Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:18:50 +
with message-id e1sdree-jf...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666440: fixed in pbuilder 0.210
has caused the Debian Bug report #666440,
regarding pbuilder: echobacktime: command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:49:51 +
with message-id e1sds8f-0002he...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665189: fixed in petitboot 12.03.29.20.47-g45e2534-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665189,
regarding [petitboot] You can't remove package.
to be marked as done.
This
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:15:38PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote:
No, i am saying that apt asks for Translation-en and the
server response with Translation-en.bz2. APT knows that
it can't request the bz2 file if bzip2 isn't available,
but some mirrors try to be helpful and clever… See also
tag 661566 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the libnet-ssleay-perl package are closed in revision
73614584658b99e41ae5c11d0e1b83a4d0fb0987 in branch 'master' by
Salvatore Bonaccorso
The full diff can be seen at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 661566 + pending
Bug #661566 [libnet-ssleay-perl] libnet-ssleay-perl: Segfault when lniked into
an Apache/mod_ssl/mod_perl process
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
661566:
Hi all
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:56:20PM -0400, mi...@open.com.au via RT wrote:
URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=75841
Hi,
Yes that works fine everywhere.
Great Work!
Sorry for the late answer, I was quite busy.
I tried the patch from [1] applied to the Debian package.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 665221 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #665221 [src:libdancer-plugin-database-perl]
libdancer-plugin-database-perl: FTBFS: tests failed
Removed tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
tag 665221 + upstream
Bug #665221
tag 665221 - moreinfo unreproducible
tag 665221 + upstream
forwarded 665221 https://github.com/bigpresh/Dancer-Plugin-Database/issues/29
thanks
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libdancer-plugin-database-perl
Version: 1.81-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy
forwarded 666468 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
reassign 666468 xorg-server 2:1.11.4-1
severity 666468 grave
thanks
On Sa, 2012-03-31 at 02:59 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Note: after a redraw, text is corrected, but other parts of the window
get corrupted in a similar
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 666468 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
Bug #666468 [libcairo2] libcairo2:amd64: major text display problems in
iceweasel
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47266'.
reassign
Package: python-tz
Version: 2010b-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
In a Python shell (on 30 Mar 2012):
import datetime, pytz
now = datetime.datetime.now()
pytz.timezone(US/Hawaii).utcoffset(now)
datetime.timedelta(-1, 48600)
The expected answer is
tag 666420 unreproducible morinfo
severity 666420 normal
thanks
On sam., 2012-03-31 at 04:16 -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
Sorry should have just been alarm singular not plural. I meant that a
single alarm causes tons of sound, libnotify notifications, and orage
notifications (I have all
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 666420 unreproducible morinfo
Unknown tag/s: morinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental
severity 666469 important
thanks
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 02:49, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
Package: reportbug
Version: 6.3.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
(well, not completely, but this is definitely a RC bug if you don't
want a mess in the bug
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 666469 important
Bug #666469 [reportbug] reportbug: reports bug assigned to the wrong package
(multi-arch problem?)
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:52:26 +
with message-id e1sdu2s-0007de...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#661566: fixed in libnet-ssleay-perl 1.45-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #661566,
regarding libnet-ssleay-perl: Segfault when lniked into an
Apache/mod_ssl/mod_perl
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:49:04 +
with message-id e1sduvg-0004pb...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666327: fixed in libmecab-java 0.99.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #666327,
regarding libmecab-java: FTBFS: MeCab_wrap.cxx:304:16: error: 'mecab_node_t'
has no member
tags 665461 pending
thanks
El 31 de març de 2012 0:26, Mats Erik Andersson
mats.anders...@gisladisker.se ha escrit:
The install image for GNU/kFreeBSD from last summer forced
makedev upon me, and now when I conducted an upgrade, this
bug hit me, and an hour later also a user in Argentine,
see
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:03:05 +
with message-id e1sdv9f-0005ut...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665461: fixed in makedev 2.3.1-91
has caused the Debian Bug report #665461,
regarding makedev.postinst for GNU/kFreeBSD
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:03:05 +
with message-id e1sdv9f-0005ut...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665461: fixed in makedev 2.3.1-91
has caused the Debian Bug report #665461,
regarding [makedev] Aborts on kfreebsd while upgrade unable to find
/dev/tty[0-9]*
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:03:05 +
with message-id e1sdv9f-0005uz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665472: fixed in makedev 2.3.1-91
has caused the Debian Bug report #665472,
regarding [makedev] Aborts on kfreebsd while upgrade unable to find
/dev/tty[0-9]*
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:03:05 +
with message-id e1sdv9f-0005uz...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665472: fixed in makedev 2.3.1-91
has caused the Debian Bug report #665472,
regarding makedev.postinst for GNU/kFreeBSD
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.12-1
Severity: critical
File: linux-image-3.2.0
Tags: patch
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
IDE bus modules are not included in newer versions of linux-image, including
3.2.12-1 and 3.2.13-1.
* What led up to the situation?
An
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 634384 with 660488
Bug #634384 [miredo] portability improvement in debian/control
634384 was not blocked by any bugs.
634384 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 634384: 660488 and 661907
thanks
Stopping processing here.
tags 666506 = moreinfo
# failed boot?
severity 666506 important
quit
Hi Fernando,
Fernando Cerezal wrote:
Justification: breaks the whole system
IDE bus modules are not included in newer versions of linux-image,
including 3.2.12-1 and 3.2.13-1.
Current Debian kernels get PATA support using
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 666506 = moreinfo
Bug #666506 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0: IDE support disabled
Added tag(s) moreinfo; removed tag(s) patch.
# failed boot?
severity 666506 important
Bug #666506 [linux-2.6] linux-image-3.2.0: IDE support disabled
Severity
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:20:04 +
with message-id e1sdwlk-0002ak...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666315: fixed in nwchem 6.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #666315,
regarding nwchem: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/doc/user/userpdf.pdf': No
such file or directory
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:55:10AM +0200, Alberto Garcia wrote:
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary
packages (binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a recent
dpkg that uses the build-arch target if available.
Ok, I updated the package yesterday, I'm
tag 666286 patch pending
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net (30/03/2012):
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packages
(binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 666286 patch pending
Bug #666286 [src:yasr] yasr: FTBFS: yasr.h:312:12: error: conflicting types for
'openpty'
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666286:
Hi,
After a quick look, I think the new upstream version needs to be
packaged to fix this bug. And the package is currently useless because
audacious does not detect the plugin.
There also seems to be a plugin named ModPlug in audacious-plugins which
may have the same features.
Cheers,
Vincent
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.5.2~rc2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi.
The recent package upgrade fails with:
Preparing to replace libreoffice-officebean 1:3.4.6-2 (using
.../libreoffice-officebean_1%3a3.5.2~rc2-1_amd64.deb) ...^M
Unpacking replacement
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:48:46 +
with message-id e1sdyfe-0006vw...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665673: fixed in qof 0.8.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #665673,
regarding qof: FTBFS with glib 2.32 due to -Werror=deprecated-declarations
to be marked as done.
This
Hi.
Confirm this, but for me it happens also in other applications, e.g
gnome terminal.
Downgrading fixes, obviously.
Cheers,
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
severity 666523 serious
tag 666523 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 03:32:14PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
Package: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.5.2~rc2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
No, if at least, it would be serious. Because if installed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 666523 serious
Bug #666523 [libreoffice] libreoffice: upgrade to 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 utterly fails
Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave'
tag 666523 + moreinfo
Bug #666523 [libreoffice] libreoffice: upgrade to 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 utterly fails
Added
tag 666523 + unreproducible
thanks
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Will try one again.
I)
apt-get (wheezy + libreoffice - sid):
root@frodo:/# apt-get dist-upgrade
[...]
Preparing to replace ure 3.4.6-2 (using .../ure_3.5.2~rc2-1_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 666523 + unreproducible
Bug #666523 [libreoffice] libreoffice: upgrade to 1:3.5.2~rc2-1 utterly fails
Added tag(s) unreproducible.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666523:
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:02:10 +
with message-id e1sdzog-cq...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666074: fixed in typo3-src 4.3.9+dfsg1-1+squeeze3
has caused the Debian Bug report #666074,
regarding TYPO3 Security Bulletin TYPO3-CORE-SA-2012-001: Several
Vulnerabilities
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Missing dependencies are RC
severity 666195 serious
Bug #666195 [texlive-lang-cjk] texlive-lang-cjk: fails to install: latex.ltx
missing
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:17:06 +
with message-id e1se038-0002bh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666196: fixed in zorp 3.9.5-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #666196,
regarding zorp: Missing dependency on python-radix
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
And no - neither do I care about *ANY* upgrade method besides
apt-get/aptitude. Especially not cupt and
graphical stuff like synaptic.
That said, all those ^M seemed like copy and pasting from some graphical
thingy.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:35:01AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: camlidl
Version: 1.05-13
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 666381 + patch
Bug #666381 [src:camlidl] camlidl: FTBFS: debian/xml-man/en/camlidl.1: No such
file or directory at /usr/bin/dh_installman line 127.
Added tag(s) patch.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 05:16:31PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
And no - neither do I care about *ANY* upgrade method besides
apt-get/aptitude. Especially not cupt and
graphical stuff like synaptic.
That
Hi,
I think that libgcj10 is simply an error. There is no = 4.7.0 of that,
neither of libgcj12.
$ rmadison libgcj10 libgcj11 libgcj12 libgcj13
libgcj10 | 4.4.5-2 | squeeze | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
libgcj10 | 4.4.7-1 |
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:02:34 +
with message-id e1se0l8-000649...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666344: fixed in dieharder 3.31.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #666344,
regarding dieharder: FTBFS: make[1]: *** No targets specified and no makefile
found. Stop.
to
On 2012-03-30 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
Source: openexr
Version: 1.6.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 665262 + pending
Bug #665262 [src:ruby-childprocess] ruby-childprocess: FTBFS:
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rspec/core/shared_example_group.rb:64:in
`ensure_shared_example_group_name_not_taken': Shared example group 'a platform
that provides
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:32:33 +
with message-id e1se1e9-0008bn...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#587544: fixed in basket 1.81-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #587544,
regarding basket: [data loss] cannot cut/copy and paste notes
to be marked as done.
This means that
hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packages
(binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a recent
On 2012-03-31 Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org wrote:
On 2012-03-30 Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
[...]
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
dh_auto_configure -- --with-openexr-prefix=/usr
configure: error: cannot run /bin/bash
Package: libsvga1-dev
Version: 1:1.4.3-32
Severity: serious
This version of libsvga1-dev is missing a
Replaces: libsvga1 ( 1:1.4.3-32) for the following change:
,
| svgalib (1:1.4.3-32) unstable; urgency=low
| [ ... ]
| * Move doc/TODO from libsvga1 to libsvga1-dev, and do not install
|
Hi Rene.
Trying to answer all your questions:
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 16:22 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
The recent package upgrade fails with:
Have a *full* log?
I tried it again (with no success) this time a complete log is
attached).
And what did you do for a upgrade?
aptitude, marking
Hi Adam,
severity 666195 serious
Bug #666195 [texlive-lang-cjk] texlive-lang-cjk: fails to install: latex.ltx
missing
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
Surely you must have loads of time ... why don't you do something useful?
I told you - or it is trivial to check - it is already
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 17:04:48 +
with message-id e1se1jm-00023b...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#665836: fixed in openssl 1.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #665836,
regarding openssh-server: segfault error 6 in libcrypto.so.1.0.0
to be marked as done.
This means
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#fixed in GIT
tags 666297 + pending
Bug #666297 [src:openexr] openexr: FTBFS: configure:1559: error: cannot run
/bin/bash ./config.sub
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666297:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 09:30:47PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
My impression is that discussion on this bug has wound down, and that it's
unlikely that any new information is going to come up. To me, that
implies that we should call for a vote.
I'm pretty sure I'm unconstitutionally late for
* Alessandro Ghedini:
Anyway, you can upload to security-master when ready. You must build
the package with specifying the -sa flag, on a squeeze system.
Ok, thank you.
Thanks for uploading. I'm a bit confused--is this an interoperability
issue introduced by DSA-2398-1?
--
To
I did several more iterations see the log for details.
I deleted some log file manually and then the upgrade of all packages
worked (after three iterations or so); however, still with endless
errors, that a stylesheet cannot be parsed.
Cheers,
Chris.
Retrieving bug reports... Done
Parsing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forcemerge 641816 628696
Bug #641816 [libmusicbrainz3-dev] libmusicbrainz3-dev should depends on
libneon25-dev and libdiscid
Bug #628696 [libmusicbrainz3-dev] libmusicbrainz3-dev: Missing dependency to
libneon27-dev and libdiscid0-dev
Severity
tags 641816 + patch
tags 641816 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libmusicbrainz3 (versioned as 3.0.2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 641816 + patch
Bug #641816 [libmusicbrainz3-dev] libmusicbrainz3-dev should depends on
libneon25-dev and libdiscid
Bug #628696 [libmusicbrainz3-dev] libmusicbrainz3-dev: Missing dependency to
libneon27-dev and libdiscid0-dev
Added tag(s)
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:10:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
I deleted some log file manually and then the upgrade of all packages
worked (after three iterations or so); however, still with endless
errors, that a stylesheet cannot be parsed.
Yes, noticed that too. (see below)
tags 666369 + patch
tags 666369 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fbcat (versioned as 0.2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 666369 + patch
Bug #666369 [src:fbcat] fbcat: FTBFS: doc/fbcat.1: No such file or directory at
/usr/bin/dh_installman line 127.
Bug #652979 [src:fbcat] fbcat: broken build-arch target
Added tag(s) patch.
Added tag(s) patch.
tags 666369 +
(I'm not the maintainer.)
* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org, 2012-03-31, 19:33:
I've prepared an NMU for fbcat (versioned as 0.2-2.1) and uploaded it
to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Why such a short delay? This bug is less than one day old...
--
Jakub
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-03-31, 19:48:
Why such a short delay? This bug is less than one day old...
Erm, s/one day/two days/. Sorry.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:50:09 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-03-31, 19:48:
Why such a short delay? This bug is less than one day old...
Erm, s/one day/two days/. Sorry.
Yup, this one, but the original one (with which it is merged) is from
December (#652979).
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:12:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Alessandro Ghedini:
Anyway, you can upload to security-master when ready. You must build
the package with specifying the -sa flag, on a squeeze system.
Ok, thank you.
Thanks for uploading. I'm a bit confused--is this
* gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org, 2012-03-31, 19:54:
Why such a short delay? This bug is less than one day old...
Erm, s/one day/two days/. Sorry.
Yup, this one, but the original one (with which it is merged) is from
December (#652979).
I know, I filed the other one. I also merged the
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:12:48 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
Why such a short delay? This bug is less than one day old...
Erm, s/one day/two days/. Sorry.
Yup, this one, but the original one (with which it is merged) is
from December (#652979).
I know, I filed the other one. I also merged the two.
On 30/03/12 at 17:43 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
tags 666294 + unreproducible
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net writes:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
[...]
/bin/bash: lex: command not found
make[1]: ***
On 01/04/12 at 01:39 +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
hi,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net wrote:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary
On 30/03/12 at 14:11 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:18:17AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: freeradius
Version: 2.1.10+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch
Source: libpadre-plugin-moose-perl
Version: 0.21-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
libpadre-plugin-moose-perl 0.21-1 FTBFS due to failing tests:
debian/rules override_dh_auto_test
make[1]: Entering directory
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
forwarded 664880 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61238
Bug #664880 [php-apc] php-apc: APC not working very well under 5.4 (at least
using mpm-itk)
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=61238'.
thanks
Stopping
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 666563 serious
Bug #666563 [src:libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl] libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl: FTBFS
Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666563:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:24:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:10:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
I deleted some log file manually and then the upgrade of all packages
worked (after three iterations or so); however, still with endless
errors, that a
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:24:53PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 07:10:17PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
I deleted some log file manually and then the upgrade of all packages
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 19:24 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Do as it says. It doesn't say that for no reason. The unopkg in your first
attempt failed
and that kept the .lock it seems.
Well I wouldn't know how this file was created by what I did.
Yes, noticed that too. But that's not a grave
tag 666562 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the libpadre-plugin-moose-perl package are closed in
revision 30864a9374ac6b2aee3de78b744ac7b5fbf942f5 in branch 'master'
by Salvatore Bonaccorso
The full diff can be seen at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 666562 + pending
Bug #666562 [src:libpadre-plugin-moose-perl] libpadre-plugin-moose-perl: FTBFS
Failing tests
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666562:
tag 666563 + pending
thanks
Some bugs in the libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl package are closed in
revision 13c0361a9c4e5ad87c8136e56bc563e50103c7d9 in branch 'master'
by Salvatore Bonaccorso
The full diff can be seen at
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 666563 + pending
Bug #666563 [src:libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl] libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl: FTBFS
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
666563:
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:20:09 +
with message-id e1se3ql-00045g...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666562: fixed in libpadre-plugin-moose-perl 0.21-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666562,
regarding libpadre-plugin-moose-perl: FTBFS Failing tests
to be marked as done.
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 09:00:01PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:43:23PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
aptitude safe-upgrade fails the same. terminal-capture attached.
omg. safe-upgrade.. on sid...
Of course, what else?
full-upgrade tries to purge half of the
Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:36:10 +
with message-id e1se45q-0006n5...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#666563: fixed in libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl 0.05-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #666563,
regarding libpadre-plugin-pdl-perl: FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that
Source: maint-guide
Version: 1.2.28
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[3]: Entering
Source: vala
Version: 0.10.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[5]: Entering directory
Source: ant-contrib
Version: 1.0~b3+svn177-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules
Source: bibtex2html
Version: 1.97-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: libreoffice
Version: 1:3.4.6-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g
Source: libcairo-perl
Version: 1.090-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1]: Entering
Source: sagasu
Version: 2.0.10-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
x86_64-linux-gnu-g
Source: gimp-plugin-registry
Version: 3.5.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
if gcc
Source: wagon2
Version: 2.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
debian/rules build
test -x
Source: developers-reference
Version: 3.4.7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2
Source: systraq
Version: 0.0.20081217-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[2]: Entering
Source: libfilesys-diskspace-perl
Version: 0.05-13
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120331 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
make[1
1 - 100 of 264 matches
Mail list logo
