On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 04:13:40PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Hi Julian,
Hi Steve!
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:03:57PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Package: smbfs
Version: 3.0.28-1~lenny1
Severity: serious
I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I
try to
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:59:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I just tried on my home box (amd64/sid), and cannot reproduce the error
you describe on recompiling cryptgps.
mmmh, this is strange, I really don't see how can it built find for you:
the cdbs class now invokes
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
package camlp4 camlp4-extra ocaml ocaml-base ocaml-base-nox
ocaml-compiler-libs ocaml-interp ocaml-mode ocaml-native-compilers ocaml-nox
ocaml-source
Ignoring bugs not assigned
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:44:32AM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
I just tried on my home box (amd64/sid), and cannot reproduce the error
you describe on recompiling cryptgps.
mmmh, this is strange, I really don't see how can it built find for you:
the cdbs class now invokes
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 11:52:11PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
Package: ocaml-nox
Version: 3.10.0-9
Severity: serious
I'm seeing several ocaml-related build failures. For example, from my
cryptgps build log using an i386 pbuilder chroot:
...
ocamlopt -inline 1 -unsafe -c
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:32:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#436200: fixed in motion 3.2.9-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:47:34AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I
try to mount my Samba partition, I get the following error:
euclid:~ # mount -t cifs //WGS-SVR-001/RMStaff /mnt/wggs/rmstaff -o
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 16:39 -0800 schrieb Nicholas Breen:
Is it somewhere publically available? I'd be happy to test it as well,
it'll be interesting to see if it also works with GROMACS 3.3.3-beta
packages.
Yes, you can find it in the SVN repository linked at
Hi!
I was updating from my own version of -2 compiled against the new libicu to
the newly uploaded -2.1 version (which should more or less be the same as my
version) when I noticed that the new libboost-regex-dev still depends on
libicu36-dev instead of libicu-dev, for what I see you forgot to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
forwarded 456399 upstream
Bug#456399: dash 0.5.4-3 dies with SIGBUS on sparc
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to upstream.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Here's the whole session from login to reboot, hoping this will help
sorry, but messages are in french
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ns1
Password:
channel 1: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed
Last login:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 01:36:11AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
The lastest version of dash in unstable is failing to build with the
following error:
[...]
cc -Wall -g -O2 -Wall -o dash alias.o arith_yacc.o arith_yylex.o cd.o
error.o eval.o exec.o expand.o histedit.o input.o jobs.o
From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dash dies on sparc with a SIGBUS due to an arithmetic error introduced
with commit 03b4958, this patch fixes it.
---
Hi Gerrit,
dash 0.5.4-3 dies on sparc with a SIGBUS due to an arithmetic error
introduced with the patch
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
Version: linux-image-2.6.18-4-686 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
This morning, as usual I did :
apt-get update
apt-get upgrade
today, there was a security update on linux-image-2.6.18-4-686
I followed the given
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:02:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#457014: fixed in ocaml 3.10.0-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 21:23 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
On 19 December 2007 at 01:29, Manuel Prinz wrote:
| I'm not sure about that. I didn't see that on a quick read of chapters 8
| and 10, though policy states in 10.2:
| Packages that use libtool to create shared
Package: megahal
Version: 9.1.1a-1
Followup-For: Bug #454212
Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
of megahal and strace.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh
At Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:23:30 -0600,
Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
/usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_zher2k'
/usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_strsv'
/usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_zdotc_sub'
[ many more of these ]
Can you see a
diff -Nru /tmp/z2bNG5yT2j/gcc-defaults-1.61/debian/changelog
/tmp/eh3mQ9ni2v/gcc-defaults-1.61.1/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/z2bNG5yT2j/gcc-defaults-1.61/debian/changelog 2007-09-04
02:41:56.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/eh3mQ9ni2v/gcc-defaults-1.61.1/debian/changelog2007-12-19
On 19 December 2007 at 11:53, Brian Gough wrote:
| At Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:23:30 -0600,
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| /usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_zher2k'
| /usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_strsv'
| /usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to
Package: exiftags
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for exiftags.
CVE-2007-6356[0]:
| exiftags before 1.01 allows attackers to cause a denial of service
| (infinite loop) via recursive IFD references in the EXIF data in a
|
On 19 December 2007 at 13:08, Manuel Prinz wrote:
| Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 21:23 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| On 19 December 2007 at 01:29, Manuel Prinz wrote:
| | I'm not sure about that. I didn't see that on a quick read of chapters 8
| | and 10, though policy states in 10.2:
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
retitle 457062 exiftags: CVE-2007-635{4,5,6} multiple vulnerabilities
Bug#457062: exiftags: CVE-2007-6356 CVE-2007-6355 multiple vulnerabilities
Changed Bug title to `exiftags:
Package: asterisk
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for asterisk.
CVE-2007-6430[0]:
| Due to the way database-based registrations (realtime)
| are processed, IP addresses are not checked when the
| username is correct and
Package: boost
Severity: serious
Justification: ftbfs from source
Version: 1.34.1-2.1
Hello,
Your package doesn't build from source in cowbuilder:
---
cd tools/jam/src sh build.sh cc mv bin.*/bjam .
###
### Using 'cc'
Hello.
Any news regarding this?
The last message from Bastian Blank dated 27 Oct 2007 contained a
patch but nobody answered and the package hasn't been uploaded since
then, it is still stuck on unstable.
I am not demanding anything, just doing a ping :-).
Thanks!!!
--
Ivan
Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
On 19 December 2007 at 11:53, Brian Gough wrote:
| At Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:23:30 -0600,
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| /usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_zher2k'
| /usr/lib/libgsl.so: undefined reference to `cblas_strsv'
|
Hi,
there is just another CVE id for exiftags:
CVE-2007-6354[0]:
| Unspecified vulnerability in exiftags before 1.01 has
| unknown impact and attack vectors, resulting from a field
| offset overflow, a different vulnerability than
| CVE-2007-6355.
Please check back with upstream for the
Hi,
The patch looks good, it should fix all of the breakage. Just a couple
of little points of clarification below.
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 06:58 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 19 December 2007 at 13:08, Manuel Prinz wrote:
| Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2007, 21:23 -0600 schrieb Dirk
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 03:11:35 am Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:59:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I just tried on my home box (amd64/sid), and cannot reproduce the error
you describe on recompiling cryptgps.
mmmh, this is strange, I really don't see
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456895: fixed in glpi 0.68.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:17:03 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456825: fixed in libvirt 0.3.3-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Karl,
you remember
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2007-10/msg00020.html
where the
This is foobar, produced by ...
ended up in the START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY?
With 4.11 PLUS your patch from the above it is still happening, minimal
not working texi file I could generate:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:02:07 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#450452: fixed in clisp 1:2.43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello,
* Neil McGovern [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:42:23AM +]:
Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
of megahal and strace.
Thanks for reproducing this bug. Unfortunately the backtrack doesn't
give much information. I'll try to figure out what's going on from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 453798 patch
Bug#453798: xdb: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library
libxdb.so.1 needed by debian/libxdb-dev/usr/bin/deletall (its RPATH is '').
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
severity 456350 important
Bug#456350: python-visual: FTBFS: New or changed copyright notices discovered!
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
End of message, stopping
tag 453798 patch
thanks
--- xdb-1.2.0~/debian/rules
+++ xdb-1.2.0/debian/rules
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
dh_md5sums -plibxdb1
dh_builddeb -plibxdb1
-libxdb-dev: build
+libxdb-dev: build libxdb1
dh_testdir -plibxdb-dev
dh_testroot -plibxdb-dev
dh_clean -v
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:23:30AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:47:34AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
I have just upgraded from 3.0.27a-1 to this version, and now when I
try to mount my Samba partition, I get the following error:
euclid:~ # mount -t cifs
Tomboy is still broken on my Sid AMD64 machine. Steps I've done so far:
1) dpkg-reconfigure libmono-addins0.2-cil libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil
tomboy
2) rm -r ~/.tomboy
3) run tomboy
Tomboy says:
$ tomboy
...
** (Tomboy:13758): WARNING **: The following assembly referenced
from
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 17:55 +0100, Vitezslav Kotrla wrote:
Tomboy is still broken on my Sid AMD64 machine. Steps I've done so far:
1) dpkg-reconfigure libmono-addins0.2-cil libmono-addins-gui0.2-cil
tomboy
2) rm -r ~/.tomboy
3) run tomboy
Is the cli-common version 0.5.1 or higher? If not,
Package: libopenmpi-dev
Version: 1.2.4-5
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
the mpi.h is missing. I found it in
/usr/lib/openmpi/include/
please add at least a symlink or something to
/usr/include
the is breaks the python-petsc4py package for example:
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:01:21 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line wxmaxima bug fixed in 0.7.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: gdm
Version: 2.20.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to start gdm, it errors saying gdmkeyword 'auto' deprecated
and errors out. It does not write to /var/log/gdm nor to
~/.xsession-errors. I cannot find anywhere that the gdmkeyword is
located.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:15:48 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#457088: mpi.h is missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:32:04 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#455487: fixed in dia 0.96.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Dec 19, 2007 7:15 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:49:15PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Package: libopenmpi-dev
Version: 1.2.4-5
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
the mpi.h is missing. I found it in
Nico Golde wrote:
CVE-2007-6430[0]:
| Due to the way database-based registrations (realtime)
| are processed, IP addresses are not checked when the
| username is correct and there is no password. An
| attacker may impersonate any user using host-based
| authentication without a secret,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 7:15 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:49:15PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Package: libopenmpi-dev
Version: 1.2.4-5
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:11:35AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:59:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I just tried on my home box (amd64/sid), and cannot reproduce the error
you describe on recompiling cryptgps.
mmmh, this is strange, I really don't
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 20:24:47 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 09:11:35AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:59:50AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I just tried on my home box (amd64/sid), and cannot reproduce the error
you
Package: ejabberd
Version: 1.1.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hi, i start the ejabberd service and seems to die
scarlet:~# /etc/init.d/ejabberd start
Starting jabber server: ejabberd.
scarlet:~# ejabberdctl
RPC failed on the node [EMAIL PROTECTED]: {'EXIT',
On 12/19/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 07:40:13PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 7:15 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:49:15PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Package: libopenmpi-dev
Version:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:52:10PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Nico Golde wrote:
CVE-2007-6430[0]:
| Due to the way database-based registrations (realtime)
| are processed, IP addresses are not checked when the
| username is correct and there is no password. An
| attacker may
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 457097 normal
Bug#457097: ejabberd dont start
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 5.04-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Launching xscreensaver-demo gives this:
$ xscreensaver-demo
antmaze: couldn't allocate color black: using black.
antmaze: couldn't allocate black either!
When xscreensaver timeouts and tries to launch
severity 457097 normal
thanks
On 12/19/07, Fernando Toledo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: ejabberd
Version: 1.1.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I guess it's not ejabberd fault.
hi, i start the ejabberd service and seems to die
scarlet:~#
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+8
Severity: grave
amd64
After upgrading from 7.2+5 X crashes with signal 11.
Nvidia drivers were recompiled with correct gcc version.
...
(**) Mouse0: Buttons: 9
(**) Mouse0: Sensitivity: 1
(II) evaluating device (Mouse0)
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input
Emil wrote:
Package: xscreensaver
Version: 5.04-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Launching xscreensaver-demo gives this:
$ xscreensaver-demo
antmaze: couldn't allocate color black: using black.
antmaze: couldn't allocate black either!
When xscreensaver
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:23:30AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
To mount such shares without DNS support, you have three options:
- add your own entry in /etc/hosts
- add nss_wins from the winbind package to your nsswitch.conf
- use the ip= option to mount.cifs
I used the second solution,
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456352: fixed in scratchbox2 1.99.0.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
reassign 457101 nvidia-glx
severity 457101 important
kthxbye
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 21:12:50 +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+8
Severity: grave
amd64
After upgrading from 7.2+5 X crashes with signal 11.
Nvidia drivers were recompiled with
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456528: fixed in scratchbox2 1.99.0.22
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 457101 nvidia-glx
Bug#457101: xserver-xorg crashes with signal 11
Bug reassigned from package `xserver-xorg' to `nvidia-glx'.
severity 457101 important
Bug#457101: xserver-xorg crashes with signal 11
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
On 19 December 2007 at 20:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| As you may know, we are trying to let Open MPI coexist with MPICH and
| LAM.
|
| /usr/include is fine for _non-conflicting_ files as good as a general
| rule, but not so clear if several packages provide it. By 'staying
| out of each
Is the cli-common version 0.5.1 or higher? If not, ugprade cli-common
and dpkg-reconfigure both mono-addins packages again.
Done, it works now! Mirco, you are my hero today. Thank you very much.
Vit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 14:45:06 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
You lost me. Please make up your mind as to whether you think it is a problem
because we do or do not use /usr/include, or /usr/include/openmpi ?
Either would be ok. /usr/lib isn't.
We use /usr/include/openmpi now, and we
| I meant something like /usr/include/openmpi/
You lost me. Please make up your mind as to whether you think it is a problem
because we do or do not use /usr/include, or /usr/include/openmpi ?
We use /usr/include/openmpi now, and we think that's the right way:
I agree that is the right way,
Hi Faidon,
* Faidon Liambotis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-19 20:18]:
Nico Golde wrote:
CVE-2007-6430[0]:
| Due to the way database-based registrations (realtime)
| are processed, IP addresses are not checked when the
| username is correct and there is no password. An
| attacker may
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:13:29 -0430
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#457100: xscreensaver: cannot allocate any color - crashes X
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
On 19 December 2007, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really believe this is more a problem with you xserver that a
xscreensaver issue, try running:
$ /usr/lib/xscreensaver/antmaze
This should launch a little window with a screensaver, if this don't
work then I believe
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 19 December 2007 at 22:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 14:45:06 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| You lost me. Please make up your mind as to whether you think it is a
| problem because we do or do not use
On 19 December 2007 at 22:15, Ondrej Certik wrote:
| | I meant something like /usr/include/openmpi/
|
| You lost me. Please make up your mind as to whether you think it is a
problem
| because we do or do not use /usr/include, or /usr/include/openmpi ?
|
| We use /usr/include/openmpi now,
On 19 December 2007 at 22:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
| On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 14:45:06 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| You lost me. Please make up your mind as to whether you think it is a
problem
| because we do or do not use /usr/include, or /usr/include/openmpi ?
|
| Either would be
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 08:52:10PM +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Nico Golde wrote:
CVE-2007-6430[0]:
| Due to the way database-based registrations (realtime)
| are processed, IP addresses are not checked when the
| username is correct and there is no password. An
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:32:05 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#264107: fixed in dia2code 0.8.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 19 December 2007 at 22:54, Sune Vuorela wrote:
| On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 19 December 2007 at 22:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
| | On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 14:45:06 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | You lost me. Please make up your mind as to whether you
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:35:29 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#430247: fixed in libbinio 1.4-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:35:29 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#430247: fixed in libbinio 1.4-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reopen 457088
#justification: fhs violation is a debian policy violation and this breaks
#other packages
thanks
On Wednesday 19 December 2007, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Thanks for coming in late and missing what the discussion was about.
I have read the discussion in the bug report. If it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 457088
Bug#457088: mpi.h is missing
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
#justification: fhs violation is a debian policy violation and this breaks
#other packages
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:47:06 +
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456851: fixed in rmpi 0.5-5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Ondrej!
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 22:15 +0100 schrieb Ondrej Certik:
Unfortunately I still don't understand how it works. I admit
it can be my fault.
No problem. I'll try to explain the situation and reasoning below.
Let me repeat my question:
Why does openmpi use /usr/lib instead
Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:15:21 -0600
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line [Pkg-openmpi-maintainers] Bug#457088: Bug#457088: Bug#457088:
mpi.h is missing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Dear Sune!
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 23:43 +0100 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
I have read the discussion in the bug report. If it is anywhere else, please
point to it instead of playing smart-ass.
That applies to everyone: I don't like the tone of the recent emails and
would be glad if we could
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 06:58 -0600 schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
On 19 December 2007 at 13:08, Manuel Prinz wrote:
| if we want to handle it via alternatives (which LAM doesn't) we have
| check the situation in pgapack, so we don't get a problem there. What is
| the advantage to have mpi.h
Hi Adam!
Thanks for your explanations. I have one question still:
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 08:40 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
I think the confusion is: the .la files are not the static libs, they
are libtool metadata files. The -dev package needs to include the .a
static libs. The
Package: log4cpp
Version: 1.0-2
Followup-For: Bug #451513
The problem was not only in timestamps.
I had also implement 02_doc_install patch, case $(DESTDIR) was missing
in install target of doc/Makefile.in
Here is my patch in attachment.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007 à 00:42 +0100, Manuel Prinz a écrit :
Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2007, 08:40 -0500 schrieb Adam C Powell IV:
I think the confusion is: the .la files are not the static libs,
they
are libtool metadata files. The -dev package needs to include
the .a
static libs.
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 16:31:09 Luis Mondesi wrote:
If you have libdirectfb-0.9.25-x installed, can you please remove it?
It seems that even though Splashy links against libdirectfb-1.0.x (from
Sid), the binary tries to access the older version of the lib causing the
-3 errors.
Please
With 4.11 PLUS your patch from the above it is still happening,
Ah, the case before had a @dircategory. I didn't try without.
(I surmise that's the difference, anyway.)
- insert_string (START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY\n);
+ add_word (START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY\n);
I installed it. Thanks
Your message dated Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:01:59 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#456849: libaqbanking: FTBFS: Package libgwenhywfar38-dev
has no installation candidate
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: openssh-server
Version: 1:4.6p1-7
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
This bug is rated critical because it breaks apt-get upgrade and
leaves the system in a dangerously unstable state.
apt-get upgrade aborts:
Setting up libsnmp-session-perl (1.11-1) ...
Setting up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11
package gnome-keyring libgnome-keyring0 libgnome-keyring-dev
libpam-gnome-keyring
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libpam-gnome-keyring libgnome-keyring0
libgnome-keyring-dev
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 451513 patch
Bug#451513: log4cpp: FTBFS: updated timestamp cause failing autotools run
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: hal
Version: 0.5.10-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hal went splat on dist-upgrade making other packages (gnome, etc) uninstallable.
apt-get dist-upgade
[...]
Errors were encountered while processing:
hal
gnome-power-manager
gnome-desktop-environment
gnome
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 457122 important
Bug#457122: hal: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status
2
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# let's make this a removal request
clone 456858 -1
Bug#456858: libchipcard3: FTBFS: Package libgwenhywfar38-dev has no
installation candidate
Bug 456858 cloned as bug 457129.
retitle -1 RM: libchipcard3 -- RoM; obsolete; FTBFS
Bug#457129:
# let's make this a removal request
clone 456858 -1
retitle -1 RM: libchipcard3 -- RoM; obsolete; FTBFS
severity -1 normal
submitter -1 !
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
stop
Lucas Nussbaum submitted this bug:
Package: libchipcard3
version: 3.0.4-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
forcemerge 456915 457064
Bug#456915: boost: FTBFS: build.sh: line 15: gcc-4.1: command not found
Bug#457064: FTBFS: boost fails to build from source
Forcibly Merged 456915 457064.
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
