Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-19
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
remove_lib64_symlink in the preinst script attempts to delete /lib64
and mv /lib64.eglibc-new /lib64. To run mv without /lib64, it has to
explicitly specify an interpreter, which it does using
Here's a work-around for anyone who can't boot because of this bug.
Boot into GRUB and edit your kernel command line to add break=init.
This should drop you to your initramfs. Your root partition should be
mounted read-only on /root, which should allow you to verify that
lib64 is gone, but that
Package: leave
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive
User: lint-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi
4.9 Main building
Package: amoeba-data
Severity: serious
Justification: Violating Policy required directive (4.9)
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
4.9 Main building script:
Package: crash-whitepaper
Severity: serious
Justification: Violating Policy required directive (4.9)
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Package: ocaml-book
Severity: serious
Justification: Violating Policy required directive (4.9)
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-missing-required-target
debian-rules-missing-recommended-target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
4.9 Main building script:
I probably don't understand all of the nuances of that code, but one
potential fix is simply to pass a benign argument to mv. Something like
if ! $ldfile /bin/mv --version /dev/null 2/dev/null; then
...
Alternatively, it may be more robust for the script to simply create a
file to mv
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
fixed 506992 vtk/5.6.1-6.1
Bug #506992 [libvtk5-dev] libvtk5-dev: transitive linking and
LINK_INTERFACE_LIBRARIES
Bug #555185 [libvtk5-dev] libvtk5-dev: Invalid dependency in
VTKConfig.cmake/VTKLibraryDepends.cmake
Bug #629815 [libvtk5-dev]
On 09/08/2011 07:26 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 07/09/11 at 10:44 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
closing, unreproducible. please have a second look/try before filing these
kind
of bugs for GCC.
Strange. Did you use a parallel build in your own try? Can you provide
your build log?
I
On 09/08/2011 06:54 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On trečiadienis 07 Rugsėjis 2011 15:07:21 Matthias Klose wrote:
On 09/04/2011 08:17 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Debian packages should use RelWithDebInfo [1] CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE if they
want settings compatible with Debian Policy
Package: libc6
Version: 2.13-10
Followup-For: Bug #640872
This just happened to me (on another machine) ... what can I do about it?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64
On 2011-09-08 08:35 +0200, Austin Clements wrote:
I probably don't understand all of the nuances of that code, but one
potential fix is simply to pass a benign argument to mv. Something like
if ! $ldfile /bin/mv --version /dev/null 2/dev/null; then
...
Alternatively, it may be
reassign 640874 tech-ctte
thanks
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:21:32AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Package: leave
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.9 - must directive
User: lint-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: debian-rules-not-a-makefile debian-rules-missing-required-target
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 640874 tech-ctte
Bug #640874 [leave] leave: debian/rules is not a Makefile
Bug reassigned from package 'leave' to 'tech-ctte'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640874:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Thu Sep 8 08:03:25 UTC 2011
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: icedove-l10n
tags 632038 + pending
Bug #632038 [icedove-l10n] New upstream (5.0)
Hi Jose!
deja-dup still has a RC bug in unstable due to the libnotify 0.7
transition. Uploading either the package currently in experimental or a
newer upstream release in unstable would fix this issue.
Could you make a new deja-dup upload to unstable?
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:47:30 +
with message-id e1r1agg-000723...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#634395: fixed in gnomint 1.2.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #634395,
regarding gnomint: FTBFS: new_req_window.c:157:8: error: variable
'column_number' set but not used
On 09/07/2011 03:18 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
Cheers,
Stanislav
Hi Stanislav,
Thanks a lot for your patch. I have applied it to the Git and uploaded
it to alioth since I believe it's quite clean now.
I've been quite busy over
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:02:19 +
with message-id e1r1av1-rj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640862: fixed in gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg 0.10.12-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #640862,
regarding gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg: uninstallable on unstable
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 640872 + pending
Bug #640872 [libc6] libc6: upgrade fails to mv /lib64.eglibc-new to /lib64;
leaves system unusable
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640872:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:59:40AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
The policy wording was hardcoded like that basically because Manoj is overly
attached to make, we had long and unfruitful discussions about it (I forget
the bug number, search the archives), and no actual practical reason to
change
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I can provide a concrete practical reason for requiring make as the
implementation language: at least one, probably two, of the options for
build-arch handling
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629385#93) require
Package: libc-bin
Version: 2.13-16
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
At the dist-upgrade my system (amd64) stops processing package for libc-bin
(tested twice) and no longer causes a bootable system.
Impact of the error:
All commands are no longer found in the path
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 640896 libc6
Bug #640896 [libc-bin] Demolition of the dist-upgrades to package libc-bin and
Broken System
Bug reassigned from package 'libc-bin' to 'libc6'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions eglibc/2.13-16.
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 640872 640896
Bug#640872: libc6: upgrade fails to mv /lib64.eglibc-new to /lib64; leaves
system unusable
Bug#640896: Demolition of the dist-upgrades to package libc-bin and Broken
System
Forcibly Merged 640872 640896.
thanks
Package: libreoffice-report-builder
Version: 1:1.2.1+LibO3.4.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
If libreoffice-report-builder is not installed, I can create Berichte with
Bericht unter Verwendung des Assistenten erstellen. Bericht in
Entwurfsansicht
tag 640900 + moreinfo
thanks
Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (300,
'testing'), (200, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 640900 + moreinfo
Bug #640900 [libreoffice-report-builder] libreoffice-report-builder is not
usuable
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
640900:
Bugreport 633926 is referring to the same problem (which I did overlook
in the first place); would it be feasible to merge it with this report?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633926
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
This bug just caused a serious security incident for us, and I was able
to work through the cause and the reason why not everyone sees it. The
problem was introduced in 0.70 and is still present in 0.73.
The following change was added in 0.70:
sub accept() {
warn accept called as a
Am 08.09.2011 13:41, schrieb Rene Engelhard:
tag 640900 + moreinfo
thanks
Versions of packages libreoffice-report-builder depends on:
[...]
ii libreoffice-report 1:3.3.3-4+b1 LibreOffice extension for
building
So you have -report-builder-bin installed from 3.3.3. Does it fix the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 620037 important
Bug #620037 {Done: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl toli...@debian.org} [nagvis]
nagvis: fails to purge - command in postrm not found
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
reassign 628353 octave3.2
affects 628353 octave-symbolic
forcemerge 628353 633719
tags 628353 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 628353 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 04:12:01PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: octave-symbolic
[...]
During a rebuild of
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 628353 octave3.2
Bug #628353 [src:octave-symbolic] octave-symbolic: FTBFS: Inconsistency
detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 737: _dl_close: Assertion `map-l_init_called'
failed!
Bug reassigned from package 'src:octave-symbolic' to
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:43:44AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Would you mind explaining here why you feel it is important to retain the
flexibility of multiple implementation languages for debian/rules?
Now, I wouldn't actually put it that way - because that would imply that we
could suddenly
# strictly speaking it's serious but I don't think we should
# block all the build fixes for this. A dist-upgrade would do
# it correctly. Will be fixed ASAP, though.
# RT: If you think otherwise, you can set it to *serious*, but that
# would delay all the other bugfixes for more time...
severity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# strictly speaking it's serious but I don't think we should
# block all the build fixes for this. A dist-upgrade would do
# it correctly. Will be fixed ASAP, though.
# RT: If you think otherwise, you can set it to *serious*, but that
# would
On 09/06/2011 10:35 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Hi,
this is fixed in the latest version from upstream. I have added a line
to the changelog in order to close the bug report.
Loic, could you upload the 3.0.1-1 version found in the git repository,
please?
Regards,
Alberto
Hi,
Sorry for
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:50:33AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Nevertheless, merely having that doubt in developers' minds is a cost;
17058 packages can definitely use this technique, while for 1 package we
have to think about it ... so I would still want to hear of a clear
benefit to allowing
tag 629416 pending
thanks
will address this in the upper-next upload RSN.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 629416 pending
Bug #629416 [plymouth] plymouth: breaks wheeze upgrade with initramfs failure
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
629416:
Package: dicom3tools,dcap
Version: dicom3tools/1.0~20110901-1
Version: dcap/2.47.5-3
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2011-09-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same
Hi Josip,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has
its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one specific
implementation and is instead properly specified in Debian policy, allowing
developers some
Package: libow-dev,libownet-dev
Version: libow-dev/2.8p13+dfsg1-2
Version: libownet-dev/2.8p13+dfsg1-2
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Date: 2011-09-08
Architecture: amd64
Distribution: sid
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 640100 mplayer2-dbg/2.0-134-g84d8671-6
Bug #640100 [mplayer-dbg,mplayer2-dbg] mplayer2-dbg and mplayer-dbg: error when
trying to install together
The source mplayer2-dbg and version 2.0-134-g84d8671-6 do not appear to match
any binary
Loic Dachary writes:
On 09/06/2011 10:35 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Hi,
this is fixed in the latest version from upstream. I have added a line
to the changelog in order to close the bug report.
Loic, could you upload the 3.0.1-1 version found in the git repository,
please?
Regards,
On 09/08/2011 03:54 PM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Loic Dachary writes:
On 09/06/2011 10:35 AM, Alberto Luaces wrote:
Hi,
this is fixed in the latest version from upstream. I have added a line
to the changelog in order to close the bug report.
Loic, could you upload the 3.0.1-1 version found
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Hi Josip,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
Instead, it is important to retain the age-old idea that the rules file has
its own calling convention (an API) that isn't linked to one specific
implementation and is
tag 635592 + patch
thanks
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 02:14:22PM +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Package: binutils
Version: 2.21.52.20110707-1
Severity: serious
Justifaction: causes other packages to FTBFS on mips/mipsel
Hello,
It seems that binutils has regressed on mipsel and mips. The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 635592 + patch
Bug #635592 [binutils] [regression] Assertion failure in emit_inc_line_addr at
../../gas/dwarf2dbg.c line 926. on mips(el)
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 607479 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=68380
Bug #607479 [libfcgi-perl] libfcgi-perl: After reloading some environment vars
become constants, that will be used if not overruled by the headers of new
requests.
Set Bug
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
The API is not the only thing to take into account. Using anything else
than make is unexpected for most other developers (some of them who might
have to NMU your package at some point).
I agree, but that argument goes both ways - we already allow
tags 635890 + patch
tags 635890 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for strongswan (versioned as 4.5.2-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru strongswan-4.5.2/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 635890 + patch
Bug #635890 [src:strongswan] strongswan: obsolete build-dependency:
libopensc2-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 635890 + pending
Bug #635890 [src:strongswan] strongswan: obsolete build-dependency:
libopensc2-dev
Added tag(s)
Source: cclib-data
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package fails to install:
| # apt-get install cclib-data
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree
| Reading state information... Done
| The following extra packages will be
Package: java3d
Version: 1.5.2+dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: debian-s...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: s390x
java3d fails to build as it can't find the path to openjdk:
| dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2
|
tags 564971 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 564971 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:04:00AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
gcc-4.5/g++-4.5, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.4/g++-4.4.
For
Package: tijmp
Version: 0.8+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
tijmp fails to build as it can't find the path to openjdk:
| checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
| checking how to hardcode library paths
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package binutils
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Setting user to bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
tags 625756 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 625756 ubuntu-patch oneiric
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 05:54:35PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
When I build electric-fence from source on amd64/sid with gcc-4.5 or
gcc-4.6, the ./tstheap 3072 call gets to iteration 100 and then starts
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 22:06:55 Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 10:57:51 Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Monday 05 September 2011 14:55:50 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
So you're basicly saying that X509_verify_cert() should give an
error in case it finds DigiNotar
On 09/07/2011 03:18 PM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Just in case, here goes the updated patch.
Cheers,
Stanislav
FYI, I just uploaded the patched version. Thanks again for your
contribution, it's much appreciated, especially that I didn't have time
to fix things over the last
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 628529 with 630517
Bug #628529 [release.debian.org] transition: ICU transition (4.4 - 4.8)
Was blocked by: 628304 631031 625415 556768 634404 625377 624962 556756 628584
554407
Added blocking bug(s) of 628529: 630517
kthxbye
Stopping
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 07:54:09 +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Hello,
On trečiadienis 07 Rugsėjis 2011 15:07:21 Matthias Klose wrote:
On 09/04/2011 08:17 AM, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Debian packages should use RelWithDebInfo [1] CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE if they
want settings compatible with
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:32:52 +
with message-id e1r1kle-py...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#632038: fixed in icedove-l10n 1:5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #632038,
regarding New upstream (5.0)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
No, the symlinks are not broken. Maybe you do maintain a package with broken or
explicit checks for locations of libraries?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Thu Sep 8 20:03:31 UTC 2011
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: libnatpmp
tags 639084 + pending
Bug #639084 [libnatpmp1] libnatpmp1: unversioned
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 05:41:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Source: cclib-data
Version: 1.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package fails to install:
| # apt-get install cclib-data
| Reading package lists... Done
| Building dependency tree
| Reading state
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:03:42 +
with message-id e1r1ll8-0003cz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#639084: fixed in libnatpmp 20110808-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #639084,
regarding libnatpmp1: unversioned files in shlib package
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:04:29 +
with message-id e1r1llt-0003zj...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#630713: fixed in pandoc 1.8.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #630713,
regarding libghc-pandoc-dev: Library does not provide profiling version
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:04:53 +
with message-id e1r1lmh-0004aa...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640742: fixed in haskell-language-javascript 0.4.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #640742,
regarding haskell-language-javascript: FTBFS: Grammar5.y: invalid character
to
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:47:12 +
with message-id e1r1mre-0001du...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#632128: fixed in aqualung 0.9~beta11-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #632128,
regarding FTBFS with Libav 0.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: komparator
Version: 1:0.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
Hello,
Your package failed to build from source:
index.docbook:1061: element book: validity error : No declaration for
element book
/book
^
make[3]: *** [doc/index.cache.bz2]
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:06:55PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Wednesday 07 September 2011 10:57:51 Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Monday 05 September 2011 14:55:50 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
So you're basicly saying that X509_verify_cert() should give an
error in case it finds DigiNotar
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:13:32 +0200, Andreas Noteng wrote:
transgui hardcodes a dependency on libssl0.9.8, which is going away.
I'm currently on vacation, will have a look at this when I get back, in
about 2 weeks.
This bug (and the not-yet-reported FTBFS) seem to be fixed in the
package's
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:18:35 +
with message-id e1r1mvb-0005zn...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640915: fixed in owfs 2.8p13+dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #640915,
regarding libownet-dev and libow-dev: error when trying to install together
to be marked as
tags 634140 + patch
tags 634140 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libgeotiff-dfsg (versioned as 1.2.5-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 634140 + patch
Bug #634140 [src:libgeotiff-dfsg] libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on
libjpeg-dev, not libjpeg62-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 634140 + pending
Bug #634140 [src:libgeotiff-dfsg] libgeotiff-dfsg: Please Build-Depends on
Your message dated Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:35:08 +
with message-id e1r1nbc-u9...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640339: fixed in openscenegraph 3.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640339,
regarding openscenegraph: FTBFS: FFmpegDecoder.cpp:88:26: error: 'AVERROR_IO'
was not
tags 635687 + patch
tags 635687 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for ecore (versioned as 1.0.0-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 635687 + patch
Bug #635687 [src:ecore] ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 635687 + pending
Bug #635687 [src:ecore] ecore: Please Build-Depends on libjpeg-dev, not
libjpeg62-dev
Added
Josip Rodin j...@debbugs.entuzijast.net writes:
It was just an arbitrary conversion of a single is to must be (in an
unrelated let's-use-consistent-RFC-like-wording drive) that went
unchecked.
I wanted to mention here that this didn't just suddenly happen as a result
of the existing Policy
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 625331 src:fstrcmp 0.3.D001-1
Bug #625331 [fstrcmp] fstrcmp: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Bug reassigned from package 'fstrcmp' to 'src:fstrcmp'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions fstrcmp/0.3.D001-1.
Bug #625331 [src:fstrcmp]
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:02:58 +
with message-id e1r1oyc-0003md...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#616264: fixed in libvdpau 0.4.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #616264,
regarding libvdpau: replace doxygen and texlive-* build dependencies with
doxygen-latex
to be
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:38:15PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
But, to return to the former idea of arguing for flexibility for just one
moment - that's moot because of another reason - we *already* allow a
near-infinite amount of abuse through flexibility, because you can make a
makefile fork
tags 625080 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 625080 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 02:31:26PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
[...]
In file included from
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 625080 patch
Bug #625080 [src:fstrcmp] fstrcmp: FTBFS: ./lib/diffseq.h:461:38: error:
'bxbest' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
Bug #625331 [src:fstrcmp] fstrcmp: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
Added tag(s)
tags 640559 patch
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
usertags 640559 ubuntu-patch oneiric
thanks
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:47:22PM +0200, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
[...]
make[2]: *** No rule
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 640559 patch
Bug #640559 [src:ircd-hybrid] ircd-hybrid: FTBFS: make[2]: *** No rule to make
target `/usr/lib/libpcre.a', needed by `ircd'. Stop.
Added tag(s) patch.
user ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Setting user to
On Thursday 08 September 2011 16:57:56 Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:06:55PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The patch for 0.9.8 is also attached, but I haven't tested it yet. It was
made based on squeeze's openssl and it seems to apply fine to lenny's
openssl (just a few
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:55:08 +
with message-id e1r1qja-0006pk...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640028: fixed in bcfg2 1.0.1-3+squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640028,
regarding Unescaped shell command vulnerabilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:55:06 +
with message-id e1r1qj8-0006oy...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#640028: fixed in bcfg2 0.9.5.7-1.1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #640028,
regarding Unescaped shell command vulnerabilities
to be marked as done.
This means that
Package: xpdf
Version: 3.03-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xpdf fails to display most pdf content due to missing fonts. This can
be cured by removing /etc/xpdf/xpdfrc, however purging and
reinstalling the package does not remove this file. As most users will
not be
Colin Watson wrote:
* While it's true that make is largely delegating responsibility to
another program here, it's a common program used by many packages,
and so serves to consolidate a lot of boring common code which is a
fairly standard software virtue. I'd be hard-pressed to
It got rid of the unreadable error messages, now I get:
blarson@tramp:~$ xpdf /tmp/DN060-02v02.pdf
Error: Missing language pack for 'Adobe-GB1' mapping
Error: Unknown font tag 'F1'
Error (315): No font in show
Error: Missing language pack for 'Adobe-GB1' mapping
Error: Unknown font tag 'F1'
Package: bpython
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
it immediatly exits as follows:
% bpython
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/bpython, line 9, in
jida...@jidanni.org writes:
r == rdiezmail-emacs rdiezmail-em...@yahoo.de writes:
r Now I have to work on a remote server via SSH, and the connection is
r not fast enough to tunnel X Windows over it, so I have to switch to
r console mode with emacs -nw.
r The console mode has been a shock.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 11:58:18PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:13:32 +0200, Andreas Noteng wrote:
transgui hardcodes a dependency on libssl0.9.8, which is going away.
I'm currently on vacation, will have a look at this when I get back, in
about 2 weeks.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 634049 pending
Bug #634049 [src:subversion] FTBFS with current swig:
bindings/swig/ruby/svn_client.c:1383:11: error: 'SWIG_RubyRemoveTracking'
undeclared
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:31:12 +0900, Mitsubishi Evo II wrote:
Package: bpython
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I just upgraded to bpython, and when running it from the command line
it immediatly exits as follows:
% bpython
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
