Quoting Denis Laxalde (dlaxa...@gmail.com):
I would then say that this bug is not reproducible and its severity
In such case, it's perfectly OK for you to close it (send a mail -
bugnr-d...@bugs.d.o.sorry for being pedantic if you lready knew this).
may be downgraded. The partition
tags 604604 + moreinfo
thanks
23.11.2010 01:20, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 0.13.0+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After 0.12.5+dfsg-5 - 0.13.0+dfsg-2 upgrade kvm doesn't start anymore.
I get an error immediately:
$ kvm
kvm: vm entry
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 604604 + moreinfo
Bug #604604 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0x; kvm_run
returned -22
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
604604:
tags 604209 patch
thanks
Hi,
I created a patch for this bug - just ignore error.
Please check and apply if it's okay.
---
diff -u ident2-1.07/debian/postrm ident2-1.07/debian/postrm
--- ident2-1.07/debian/postrm
+++
Ok, so I started looking at the internals of dietlibc, and I noticed the
data returned by getdents64 looks as I would expect, but the struct
dirent64 does not match it. Apparently the way these things are being
compiled it ends up with sizeof(uint64_t) = 4, so the struct fields don't
line up.
This also applies to:
Package: libmed-dev,libmedimport-dev
Version: libmed-dev/2.3.6-4
Version: libmedimport-dev/2.3.6-4
Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages
(according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be
slightly out of sync):
Hi,
This might be a known kernel bug[1] which got fixed recently. The
problem is somewhere in the b43/ssb driver, which won't get activated
until you install the necessary firmware files. Could you try the latest
linux kernel from experimental?
I'm having this problem (black screen, machine
Hi,
* PJ Weisberg pjweisb...@gmail.com [2010-11-23 06:06:37 CET]:
There was a 1.9.1-1 when I made the earlier report. I've since
upgraded to 1.9.2-1. In order to do so, I had to install
wesnoth-1.8-core. :-)
Right - just stating that it won't be needed for the next upgrade
because I fixed
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:47:13 +
with message-id e1pkowv-0006bq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#577062: fixed in debian-junior 1.20
has caused the Debian Bug report #577062,
regarding junior-toys: missing /etc/blends/blends.conf breaks dist-upgrade
to be marked as done.
Hi,
I cannot reproduce it with piuparts.
Setting up hylafax-server (2:6.0.5-3) ...
invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of stop.
awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `/etc/mtab' for reading (No such
file or directory)
dpkg: error processing hylafax-server (--configure):
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the quick response.
I'm trying the patch you send me but it seems to be a huge difference
from what I get using the source.
This is what i did:
apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686
cd linux-2.6-2.6.26
fakeroot debian/rules source
fakeroot debian/rules setup
cd
tags 604604 - moreinfo
tags 604604 + confirmed upstream patch
reassign 604604 linux-image-2.6.32-5-i686 2.6.32-27
severity 604604 normal
thanks
23.11.2010 01:20, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 0.13.0+dfsg-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 604604 - moreinfo
Bug #604604 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0x; kvm_run
returned -22
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
tags 604604 + confirmed upstream patch
Bug #604604 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error
Hi!
* Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp [101123 07:13]:
I fixed this bug as below and test with piuparts is fine.
Please apply it, thanks.
[..]
--- autolog-0.40/debian/postrm2010-11-11 14:06:32.0 +0900
+++ autolog-0.40/debian/postrm2010-11-23 15:09:34.0
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:18:26 +0100
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org wrote:
I haven't checked it, but guessing that the PATH is set on purpose,
wouldn't a better (and less introsive) fix be, to add /sbin to PATH?
Its postrm script is simple one, so I think it wouldn't need to
Hi,
$ find . -name *swf*
./jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/media/img/flv_player.swf
./examples/media/sample.swf
How important are those files? Could those be replaced or removed without
affecting application functionality?
I found nothing about using the flv_player.swf in sources. Seems to be
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:17:07 +
with message-id e1pkro3-0007xs...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#604256: fixed in xsd 3.3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604256,
regarding xsd: FTBFS on armel, hppa, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc
to be marked as done.
This means
Oeps, please ignore my previous post, it seems I made a mistake with the patch
files.
I have re-compiled the kernel.
I can say that after running now almost 3 hours I don't see the error anymore.
Therefore I can say this bug is resolved.
When will this patch make it into the normal updates?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 603680 normal
Bug #603680 [apt] libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from
lenny
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
603680:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 604217 -1
Bug#604217: axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails
Bug 604217 cloned as bug 604697.
retitle -1 axiom-tex should depends on texlive-binaries
Bug #604697 [axiom-tex] axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencies
clone 604217 -1
retitle -1 axiom-tex should depends on texlive-binaries
severity -1 normal
thanks
Hi!
* Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net [101121 11:00]:
-- Purging package: FAILED
(Reading database ... 6495 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing axiom-tex ...
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 16:19:58 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
clone 604217 -1
retitle -1 axiom-tex should depends on texlive-binaries
severity -1 normal
thanks
AIUI packages are not supposed to depend on texlive-binaries but on e.g.
texlive-base. cc:ing the tex maintainers so
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 600320 unreproducible
Bug #600320 [installation-reports] Installation: set password for root; did not
create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:12:01 -0500
with message-id 20101123111201.70d9e...@gmail.com
and subject line Re: Bug#600320: Installation: set password for root; did not
create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.
has caused the Debian Bug report #600320,
regarding Installation: set
tags 600320 unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:55:05 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
In such case, it's perfectly OK for you to close it (send a mail -
bugnr-d...@bugs.d.o.sorry for being pedantic if you lready knew
this).
Done.
If there's another issue, either clone the bug
I Spoke to soon, issue still present using the patch.
Package: pwauth
Version: 2.3.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
PAM configuration file for pwauth, /etc/pam.d/pwauth has an incorrect syntax.
Correct syntax is
pam_succeed_if.so [FLAG] [CONDITION]
and the items in Condition, such as fields and operator shoulc be
Just a small question to be sure I patched it correctly this is what I
did
cd /usr/src
apt-get build-dep linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686
apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686
cd linux-2.6-2.6.26
fakeroot debian/rules source
fakeroot debian/rules setup
cd debian/build/source_i386_xen
#
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 604457 - patch moreinfo
Bug #604457 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to
xen results in error can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k
Bug #461644 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting an
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:20 +0100, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote:
Just a small question to be sure I patched it correctly this is what I
did
cd /usr/src
apt-get build-dep linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686
apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686
cd linux-2.6-2.6.26
fakeroot debian/rules
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Third time's the charm
tags 604457 + patch moreinfo
Bug #604457 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to
xen results in error can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k
Bug #461644 [linux-2.6]
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:50 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
Oops, that version was not quite completely adjusted. Please test this
instead.
and I have no idea why I thought that, because the first version I sent
you was correct and the second was not.
*sigh* OK, neither of them was
On 2010-11-22 Simon McVittie s...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 17:07:24 +, Neil Williams wrote:
gnutls-cli --insecure -p 443
--x509certfile /etc/apt/client-certs/test-client.apt-test.aviatis.com.crt
--x509keyfile
By the way, it would be more consistent to ship the theme inside
desktop-base and call plymouth-set-default-theme in posinst.
If you have a working plymouth theme, maybe I should include it directly
in desktop-base?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On 11/23/2010 08:22 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
By the way, it would be more consistent to ship the theme inside
desktop-base and call plymouth-set-default-theme in posinst.
no, because then you can't use the plymouth theme without desktop-base,
or in other words, how desktop-base is
On mar., 2010-11-23 at 20:33 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 11/23/2010 08:22 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
By the way, it would be more consistent to ship the theme inside
desktop-base and call plymouth-set-default-theme in posinst.
no, because then you can't use the plymouth theme without
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:47:06 +
with message-id e1pkypw-0002yr...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#582581: fixed in monobristol 0.60.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #582581,
regarding bristol doesn't start when using monobristol
to be marked as done.
This means that
Apologies that I didn't see this question earlier:
http://apt-test.aviatis.com/ has now been updated with the Apache configuration.
On Nov 21, 2010, at 15:31, Simon McVittie wrote:
Johannes, how exactly are you running apt-cacher? Is it running as a CGI
or a standalone server or what? Could
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 12:21 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:17:07 +
with message-id e1pkro3-0007xs...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#604256: fixed in xsd 3.3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604256,
regarding xsd: FTBFS on
Dear Release Team,
On Sunday, 21. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote:
On Saturday, 20. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote:
i did work on a fix for rc bug #603427[1], but before uploading i would
like to get some feedback from you, if that would be sufficient, as it
isn't a small fix.
i was
On 11/23/2010 08:39 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is that really a problem?
yes. unrelated to that, there's gonna be a plymouth-themes-debian
package anyway (for other themes, analog to syslinux-themes-debian)..
On the opposite, shipping the theme in plymouth means plymouth has to be
updated
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Quoting jcristeau on #debian-release: bashisms in debian/rules are arguably
rc, since dash is the default sh
severity 581460 serious
Bug #581460 [src:wml] wml: bashism in debian/rules
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Only affects repackaging the source package, therefore does not cause
FTBFS. Thanks to jcristau for reminding me of that
severity 581460 minor
Bug #581460 [src:wml] wml: bashism in debian/rules
Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious'
thanks
On mar., 2010-11-23 at 21:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 11/23/2010 08:39 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Is that really a problem?
yes. unrelated to that, there's gonna be a plymouth-themes-debian
package anyway (for other themes, analog to syslinux-themes-debian)..
Hmhm, can you
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:02:51 +
with message-id e1pl00p-f3...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#546528: fixed in dash 0.5.5.1-7.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #546528,
regarding dash's preinst shouldn't rely on /bin/sh
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:44:09 +0100
with message-id 4cec43b9.5080...@debian.org
and subject line Re: Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base
has caused the Debian Bug report #603551,
regarding update theme for squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx
Version: 2.6.32-27
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream squeeze lenny patch
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: armel (armv5tel)
Kernel:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reopen 603551
Bug #603551 {Done: Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org} [plymouth] update theme
for squeeze
retitle 603551 add plymouth theme
Bug #603551 [plymouth] update theme for squeeze
Changed Bug title to 'add plymouth theme' from 'update theme
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 604748 - squeeze lenny
Bug #604748 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx] linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx: kernel
stack trace errors in pppol2tp.ko
Removed tag(s) squeeze and lenny.
severity 604748 important
Bug #604748 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx]
Your message dated Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:32:26 +
with message-id e1pl9q6-0004fz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#588418: fixed in atlas 3.8.3-29
has caused the Debian Bug report #588418,
regarding libatlas-test: Empty package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Uploaded. Thanks for the patch!
S
Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 à 01:04 +, Simon McVittie a écrit :
tags 588418 + patch
thanks
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 at 16:01:53 +0900, Ryo IGARASHI wrote:
Today I found that current libatlas-test package is completely empty.
It seems that doing `make
51 matches
Mail list logo
