Bug#352177: relocation error: symbol png_read_data, version PNG12_0 not defined in file libpng12.so.0 with link time reference

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Neuffer
Package: pngcrush Version: 1.5.10-2 Severity: grave [Desktop]# pngcrush Logo-1.png Logo-2.png Warning: versions are different between png.h and png.c png.h version: 1.2.7 png.c version: 1.2.8 | pngcrush 1.5.10, Copyright (C) 1998-2002 Glenn Randers-Pehrson | This is a free, open-source

Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of #308879

2006-02-10 Thread eweber
Package: tinyca Version: 0.6.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After upgrading from Debian 3.0 Woody to 3.1 Sarge it is impossible to access existing CA, certificates and keys of production systems. The issue is described in bug report #308879, this one is resolved,

Bug#207932: Time to close this bug ?

2006-02-10 Thread Xavier Roche
Shouldn't we stop this madeness and close this bug ? I don't think our beloved users need such extrmist attitude. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Re: Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of #308879

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Version: 0.7.0-1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. tags 308879 -sid Bug#308879: endless loop on startup Tags were: sid Tags removed: sid merge 352179 308879 Bug#308879: endless loop on startup Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of

Bug#352179: marked as done (tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of #308879)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:32:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of #308879 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#352182: Crash in the

2006-02-10 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: libtasn1-2 Version: 0.2.17-1 Severity: grave Tags: security A crash in the DER decoder of GnuTLS has been disclosed. From: Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: GnuTLS 1.2.10 - Security release Newsgroups: gnu.announce To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], help-gnutls@gnu.org, info-gnu@gnu.org

Bug#349729: Was: sudo update to 1.6.8p7-1.3 breaks scripts: is this the permanent fix?

2006-02-10 Thread Jan Grant
Apologies for resubmission; I've jsut found this bug report. I'd like to add my voice to the requests that this be re-evaluated. In particular, env_check does not suffice. See below: From: Jan Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sudo update to 1.6.8p7-1.3 breaks scripts: is this the permanent

Processed: merging 308879 352179

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 merge 308879 352179 Bug#308879: endless loop on startup Bug#352179: tinyca: Sarge-Version of TINYCA still affected of #308879 Merged 308879 352179. End of message, stopping

Processed: tweaks

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 352182 Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder Bug#352182: Crash in the Changed Bug title. clone 352182 -1 Bug#352182: Crash in the ASN.1 DER decoder Bug 352182 cloned as bug 352188. reassign -1 libtasn1-0 0.1.2-5 Bug#352188: Crash in the ASN.1 DER

Bug#352086: marked as done (libkjsembed-dev: libkjsembed.la depends on /usr/lib/libXft.la which no longer exists in debian)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 02:21:53 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#352086: libkjsembed-dev: libkjsembed.la depends on /usr/lib/libXft.la which no longer exists in debian has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#352196: eclipse-sdk: update to 3.1.2-1 failed

2006-02-10 Thread Armin Berres
Package: eclipse-sdk Version: 3.1.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I just tried to update to 3.2.1-1, but it failed and made eclipse unusable. ### dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of eclipse-sdk: eclipse-sdk depends on eclipse (= 3.1.2-1); however:

Bug#352197: eclipse: locally installed plugins vanished

2006-02-10 Thread Armin Berres
Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss I just updated to 3.2.1-1 and with this update all my plugins which were installed via eclipse vanished (CDT, sublipse, checkstyle and even more). The plugins living in /usr/local/lib/eclipse/plugins/

Bug#350874: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#350874: [Kmymoney2-developer] Re: kmymoney 0.8.2 build dependency on $(HOME) directory

2006-02-10 Thread Mark Purcell
On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:19, Thomas Baumgart wrote: The real problem though is, that our configure script does not support being called by an absolute path. I changed that in the current CVS HEAD version and try to backport it for the next stable release. How could this be tested

Bug#352197: Acknowledgement (eclipse: locally installed plugins vanished)

2006-02-10 Thread Armin Berres
Got some more Information: After reinstalling CDT from the CDT update site subclipse also reappeard partially. I can use it from the menu and it is on the update site again, but the subclipse view doesn't work (eclipse gave me a message about this too). The CDT view seems to be broken too.

Processed: Move bug to libparted

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 294520 libparted1.6-13 Bug#294520: QTParted Mixes Up Partiton Numbers Bug reassigned from package `qtparted' to `libparted1.6-13'. retitle 294520 libparted1.6-13: Incorrect handling of extended partitions Bug#294520: QTParted Mixes Up

Bug#352202: CVE-2006-0635: Incorrect parsing of sizeof() may introduce integer overflows

2006-02-10 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: tcc Version: 0.9.23-2 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole XFocus Security discovered that tcc incorrectly evaluates certain sizeof() expressions, which may lead integer overflows. Please see

Bug#352197: Acknowledgement (eclipse: locally installed plugins vanished)

2006-02-10 Thread Michael Koch
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:46:16PM +0100, Armin Berres wrote: Got some more Information: After reinstalling CDT from the CDT update site subclipse also reappeard partially. I can use it from the menu and it is on the update site again, but the subclipse view doesn't work (eclipse gave me a

Bug#352207: grub-update does not work since update to 0.97-3

2006-02-10 Thread Didrik Pinte
Package: grub Version: 0.97-4 Severity: serious Justification: 2 Hi, I've just updated an AMD64 server with dist-upgrade to the latest grub version and kernel 2.6.15. The upgrade jumped from before 0.97-1 version to 0.97-3 version. When calling update-grub, I receive :

Bug#350874: [Pkg-kde-extras] Bug#350874: [Kmymoney2-developer] Re: kmymoney 0.8.2 build dependency on $(HOME) directory

2006-02-10 Thread Thomas Baumgart
Hi all, on Friday 10 February 2006 12:27, Mark Purcell wrote: On Thursday 02 February 2006 17:19, Thomas Baumgart wrote: The real problem though is, that our configure script does not support being called by an absolute path. I changed that in the current CVS HEAD version and try to

Bug#352197: Acknowledgement (eclipse: locally installed plugins vanished)

2006-02-10 Thread Armin Berres
Michael Koch wrote: I dont investigated your problem yet but why dont your install CDT from Debian (apt-get install eclipse-cdt)? Oh, great. Didn't notice we have this :) Will use it... Cheers, Michael Thanks, Armin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Bug#294520: Patch for this bug(?)

2006-02-10 Thread Bas Wijnen
Tags: patch Hello, I have traced this problem down to libparted (and reassigned the bug accordingly). I think I have found the problem, but since I cannot reproduce the behaviour, I am not sure. I attached a patch for libparted/disk_dos.c. The problem seems to be that the partition number

Bug#170795: fixed in opensp 1.5.2-1

2006-02-10 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:44:23AM -0500, Neil Roeth wrote: Correct on both counts: it would be just pushing it ahead, and I am reluctant at this time to turn off DTDDECL in stable, because that is removing behavior, though the longer the package remains in unstable with DTDDECL handling

Bug#352210: websvn: Temporary files not compliant to FSH

2006-02-10 Thread Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
Package: websvn Version: 1.61-16 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system Temporary directories and files are created in /usr/share/websvn/temp. IMHO this behaviour is not compliant with FSH. Moreover, it seems that the temporary files are never got rid of. In a few days

Bug#352219: gri: Please rebuild with current netcdf.

2006-02-10 Thread Daniel Kobras
Package: gri Version: 2.12.10-5 Severity: grave Justification: package uninstallable The netcdf3g package has been renamed and split into C and C++ parts, but the i386 package of gri still depends on the removed netcdf3g and therefore cannot be installed at the moment. A simple rebuild should be

Bug#340375: Subject: kuser destroys all passwords if /etc/shadow isn't present

2006-02-10 Thread Christopher Martin
severity 340375 important stop Since this bug is largely fixed in Sid, but not so totally resolved that I'd want to attach a fixed tag, I think the best course of action is to lower the bug to important, but keep it open. In any case, the bug isn't a regression with respect to what's in Etch

Processed: tagging 349442

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 # until someone has a better idea tags 349442 patch Bug#349442: dpkg: Assertion `dependtry = 4' failed (abort). There were no tags set. Bug#349120: dpkg: assertion failure after

Processed: Re: Bug#340375: Subject: kuser destroys all passwords if /etc/shadow isn't present

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 340375 important Bug#340375: Subject: kuser destroys all passwords if /etc/shadow isn't present Severity set to `important'. stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#352225: adduser: severe problem in existing_user_ok()

2006-02-10 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Package: adduser Version: 3.82 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Severity is set to grave because it breaks one of the two core functionalities of adduser, and one that is used by most postinst scripts that use adduser, to boot. Adduser is failing to correctly deal with a

Bug#352227: gmt: FTBFS and uninstallable on hppa.

2006-02-10 Thread Daniel Kobras
Package: gmt Version: 4.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on release candidate architecture Despite several attempts, version 4.0-2 of gmt could never be built on hppa due to linkage problems[0]. As a consequence, 3.4.4-1 is still current on hppa, but this version is uninstallable

Bug#352228: dovecot-common: Overwrites config files

2006-02-10 Thread Hans Fugal
Package: dovecot-common Version: 1.0.alpha5-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7.3 On upgrade, overwrites configuration files in /etc/dovecot, specifically (in my case) /etc/dovecot/dovecot{,-ldap}.conf. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing

Bug#352231: Subject: aptitude: aptitude ignores --target-release option

2006-02-10 Thread Grégoire Druant
Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: grave Aptitude ignores -t option or its long version --target-release. It will allways install the unstable version of the packages I try to install. If I try aptitude install package -t blablabla, it doesn't mind that blablabla is no valid release,

Bug#352232: python-netcdf: Uninstallable due to netcdf transition.

2006-02-10 Thread Daniel Kobras
Package: python-netcdf Version: 2.4.9-3 Severity: grave Justification: package uninstallable Moi Matthias! python-netcdf depends on package netcdf3g that was removed in your recent netcdf NMU. As python-scientific has strictly versioned dependencies from arch-any to arch-all packages, it can't

Bug#348649: ftbfs: I can't find file `policy.aux'.

2006-02-10 Thread Wolfgang Baer
tags 348649 + unreproducible moreinfo thanks Hi, I just tried it on an uptodate sid and with an uptodate pbuilder and both built java-common without a problem. Can you retry and if it still fails provide more information about the system and the versions of the build-dependencies you are using

Bug#352219: gri: Please rebuild with current netcdf.

2006-02-10 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Daniel Kobras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: gri Version: 2.12.10-5 Severity: grave Justification: package uninstallable The netcdf3g package has been renamed and split into C and C++ parts, but the i386 package of gri still depends on the removed netcdf3g and therefore cannot be

Processed: tagging 294520

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 294520 + patch Bug#294520: libparted1.6-13: Incorrect handling of extended partitions There were no tags set. Tags added: patch End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Fixed in NMU of zynaddsubfx 2.2.1-4

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 352014 + fixed Bug#352014: zynaddsubfx: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'zlib1g-dev' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#348649: ftbfs: I can't find file `policy.aux'.

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 348649 + unreproducible moreinfo Bug#348649: ftbfs: I can't find file `policy.aux'. There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#350816: marked as done (tix: tcl/tk can't find libTix8.4.so.1)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:47:22 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350816: fixed in tix 8.4.0-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#352196: How does that happen?

2006-02-10 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi, Assuming you mean 3.1.2-1, could you indicate the command which generates that output? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#352196: How does that happen?

2006-02-10 Thread Armin Berres
Filipus Klutiero wrote: Hi, Assuming you mean 3.1.2-1, could you indicate the command which generates that output? It was a simple aptitude upgrade. As I said aptitude install eclipse configured eclipse and eclipse-sdk worked afterwards. If no one can verify this problem feel free to close

Bug#285484: marked as done (ayttm: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): invalid lvalue in assignment)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:02:06 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#285484: fixed in ayttm 0.4.6+34-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#352243: Uninstallable in Sid - depends on experimental libraries

2006-02-10 Thread Adam Majer
Package: bridge-utils Version: 1.1.1-1 Severity: grave [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy bridge-utils bridge-utils: Installed: 1.0.6-1 Candidate: 1.1-1 Version table: 1.1-1 0 900 http://debian.yorku.ca unstable/main Packages *** 1.0.6-1 0 100 http://debian.yorku.ca

Processed: Serious

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 351043 serious Bug#351043: gnudoku: generates puzzles with multiple solutions Severity set to `serious'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#255382: marked as done (supports only older kernels, probably should be removed from testing)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:05:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line These kernel packages / patches have been removed from the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#310551: marked as done ('kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:05:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line These kernel packages / patches have been removed from the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#310580: marked as done ('kernel-patch-psd' does not apply to any current sarge kernel)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:05:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line These kernel packages / patches have been removed from the archive has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#352243: Uninstallable in Sid - depends on experimental libraries

2006-02-10 Thread Adam Majer
Maybe including the dependencies would make more sense in this report :) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache showpkg bridge-utils Package: bridge-utils Versions: 1.1-1(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.yorku.ca_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages)

Bug#340352: otrs: Multiple SQL injection and Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilities

2006-02-10 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Torsten Werner wrote: OTRS is vulnerable to several SQL injection and Cross-Site-Scripting vulnerabilities. Please see here for more information: http://otrs.org/advisory/OSA-2005-01-en/ http://moritz-naumann.com/adv/0007/otrsmulti/0007.txt The new upstream version 1.3.3 fixes all

Bug#352253: crashes on startup with wx.PyEventBinder problem

2006-02-10 Thread Joey Hess
Package: ipodder Version: 2.1.9-4 Severity: serious [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ipodder Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/ipodder/iPodderGui.py, line 44, in ? import gui.iPodderWindows File /usr/share/ipodder/gui/iPodderWindows.py, line 21, in ? import listctrl as listmix

Bug#351043: gnudoku

2006-02-10 Thread David Gil
tags 351043 +help thanks I don't know how to deal with this bug. I am quite surprised of its severity since I totally agree with John. Of course I don't want to start a severity war so I just mark the bug with the help tag. The generation of ambiguous puzzles is a known bug. None of the

Processed: Re: Bug#351043: gnudoku

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 351043 +help Bug#351043: gnudoku: generates puzzles with multiple solutions There were no tags set. Tags added: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#352258: Recompile libfox1.4-dev due to changes in libxft-dev

2006-02-10 Thread geiger
Package: libfox-1.4-dev Version: 1.4.16-2 Severity: serious Hi, I am maintaining rezound, a package that uses the FOX toolkit. Due to changes in libxft-dev the FOX package has to be recompiled, as libfox1.4-dev currently depends on the file /usr/lib/libXft.la (which doesn't exist anymore). I

Bug#352231: Subject: aptitude: aptitude ignores --target-release option

2006-02-10 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Grégoire Druant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: grave Aptitude ignores -t option or its long version --target-release. It will allways install the unstable version of the packages I try to install. If I try aptitude install package -t blablabla,

Bug#349794: Patch, CVE number

2006-02-10 Thread Martin Pitt
tag 349794 patch thanks Hi! I took a stab at this bug; granted, it's not the worst one in the world, but it should be fixed eventually. This is the patch I used for the Ubuntu security update: http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/unzip.CVE-2005-4667.diff It works for version 5.52; 5.51 still

Processed: Patch, CVE number

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 349794 patch Bug#349794: unzip: Info-ZIP UnZip File Name Buffer Overflow Vulnerability Tags were: security Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#349794: Patch for 5.51

2006-02-10 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi again, Martin Pitt [2006-02-10 20:45 +0100]: It works for version 5.52; 5.51 still crashes with that patch, I will look into this as well. Ok, done: 5.51 does some unsafe strcpy()s in do_wild(), which are not present any more in 5.52. Here is the 5.51 patch, maybe it is useful for fixing

Bug#352207: grub-update does not work since update to 0.97-3

2006-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:43:14PM +0100, Didrik Pinte wrote: Package: grub Version: 0.97-4 Severity: serious Justification: 2 I've just updated an AMD64 server with dist-upgrade to the latest grub version and kernel 2.6.15. The upgrade jumped from before 0.97-1 version to 0.97-3 version.

Processed: severity of 352231 is important

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 severity 352231 important Bug#352231: Subject: aptitude: aptitude ignores --target-release option Severity set to `important'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much

2006-02-10 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: apt Version: 0.6.43.2 Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss I intended to purge dbus-1 so I could make sure that the config files were the Debian defaults. I intended to re-install dbus-1 immediately afterwards. So, I did apt-get --purge dbus-1 I expected this

Bug#334235: fixed in visualboyadvance 1.7.2-5

2006-02-10 Thread Jose Carlos Medeiros
Hi, Steve Ah, I didn't notice that this bug was about memory usage in g++; I assumed it was a C++ standards bug, like so many others. Still, this seems to be the only package in all the archive that has such a problem, and the only package which build-depends on g++-3.3; could this bug be

Processed: Tagging pending bugs fixed in SVN

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 345641 + pending Bug#345641: libc6: libnss_dns-2.3.5.so incompatible with libc-2.3.5.so : version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tag 351036 + pending Bug#351036: libc6 should restart Dropbear sshd (or

Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much

2006-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 352267 moreinfo unreproducible severity 352267 normal thanks On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 08:46:26PM +, Greg Kochanski wrote: I intended to purge dbus-1 so I could make sure that the config files were the Debian defaults. I intended to re-install dbus-1 immediately afterwards. So, I did

Processed: Re: Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 352267 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible severity 352267 normal Bug#352267: apt-get --purge remove dbus-1 purges far too much

Processed: typo in pseudo-header

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 352183 1.4-3 Bug#352183: minc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: MINC file has only 3 dims, volume requires 4. Bug marked as found in version 1.4-3. severity 352183 serious Bug#352183: minc: ftbfs [sparc] Error: MINC file has only 3 dims, volume requires

Bug#320876: marked as done (uninstallable due to aalib transition)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#320876: fixed in smilutils 0.3.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#321551: marked as done (smilutils: uninstallable due to dependency on slang1)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#321551: fixed in smilutils 0.3.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#348529: marked as done (smilutils - FTBFS: error: bswap.h: No such file or directory)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:33:43 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#348529: fixed in smilutils 0.3.0-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#350007: marked as done (gkrelldnet - FTBFS: error: gkrellm2/gkrellm.h: No such file or directory)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:32:31 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#350007: fixed in gkrelldnet 0.14.2-5 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#351782: marked as done (subversion_1.3.0-1(sparc/experimental): FTBFS)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:39:27 -0600 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in ecj has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to

Bug#352277: Package places libs in incorrect directory

2006-02-10 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Package: libgtk-trayicon-ruby Version: 0.1.0-4 Severity: grave Tags: patch The package installs the library in a usr/local/lib/site_ruby tree _under_ /usr/lib/ruby. This directory is obviously not in the $LOAD_PATH and therefore this package/the lib is not usable at all. % dpkg -L

Bug#334235: fixed in visualboyadvance 1.7.2-5

2006-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 06:21:05PM -0200, Jose Carlos Medeiros wrote: Ah, I didn't notice that this bug was about memory usage in g++; I assumed it was a C++ standards bug, like so many others. Still, this seems to be the only package in all the archive that has such a problem, and the

Bug#352243: Retitle

2006-02-10 Thread Filipus Klutiero
retitle 352243 Uninstallable on i386/FTBFS elsewhere: depends on experimental libsysfs found 352243 1.1-1 notfound 352243 1.1.1-1 thanks Santiago, I guess Martin was asking to address 347634 in experimental until libsysfs2 itself enters unstable :) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Bug#352286: apt-get purges packages after it asks for permission to remove them.

2006-02-10 Thread Greg Kochanski
Package: apt Version: 0.6.43.2 Severity: grave Justification: causes non-serious data loss See the example. Apt-get asks permission to REMOVE the packages, but it will actually PURGE them, if given permission. # apt-get --purge remove samba-common Reading package lists... Done Building

Processed: Re: Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 347479 + pending Bug#347479: Seems to not handle VG creation correctly Tags were: patch Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: severity of 352286 is normal, merging 352286 352267

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.11 # bts abuse severity 352286 normal Bug#352286: apt-get purges packages after it asks for permission to remove them. Severity set to `normal'. merge 352286 352267 Bug#352267:

Bug#352258: marked as done (Recompile libfox1.4-dev due to changes in libxft-dev)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:19:03 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#352258: Recompile libfox1.4-dev due to changes in libxft-dev has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#352297: perl-modules 5.8.8-2 needs to depend on perl-base 5.8.8-2

2006-02-10 Thread Blars Blarson
Package: perl-modules Version: 5.8.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On my amd64 system, today's upgrade got me perl-base 5.8.8-1 and perl-modules 5.8.8-2 . With the fix for bug 352074, neither contains overload.pm, making the install of other packages break.

Bug#352299: My debconf-settings do not have efect

2006-02-10 Thread Juhapekka Tolvanen
Package: console-setup Version: 1.0 Severity: serious I thougth I chose right settings, when debconf was run during installation. But somehow they have no effect. For example I have Finnish keyboard layout and 102 keys. But as you can see below, debconf did not care my choices at all. --

Bug#352183: running test

2006-02-10 Thread Blars Blarson
I'll try to get to it next week, I'm helping with a debian booth this weekend. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#352219: marked as done (gri: Please rebuild with current netcdf.)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:47:12 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#352219: fixed in gri 2.12.10-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#349853: libdockapp-dev - depends against unavailable package xlibx11-dev

2006-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 349853 patch thanks Hi Jeff, I've prepared a fixed NMU to correct the botched package name in the previous NMU. Please find the patch for this attached. The NMU will be uploaded to incoming shortly, as this is one of only a handful of packages left that break with the new xorg. Cheers,

Processed: Re: libdockapp-dev - depends against unavailable package xlibx11-dev

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 349853 patch Bug#349853: libdockapp-dev - depends against unavailable package xlibx11-dev There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#352297: perl-modules 5.8.8-2 needs to depend on perl-base 5.8.8-2

2006-02-10 Thread Steve Langasek
severity 352297 normal thanks On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 07:02:40PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote: Package: perl-modules Version: 5.8.8-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On my amd64 system, today's upgrade got me perl-base 5.8.8-1 and perl-modules 5.8.8-2 . With the fix

Bug#352306: stgit: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'python-dev'

2006-02-10 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: stgit Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'stgit' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: #/usr/bin/make install DESTDIR=/stgit-0.8.1/debian/stgit python setup.py install --root=/stgit-0.8.1/debian/stgit running install error: invalid Python

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libdockapp 1:0.5.0-1.3

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 349853 + fixed Bug#349853: libdockapp-dev - depends against unavailable package xlibx11-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#352297: perl-modules 5.8.8-2 needs to depend on perl-base 5.8.8-2

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 352297 normal Bug#352297: perl-modules 5.8.8-2 needs to depend on perl-base 5.8.8-2 Severity set to `normal'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#347083: marked as done (sablevm-classlib: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:47:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#347083: fixed in sablevm-classlib 1.13-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#349195: marked as done (FTBFS: configure doesn't use pangoft2 flags)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:47:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349195: fixed in sablevm-classlib 1.13-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#352309: tioga: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'ruby1.8'

2006-02-10 Thread Andreas Jochens
Package: tioga Version: 1.0.I-2 Severity: serious Tags: patch When building 'tioga' in a clean 'unstable' chroot, I get the following error: dh_clean debian/rules build dh_testdir # Add here commands to configure the package. cd make;\ PREFIX=/usr ruby1.8 extconf.rb --debian; /bin/sh:

Bug#325155: marked as done (warped: FTBFS: Please change the Build-Depends from mpich to 'libmpich1.0-dev')

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:06:47 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line warped: #325155 fixed in latest unstable version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#268250: marked as done (warped: FTBFS with gcc-3.4: `INT64_MAX' was not declared in this scope)

2006-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:15:55 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line warped: #268250 fixed in latest unstable version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case