Bug#845082: (no subject)

Hi Graham, On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 08:08:10 +0200 Graham Inggs wrote: > On 29 November 2016 at 00:29, Breno Leitao wrote: > > We just created a pull request to have this fixed upstream. > > Thanks! > > > Should we create a Debian patch also? > > This bug is

Processed: reopening 828413, severity of 828413 is important, unblock 827061 with 828413

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 828413 Bug #828413 {Done: Laurent Bigonville } [src:libssh] libssh: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need

Bug#845416:

It looks like this package just needs a rebuild. I was able to get a working deb by simply downloading the source package and doing a manual build of the package without making any changes.

Bug#830376: marked as done (tpb: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b tpb-0.6.4 gave error exit status 2)

Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2016 03:33:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#830376: fixed in tpb 0.6.4-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #830376, regarding tpb: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b tpb-0.6.4 gave error exit status 2 to

Bug#843073: Debian Installer Stretch Alpha 8 release

On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 17:23:19 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Nov 21, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Oh, and forgot to mention, this issue has been known for over 8 > > months, and now there's this need to be pushy and rush things, etc. > > I certainly do not appreciate that. >

Processed: Proper version tracking

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 829181 1.1-2.1 Bug #829181 {Done: Eriberto Mota } [src:louie] louie: FTBFS: dh_clean: Please specify the compatibility level in debian/compat Marked as fixed in versions louie/1.1-2.1. > thanks Stopping processing

Bug#844944: Patch available from upstream

tag 844944 +patch thanks There's a proposed patch here: https://github.com/certbot/certbot/pull/3827/files On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 09:43:20PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote: > tag 844944 +upstream > forwarded 844944 https://github.com/certbot/certbot/issues/3817 > thanks > > This looks

Processed: Patch available from upstream

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 844944 +patch Bug #844944 [src:python-acme] python-acme: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: pybuild --test -i python{version} -p 2.7 returned exit code 13 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#846300: ruby-distribution: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

Package: src:ruby-distribution Version: 0.7.3+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed:

Bug#845385: Privilege escalation via removal

Le 29/11/2016 à 23:45, Markus Koschany a écrit : > I don't understand why this is a security issue when > /etc/tomcat8/Catalina/attack is owned by root:root after the purge and > the tomcat8 user doesn't even exist anymore. My understanding is that the file is left with execution permissions for

Bug#846295: marked as done (octave: Octave can't find correct library files on installation)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:19:58 -0800 with message-id <20161129231958.npbwa7g3qrkrb...@galago.mtmxr.com> and subject line Re: Bug#846295: octave: Octave can't find correct library files on installation has caused the Debian Bug report #846295, regarding octave: Octave can't find

Bug#845385: Privilege escalation via removal

I think the solution is quite simple. Let's replace chown -Rhf root:root /etc/tomcat8/ || true with rm -rf /etc/tomcat8 I mean purge means purge. Remove all files, don't leave anything behind. As another improvement suggestion for Tomcat 9, we could stop deleting the tomcat user on purge and

Bug#846113: polygraph loses SSL support when compiled with OpenSSL 1.1

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:50:21PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2016-11-28 16:49:35 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Package: polygraph > > Version: 4.3.2-4 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: patch > > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > > > ... > > checking for CRYPTO_lock in -lcrypto...

Bug#845729: libtspi-dev must not force OpenSSL 1.1 on packages that are not ready

On 2016-11-26 11:31:49 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: libtspi-dev > Version: 0.3.14+fixed1-1 > Severity: serious > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > libtspi-dev must not force OpenSSL 1.1 on packages that > are not ready for 1.1 > > At least opencryptoki (#828465) and tpm-tools (#828577) >

Bug#846299: lighttpd depends on systemd

Source: lighttpd Version: 1.4.43-1 Severity: serious lighttpd 1.4.39-1 depends on lsb-base (>= 3.2-14) | systemd (>= 29.1) while lighttpd 1.4.43-1 depends on lsb-base AND systemd, is it intentional? 1.4.39-1 just works fine without systemd Regards -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#845385: Privilege escalation via removal

> I don't understand why this is a security issue when > /etc/tomcat8/Catalina/attack is owned by root:root after the purge and > the tomcat8 user doesn't even exist anymore. Nevermind. I missed the "world". However dpkg warns about that /etc/tomcat8/Catalina is not empty on purge, so the admin

Bug#846078: [pycogent/pycogent] Random failures of test suite (#103)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Thanks a lot for this quick and helpful response. I've prepared a > package featuring this verbose output and uploaded it to the Debian > mirror. Santiago, I wonder whether you can run your tests with > python-cogent_1.9-5 to

Bug#846113: polygraph loses SSL support when compiled with OpenSSL 1.1

On 2016-11-28 16:49:35 [+0200], Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: polygraph > Version: 4.3.2-4 > Severity: serious > Tags: patch > Control: block 827061 by -1 > > ... > checking for CRYPTO_lock in -lcrypto... no > checking for CRYPTO_add_lock in -lcrypto... no > ... > > Not a perfect solution but an

Bug#845385: Privilege escalation via removal

On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:35:34 +1100 Paul Szabo wrote: > Package: tomcat8 > Version: 8.0.14-1+deb8u4 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > > Having installed tomcat8, the directory /etc/tomcat8/Catalina is set > writable by group tomcat8, as per the postinst script.

Processed: Update bug status

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #840377 [src:pyepl] pyepl: Please remove build dependency on jade Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 840377: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840377 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#844143: marked as done (eclipse-titan: FTBFS: pattern_la.l:38:24: fatal error: pattern_p.hh: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:48:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844143: fixed in eclipse-titan 6.1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #844143, regarding eclipse-titan: FTBFS: pattern_la.l:38:24: fatal error: pattern_p.hh: No such

Processed: liquidsoap: diff for NMU version 1.1.1-7.2

Processing control commands: > tags 845363 + pending Bug #845363 [src:liquidsoap] liquidsoap: removal of libschroedinger Added tag(s) pending. -- 845363: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=845363 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#844479: RE:Bug#844479: zeromq3: zeromq 4.2.0 breaks tango

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 11:56:15 + Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 09:58 +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just opened a bug for tango > > > > https://github.com/tango-controls/cppTango/issues/312 > > > > > > what is the deadline

Processed: Update bug status

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #837510 [src:mozart] mozart: Please replace build dependency on sp with opensp Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 837510: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837510 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#806032: marked as done (gftp: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:49:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#806032: fixed in gftp 2.0.19-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #806032, regarding gftp: FTBFS when built with dpkg-buildpackage -A (No such file or directory) to be

Bug#845363: liquidsoap: diff for NMU version 1.1.1-7.2

Control: tags 845363 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for liquidsoap (versioned as 1.1.1-7.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru liquidsoap-1.1.1/debian/changelog

Processed: Update bug status

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #832491 [aboot] aboot: please remove build dependency on obsolete package sp Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' -- 832491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#846295: octave: Octave can't find correct library files on installation

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 13:20:26 -0800, Gary Roach wrote: > I attempted to install the Octave package on my Debian Stretch system using > both Aptitude and apt-get. Both methods resulted in the same error: > > Setting up octave (4.0.3-2+b1) ... >

Bug#845362: marked as done (libquicktime: removal of libschroedinger)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:33:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#845362: fixed in libquicktime 2:1.2.4-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #845362, regarding libquicktime: removal of libschroedinger to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: limit source to lintian, tagging 844903, tagging 843406, tagging 818962, tagging 843595

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source lintian Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'lintian' Limit currently set to 'source':'lintian' > tags 844903 + pending Bug #844903 [src:lintian] lintian: FTBFS: Tests failures Added tag(s) pending. >

Bug#840458: marked as done (linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly})

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:21:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#840458: fixed in givaro 4.0.2-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #840458, regarding linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} to be marked as done.

Bug#846144: liferea: FTBFS randomly (build hangs)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:56:08PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 help > > Hi Santiago, > > On 28-11-16 18:04, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" > > (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) > > As

Bug#846270: marked as done (fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:21:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#846270: fixed in fakechroot 2.19-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #846270, regarding fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting. to be marked as done. This means

Bug#844800: marked as done (alljoyn-core-1509: FTBFS: common/crypto/openssl/CryptoAES.cc:286:92: error: 'AES_ctr128_encrypt' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:19:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844800: fixed in alljoyn-core-1509 15.09a-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #844800, regarding alljoyn-core-1509: FTBFS: common/crypto/openssl/CryptoAES.cc:286:92: error:

Bug#844838: marked as done (alljoyn-core-1604: FTBFS: common/crypto/openssl/CryptoAES.cc:285:92: error: 'AES_ctr128_encrypt' was not declared in this scope)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:19:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844838: fixed in alljoyn-core-1604 16.04a-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #844838, regarding alljoyn-core-1604: FTBFS: common/crypto/openssl/CryptoAES.cc:285:92: error:

Bug#846295: octave: Octave can't find correct library files on installation

Package: octave Version: 4.0.3-2+b1 Severity: grave Tags: upstream Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I attempted to install the Octave package on my Debian Stretch system using both Aptitude and apt-get. Both methods resulted in the same error: Setting up octave

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On 29.11.2016 15:10, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:25:23 +0100 Julian Taylor > wrote: >> On 03.11.2016 20:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However the package still failed to

Bug#845362: marked as pending

tag 845362 pending thanks Hello, Bug #845362 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/libquicktime.git;a=commitdiff;h=b1c9046 --- commit

Processed: Bug#845362 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 845362 pending Bug #845362 [src:libquicktime] libquicktime: removal of libschroedinger Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 845362:

Processed: found 845241 in 8:6.7.7.10-4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 845241 8:6.7.7.10-4 Bug #845241 {Done: Bastien Roucariès } [src:imagemagick] Prevent fault in MSL interpreter Marked as found in versions imagemagick/8:6.7.7.10-4. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Bug#846144: liferea: FTBFS randomly (build hangs)

Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #846144 [src:liferea] liferea: FTBFS randomly (build hangs) Added tag(s) help. -- 846144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846144 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#846144: liferea: FTBFS randomly (build hangs)

Control: tags -1 help Hi Santiago, On 28-11-16 18:04, Santiago Vila wrote: > I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" > (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) As a data point, I always upload source-only when allowed, the buildds have always

Processed: Re: Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch fixed-upstream Bug #828351 [src:inn2] inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch. -- 828351: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828351 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#828351: inn2: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

control: tags -1 patch fixed-upstream On 2016-06-27 15:56:40 [+0200], Julien ÉLIE wrote: > I suggest to release a 2.6.0-3 Debian package containing upstream commits > 9988 and 10024. (And, while we're at it, also upstream commit 9986 that > removes TCP_NODELAY for nnrpd.) > It will normally

Processed: perlpanel: diff for NMU version 1:0.9.1+cvs20051225-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags 817616 + pending Bug #817616 [src:perlpanel] perlpanel: Removal of debhelper compat 4 Added tag(s) pending. -- 817616: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817616 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#817616: perlpanel: diff for NMU version 1:0.9.1+cvs20051225-2.1

Control: tags 817616 + pending Dear maintainer, Christoph Biedl has prepared an NMU for perlpanel (versioned as 1:0.9.1+cvs20051225-2.1) and I have uploaded it for him to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -u

Bug#846270: fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.

tags 846270 - unreproducible On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > + fakechroot_detect='/usr/bin/fakechroot: line 163: /usr/bin/echo: No such > file or directory' Ok thanks, This bug is appearing on systems which were upgraded from stable

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: Bug#846270: fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 846270 - unreproducible Bug #846270 [fakechroot] fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting. Removed tag(s) unreproducible. > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. >

Bug#846270: fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.

On Tue, Nov 29 2016, Piotr Roszatycki wrote: > I can't reproduce this bugs. Can you run, ie.: > > $ bash -x fakechroot true > > please? servo:~ 0$ bash -x fakechroot true + FAKECHROOT_VERSION=2.19 + '[' '' = true ']' + fakechroot_lib=libfakechroot.so +

Bug#846059: marked as done (libmath-bigint-gmp-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/12 test programs (t/bigintpm.t))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:34:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#846059: fixed in libmath-bigint-gmp-perl 1.6001-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846059, regarding libmath-bigint-gmp-perl: FTBFS: Failed 1/12 test programs

Bug#828230: marked as done (alljoyn-core-1504: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:33:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828230: fixed in alljoyn-core-1504 15.04b-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #828230, regarding alljoyn-core-1504: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This

Bug#846088: Alladin License in krb5

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:17:35AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote: > To be clear I've contacted upstream off-list and we'll see what we find > in the next few days. Upstream has relicensed the file; we can pull that in for the next upload. -Ben >

Processed: Re: Bug#846088: Alladin License in krb5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 846088 pending Bug #846088 [krb5] Alladin License in krb5 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 846088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=846088 Debian Bug

Bug#840458: [Debian-science-sagemath] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

Yes, please do. On Tue, Nov 29, 2016, 1:52 PM Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 11/29/2016 06:01 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > > On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: > >> Control: reassign -1 src:givaro > >> > >> On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > >>> I think I

Bug#846270: fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.

tags 846270 unreproducible thanks Hi. I can't reproduce this bugs. Can you run, ie.: $ bash -x fakechroot true please? Also: $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH= LD_PRELOAD=libfakechroot.so ldd /bin/true would be helpful. Thanks! On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins

Processed: Re: Bug#846270: fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 846270 unreproducible Bug #846270 [fakechroot] fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting. Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 846270:

Bug#811750: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:05:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#811750: fixed in re 0.1-6.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #811750, regarding FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#829181: marked as done (louie: FTBFS: dh_clean: Please specify the compatibility level in debian/compat)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:00:23 -0200 with message-id and subject line Re: louie: FTBFS: dh_clean: Please specify the compatibility level in debian/compat has caused the Debian Bug report #829181, regarding louie:

Bug#846273: ga FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures

Source: ga Version: 5.4~beta~r10636+dfsg-3 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=ga=ppc64el=5.4~beta~r10636+dfsg-3=1479951299 ... make[5]: Entering directory '/«BUILDDIR»/ga-5.4~beta~r10636+dfsg' make[6]: Entering directory '/«BUILDDIR»/ga-5.4~beta~r10636+dfsg' PASS:

Bug#846272: ga FTBFS on !x86 !ppc: error: unknown type name 'PAD_LOCK_T'

Source: ga Version: 5.4~beta~r10636+dfsg-3 Severity: serious https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ga ... libtool: compile: mpicc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./src/devices/sockets -I./src/include -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -c src/locks/locks.c -fPIC -DPIC -o

Bug#840458: [Debian-science-sagemath] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra, charpoly}

On 11/29/2016 06:01 PM, Tobias Hansen wrote: > On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: >> Control: reassign -1 src:givaro >> >> On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: >>> I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal >>> instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro

Processed: affects 846270

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 846270 + debirf Bug #846270 [fakechroot] fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting. Added indication that 846270 affects debirf > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 846270:

Bug#841704: marked as done (reel: Will FTBFS after March 2017)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:35:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#841704: fixed in reel 0.6.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #841704, regarding reel: Will FTBFS after March 2017 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:52:01PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > I'm sorry about not being able to reply right now. Gotta catch another > train in 30 or 90min… > > (I peeked into your replies very briefly and saw that I cannot reply quickly…) OK, take your time, have a nice travel - but please

Bug#846270: fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting.

Package: fakechroot Version: 2.19-2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable servo:~ 0$ fakechroot true fakechroot: preload library not found, aborting. servo:~ 1$ I think that pretty much covers it. Renders the debirf package unusable. -- System Information: Debian Release:

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 02:58:53PM +, Tobias Hansen wrote: >... > (I'm not sure if some of these flags (mmx, sse ?) are allowed > on i386 and didn't find that info. Ximin, do you know this?) None of these is allowed on i386. The baseline for i386 in stretch is the Pentium Pro, that has

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

On 11/29/2016 03:53 PM, Doug Torrance wrote: > Control: reassign -1 src:givaro > > On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: >> I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal >> instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu >> extensions that are not

Bug#846266: solid: FTBFS on mipsel and m68k - src/solid/predicate_parser.c: No such file or directory

Source: solid Version: 5.28.0-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, So I've had a look at the mips FTBFS, and while I have not been able to reproduce it there does seem to be a parallel build race going on with the bison/flex parser generation. In src/solid/CMakeLists.txt, the parser is generated

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu

Hi Andreas (& Ole), On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:04:31PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I wonder what your opinion about the two existing answers might be. You > requested a discussion about your proposed patch but you did not took > part in the last 36 hours. > > I hope you are fine and kind

Bug#846263: design-design cannot enter stretch due to dependency on bookletimposer

Package: design-desktop-graphics Version: 3.0.3 Severity: serious debian-design (- to 3.0.3) Maintainer: Debian Design Team 182 days old (needed 5 days) Invalidated by dependency Depends: debian-design bookletimposer (not considered) Not considered Likely the solution should be to drop

Bug#845082: numexpr FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures

X-Debbugs-Cc: gin...@debian.org, bren...@br.ibm.com On 11/29/2016 03:18 PM, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote: > Also I had to consider a ci failure on appveyor, that is why I also > included a verification for msvc version on the PR. By the way, it has been merged upstream. signature.asc

Bug#845082: numexpr FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures

Hello. At first I tried to fix that with round(). Problem is round() returns the same type as the argument so the cast happens anyway. I would recommend using the latest version, with llround(), which returns long long. Also I had to consider a ci failure on appveyor, that is why I also included

Bug#828330: canl-c/gridsite: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 08:22:10PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi again, > > On Saturday, 12 November 2016 07:51:40 CET Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > If these two packages cannot transition to openssl 1.1.0 before apache2 > > does, I suggest that you build with openssl 1.0.2 explicitly and then >

Bug#846233: vim-command-t is not installable in unstable

On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 14:59 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Package: vim-command-t > Version: 4.0-2.1 > Severity: serious > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: >  vim-command-t : Depends: libruby2.3 (< 2.3.2) but 2.3.3-1 is to be > installed Thanks for this. The package needs a rebuild

Processed: limit source to vim-command-t, tagging 846233

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > limit source vim-command-t Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'vim-command-t' Limit currently set to 'source':'vim-command-t' > tags 846233 + pending Bug #846233 [vim-command-t] vim-command-t is not installable in

Processed: Merge duplicates and move to correct package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 846137 salt-common 2016.3.4+ds-1 Bug #846137 [src:salt-formula-ceilometer] salt-formula-ceilometer: FTBFS: Failing test (KeyError: 'VERSION_ID') Bug reassigned from package 'src:salt-formula-ceilometer' to 'salt-common'. No longer

Bug#846137: marked as done (salt-formula-ceilometer: FTBFS: Failing test (KeyError: 'VERSION_ID'))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:22:03 +0200 with message-id <20161129162203.syciugwxrrigt...@bunk.spdns.de> and subject line This was fixed in 2016.3.4+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #846137, regarding salt-formula-ceilometer: FTBFS: Failing test (KeyError: 'VERSION_ID') to be marked

Bug#846229: marked as done (salt-formula-heat: FTBFS (KeyError: 'VERSION_ID'))

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 18:22:03 +0200 with message-id <20161129162203.syciugwxrrigt...@bunk.spdns.de> and subject line This was fixed in 2016.3.4+ds-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #846137, regarding salt-formula-heat: FTBFS (KeyError: 'VERSION_ID') to be marked as done. This

Bug#846002: blends-tasks must be priority:standard and not make a mess out of tasksel menu

Hi Holger, On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 05:38:27PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > I also plan to NMU blends-dev to set blends-tasks back to priority:optional, > probably on Thursday or Friday this week. (To give some time to discussion, > but soon, to not let this slip for to long.) I wonder what

Bug#845105: marked as done (mk-freebsd: bsd.cpu.mk sets -mfloat-abi=softfp on armhf)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:03:45 + with message-id and subject line Bug#845105: fixed in freebsd-buildutils 10.3~svn296373-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #845105, regarding mk-freebsd: bsd.cpu.mk sets -mfloat-abi=softfp on armhf to be

Processed: fixed 835542 in 2.5.39-8+deb8u2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 835542 2.5.39-8+deb8u2 Bug #835542 [flex] flex: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions Marked as fixed in versions flex/2.5.39-8+deb8u2. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 840458 src:linbox Bug #840458 [src:givaro] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} Added indication that 840458 affects src:linbox > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

Control: reassign -1 src:givaro On 11/29/2016 09:58 AM, Tobias Hansen wrote: I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu extensions that are not allowed. Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens

Processed: Re: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:givaro Bug #840458 [src:linbox] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} Bug reassigned from package 'src:linbox' to 'src:givaro'. No longer marked as found in versions linbox/1.4.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Processed: reopening 835542

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 835542 Bug #835542 {Done: Salvatore Bonaccorso } [flex] flex: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will

Bug#844081: Reproducer

Hello Christian, I tried to execute the script during build process. Here is a couple of outputs from machine where this build is sometimes failing: [(0, 9), (0.0001, 9), (0.001, 8), (0.01, 0), (0.1, 0), (1, 0)] [(0, 10), (0.0001, 10), (0.001, 7), (0.01, 0), (0.1, 0), (1, 0)] [(0, 10), (0.0001,

Bug#846254: compile error with gcc-6

Package: googletest Version: 1.8.0-3 Severity: serious thanks Hi, building the alljoyn packages (alljoyn-core-1504, alljoyn-core-1509, alljoyn-core-1604) with googletest and gcc-6 gives the following compile error. I guess the "#include " jusst needs to be replaced by "#include " for gcc-6

Bug#846252: kf5-kdepim-apps-libs: FTBFS: recipe for target 'kaddressbookgrantlee/src/CMakeFiles/KF5KaddressbookGrantlee.dir/all' failed

Source: kf5-kdepim-apps-libs Version: 4:16.04.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, kf5-kdepim-apps-libs fails to build from source

Bug#828413: marked as done (libssh: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:27:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828413: fixed in libssh 0.7.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #828413, regarding libssh: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#828473: marked as done (opensmtpd: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:27:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#828473: fixed in opensmtpd 6.0.2p1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #828473, regarding opensmtpd: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#844975: marked as done (courier: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:22:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844975: fixed in courier 0.76.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #844975, regarding courier: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#840458: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

Hi Doug, I think I figured out at least the test failures with "Illegal instruction" on i386. The problem is that givaro is built using cpu extensions that are not allowed. Jerome figured out in [1] that the problem happens when givaro code is called. And sure enough: objdump -S

Bug#820023: marked as done (openjdk-9-jdk,openjdk-9-jdk-headless: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:56 +0100 with message-id <855754fa-bb1f-08a1-4b9a-96c15d230...@ubuntu.com> and subject line openjdk-9 file conflicts are fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #820023, regarding openjdk-9-jdk,openjdk-9-jdk-headless: error when trying to install together

Bug#832846: marked as done (guacamole-client: FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies for project org.glyptodon.guacamole:guacamole-common:jar:0.8.0)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:18:25 + with message-id and subject line guacamole-client_0.9.9+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #832846, regarding guacamole-client: FTBFS: Could not resolve dependencies

Bug#816440: marked as done (openjdk-9-jdk: file conflict jawt.h)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:40:56 +0100 with message-id <855754fa-bb1f-08a1-4b9a-96c15d230...@ubuntu.com> and subject line openjdk-9 file conflicts are fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #816440, regarding openjdk-9-jdk: file conflict jawt.h to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#818265: Bug#818187: Bug#818265: Bug#818187: zeromq3 migrated without any transition being done

On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 20:25:23 +0100 Julian Taylor wrote: > On 03.11.2016 20:17, Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> Looks like your last upload fixed the build on most architectures. However > >> the > >> package still failed to build on arm64. > >> > >>

Bug#844303: marked as done (ncrack: FTBFS: configure:6846: error: ./configure failed for opensshlib)

Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2016 13:48:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#844303: fixed in ncrack 0.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #844303, regarding ncrack: FTBFS: configure:6846: error: ./configure failed for opensshlib to be marked as

Processed: Bug#844303 marked as pending

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 844303 pending Bug #844303 [src:ncrack] ncrack: FTBFS: configure:6846: error: ./configure failed for opensshlib Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 844303:

Bug#844303: marked as pending

tag 844303 pending thanks Hello, Bug #844303 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-security/ncrack.git;a=commitdiff;h=efb1647 --- commit

Bug#846234: tortoisehg is not installable in unstable

Source: tortoisehg Version: 3.9-1 Severity: serious The following packages have unmet dependencies: tortoisehg : Depends: mercurial (< 4.0~) but 4.0-1 is to be installed

  1   2   >