules of the /etc/udev/
directory.
I attach a bzipped tarball of /etc/udev.
Quickly,
Nowhere man
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
With regard to bug #295877: gauche-gtk is missing versioned build
dependencies on gauche-dev (= 0.8.3-1) and possibly on gauche (=
0.8.3-1). gauche has been split into several packages and is waiting for
NEW package processing (see http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html). I've
verified that those
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `xeplugin_dcop_skel.h', needed by
`all-am'. Stop.
Debian (including kxdocker package) doesn't seem to contain a file named
like that. Removing the reference to it in src/Makefile.am and
src/Makefile.in allows the package to be built.
--
To
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 07 Mar 2005 01:47:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#286905: fixed in perl 5.8.4-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
52 matches
Mail list logo
