Bug#469882: virtualbox-ose-source: cannot build with 2.6.24 kernel on amd64

On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:59:43PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Philipp Kern wrote: Starting from 1.5.6-dfsg-1 I cannot compile virtualbox-ose-source against my 2.6.24 vanilla anymore. A build log of 1.5.6-dfsg-2 is attached. which is serious, since there needs to happen, at least, one

Bug#469146: marked as done (binary name errors in init script and vmxnet detection)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:47:06 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#469146: fixed in open-vm-tools 2008.02.13-77928-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #469146, regarding binary name errors in init script and vmxnet detection to be marked as done. This means

Bug#461853: marked as done (sdd - FTBFS: make[1]: p: Command not found)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:47:10 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#461853: fixed in sdd 1.52-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #461853, regarding sdd - FTBFS: make[1]: p: Command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#462854: marked as done (rawstudio - FTBFS: error: unknown register name '%eax' in 'asm')

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 08:47:09 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#462854: fixed in rawstudio 0.7+20080308-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #462854, regarding rawstudio - FTBFS: error: unknown register name '%eax' in 'asm' to be marked as done. This means

Bug#463419: autofs: ldap_get_values, ldap_init implicitly converted to pointers

Hi Jan Christoph, Attached please find an even more minimal patch for this issue, which lets us fix it without having to modify the upstream source. Since this is an RC bug (and we're in a BSP this weekend besides), I'm uploading this NMU directly to incoming. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek

Bug#463419: marked as done (autofs: ldap_get_values, ldap_init implicitly converted to pointers)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:17:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463419: fixed in autofs 4.1.4+debian-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #463419, regarding autofs: ldap_get_values, ldap_init implicitly converted to pointers to be marked as done. This

Processed: Patch for NMU to fix 442313

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 442313 patch Bug#442313: abntex: texlive-latex-recommended is insufficient for Build-Depends Tags were: sid lenny Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Processed: severity of 469935 is important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 severity 469935 important Bug#469935: twin: should this package be orphaned or removed? Severity set to `important' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here.

Bug#442313: Patch for NMU to fix 442313

tag 442313 patch thanks Attached please find the interdiff for the NMU which I will make shortly to fix this bug. Don Armstrong -- Some pirates achieved immortality by great deeds of cruelty or derring-do. Some achieved immortality by amassing great wealth. But the captain had long ago

Bug#465639: agsync: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool archive

reopen 465639 clone 465639 -1 reassign -1 libsynce0-dev severity 465639 important notfound 465639 0.2-pre-9 found 465639 0.2-pre-9.1 thanks This was never a bug in agsync. The bug was in libsynce0, for providing a .la file that references other .la files that it doesn't depend on. *Now* agsync

Processed: Re: agsync: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool archive

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 465639 Bug#465639: agsync: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.la' is not a valid libtool archive 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug

Bug#448024: marked as done (rpm_4.4.2.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: type qualifiers ignored on function return type)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Mar 2008 02:53:14 -0800 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Re: rpm_4.4.2.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: type qualifiers ignored on function return type has caused the Debian Bug report #448024, regarding rpm_4.4.2.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: type qualifiers

Bug#456841: marked as done (uswsusp: FTBFS: /usr/include/splashy.h:67: error: expected ')' before 'visible')

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:47:09 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#456841: fixed in uswsusp 0.7-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #456841, regarding uswsusp: FTBFS: /usr/include/splashy.h:67: error: expected ')' before 'visible' to be marked as done.

Bug#463362: marked as done (dspam: ldap_init implicitly converted to pointer)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:02:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#463362: fixed in dspam 3.6.8-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #463362, regarding dspam: ldap_init implicitly converted to pointer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#466813: marked as done (FTBFS: /usr/include/splashy.h:67: error: expected ')' before 'visible')

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:47:09 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#456841: fixed in uswsusp 0.7-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #456841, regarding FTBFS: /usr/include/splashy.h:67: error: expected ')' before 'visible' to be marked as done. This means

Bug#442313: marked as done (abntex: texlive-latex-recommended is insufficient for Build-Depends)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:02:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#442313: fixed in abntex 0.9~beta2-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #442313, regarding abntex: texlive-latex-recommended is insufficient for Build-Depends to be marked as done. This means

Bug#468807: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Bug#468807: Acknowledgement (bzr-svn: uninstallable with bzr 1.2~rc1)

Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 03:08 +0100 schrieb Michael Biebl: what's the status of this bug? Haven't received an answer so far. This is an upstream problem and I haven't found time (as upstream) to do another release. With a bit of luck, that'll happen this week. Cheers, Jelmer -- Jelmer

Bug#433273: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers

Hi Dan, I've prepared a zero-day NMU for this RC bug as part of the ongoing bug squashing party. While I'm at it, I've applied the patch from bug #379708, which has been well-tested in Ubuntu for some time and brings the bogl package completely back in sync between Debian and Ubuntu. Please

Processed: reopening 465700, closing 465700

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14 # unversioned closes for binNMUs reopen 465700 Bug#465700: Coredump: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Exiv2::Error' 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been

Bug#465700: reopening 465700, closing 465700

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14 # unversioned closes for binNMUs reopen 465700 close 465700 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 464300 patch Bug#464300: imapsync: FTBFS: Can't locate Mail/IMAPClient.pm in @INC There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: cl-ssl: diff for NMU version 0.2+cvs.2004.01.07-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 468936 + patch Bug#468936: cl-ssl: FTBFS: make: Nothing to be done for `binary-arch'. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#465642: Patch for NMU to fix 465642

tag 465642 patch thanks Attached please find the patch for the NMU to fix 465642 which I will upload suddenly. Don Armstrong -- Cheop's Law: Nothing ever gets built on schedule or within budget. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p242 http://www.donarmstrong.com

Processed: Patch for NMU to fix 465642

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tag 465642 patch Bug#465642: libapp-cache-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/3 test scripts, 66.67% okay. 3/37 subtests failed, 91.89% okay. There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#406036: FTBFS on sparc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jurij Smakov wrote: Here's the backtrace for the SIGBUS on sparc in tsa2d32.c: Upstream author of gcin released a fixed tsa2d32.c today. Upstream version is 1.4.0.pre8 now. I will wait for the official release of 1.4.0 and upload it to

Bug#464300: marked as done (imapsync: FTBFS: Can't locate Mail/IMAPClient.pm in @INC)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:32:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#464300: fixed in imapsync 1.241-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #464300, regarding imapsync: FTBFS: Can't locate Mail/IMAPClient.pm in @INC to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#433273: marked as done (FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:32:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#433273: fixed in bogl 0.1.18-1.6 has caused the Debian Bug report #433273, regarding FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Processed: tagging 468807

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14 tags 468807 sid Bug#468807: bzr-svn: uninstallable with bzr 1.2~rc1 There were no tags set. Tags added: sid End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#464300: (no subject)

tag 464300 patch thanks Attached please find the patch to fix #464300 corresponding to the NMU which I will be uploading suddenly. Don Armstrong -- Our days are precious, but we gladly see them going If in their place we find a thing more precious growing A rare, exotic plant, our gardener's

Processed: lsb-rpm: severity 459603 important

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: severity 459603 important Bug#459603: lsb-rpm: Produces packages that are not LSB-compliant Severity set to `important' from `grave' End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system

Bug#468936: marked as done (cl-ssl: FTBFS: make: Nothing to be done for `binary-arch'.)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:47:02 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#468936: fixed in cl-ssl 0.2+cvs.2004.01.07-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468936, regarding cl-ssl: FTBFS: make: Nothing to be done for `binary-arch'. to be marked as done. This means

Bug#465642: marked as done (libapp-cache-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/3 test scripts, 66.67% okay. 3/37 subtests failed, 91.89% okay.)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 11:47:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#465642: fixed in libapp-cache-perl 0.33-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #465642, regarding libapp-cache-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/3 test scripts, 66.67% okay. 3/37 subtests failed, 91.89%

Bug#468936: cl-ssl: diff for NMU version 0.2+cvs.2004.01.07-0.1

tags 468936 + patch thanks Hi, The following is the diff for my cl-ssl 0.2+cvs.2004.01.07-0.1 NMU. diff -Nru /tmp/I4J7KZ5oxm/cl-ssl-0.2+cvs.2004.01.07/debian/changelog /tmp/aMqzz7lyrf/cl-ssl-0.2+cvs.2004.01.07/debian/changelog --- cl-ssl-0.2+cvs.2004.01.07/debian/changelog 2008-02-24

Bug#432499: It seems we have lost

PhallusProdigiousRoxanne http://www.weriutyea.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#431315: and author of

ShlongQueen-sizeLeslie http://www.juriepsir.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#468936: cl-ssl: diff for NMU version 0.2+cvs.2004.01.07-0.1

On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:56:06 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: diff -Nru /tmp/I4J7KZ5oxm/cl-ssl-0.2+cvs.2004.01.07/debian/control /tmp/aMqzz7lyrf/cl-ssl-0.2+cvs.2004.01.07/debian/control --- cl-ssl-0.2+cvs.2004.01.07/debian/control 2008-02-24 14:53:03.0 +0100 +++

Bug#468936: cl-ssl: diff for NMU version 0.2+cvs.2004.01.07-0.1

On 2008-03-08 13:11:17.00 Julien Cristau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it seems you're making the package arch: all, and build it in binary-arch. This doesn't make sense to me, am I missing something? Yeah, that was one change too much. Thanks for noticing! I'll do the attached to fix. Kind

Bug#465336: marked as done (Do not build -- missing dependencies and more)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:04:40 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in 1.4.1.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #465336, regarding Do not build -- missing dependencies and more to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#468251: marked as done (unusable due to swaml bug)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 12:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#468251: fixed in buxon 0.0.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #468251, regarding unusable due to swaml bug to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#221906: because they're there.

BodypartPlumpingLaura http://www.nuriagot.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#469534: marked as done (missing shlibs bumps breaks other packages)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:47:04 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#469534: fixed in gpgme1.0 1.1.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #469534, regarding missing shlibs bumps breaks other packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: Re: Bug#465336: marked as done (Do not build -- missing dependencies and more)

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 465336 Bug#465336: Do not build -- missing dependencies and more 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. tags 465336 +

Processed: gcompris: diff for NMU version 8.4.4-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 468589 + patch Bug#468589: python-xml removal: please drop/replace (build) dependencies There were no tags set. Tags added: patch tags 469430 + patch Bug#469430: gcompris-dbg: unable to upgrade due to file conflict There were no tags set.

Bug#469430: gcompris: diff for NMU version 8.4.4-1.1

tags 468589 + patch tags 469430 + patch tags 469433 + patch thanks Hi, The following is the diff for my gcompris 8.4.4-1.1 NMU. Note that as per policy, you must depend on the package whose doc dir you link to. Kind regards T. diff -u gcompris-8.4.4/debian/control

Processed: found 465724 in 1.1.1~rc7-4, found 465724 in 1.1.1~rc8-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12 found 465724 1.1.1~rc7-4 Bug#465724: libjogl-java_1.1.1~rc7-3(unstable/powerpc/anakreon): FTBFS Bug marked as found in version 1.1.1~rc7-4. found 465724 1.1.1~rc8-2 Bug#465724:

Bug#433273: FTBFS: Versioned Build-Depends on linux-kernel-headers

On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 03:14:03AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Dan, I've prepared a zero-day NMU for this RC bug as part of the ongoing bug squashing party. While I'm at it, I've applied the patch from bug #379708, which has been well-tested in Ubuntu for some time and brings the bogl

Bug#469430: no NMU

Hi, I won't NMU this at the moment. Kind regards T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#456880: bulmages: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure and Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

Hi, first of all thanks for the bug and the patch. We had working on restructuring a bit the bulmages package [1] and we are preparing a new version. Also, Upstream have changed their build system so I hope that this patch will not be necessary. There's no official version yet, because we are

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: clone 468050 -1 Bug#468050: Security problems present in xwine Bug 468050 cloned as bug 469997. reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug#469997: Security problems present in xwine Bug reassigned from package `xwine' to `ftp.debian.org'. severity -1 normal

Bug#470002: notebook: spurious libxml build-dep

Package: notebook Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal Hi, Your package build-depends upon libxml-dev, but has no corresponding dependency, it's probably a spurious depdency. Please make sure that your package drops this dependency as soon as

Bug#470004: lustre: spurious libxml build-dep

Package: lustre Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal Hi, Your package build-depends upon libxml-dev, but has no corresponding dependency, it's probably a spurious depdency. Please make sure that your package drops this dependency as soon as

Bug#470000: gromacs: spurious libxml build-dep

Package: gromacs Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal Hi, Your package build-depends upon libxml-dev, but has no corresponding dependency, it's probably a spurious depdency. Please make sure that your package drops this dependency as soon as

Bug#470003: gnome-pilot-conduits: spurious libxml build-dep

Package: gnome-pilot-conduits Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal Hi, Your package build-depends upon libxml-dev, but has no corresponding dependency, it's probably a spurious depdency. Please make sure that your package drops this dependency as

Bug#470005: prestimel: spurious libxml build-dep

Package: prestimel Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal Hi, Your package build-depends upon libxml-dev, but has no corresponding dependency, it's probably a spurious depdency. Please make sure that your package drops this dependency as soon as

Bug#458850: bulmages: FTBFS: plugin.cpp:(.text+0x352): undefined reference to

Hi, well, this is like #456880. Upstream have changed the build system so we hope that this will be solved. Regards, Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 PGP: 0xF944807E Catalonia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#470001: baycomepp: spurious libxml build-dep

Package: baycomepp Severity: serious Tags: lenny sid User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: gnome-1.x-removal Hi, Your package build-depends upon libxml-dev, but has no corresponding dependency, it's probably a spurious depdency. Please make sure that your package drops this dependency as soon as

Bug#436131: bulmages-docs: empty package

Hi, first of all thanks for report the bug. This package does not provide documentation. It's empty apart from changelog.Debian.gz and copyright files, and has no dependencies. yes, you are right. The documentation of the package is bit unsorted. I will try to ask to upstream to sort it

Bug#460611: Is this problem reproduceable in another ppc ?

Hi, I've been trying to reproduce this bug in a i386 but I couldn't, as the built package contains the TkCximage.so file in the exact same way as in the i386 package, this problem might be: - A weird bug in PowerPC's wish8.5 - A problem in the reporter's machine - A bug in the PowerPC build

Processed: severity of 469979 is serious

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 # Also seen on the amd64 buildd for apertium. But there are plenty of other logs that don't show the problem with that version of flex. severity 469979 serious Bug#469979: amd64

Processed: cloning 469566, reassign 469566 to gnumach, retitle 469566 to Mach crashes when DF=1 on syscall ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 clone 469566 -1 Bug#469566: Hurd crashes when a signal handler is called with DF = 1 Bug 469566 cloned as bug 470021. reassign 469566 gnumach Bug#469566: Hurd crashes when a signal

Processed: tagging 469566

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 tags 469566 + pending Bug#469566: Mach crashes when DF=1 on syscall There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#469566: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

Aurelien Jarno, le Wed 05 Mar 2008 23:09:16 +0100, a écrit : On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:53:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: - hurd crashes in this case. It has to be fixed It's actually worse than that: asm(std); printf(bouh!\n); would crash Mach :) That's because on syscall GNU Mach wasn't

Processed: tagging 470021

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 tags 470021 + pending Bug#470021: Hurd trampoline doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing

Bug#469566: Linux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag

Samuel Thibault, le Sat 08 Mar 2008 16:54:24 +, a écrit : Aurelien Jarno, le Wed 05 Mar 2008 23:09:16 +0100, a écrit : On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:53:28PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: - hurd crashes in this case. It has to be fixed It's actually worse than that: asm(std);

Processed: tagging 470021

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 tags 470021 + pending Bug#470021: Hurd trampoline doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt direction flag Tags were: pending Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 469653

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 tags 469653 pending Bug#469653: kio_fish.so not linked against libutil - undef. symbol: openpty Tags were: confirmed Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: severity of 465724 is normal

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 severity 465724 normal Bug#465724: libjogl-java_1.1.1~rc7-3(unstable/powerpc/anakreon): FTBFS Severity set to `normal' from `serious' End of message, stopping processing here.

Processed: tagging 465724

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 tags 465724 + unreproducible Bug#465724: libjogl-java_1.1.1~rc7-3(unstable/powerpc/anakreon): FTBFS There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible End of message, stopping

Bug#465336: marked as done (Do not build -- missing dependencies and more)

Hi, On 2008-03-08 15:12:48.00 Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't close such bugs before checking the buildd logs. http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=pkg=encfs The HPPA problem should after rotating the linker arguments, soon... apologies. I did see the HPPA problem. Between

Processed: libcairo-ruby: diff for NMU version 1.5.0-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 458679 + patch Bug#458679: libcairo-ruby: FTBFS: :0:in `require': no such file to load -- ftools (LoadError) There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

Bug#458679: libcairo-ruby: diff for NMU version 1.5.0-1.1

tags 458679 + patch thanks Hi, Attached is the diff for my libcairo-ruby 1.5.0-1.1 NMU. diff -u libcairo-ruby-1.5.0/debian/changelog libcairo-ruby-1.5.0/debian/changelog --- libcairo-ruby-1.5.0/debian/changelog +++ libcairo-ruby-1.5.0/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +libcairo-ruby (1.5.0-1.1)

Processed: Bug#469462: X access wide open on LTSP clients

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 469462 ldm Bug#469462: X access wide open on LTSP clients Bug reassigned from package `ltsp' to `ldm'. notfound 469462 5.0.40~bzr20080214-1~40.etch.0 Bug#469462: X access wide open on LTSP clients Bug no longer marked as found in version

Bug#469433: Bug#469430: no NMU

Hi, On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 04:17:12PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: I won't NMU this at the moment. Since you have done the work, you can upload it, that's OK with me. Best regards, -- Yann -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#469462: X access wide open on LTSP clients

reassign 469462 ldm notfound 469462 5.0.40~bzr20080214-1~40.etch.0 found 469462 2:0.1~bzr20071217-1 found 469462 2:0.1~bzr20071217-1 found 469462 0.99debian11 tags 469462 patch tags 469462 pending thanks not that that's out of the way... On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:16:51PM +0100, Christian Herzog

Processed: linked to upstream report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: forwarded 422800 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=512798 Bug#422800: evolution: Sometimes fails when dragging and dropping a message from one folder to another Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to

Bug#458679: marked as done (libcairo-ruby: FTBFS: :0:in `require': no such file to load -- ftools (LoadError))

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:02:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#458679: fixed in libcairo-ruby 1.5.0-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #458679, regarding libcairo-ruby: FTBFS: :0:in `require': no such file to load -- ftools (LoadError) to be marked as

Processed: 470000 is pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # that's a nice round bug number. tags 47 = confirmed pending Bug#47: gromacs: spurious libxml build-dep Tags were: lenny sid Tags set to: confirmed, pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#467096: need to revoke in part

As far as it regards the icons, I have to revoke this bug. My comparison regarding the output of # dpkg -L traverso was based on incomplete information. The user I compared the output with did not mention, that he added the icons manually. So I appologize for the confusion I might have

Bug#422800:

Matijs, Does icedove handle this situation differently (in case this bug is the reason you moved to icedove)? -- Tim Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#469379: Patch for the sparc FTBFS

Jurij Smakov wrote: The attached patch fixes this build failure. This is a probably a better patch than the one in the NMU I have in the delayed queue, since it follows upstream. I am unsure if removing the sys_getpagesize line from syscallent.h is right. Other arches handle it by keeping the

Processed: cloning 463369, reassign -1 to sylpheed-claws-ghostscript-viewer ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 clone 463369 -1 -2 -3 Bug#463369: sylpheed-claws: ldap_get_values, ldap_init, ldap_open implicitly converted to pointers Bug 463369 cloned as bugs 470050-470052. reassign -1

Processed: retitle 470050 to sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing ... ...

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 retitle 470050 sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing Bug#470050: sylpheed-claws: ldap_get_values, ldap_init, ldap_open implicitly converted to pointers Changed Bug title to

Processed: severity of 468105 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16 severity 468105 grave Bug#468105: hardinfo: installs modules under /usr/lib64 on amd64 Severity set to `grave' from `important' End of message, stopping processing here. Please

Bug#373573: marked as done (defrag: FTBFS (amd64): warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 22:16:49 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line defrag: FTBFS (amd64): warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules has caused the Debian Bug report #373573, regarding defrag: FTBFS (amd64): warning:

Bug#456870: marked as done (radiusclient: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libradiusclient.so.0 needed by debian/tmp/usr/sbin/radstatus (its RPATH is '').)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:17:10 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#456870: fixed in radiusclient 0.3.2-11.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #456870, regarding radiusclient: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libradiusclient.so.0 needed

Processed: tagging 365321, tagging 469767

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 tags 365321 + pending Bug#365321: star: typo in man page There were no tags set. Tags added: pending tags 469767 + pending Bug#469767: missing build-dependency smake There were no

Bug#465041: marked as done (ptop: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `ptop.1': No such file or directory)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:02:16 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#465041: fixed in ptop 3.6.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #465041, regarding ptop: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `ptop.1': No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#436333: marked as done (inkscape: FTBFS: Global symbol @INTLTOOL_ICONV requires explicit package name at ./intltool-merge line 94.)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:17:05 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#436333: fixed in inkscape 0.45.1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #436333, regarding inkscape: FTBFS: Global symbol @INTLTOOL_ICONV requires explicit package name at ./intltool-merge

Processed: reassign 470052 to sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 reassign 470052 sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin Bug#470052: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing Warning: Unknown package 'ylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin' Bug reassigned from

Processed: fixed 458091 in 1.2.15-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.12 fixed 458091 1.2.15-1 Bug#458091: The Etch version of MLMMJ is crashing because MLMMJ is not checking for empty files Bug marked as fixed in version 1.2.15-1. End of message,

Bug#462233: marked as done (migrate r-noncran-lindsey to gfortran)

Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 00:37:29 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line fixed in latest version has caused the Debian Bug report #462233, regarding migrate r-noncran-lindsey to gfortran to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#470066: cacti: Cacti reconfiguration hangs on ucf call

Package: cacti Version: 0.8.7b-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Cacti configuration hangs, with the last displayed line being 'dbconfig-common: flushing admin password'. Inserting diagnostic echos in /var/lib/dpkg/info/cacti.postinst reveals the following line to be

Processed: already removed

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 468398 xwine Bug#468398: RM: xwine -- RoQA; obsolete, security issue Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `xwine'. severity 468398 grave Bug#468398: RM: xwine -- RoQA; obsolete, security issue Severity set to `grave' from `normal'

Bug#453220: marked as done (ogle: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency libasound2 ( 1.0.14) libsm6)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:32:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#453220: fixed in ogle 0.9.2-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #453220, regarding ogle: FTBFS: dpkg-gencontrol: warning: can't parse dependency libasound2 ( 1.0.14) libsm6 to be marked as

Bug#469430: marked as done (gcompris-dbg: unable to upgrade due to file conflict)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:17:11 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#469430: fixed in gcompris 8.4.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #469430, regarding gcompris-dbg: unable to upgrade due to file conflict to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#469433: marked as done (file conflicts between packages)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:17:11 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#469430: fixed in gcompris 8.4.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #469430, regarding file conflicts between packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#469430: marked as done (gcompris-dbg: unable to upgrade due to file conflict)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:17:11 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#469433: fixed in gcompris 8.4.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #469433, regarding gcompris-dbg: unable to upgrade due to file conflict to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#469433: marked as done (file conflicts between packages)

Your message dated Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:17:11 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#469433: fixed in gcompris 8.4.4-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #469433, regarding file conflicts between packages to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#470073: clamav-0.92.1~dfsg still contains non-free unrar files

Package: clamav Version: 0.92.1~dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: DFSG violation -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 libclamunrar includes non-free files (use restriction). All files except the Makefiles in the libclamunrar directory need to be removed. - -- System Information:

Processed: libfile-sharedir-perl: diff for NMU version 0.05-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 460383 + patch Bug#460383: libfile-sharedir-perl: FTBFS: t/02_main...Can't locate Class/Inspector.pm in @INC There were no tags set. Tags added: patch thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug

  1   2   >