Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attaching the output of this and the others asked by Frank. I did
include a listing of /etc/texmf as well (1st run wasn't recursive).
Script started on Mon 07 Nov 2005 04:05:16 PM PST
04:05:16
daddy:~# ls -l /etc/texmf/updmap.d/
total 11
Package: mime-codecs
Version: 7.19-7
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
It appears that the buffering recently introduced to base64-decode has
some major flaws in it that render of all base64-encoded files that
are larger than the input buffer size (~36K)
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:10:17PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
ocaml has been updated to a new upstream version. as a result,
libextlib-ocaml-dev needs to be updated. I see a lot of your other
packages are in the same situation.
In order to ease migration into testing of the whole bunch of ocaml
clone 338090 -1
reassign -1 python-gtk2-dev 2.8.0-1
retitle -1 pygtk-codegen-2.0 from 2.8's pygtk generates code incompatible with
python 2.3
severity -1 important
thanks
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005, Manish Singh wrote:
Due to a bug upstream
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 338090 -1
Bug#338090: Broken python binding
Bug 338090 cloned as bug 338117.
reassign -1 python-gtk2-dev 2.8.0-1
Bug#338117: Broken python binding
Bug reassigned from package `python-vte' to `python-gtk2-dev'.
retitle -1 pygtk-codegen-2.0 from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign #334001 vte 1:0.11.15-1
Bug#334001: Importing vte in python doesn't work
Bug#334668: ImportError while trying to import the vte module
Bug reassigned from package `pygtk' to `vte'.
reassign #338090 vte 1:0.11.15-1
Bug#338090: Broken python
clone 334613 -1
found -1 3.0-10.1
retitle -1 Should make sure the TEXFONTPATH setting is correct
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stop
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kenward Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
04:06:19
daddy:~# kpsewhich --format=map
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005, Loic Minier wrote:
... which suggest the problem will be fixed.
I don't get the same import vte error, but it still fails:
import vte
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in ?
ImportError: could not import gtk._gtk
(This is with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:43:34 -0600
Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright. I'll send a report to lvm2.
...or this bugreport can be reasigned. I just wanted to make sure I
didn't reassign if I somehow misunderstood.
Tell me if you've
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 330983 serious
Bug#330983: asterisk: Building chan_zap.so requires zaptel.h at the wrong place
Severity set to `serious'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 03:32:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#336324: fixed in inkscape 0.42.2+0.43pre2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Subject: gnucash: Gnucash uninstallable in Unstable
Package: gnucash
Version: 1.8.10-19
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Gnucash uninstallable on Debian unstable.
It appears to stem from a conflict between slib and
Package: kdegraphics
Version: 4:3.4.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
building the package kdegraphics in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
make[5]: Entering directory
Package: pnetc
Version: 0.6.12-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package pnetc in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
fi
touch debian/stamp-autotools-files
chmod a+x
Jonas:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:43:34 -0600
Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright. I'll send a report to lvm2.
...or this bugreport can be reasigned. I just wanted to make sure I
didn't reassign if I
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 05:17:05 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#333795: fixed in python-scipy 0.3.2-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 06:17:12 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334691: fixed in console-tools 1:0.2.3dbs-58
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: yacas
Version: 1.0.57-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
building the package yacas in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
mkdir .libs
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reassign 338030 lvm2
retitle 338030 lvdisplay checksum error
thanks
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:15:41 -0600
Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonas:
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:43:34 -0600
Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 338030 lvm2
Bug#338030: yaird error: Could not read output for /sbin/lvdisplay -c (fatal)
Bug reassigned from package `yaird' to `lvm2'.
retitle 338030 lvdisplay checksum error
Bug#338030: yaird error: Could not read output for
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 286191 patch
Bug#286191: uae: new uptream version
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
tags 271476 patch
Bug#271476: uae: build dependency on xlibs-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
tags 238678 patch
Bug#238678: uae: Unable to
tags 286191 patch
tags 271476 patch
tags 238678 patch
tags 201563 patch
tags 190258 patch
tags 297251 patch
thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] BCC'd
Hello *,
FWIW, I've packaged the most recent upstream version. Please note that
those packages greatly differ from previous versions, most notacibly
only one
Hi,
looks like a #322353 that hasn't been fixed. (I can reproduce the
problem very well.)
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 16:46 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
looks like a #322353 that hasn't been fixed. (I can reproduce the
problem very well.)
Sorry, should have been 334953.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know which mirror you exactly use but the current version of the
ogre-plugins-cgprogrammanager package depends on libdevil1c2, not
libdevil1c2. Also, libogre-dev works perfectly well with the last
libopenexr-dev package in unstable.
Can you please provide your /etc/apt/sources.list file
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:47:14 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#326507: fixed in mplayerplug-in 3.15-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 338142 pending
stop
On November 8, 2005 07:53, Roland Stigge wrote:
building the package kdegraphics in a clean sid build environment
(with pbuilder) on i386 results in:
=
[...]
make[5]: Entering directory
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 338142 pending
Bug#338142: kdegraphics: FTBFS: missing declarations
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.14-2
Severity: critical
ia64 users shouldn't upgrade to 2.6.14 yet - the ia64 kernel currently
has problems footprinting initramfs, which means it can't work with
either yaird or initramfs-tools. Monitor this bug for status info.
--
dann frazier [EMAIL
Hello,
* Aníbal Monsalve Salazar [2005-11-08]:
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
[...]
Full build logs are available on buildd.debian.org.
Please refer to the build log at:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
found 333052 0-1
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - Unknown symbol
Bug marked as found in version 0-1.
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 298909 etch-ignore
Bug#298909: zope-mysqlda: depends on zope and forgets about zope2.7
Tags were: wontfix
Tags added: etch-ignore
tag 337410 etch-ignore
Bug#337410: zope-znavigator: Uninstallable due to zope transition
Tags were: wontfix
Tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 329041 important
Bug#329041: valgrind: Valgrind is being compiled with SSE instruction set
Severity set to `important'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# please *do* *not* set etch-ignore without explizit approval
tag 298909 - etch-ignore
Bug#298909: zope-mysqlda: depends on zope and forgets about zope2.7
Tags were: etch-ignore wontfix
Tags removed: etch-ignore
tag 337410 - etch-ignore
Bug#337410:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 335967 + fixed
Bug#335967: BBPFS (experimental): mips-tools doesn't include binary
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:47:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337869: fixed in aptitude 0.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 09:47:07 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337869: fixed in aptitude 0.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:05:06 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the Debian Bug report #337820,
regarding tse3 - FTBFS: error: call of overloaded 'element(const char [9],
size_t)' is ambiguous
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s)
Nathanael Nerode writes:
tags 336114 +upstream
forwarded 336114 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712
thanks
Forwarded upstream as GCC bug number 24712.
I think, that's not upstream. both changes were made between the 4.0.1
and the 4.0.2 release.
Matthias
--
To
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 333103 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#333103: liferea: [gnome 2.12 transition] build-depend on dbus changes
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Package: ekg2
Version: 20051106+1657-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build:
| Automatic build of ekg2_20051106+1657-1 on odin by sbuild/sparc 69
| Build started at 20051108-0726
| **
| Checking available
Package: udev
Version: 0.071-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
mini-me[~]19:36:14$ sudo apt-get install udev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 04:18:11PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:55:07AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
Package: librplay3-dev
Version: 3.3.2-9
Severity: serious
File: /usr/include/rplay.h
Per Policy §3.5, librplay3-dev should depend on libc6-dev |
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Loic Minier wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005, Loic Minier wrote:
... which suggest the problem will be fixed.
I don't get the same import vte error, but it still fails:
import vte
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1,
severity 338030 normal
tags 338030 wontfix
thanks
lvm checks for several errors in the headers since some versions.
Please use vgcfgbackup and vgcfgrestore to fix the errors, after you
have checked that the backup is correct.
Bastian
--
We have phasers, I vote we blast 'em!
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 338030 normal
Bug#338030: lvdisplay checksum error
Severity set to `normal'.
tags 338030 wontfix
Bug#338030: lvdisplay checksum error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 10:47:09 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#335434: fixed in dcgui 0.80-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:57:34 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338202: installation error: rmdir: `/tmp/udev.LoQwmw':
Directory not empty
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: udev
Version: 0.074-1
Followup-For: Bug #337881
reopen #337881
thanks
This bug is still present in 0.074-1. The same work-around applies.
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 24
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-04-10 14:12 020_permissions.rules -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Package: udev
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Version: 0.074-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
Followup-For: Bug #337881
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
reopen #337881
Bug#337881: udev
Package: lucene
Version: 1.4.3-8
Severity: serious
Justification: missing sources in main
Hi,
your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately
the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the same upstream
version in different distributions (contrib vs. main) and the
Package: libgnomeprint15
Severity: serious
Hi
I can't install the package libgnomeprint15, because it depends on a
specific version of libgnomeprint-data, but the version of
libgnomeprint-data in unstable is newer than the dependency.
This makes libgnomeprint15 and other packages which are
Please tell me you're not wasting my time with this while I'm
working to get 2.0.9 packaged? Of course fwbuilder 2.0.7 is going to
fail to build when I uploade 2.0.9 libfwbuilder. I have to get
libfwbuilder into the mirror before I can upload fwbuilder 2.0.9 for
this precise reason. Quit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
tags 335671 + pending
Bug#335671: spamassassin: Missing depends on libio-socket-inet6-perl
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
reassign 327746 tk8.4
severity 327746 grave
reassign 327736 tk8.4
severity 327736 grave
merge 327736 327746
retitle 327736 tk8.4: needs to be rebuilt on m68k
tags 327736 + pending
thanks
Hi,
It appears tk8.4 was built with binutils 2.16.1cvs20050902, which is
utterly broken on m68k, in that it
Hi,
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:47:01 -0600
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you have a ready test case for this, can you try the neon
package at
http://www.barcikacomp.hu/deb/libneon25_0.25.4.dfsg-1_i386.deb, as
mentioned in Bug #335574?
With a Debian sid updated yesterday and your
On Nov 08, Vincent Bernat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This bug is still present in 0.074-1. The same work-around applies.
I highly doubt this, considering that prerm does not use --stop --exec
anymore. You problem was that when upgrading from the buggy releases the
old prerm was used, I will add
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:59:59 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338206: can't install, because of dependency?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
Package: lucene
Version: 1.4.3-8
Severity: serious
Justification: missing sources in main
Hi,
your package lucene recently moved from contrib to main. Unfortunately
the DAK is unable to handle two debian revisions of the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
unblock 335434 by 336577
Bug#335434: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Was blocked by: 336577
Blocking bugs removed: 336577
unblock 335435 by 336577
Bug#335435: FTBFS with recent l-k-h; should not use l-k-h
Was blocked by: 336577
Blocking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 327746 tk8.4
Bug#327746: ocaml: [m68k] FTBFS:
Bug reassigned from package `ocaml' to `tk8.4'.
severity 327746 grave
Bug#327746: ocaml: [m68k] FTBFS:
Severity set to `grave'.
reassign 327736 tk8.4
Bug#327736: lablgl: FTBFS on m68k,
Package: maxima
Severity: serious
Version: 5.9.2-2
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of maxima_5.9.2-2 on sarti by sbuild/hppa 69
Build started at 20051108-1819
[...]
** Using build dependencies
[Thomas Petazzoni]
Since you have a ready test case for this, can you try the neon
package at
http://www.barcikacomp.hu/deb/libneon25_0.25.4.dfsg-1_i386.deb, as
mentioned in Bug #335574?
With a Debian sid updated yesterday and your package, it still doesn't
work:
Oh, doh!
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.8
package cmucl cmucl-clm cmucl-docs cmucl-source
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: cmucl-source cmucl-clm cmucl cmucl-docs
tags 337258 + pending
Bug#337258: cmucl: FTBFS with new
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:57:34PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
It's not obvious what is happening since you did not report the content
of the directory.
yes, i probably should have supplied that info...
unfortunately, i've rebooted since then. fortunately, nothing
evil seemd to happen on reboot
Package: asterisk
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.0.9.dfsg-6
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of asterisk_1:1.0.9.dfsg-6 on ball by sbuild/mips 69
Build started at 20051108-1951
[...]
** Using build
Package: koffice
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.4.2-2
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of koffice_1:1.4.2-2 on a4000t by sbuild/m68k 69
Build started at 20051107-2208
[...]
** Using build dependencies
Package: lirc-modules-source
Version: 0.7.1pre2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
the lirc-modules-source build process needs the kernel-sources. Trying
to build using only the kernel-headers will fail with the following
error:
/usr/src/modules/lirc$
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:50:26PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
reassign 327746 tk8.4
severity 327746 grave
reassign 327736 tk8.4
severity 327736 grave
merge 327736 327746
retitle 327736 tk8.4: needs to be rebuilt on m68k
tags 327736 + pending
thanks
Hi,
It appears tk8.4 was built
Hi,
* Christoph Biedl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051108 11:09]:
ii zaptel-source1.0.7-4.1Zapata telephony interface (source code
for kern
In other words: To verify I've started with a fresh sarge installation
today and built asterisk again.
I tried now with pbuilder on sid; the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
block 338220 with 336167
Bug#338220: asterisk_1:1.0.9.dfsg-6_mips: FTBFS: internal compiler error:
Floating point exception
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs added: 336167, 336463
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 292953 + fixed
Bug#292953: aime: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): explicit specialization of
'LinkedNodeTYPE::LinkedNode(TYPE*)' must be introduced by 'template '
Tags were: patch
Bug#334124: FTBFS on 64bit arches
Tags added: fixed
tag 334124 + fixed
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 02:19:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
This is bug #336463 in gcc-4.0;
I knew that. That's why I blocked #338220 with #336167.
it is not a bug in asterisk.
It's still a bug in asterisk as it FTBFS.
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334001: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334668: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334001: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#334668: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:36 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#337469: fixed in xsupplicant 1.0.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338090: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 14:33:31 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#338090: fixed in vte 1:0.11.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: asterisk
Severity: serious
Version: 1:1.0.9.dfsg-6
Tags: sid
Justification: fails to build from source
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
Automatic build of asterisk_1:1.0.9.dfsg-6 on ball by sbuild/mips 69
Build started at 20051108
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 10:04, Christoph Biedl wrote:
[...]
I have been told the package was uploaded by the maintainer, not build
on the Debian buildds. Which would also explain the bug report.
[...]
This is not for the i386 architecture. I admit that this build log looks
fine for alpha
Package: vrms
Version: 1.10
Severity: serious
Justification: package is uninstallable (unless you happen to have perl)
vrms has no explicit dependencies, but it seems it tries to use the
module diagnostics.pm, which is not included perl-base, so a dependency
on perl would seem to be in order (or
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323688: fixed in gs-esp 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#323688: fixed in gs-esp 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 08 Nov 2005 15:32:10 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#320851: fixed in gs-esp 8.15.1.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: wims-common
Version: 3.28-6.1
Severity: serious
Justification: violates a must in policy
When testing wims-common with piuparts, I see several problems. To begin
with, it assumes that the wims user and group exists and is dedicated
for its use, yet does not even try to create the user.
Package: wzdftpd
Version: 0.5.5-3
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks upgrades
wzdftpd has one use of ucf in its maintainer scripts (postinst), so it
should have a dependency on ucf. This comes up when testing upgrades
from sarge to etch to sid (with piuparts), although the test only gets
to
[Peter Samuelson]
Oh, doh! /usr/bin/svn will not use libneon25, so that accomplished
nothing.
I'll build a new set of packages that use libneon25 instead
Well, now I see why Debian ships both neon24 and neon25. subversion
won't yet compile against neon25, and I don't have the time or
Package: gobby
Version: 0.2.2-2
Followup-For: Bug #337047
Hi,
I am also getting this bug. I ran gobby once the other day, and it
worked fine. But now it segfaults.
What information can I provide that might help? (Please give me
specific instructions - I'm not very experienced with tracing
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:20:35AM -0800, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote:
Please tell me you're not wasting my time with this while I'm
working to get 2.0.9 packaged? Of course fwbuilder 2.0.7 is going to
fail to build when I uploade 2.0.9 libfwbuilder. I have to get
libfwbuilder into the mirror
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
retitle 338185 ia64 has problems footprinting initramfs
thanks
ia64 users shouldn't upgrade to 2.6.14 yet - the ia64 kernel currently
has problems footprinting initramfs, which means it can't work with
either yaird or initramfs-tools. Monitor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 338185 ia64 has problems footprinting initramfs
Bug#338185: stay on 2.6.12 for now
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR
Services_Weather module has been created for distribution as a part of
Debian (and thereafter all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was
discovered that the PHP License under which Services_Weather is released
is problematic for
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR XML_Parser
module has been created for distribution as a part of Debian (and
thereafter all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was discovered
that the PHP License under which XML_Parser is released is problematic
for software
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR DB module
has been created for distribution as a part of Debian (and thereafter
all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was discovered that the PHP
License under which DB is released is problematic for software other
than PHP
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR HTTP module
has been created for distribution as a part of Debian (and thereafter
all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was discovered that the PHP
License under which HTTP is released is problematic for software other
than PHP
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR Mail module
has been created for distribution as a part of Debian (and thereafter
all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was discovered that the PHP
License under which Mail is released is problematic for software other
than PHP
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR File module
has been created for distribution as a part of Debian (and thereafter
all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was discovered that the PHP
License under which File is released is problematic for software other
than PHP
Hi,
As you may already be aware, a Debian package of your PEAR Net_Socket
module has been created for distribution as a part of Debian (and
thereafter all of its derivatives). Unfortunately, it was discovered
that the PHP License under which Net_Socket is released is problematic
for software
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
