Bug#349120: marked as done (dpkg: assertion failure after failing to configure a package)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#349120: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#315784: marked as done (dependencies should ensure md5sum is present)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#313605: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#313605: marked as done (dpkg removes a file from another package using a local diversion)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 30 May 2006 22:17:06 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#315784: fixed in dpkg 1.13.20 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#369448: linux-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc: package fails to install

2006-05-31 Thread Sven Luther
clone 369448 -1 reassign 369448 linux-2.6 reassign -1 kernel-package retitle 369448 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install retitle -1 [powerpc] failure in pre-inst script, package fails to install thanks On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:47:55AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote: On

Bug#366852: marked as done (phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 08:40:37 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#366852: phpldapadmin: PHP segfault on tree.php has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#362296: too simple ... now old X11 installations are broken

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:59:40AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: The bad news, though, is that no such link is shipped for encodings/large. If the maintainer cares about maintaining compatibility, in my opinion the way to go would be to ask the xfonts-encodings maintainer to

Bug#369659: glibc - FTBFS: Missing build dependency lib64gcc1

2006-05-31 Thread Bastian Blank
]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/build-tree/s390-s390x' make: *** [/build/buildd/glibc-2.3.6/stamp-dir/build_s390x] Error 2 ** Build finished at 20060531-0057 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]

Bug#354698: inkscape: gdb messages were :

2006-05-31 Thread Jung-hoon Han
Package: inkscape Version: 0.43-4 Followup-For: Bug #354698 (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/inkscape (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) .. [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 47507615925264 (LWP 2163)] Program

Bug#369636: marked as done (seems to be missing libgcc_s.so.1, totally breaks d-i)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 00:47:31 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#369636: fixed in glibc 2.3.6-13 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#369661: nvidia-settings_1.0+20060404-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends

2006-05-31 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: nvidia-settings Version: 1.0+20060404-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of nvidia-settings_1.0+20060404-1 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 98 Build started at 20060517-1950 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:

Processed: Re: Bug#366128: ding in etch don't start

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 366128 important Bug#366128: ding in etch don't start Severity set to `important' from `grave' thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs

Bug#359206: marked as done (xfce4-panel: xfce4 panel crashes due to a free() of an invalid pointer)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 09:15:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woo RC bugs fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#359206: marked as done (xfce4-panel: xfce4 panel crashes due to a free() of an invalid pointer)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 09:15:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woo RC bugs fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358249: marked as done (xfce4-weather-plugin crashes xfce4-panel with glib 2.10)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 09:15:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woo RC bugs fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358249: marked as done (xfce4-weather-plugin crashes xfce4-panel with glib 2.10)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 09:15:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woo RC bugs fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358358: marked as done (xfce4-panel: crashes with glibc-error since last libc update in unstable)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 09:15:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woo RC bugs fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#358358: marked as done (xfce4-panel: crashes with glibc-error since last libc update in unstable)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 09:15:16 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Woo RC bugs fixed by new version has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#366128: ding in etch don't start

2006-05-31 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
severity 366128 important thanks I cannot reproduce the bug either, the submitter does not answer to the maintainer questions. This RC severity is exagerated for no reason, lowering the severity to important. If the submitter provides a way or an information that leads to reproducibility,

Bug#364959: marked as done (libkjsembed1: FTBFS in pbuilder - cannot find jni.h)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 10:21:18 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line libkjsembed1: FTBFS in pbuilder - cannot find jni.h has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#340538: followup on this bug?

2006-05-31 Thread Thom May
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : This RC bug has been open since November with no maintainer followup that I can see. Is anything being done to remove the problimatic files and/or get them properly licensed upstream? This is in progress with upstream; we've worked with them to remove

Bug#312932: marked as done (wrong binary name (xmlstarlet instead of xml) on i386)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 01:32:09 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#312932: fixed in xmlstarlet 1.0.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#354698: inkscape crshes under certain conditions with smooth themes

2006-05-31 Thread Wolfram Quester
Hi Ed, I am the maintainer of inkscape, a graphical svg editor and drawing program. I just wanted to ask for your opinion on bug #354698. It was reported against inkscpe, but I assume this is a bug in gtk2-engines-smooth which might also cause bugs #346174, #349060, #349063, and #359985.

Bug#369607: is uninstallable (cl-flexi-streams doesn't exist)

2006-05-31 Thread Peter Van Eynde
Hello, On Wednesday 31 May 2006 00:17, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: You're depending on a non-existant package (and I don't see something fitting waiting in NEW). http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html - flexi-streams 0.5.3-1 source all unstable 2 weeks Peter Van

Bug#369626: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails

2006-05-31 Thread Roger Leigh
tags 369626 + confirmed Andreas Bombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The session cleanup in 10mount ignores failures of umount invocations and cleanup continues. In the case of file chroots with a /home bind mount that failed to umount, the rm -rf in 05file blindly descends into the system /home

Processed: Re: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369626 + confirmed Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails Tags were: confirmed Tags added: confirmed Andreas Bombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Bug#369626: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails

2006-05-31 Thread Roger Leigh
tags 369626 + confirmed Andreas Bombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The session cleanup in 10mount ignores failures of umount invocations and cleanup continues. In the case of file chroots with a /home bind mount that failed to umount, the rm -rf in 05file blindly descends into the system /home

Processed: Re: [Buildd-tools-devel] Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369626 + confirmed Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed Andreas Bombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

Bug#368255: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools)

2006-05-31 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
On Wed, May 24, 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Building it just now, it works fine. Can you get a more verbose failure from the tests? Can other people test this? 0.4.40 builds fine for me and I can't find sources for 0.4.36. Do you have a link? -- adn Mohammed Adnène Trojette

Bug#368255: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends (python-setuptools)

2006-05-31 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Mittwoch, 31. Mai 2006 12:03 schrieb Mohammed Adnène Trojette: On Wed, May 24, 2006, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Building it just now, it works fine. Can you get a more verbose failure from the tests? Can other people test this? 0.4.40 builds fine for me and I can't find sources for

Bug#368098: Intend to NMU debroster for this bug

2006-05-31 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hello Matthew, This package hasn't seen an update in 1.5 years and now has this RC bug. I intend to NMU debroster anytime soon for this RC-bug with the attached patch. I've completely removed the key specification for sort because it eliminates valid contributors. The only possible risk is that a

Processed: Fixed in NMU of xmovie 1.9.12-1.1

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 367519 + fixed Bug#367519: FTBFS with G++ 4.1: extra qualification Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 369523 + fixed Bug#369523: FTBFS: 'quicktime_set_window' was not declared in this scope' Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping

Bug#369659: glibc - FTBFS: Missing build dependency lib64gcc1

2006-05-31 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Bastian Blank a écrit : Package: glibc Version: 2.3.6-12 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of glibc_2.3.6-12 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 85 [...] This problem has been fixed in 2.3.6-13. However, it still not build, I am

Bug#369523: NMU diff

2006-05-31 Thread Martin Michlmayr
I've uploaded the following NMU: diff -u xmovie-1.9.12/debian/changelog xmovie-1.9.12/debian/changelog --- xmovie-1.9.12/debian/changelog +++ xmovie-1.9.12/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@ +xmovie (1.9.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=low + + * NMU as part of the GCC 4.1 transition. + * Include

Bug#369523: FTBFS: 'quicktime_set_window' was not declared in this scope'

2006-05-31 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Helge Kreutzmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-30 19:17]: Ok, I do. A while ago I tried building xmovie, but it was version 1.9.13, not Indeed, thanks a lot. I've uploaded this now. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Processed: Re: ibm-3270: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing Build-Depends

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 367830 patch Bug#367830: ibm-3270: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing Build-Depends There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks dude Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: severity of 309713 is serious, tagging 309713

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 severity 309713 serious Bug#309713: asmounter: configuration file should be in /etc Severity set to `serious' from `minor' tags 309713 + patch Bug#309713: asmounter: configuration

Bug#367830: ibm-3270: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing Build-Depends

2006-05-31 Thread Mohammed Adnène Trojette
tag 367830 patch thanks dude On Thu, May 18, 2006, Daniel Schepler wrote: Package: ibm-3270 Version: 3.3.4p6-3 Severity: serious /usr/include/X11/bitmaps/gray is now in xbitmaps. Here is a patch addressing the issue with the following changelog: diff -u ibm-3270-3.3.4p6/debian/changelog

Processed: Fixed in NMU of gpsim 0.20.14-7.3

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 244126 + fixed Bug#244126: gpsim: please recompile against libgtkextra17-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed tag 346347 + fixed Bug#346347: gpsim: FTBFS: build-depends on xlibs-dev Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing

Bug#369685: Nautilus FTBFS with low version of libIDL

2006-05-31 Thread Tom Parker
Package: nautilus Version:2.14.1-4 Severity: grave With libidl-dev 0.8.5-1 installed (current stable), Nautilus FTBFS as shown below. Upgrading libidl-dev to 0.8.6-1 fixes this. make[3]: Entering directory `/home/parkertev/stuff/nautilus-2.14.1/src' /usr/bin/orbit-idl-2 -I

Bug#369687: uninstallable (versioned dep on virtual package)

2006-05-31 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Package: sgcontrol Severity: grave Heya, sgcontrol depends on hamlib4 (= 1.2.5). hamlib4 doesn't exist anymore, but is provided as virtual package by libhamlib2. As dpkg doesn't support versioned provides, sgcontrol is uninstallable at the moment. Please fix this uploading a new release with

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ibm-3270 3.3.4p6-3.1

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 367830 + fixed Bug#367830: ibm-3270: FTBFS with new X packages: Missing Build-Depends Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#369704: xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build dependency on pkg-config

2006-05-31 Thread Frederik Schüler
Package: xmlstarlet Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), libxslt1-dev (= 1.1.9) A build dependency on pkg-config is missing: checking for

Bug#369706: inkscape: fails to start with Entity: line 8: parser error : PCDATA invalid Char value 8

2006-05-31 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Package: inkscape Version: 0.43-5 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Steps to reproduce (/tmp/home used to make sure nothing in $HOME can affect this): 1) mkdir /tmp/home 2) cp ~/.Xauthority /tmp/home 3) HOME=/tmp/home strace -o inkscape.strace -f -s4096 inkscape Expected

Bug#369702: sdcv_0.4.2-1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: error: no matching function for call to 'min(long unsigned int, guint32)'

2006-05-31 Thread Frederik Schüler
Package: sdcv Version: 0.4.2-1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Making all in lib make[4]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/sdcv-0.4.2/src/lib' if x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/include/glib-2.0

Bug#369711: mlgmp_20021123-10+b1(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: debian/libgmp-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.1/stublibs/ not found

2006-05-31 Thread Frederik Schüler
Package: mlgmp Version: 20021123-10+b1 Severity: serious Hello, There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: if [ -e ./test_suite.opt ]; then ./test_suite.opt; fi install -d /build/buildd/mlgmp-20021123/debian/libgmp-ocaml-dev/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.2/gmp/ install -m 0644 -c

Bug#369523: NMU diff

2006-05-31 Thread David Martínez Moreno
El miércoles, 31 de mayo de 2006 13:53, Martin Michlmayr escribió: I've uploaded the following NMU: Thanks, Martin and Helge. I am preparing other packages with higher priority than xmovie, so sorry for silence. Best regards, Ender. -- Network engineer

Bug#369508: FTBFS due to gfortran

2006-05-31 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
deb-science'rs, Anybody here who could help me with a Fortran problem? I cannot compil one (old) routine in the source package fmultivar with gfortran: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/CRAN/fMultivar-221.10065/src$ gfortran -c 46C-OutlierDetection.f [...] In file 46C-OutlierDetection.f:79

Bug#368098: Intend to NMU debroster for this bug

2006-05-31 Thread Matthew Vernon
severity 368098 important quit If you do not approve of this, please let me know. I don't. Not least of which, your patch doesn't actually solve the problem of not properly uniqifying the maintainer list. Matthew -- At least you know where you are with Microsoft. True. I just wish I'd

Processed: Bug#368098: Intend to NMU debroster for this bug

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 368098 important Bug#368098: uniquifies maintainer list by first name Severity set to `important' from `grave' quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#369722: xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1(i386/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-depends

2006-05-31 Thread Ryan Murray
Package: xmlstarlet Version: 1.0.1-1 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of xmlstarlet_1.0.1-1 on ninsei by sbuild/i386 98 Build started at 20060531-0138 [...] ** Using build dependencies supplied by package: Build-Depends: debhelper

Processed: Fixed in NMU of ispell-tl 0.02-5.1

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 319666 + fixed Bug#319666: aspell-tl: Needs repackaging for latest aspell Tags were: sid Bug#360450: ispell-tl: FTBFS: Build depends on aspell-bin. Tags added: fixed tag 331870 + fixed Bug#331870: ispell-tl depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0

Bug#367837: marked as done (synergy: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect X)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 15:02:12 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#367837: fixed in synergy 1.3.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#369726: xcircuit 3.6.24-1 unusable on amd64

2006-05-31 Thread Michael Ablassmeier
package: xcircuit severity: grave Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 08:47:24 -0700 To: Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Ablassmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xcircuit 3.6.24-1 unusable on amd64 Hi - I don't mean to complain, but the recent upload

Processed: tag squashfs bugs as pending

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369522 + pending Bug#369522: Kernel ABI changed There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 368969 + pending Bug#368969: rounding error causes generation of invalid filesystems Tags were: upstream patch Tags added: pending thanks Stopping

Bug#361541: marked as done (monodoc-dbus-1-manual: package empty)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 14:47:43 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#361541: fixed in dbus 0.61-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: tagging

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: notfound 366044 3.23.49-8.15 Bug#366044: SECURITY: MySQL Anonymous Login Handshake - Information Leakage Bug marked as not found in version 3.23.49-8.15. (By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.) thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: Fixed in NMU of grub 0.97-9.1

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 369452 + fixed Bug#369452: grub_0.97-9(amd64/unstable): FTBFS (amd64) build-depends on nonexisting package libs-dev-i386 There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian

Bug#369508: Fwd: FTBFS due to gfortran

2006-05-31 Thread Michael Gilbert
i think these error messages are indicating that the line at 24 is within a DO block, whereas the GOTO at 18 is external to the DO. similar with the line at 25. gfortran may be more strict about these conditions than g77. you probably need to rewrite the algoritm so it doesn't rely on unsafe

Bug#361541: Accepted dbus 0.61-6 (source i386 all)

2006-05-31 Thread Pierre Habouzit
Le Mer 31 Mai 2006 23:47, Sjoerd Simons a écrit : Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 15:00:49 +0200 […] Description: […] monodoc-dbus-1-manual - compiled XML documentation for the D-BUS CLI bindings Accepted: […] monodoc-dbus-1-manual_0.61-6_all.deb to

Processed: Fixed in NMU of libgii 1:0.9.1-0.2

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 367832 + fixed Bug#367832: libgii: FTBFS with new X packages: Fails to detect X There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#367844: marked as done (xkeycaps: FTBFS: imake config files have moved)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#367844: fixed in xkeycaps 2.47-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory

2006-05-31 Thread Srdjan
Package: libgl1-mesa-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Cannot install: Unpacking libgl1-mesa-dev (from .../libgl1-mesa-dev_6.4.2-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgl1-mesa-dev_6.4.2-1_i386.deb (--unpack): error creating symbolic link

Bug#361541: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Re: Bug#361541: monodoc-dbus-1-manual: package empty

2006-05-31 Thread Pierre HABOUZIT
I've sent another mail sooner in the night, please ignore it, it's not relevant, I completely misread your changelog, and I apology. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O[EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO

Processed: confirm bug #340008

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 340008 0.99.14-1sarge0 Bug#340008: dovecot: Dovecont install new sslkey on upgrade Bug marked as found in version 0.99.14-1sarge0. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#369735: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding

2006-05-31 Thread Christian Hammers
package: mysql-server-4.1 severity: grave justification: security hole Just for reference, the DSA is already in preparation. -christian- On 2006-05-31 Joerg Bruehe wrote: Bugs fixed: * Security fix: An SQL-injection security hole has been found in multibyte encoding processing.

Processed: tagging

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 368213 grave Bug#368213: unable to install estraier on sid due to dependency problems Severity set to `grave' from `normal' tag 368213 sid Bug#368213: unable to install estraier on sid due to dependency problems There were no tags set. Tags

Bug#369503: samhain_2.0.10a-4(amd64/unstable): FTBFS: configure.ac:44: error: m4_defn: undefined macro: _AC_LANG

2006-05-31 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:43:02AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: From this it looks like AC_PROG_CC - AC_LANG_POP - _AC_LANG and for some reason that macro is undefined. But samhain does not use that at all, that's autoheader working here. After debugging this issue, it seems

Processed: Re: Bug#369735: Acknowledgement (Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 369735 -1 Bug#369735: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding Bug 369735 cloned as bug 369741. reassign -1 mysql-dfsg Bug#369741: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding Bug reassigned from package `mysql-server-4.1' to

Bug#369738: gr-usrp: uninstallable on amd64

2006-05-31 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
Package: gr-usrp Version: 0.8-1 Severity: serious gr-usrp is uninstallable on amd64 (and unbuildable on all other archs) due to usrp 0.12-1 being stuck in NEW. (I'm mainly keeping this here so it's visible in the BTS in case someone wonders -- seems like NEW processing could take a little while

Bug#369626: schroot: rm -rf in file chroot cleanup destroys real /home if umount fails

2006-05-31 Thread Andreas Bombe
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:53:18AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: Andreas Bombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The session cleanup in 10mount ignores failures of umount invocations and cleanup continues. In the case of file chroots with a /home bind mount that failed to umount, the rm -rf in

Bug#299623: marked as done (mdadm: Fails to upgrade while udev installed)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 16:32:21 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#299623: fixed in mdadm 2.4.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#356884: please remove bazaar

2006-05-31 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Laszlo Boszormenyi 2006-05-20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bazaar is abadonned by upstream[1], maintainer is said to be MIA since seven months. Has a new development branch, but that's called bazaar-ng[2], a package is requested for it[3]. Rob was my NM, I've just rejected his application because his

Bug#368060: easy to fix with rebuilding

2006-05-31 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, after rebuilding thuban in a clean sid chroot (and confirming this with pbuilder) I can say that a simple binNMU fixes this bug. As we are in a permanent BSP (where 0-day NMUs are allowed (*)) and this bug is open for more than a week, I plan to do a (sponsored) binNMU tomorrow. If you're

Bug#369685: Nautilus FTBFS with low version of libIDL

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 369685 liborbit2-dev thanks On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:17:52PM +0200, Tom Parker wrote: With libidl-dev 0.8.5-1 installed (current stable), Nautilus FTBFS as shown below. Upgrading libidl-dev to 0.8.6-1 fixes this. make[3]: Entering directory

Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 368883 patch thanks So, having diagnosed that this is an interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden and referencing inlined methods (bug #369642), the obvious workaround is to keep the problematic methods from getting inlined. The attached patch should do this; unfortunately, I haven't

Processed: rather binNMU_needed than patch but whatever (its easy see this in the bugreport)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 368060 patch Bug#368060: thuban: Thuban was compiled with wx 2.4.4 but wxPython is 2.4.5.0 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: Bug#369685: Nautilus FTBFS with low version of libIDL

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 369685 liborbit2-dev Bug#369685: Nautilus FTBFS with low version of libIDL Bug reassigned from package `nautilus' to `liborbit2-dev'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: Re: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 368883 patch Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Processed: Re: Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369732 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible thanks Stopping processing

Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 369732 moreinfo unreproducible thanks On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:28:50AM +1200, Srdjan wrote: Package: libgl1-mesa-dev Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Cannot install: Unpacking libgl1-mesa-dev (from .../libgl1-mesa-dev_6.4.2-1_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error

Bug#368213: note of estraier bin-NMU

2006-05-31 Thread Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt
Heya, Just wanted to note that I've asked for bin-NMUs on all archs for estraier, that should pick up the new dep and fix this RC bug without a new sourceful upload. Just wait a few hours/days until all bin-NMUs are done and close the bug :-) Marc -- BOFH #388: Bad user karma. -- To

Bug#368213: marked as done (unable to install estraier on sid due to dependency problems)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 31 May 2006 17:49:10 -0700 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line unable to install estraier on sid due to dependency problems has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: tagging 364098

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.16 tags 364098 + experimental Bug#364098: glibc_2.3.999-1(m68k/experimental): There were no tags set. Tags added: experimental End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact

Bug#369659: marked as done (glibc - FTBFS: Missing build dependency lib64gcc1)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
** Build finished at 20060531-0057 FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died] ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Aurelien Jarno wrote: Bastian Blank a écrit : Package: glibc Version: 2.3.6-12 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build

Bug#364651: Related to user config?

2006-05-31 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Does this reproduce with a newly-created user on your system? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#367910: Still happens?

2006-05-31 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Are you able to reproduce this with 1.4.0a-1? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#366042: Related to user config?

2006-05-31 Thread Filipus Klutiero
After looking at some other amarok bug reports, I removed the xine entries from amarokrc, but it still crashes in the same way, and the strace still shows it loading xine libraries. Thanks for this verification, but it would be useful if you could try to reproduce with a newly-created user,

Bug#309501: marked as done (basilisk2_0.9.20050428-1 (unstable): fails to build)

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2006 03:16:03 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Package builds with basilisk2-0.9.20050730 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#369752: freemind: Dependency Problem (package unusable)

2006-05-31 Thread Walter B. Rasmann
Package: freemind Version: 0.7.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable After installing and running the following was displayed: Exception in thread main java.awt.AWTError: Cannot load AWT toolkit: gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GtkToolkit at

Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory

2006-05-31 Thread Srdjan
I don't have /usr/lib/libGL.so on my system. I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-06-01 09:40 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 - libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447560 2006-05-29 14:56 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 My understanding is that libgl1-mesa-dev creates a symlink to /usr/lib/libGL.so.1, and that

Bug#337496: New Debian package entering sid in 24h supports nostrip

2006-05-31 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Hi, Please try rebuilding the new package due in sid within 24h: It should properly support nostrip! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm pgpjPf5EuTO3S.pgp

Bug#366748: snort-mysql still depends on libmysqlclient12

2006-05-31 Thread Christian Kujau
Package: snort-mysql Version: 2.3.3-6 Followup-For: Bug #366748 I've noticed the same dependancy and I was happy that it was already fixed...almost: $ apt-cache show snort-mysql | egrep '^Version|libmysqlclient' Version: 2.3.3-6 Depends: snort-rules-default (= 2.3.3-6), debconf (= 0.2.80) |

Bug#368060: easy to fix with rebuilding

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:11:42AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: after rebuilding thuban in a clean sid chroot (and confirming this with pbuilder) I can say that a simple binNMU fixes this bug. As we are in a permanent BSP (where 0-day NMUs are allowed (*)) and this bug is open for more than

Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory

2006-05-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:03:03PM +1200, Srdjan wrote: I don't have /usr/lib/libGL.so on my system. I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-06-01 09:40 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 - libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447560 2006-05-29 14:56 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 What does dpkg -S

Processed: tagging 362170, merging 354725 362170

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 tags 362170 - help Bug#362170: firefox fails to start with bus error on sparc64 Tags were: upstream help Tags removed: help merge 354725 362170 Bug#354725: recent versions crash on

Processed: found 369735 in 4.1.11a-4sarge3

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: found 369735 4.1.11a-4sarge3 Bug#369735: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding Bug marked as found in version 4.1.11a-4sarge3. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: your mail

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 369733 liboil Bug#369733: banshee: Banshee segfaults when trying to play a song. Bug reassigned from package `banshee' to `liboil'. forcemerge 368991 369733 Bug#368991: banshee: crash when click play Bug#369733: banshee: Banshee segfaults

Processed: tagging 369735

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369735 + security Bug#369735: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding There were no tags set. Tags added: security End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: tagging 369741, notfound 369741 in 3.23.49-8.15, cloning 369741, reassign -1 to mysql ...

2006-05-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 369741 + security Bug#369741: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding There were no tags set. Tags added: security notfound 369741 3.23.49-8.15 Bug#369741: Security: SQL-injection with multibyte encoding Bug marked as not found in version

Bug#369732: libgl1-mesa-dev: Doesn't install - error creating symbolic link `./usr/lib/libGL.so': No such file or directory

2006-05-31 Thread Srdjan
Steve Langasek wrote: On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:03:03PM +1200, Srdjan wrote: I don't have /usr/lib/libGL.so on my system. I have lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-06-01 09:40 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 - libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 447560 2006-05-29 14:56 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 What

  1   2   >