On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 06:01:38PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>On 2019-03-28 17:31, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> I'm a little bit at a loss to see what's causing it... :-/
>
>I tried to normalize the logs (remove timestamps, tmpdir and everything
>before the dist-upgrade to buster) and then diff
* Bernhard R. Link [190330 07:58]:
> I'm looking into #901952 (pristine-tar failing to checkout out old files
> with non-printable unicode characters) and think that might be solved
> with the attached patches, by calling tar with --null and giving it
> a copy of the manifest file that is
It looks like this is fixed upstream (at least for 64-bit machines):
https://github.com/heimdal/heimdal/issues/533
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 06:17:32 -0500 "A. Wilcox"
wrote:
> Source: heimdal
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch
Bug #842893 [src:libxml-twig-perl] libxml-twig-perl: CVE-2016-9180:
expand_external_ents fails to work as documented
Added tag(s) patch.
--
842893: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 + patch
On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 23:27:59 +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> severity 842893 grave
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 07:07:13AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Source: libxml-twig-perl
> > Version: 1:3.39-1
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security upstream
On 3/30/19 8:10 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: cloud-init
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> This was assigned CVE-2019-0816:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~jasonzio/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init/+merge/363445
>
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 22:18:55 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924473: fixed in duc 1.4.3-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #924473,
regarding duc: FTBFS (dh_installman: Cannot find "debian/build-nox/doc/duc.1")
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
About 8 to 10 of our servers suffered from these issues in the last days. All
servers are virtualized on
a vSphere cluster. It happens with amd64 and i386 machines. Our sole
non-virtualized server with Debian
8 and linux-image-3.16.0-8-amd64 (Nagios under heavy load) runs stable until
now.
"xterm -T ä" crashes the X-server too.
So it seems rather to be a bug in xfce4.
Martin
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 20:45:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#867681: fixed in software-properties 0.96.20.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #867681,
regarding software-properties-gtk: trusted.gpg file created by this package
produces gpg error for 'apt-get update'
Package: octave
Version: 5.1.0-1
Severity: serious
User: alteh...@debian.org
Usertags: ftp
thanks
Please add the missing licenses of:
etc/fonts/*.otf
to your debian/copyright.
While you are at it, our hardworking trainees found:
./display-available.h:Copyright (C) 2012-2019 John W. Eaton
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:49:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#900573: fixed in qreator 16.06.1-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #900573,
regarding qreator: won't start complaining no module named Image
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:22:31PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:31:35PM +0100, Andreas Boll wrote:
> > Control: severity -1 serious
> > Control: tags -1 + patch
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared a patch to fix this issue.
> > Also currently the package
Ivo De Decker writes:
> I added a removal hint to get it out of testing.
I saw that after I uploaded 2.0-1... I'd been meaning to get back to
calypso for quite a while but got stuck because the various Python2
dependencies were no longer supported and yet some were not yet
available for
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:27:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926027: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #914982,
regarding xtensor: FTBFS with GCC 8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:27:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926033: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #864827,
regarding [zotero-standalone] No longer works with firefox 54 update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:26:14 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926026: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #909861,
regarding shark FTBFS on i386 with gcc 8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:26:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926029: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #904815,
regarding python-pydap: FTBFS and Debci failure with Python 3.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:26:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926029: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #900486,
regarding python-pydap: FTBFS and Debci failure with NumPy 1.14
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:21:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915620: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #915723,
regarding openjdk-8 needs a build dependency preventing build attempts on zero
architectures
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:21:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915620: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #920037,
regarding Don't include in buster
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:21:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915620: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #911925,
regarding S8195874: Improve jar specification adherence breaks reverse depends
build and runtime
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:21:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#915620: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #911925,
regarding S8195874: Improve jar specification adherence breaks reverse depends
build and runtime
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:19:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926019: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #921460,
regarding dead upstream - keep out of testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:19:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#926019: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #897722,
regarding clsparse: ftbfs with GCC-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:16:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924018: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #920704,
regarding python3.6: keep out of testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:16:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924018: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #918259,
regarding idle-python3.6 is not installable in unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 19:11:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925503: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #913443,
regarding Broken with Thunderbird 60
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: cloud-init
Severity: grave
Tags: security
This was assigned CVE-2019-0816:
https://code.launchpad.net/~jasonzio/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init/+merge/363445
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4491476/extraneous-ssh-public-keys-added-to-authorized-keys-file-on-linux-vm
Is this
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:23:22AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Source: libssh2
> Version: 1.8.0-2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security upstream
> Control: found -1 1.7.0-1
>
> Hi,
>
> The following vulnerabilities were published for libssh2.
[...]
Trying to work on a NMU and should
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 18:48:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#884516: fixed in python-bayespy 0.5.17-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #884516,
regarding python-bayespy: FTBFS and Debci failure on several architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 917501 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
thank you
Hi,
I tried to work on this bug for a few hours, but I am quite puzzled:
first of all, the issue I am experiencing right now is different from
what is already described in the bug log. If I build meson with
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 924562 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
thank you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # just had a chat with kibi about this bug, it might not get fixed for
> # buster...
> tags 851774 buster-ignore
Bug #851774 [apt-setup-udeb] Stop using apt-key add to add keys in
generators/60local
Added tag(s) buster-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping
On March 30, 2019 6:10:40 PM UTC, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
>
>usertags 915319 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
>tags 915319 + patch
>thank you
>
>Hi,
>
>I did some further diagnosis on this bug: the reason why CMake fails to
>discover libsmbclient is because CMake
Il 30/03/19 19:14, Scott Kitterman ha scritto:
> Is there anything left in the archive that uses this functionality?
I am not sure this question is for me, but just in case: I have no idea.
I just met this bug during the Paris BSP, but I do not specific
knowledge of neither KDE nor CMake.
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 915319 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
tags 915319 + patch
thank you
Hi,
I did some further diagnosis on this bug: the reason why CMake fails to
discover libsmbclient is because CMake tries to compile a little program
including libsmbclient.h using -std=c90,
Source: torbrowser-launcher
Version: 0.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
for basically the same reasons that made us not include
torbrowser-launcher in Stretch, IMO it should not be part of Buster
either:
1. This downloader package requires updates, from time to time, to
cope with changes in how
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was g...@debian.org).
> usertags 915319 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
Usertags were: bsp-2019-02-de-bonn.
Usertags are now: bsp-2019-02-de-bonn bsp-2019-03-fr-paris.
>
Hi Ben,
thanks for the updated version. I've installed the new version on one
affected machine which crashed after some hours with the old kernel.
It's currently running with the updated version since 9 hours without
problems. I'll get back to you.
Cheers,
Werner
Am 30.03.19 um 05:15 schrieb
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
thank you for reporting this bug to Debian. I concur with your
analysis; in particular, I appreciate that you're taking into account
how the behavior of other virsh commands sets users' expectations
which are not matched by blockresize. I encourage you to share
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #902171 [libvirt-clients] libvirt-clients: unsafe blockresize behaviour
inconsistent with vol-resize
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
--
902171: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902171
Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 902171 + upstream
Bug #902171 [libvirt-clients] libvirt-clients: unsafe blockresize behaviour
inconsistent with vol-resize
Added tag(s) upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
902171:
Le mercredi 13 mars 2019 à 14:08 +0100, Félix Sipma a écrit :
> It may be time to ask for removal... What do you think?
Indeed. I have filed the removal request (see #926033).
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://seb
astien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 16:21:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924232: fixed in jupyter-notebook 5.7.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #924232,
regarding python{,3}-notebook: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
Processing control commands:
> found -1 1.5
Bug #925202 [calypso] Keep calypso out of testing/buster
There is no source info for the package 'calypso' at version '1.5' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.5'
Marked as found in versions 1.5.
--
925202:
Control: found -1 1.5
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:02:13AM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
> Package: calypso
> Version: 1.5-5
> Severity: grave
>
> Calypso has not seen much attention recently so it's likely better to
> not ship it in a stable release. It wasn't in stretch either so this
> will
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was sebast...@debian.org).
> usertags 924232 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bsp-2019-03-fr-paris.
> tags 924232 + patch
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 924232 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
tags 924232 + patch pending
thank you
Dear Maintainer,
I am about to NMU a fix this bug. I submitted a merge request
corresponding to the contents of the upload:
Hi,
totally agree, although I'll also see what upgrading json.c to the latest
version gives for results. That should not depend on the rest of the gpsd
code.
Am 30. März 2019 13:25:45 MEZ schrieb Markus Koschany :
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:32:34 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
> wrote:
>>
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 15:35:01 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920209: fixed in galera-3 25.3.25-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #920209,
regarding galera-3: FTBFS on mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 14:51:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925020: fixed in scilab 6.0.1-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #925020,
regarding scilab terminates immediately when started from the desktop
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 14:48:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#922378: fixed in apparmor 2.13.2-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #922378,
regarding AppArmor policy breaks confined software when running under live-boot
+ overlayfs
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #911890 [src:opengm] [opengm] FTBFS with boost1.67
Added tag(s) pending.
--
911890: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=911890
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
control: tags -1 + pending
Removal bug filed, see #926022.
On 30/03/2019 05:15, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I've uploaded a new version of linux to:
> https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/jessie-security/
> which I believe will fix this regression (bug #925919). Please let me
> know whether it works for you.
I just installed it on two machines which hung
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 912467 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
thank you
Hi,
I am working on bug #912467. The most evident problem is that the
compiler is not instructed to search for classes in the saaj library,
which is probably due to the fact that the saaj dependency is marked
Cyril Brulebois wrote...
> Restoring the patch is not sufficient, as the context obviously changed.
> Given there were few changes there, I've tried reverting the upstream
> commit (9c143ce52da11ec3d21a3491c3749841d3dc10f0), restoring
> temp-deb-installer-hack.patch and enabling the relevant
control: tags -1 + pending
Removal bug filed, see #926019.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #921460 [clsparse] dead upstream - keep out of testing
Added tag(s) pending.
--
921460: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921460
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Am 30.03.19 um 05:15 schrieb Ben Hutchings:
Hi Ben,
> I've uploaded a new version of linux to:
> https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/jessie-security/
> which I believe will fix this regression (bug #925919). Please let me
> know whether it works for you.
Had been hit by the crash before,
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags 917711 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
forwarded 917711 https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/issues/51
thank you
Dear maintainer,
I triaged and submitted upstream this bug:
https://github.com/steveire/grantlee/issues/51
The upstream bug contains my
As agreed with jcristau at Paris BSP, the plan is to remove scilab-
celestlab from buster (the other two, scilab-{ann,plotlib}, are not in
buster either), and then to tag this bug as buster-ignore.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://seb
astien.villemot.name
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org (was g...@debian.org).
> usertags 917711 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: bsp-2019-03-fr-paris.
> forwarded 917711
Heya,
Chris Boot (2019-03-30):
> On 29/03/2019 17:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [snip]
> > But in practice, that means that rescue/enable=true is no longer visible
> > from the rescue-check binary package (from src:rescue), meaning a broken
> > rescue mode. I expect a number of other features to
El 30/3/19 a les 5:15, Ben Hutchings ha escrit:
I've uploaded a new version of linux to:
https://people.debian.org/~benh/packages/jessie-security/
which I believe will fix this regression (bug #925919). Please let me
know whether it works for you.
I only included the amd64 linux-image package
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 08:32:34 +0100 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Bernd,
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:54:50PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > Hi Salvatore,
> >
> > > The following vulnerability was published for gpsd, not competely sure
> > > on severity and on if the referenced
Hi,
we've seen this with the following errors on several VMWare systems:
Mar 28 13:58:13 mail kernel: [26002.992114] general protection fault:
[#1] SMP
Mar 28 07:03:46 sigten kernel: [ 1251.757467] BUG: Bad page map in
process apache2 pte:2c303a2236706f70 pmd:7afb5067
Mar 28 07:03:46
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 apparmor
Bug #922378 [live-boot] live-boot: Libreoffice doesn't start from a live
environment. Signal 11
Bug reassigned from package 'live-boot' to 'apparmor'.
No longer marked as found in versions live-boot/1:20180603.
Ignoring request to alter fixed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 922346 - moreinfo
Bug #922346 [libgl1-mesa-dri] eog: Opened an image and my display server crashed
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
922346:
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:02:18 +0100, Julien Vion wrote:
> Package: libdrm-radeon1
> Version: 2.4.90
> Severity: serious
>
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
>
> I have been experiencing periodic general UI freezes since last reboot.
> UI
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #892812 [libdrm-radeon1] [libdrm-radeon1] Periodic UI freezes
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
892812: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=892812
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Hi Andrew,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 15:24:52 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Julien,
>
you didn't actually send your message to the bug submitter. You may
want to double check recipients of such messages :)
Cheers,
(another) Julien
Control: reassign -1 gnome-shell
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 17:03:46 +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> Package: xorg
> Version: 1:7.7+19
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Since upgrading to stretch, I can no longer switch to a VT - if I do
> Ctrl-Alt-F1 the mouse pointer
control: forwarded -1
https://github.com/Washington-University/CiftiLib/issues/19
Meanwhile, I'll ask for removal of the package on the failing architectures to
facilitate the transition of the new version for Buster.
Ghis
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/Washington-University/CiftiLib/issues/19
Bug #921555 [src:ciftilib] ciftilib FTBFS on big endian: test failures
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/Washington-University/CiftiLib/issues/19'.
--
921555:
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 gnome-shell
Bug #866898 [xorg] xorg: switching to a VT (with Ctrl-Alt-Fx) hangs entire
system
Bug reassigned from package 'xorg' to 'gnome-shell'.
No longer marked as found in versions xorg/1:7.7+19.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
Hi,
Il 23/01/19 15:57, Otto Kekäläinen ha scritto:
> If you want, you can submit the patch above as a Merge Request on
> Salsa and thus ensure there are no obvious visible regressions related
> to it:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MySQL/patches
This has been marked pending for two months now.
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:49:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925957: fixed in fstransform 0.9.3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #925957,
regarding fstransform: Reproducible filesystem corruption (data loss)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:45:18 +0100
with message-id <20190330104518.xb72tzn73efwy...@topinambour.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#920862: xorg: Input doesn't work on LTSP clients while
X is running, works otherwise
has caused the Debian Bug report #920862,
regarding xorg:
Hi KiBi,
On 29/03/2019 17:45, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[snip]
> But in practice, that means that rescue/enable=true is no longer visible
> from the rescue-check binary package (from src:rescue), meaning a broken
> rescue mode. I expect a number of other features to be broken in the
> same way, via
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #905268 [xorg-server] at-spi2-core: key repeat causes a blocked system
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity -1 important
Bug #905268 [xorg-server] at-spi2-core: key repeat causes a blocked system
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 14:39:07 +0200, Michael Becker wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> thanks for the fast response.
> Unfortunately this problem does not occur regularly but only occasionally.
> But if it happens, it happens for roughly half an
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:35:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#925618: fixed in octave-fits 1.0.7-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #925618,
regarding octave-fits is underlinked
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #925618 in octave-fits reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #925618 [src:octave-fits] octave-fits is underlinked
Added tag(s) pending.
--
925618: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=925618
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
Il 29/03/19 11:12, Alexander E. Patrakov ha scritto:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> approximately 1.5 years ago I have discovered a reproducible case
> of filesystem corruption by fstransform, and reported it upstream:
>
> https://github.com/cosmos72/fstransform/issues/13
>
> I understand that the
user debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
usertags -1 + bsp-2019-03-fr-paris
thank you
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://seb
astien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Your message dated Sat, 30 Mar 2019 09:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#924822: fixed in adms 2.3.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #924822,
regarding adms: FTBFS: admstpathYacc.y:14604: error: unterminated argument list
invoking macro "adms_message_error"
to be marked as
Hi Bernd,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:54:50PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> > The following vulnerability was published for gpsd, not competely sure
> > on severity and on if the referenced upstream commit is enough.
> > Ideally though the fix seems ideal to go to buster.
>
>
I'm looking into #901952 (pristine-tar failing to checkout out old files
with non-printable unicode characters) and think that might be solved
with the attached patches, by calling tar with --null and giving it
a copy of the manifest file that is unescaped and NUL-terminated.
What I haven't
Control: fixed -1 cross-gcc-dev/230
Hi Dima,
Great to see that you've already taken care. Much appreciated.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 02:07:11PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
> My key situation should be resolved with the next keyring update, but
> this will take a few weeks probably. If it's useful
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 cross-gcc-dev/230
Bug #925950 [cross-gcc-dev] patches no longer apply for gcc-8 and gcc-9
The source cross-gcc-dev and version 230 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as fixed in versions cross-gcc-dev/230.
--
925950:
93 matches
Mail list logo
