Bug#881506: xul-ext-gnome-keyring doesn't work with firefox >=57

2018-11-19 Thread Jeremy Bicha
> Given that Xul is still supported in Thunderbird, let maybe drop the support > for > Firefox/Iceweasel (with a NOTE telling people how to migrate their existing > secrets) and upgrade to 0.13? While upgrading to 0.13 would fix one problem, it still wouldn't be able to reach Testing since it

Bug#885742: linsmith: GTK+ 3 / GooCanvas port may be available upstream

2018-11-19 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Graham, I don't know if you saw this bug and Yavor's response at https://bugs.debian.org/885742 Are you interested in talking to upstream about getting access to the gtk3 port of linsmith? linsmith is one of the last packages using libgnome in Debian and the Debian GNOME would really like to

Bug#914093: [mediathekview] Mediathelview hangs in startup

2018-11-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.11.18 um 12:55 schrieb Reinhard Karcher: > Am Montag, 19. November 2018, 12:51:03 CET schrieb Markus Koschany: >> Am 19.11.18 um 10:26 schrieb Reinhard Karcher: >>> Package: mediathekview >>> Version: 13.2.1-1 >>> Severity: grave >> >>> mediathekview hangs in startup: >> [...] >> >> Hi, >>

Bug#914093: [mediathekview] Mediathelview hangs in startup

2018-11-19 Thread Reinhard Karcher
Am Montag, 19. November 2018, 12:51:03 CET schrieb Markus Koschany: > Am 19.11.18 um 10:26 schrieb Reinhard Karcher: > > Package: mediathekview > > Version: 13.2.1-1 > > Severity: grave > > > mediathekview hangs in startup: > [...] > > Hi, > > thanks for the report. It appears libguava-java

Bug#887928: marked as done (din uses deprecated Tcl 8.5)

2018-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 19 Nov 2018 06:57:09 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: din uses deprecated Tcl 8.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #887928, regarding din uses deprecated Tcl 8.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#914093: [mediathekview] Mediathelview hangs in startup

2018-11-19 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 19.11.18 um 10:26 schrieb Reinhard Karcher: > Package: mediathekview > Version: 13.2.1-1 > Severity: grave > > mediathekview hangs in startup: [...] Hi, thanks for the report. It appears libguava-java must be added as a runtime dependency too. This will be fixed shortly. Regards, Markus

Bug#913909: [Ceph-maintainers] Bug#913909: Bug#913909: ceph: FTBFS on i386 and mipsel (regression)

2018-11-19 Thread James Page
Hi Gaudenz On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 07:51 Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: [...] > I did the same and the build hanged as well. Retrying the hanging > call with all the -O2 arguments removed succeeds. So this seems to > be a bug in GCC with optimizations. I'm unsure on how to proceeed > from here. It's

Processed: Re: Bug#914085: soundscaperenderer: failed to cofigure cleanly

2018-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #914085 [soundscaperenderer] soundscaperenderer: failed to cofigure cleanly Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' -- 914085: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=914085 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#913910: atop crashed with "Malloc failed for 1826553824 deviated tasks"

2018-11-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2018-11-19 09:58:04 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2018-11-17 10:42:36 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > If this is a repeat occurrence, I don't have the slightest idea what > > might be happening here other than asking you to try running atop with > > debug info and trying to obtain a

Bug#914093: [mediathekview] Mediathelview hangs in startup

2018-11-19 Thread Reinhard Karcher
Package: mediathekview Version: 13.2.1-1 Severity: grave mediathekview hangs in startup: . Portable Mode: false . Proxy Authentication: not configured WARNING: An illegal reflective access operation has occurred WARNING: Illegal reflective access by mediathek.Main (file:/usr/share/

Bug#913910: atop crashed with "Malloc failed for 1826553824 deviated tasks"

2018-11-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2018-11-19 09:58:04 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > I have not seen this on any of my systems. > > I can reproduce this problem on at least 2 machines. But not on a 3rd machine. The reason might be that it is older or that it doesn't use systemd. -- Vincent Lefèvre - Web:

Bug#913729: wrong modinfo path if compiled on merged-usr system and executed on unmerged system

2018-11-19 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 13:45:59 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 14.11.18 um 13:18 schrieb Michael Biebl: > > I.e. AC_PATH_PROG return the wrong path when built in a merged-usr > > system. > > I suspect that this particular problem is very widespread, so i was > > wondering if we couldn't just

Processed: Re: Bug#913910: atop crashed with "Malloc failed for 1826553824 deviated tasks"

2018-11-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #913910 [atop] atop crashed with "Malloc failed for 1826553824 deviated tasks" Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' -- 913910: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913910 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#913645: Oldstable also affected

2018-11-19 Thread Bastian Neuburger
Hi, > this is not differing between the Debian releases(, unfortunately). > Debian hasn't touched any code here. > ... > First we/you need to check please if this behavior is also existing in > the upstream binaries. To check this you can simply download the > pre-compiled binary and start the

Bug#914074: work-around until package is updated

2018-11-19 Thread Gijs Hillenius
apt purge iptables && apt install iptables

Bug#913005: ruby-rack: CVE-2018-16471: Possible XSS vulnerability in Rack

2018-11-19 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Security team, like ruby-i18n, I would be more than happy to prepare > and upload a stable security upload of this package when addressing > it in jessie LTS. […] > Ruby team, again, I could easily upload to sid at the same time. Let > me know here too. Gentle ping on the

Bug#899454: boost-defaults: Invalid maintainer address pkg-boost-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

2018-11-19 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi, Il 18/11/18 02:20, Dimitri John Ledkov ha scritto: > Hmmm so i'm not sure what to do about this. > > Is it allowed to use Debian Boost Team > as the maintainer field? Yes, we had already discussed this and it is ok. We do the same for boost1.62 and boost1.67. I'd say the bug is already

<    1   2