Bug#948195:

2020-01-04 Thread KeyofBlueS
Hi jim_p, Same problem I reported in bug #948032 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948032 To downgrade I've written a dirty script for my personal use, if you need it You'll find it in attachment. nvidia-recovery.sh Description: application/shellscript

Bug#948195: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver: Xorg fails to start with a kernel panic after the upgrade to 340.108-1

2020-01-04 Thread jim_p
Package: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver Followup-For: Bug #948195 I finally managed to install 340.107-8 from the snapshot repo and, as you can also see in the logs below, there is no issue with it. I am pinning it for now... -- Package-specific info: uname -a: Linux mitsos 5.4.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP

Bug#947339: marked as done (RM: slingshot -- RoQA; python2-only; upstream dormant since 8+ years)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:27:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947339: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #947339, regarding RM: slingshot -- RoQA; python2-only; upstream dormant since 8+ years to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#936573: marked as done (fusionforge: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947890: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936573, regarding fusionforge: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#884264: marked as done (fusionforge-web: fails to install: /usr/share/fusionforge/post-install.d/web/web.sh: line 126: /etc/httpd/conf.modules.d/00-macro.conf: No such file or directory)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947890: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #884264, regarding fusionforge-web: fails to install: /usr/share/fusionforge/post-install.d/web/web.sh: line 126:

Bug#941869: marked as done (cherrytree: Depends on unmaintained pygtk)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:26:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #941869, regarding cherrytree: Depends on unmaintained pygtk to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#947338: marked as done (RM: cherrytree -- RoQA; python2-only; depends on pygtk/gtksourceview, deprecated; upstream is rewriting it in C++, so there's no hope for a py3k port)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:26:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #947338, regarding RM: cherrytree -- RoQA; python2-only; depends on pygtk/gtksourceview, deprecated; upstream is rewriting it in C++,

Bug#937719: marked as done (python-duckduckgo2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:31:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947940: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #937719, regarding python-duckduckgo2: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#946183: marked as done (Should fusionforge be removed?)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947890: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #946183, regarding Should fusionforge be removed? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#878698: marked as done (pygtksourceview: keep out of testing)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947854: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #878698, regarding pygtksourceview: keep out of testing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#936297: marked as done (cherrytree: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:26:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936297, regarding cherrytree: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#789773: marked as done (fusionforge-shell: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/pam.d/sshd)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947890: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #789773, regarding fusionforge-shell: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/pam.d/sshd to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#846219: marked as done (Missing runtime dependencies (former libarc-php, libgraphite-php and php-http))

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947890: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #846219, regarding Missing runtime dependencies (former libarc-php, libgraphite-php and php-http) to be marked as done. This means

Bug#937453: marked as done (pygtksourceview: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947854: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #937453, regarding pygtksourceview: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#822586: marked as done (cherrytree: depends on python-gtksourceview2 which is deprecated)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:26:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #822586, regarding cherrytree: depends on python-gtksourceview2 which is deprecated to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#867787: marked as done (cherrytree: Changes sometimes not saved)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:26:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947338: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #867787, regarding cherrytree: Changes sometimes not saved to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#789772: marked as done (fusionforge-mta-exim4: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template /etc/exim4/conf.d/main/01_exim4-config_listmacrosdefs)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:30:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947890: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #789772, regarding fusionforge-mta-exim4: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template

Processed (with 1 error): fixed in 0.12.0+dfsg-2

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 945327 0.12.0+dfsg-2 Bug #945327 [src:python-pomegranate] python-pomegranate ftbfs in unstable Failed to add fixed on 945327: failed to get lock on /srv/bugs.debian.org/spool/debbugs.trace.lock -- Unable to lock

Bug#936605: marked as done (gevent-socketio: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:22:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#931404: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936605, regarding gevent-socketio: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#936660: marked as done (grib-api: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:22:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#932208: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936660, regarding grib-api: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#655465: marked as done (No thumbnails created in Gnome 3.2.1)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:21:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#930248: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #655465, regarding No thumbnails created in Gnome 3.2.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#886072: marked as done (gnome-xcf-thumbnailer: Depends on gconf)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:21:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#930248: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #886072, regarding gnome-xcf-thumbnailer: Depends on gconf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#925707: marked as done (grib-api: ftbfs with GCC-9)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:22:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#932208: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #925707, regarding grib-api: ftbfs with GCC-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#937625: marked as done (python-bz2file: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 07:06:12 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937625: fixed in python-bz2file 0.98-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #937625, regarding python-bz2file: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#936609: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack)

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 help Hi, I was asking upstream about this issue[1] and an issue about gsl usage is suspected. Any hint how this can be fixed? > Finally I have a question about building with lapack. I get: > > ... > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -Wdate-time >

Processed: cblas / gsl hint needed (Was: Bug#936609: Ported ghmm to Python3 but issues with clapack)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 help Bug #936609 [src:ghmm] ghmm: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #936609 to the same tags previously set -- 936609: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936609 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: bug 936955 is forwarded to https://github.com/lizardfs/lizardfs/issues/665

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 936955 https://github.com/lizardfs/lizardfs/issues/665 Bug #936955 [src:lizardfs] lizardfs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/lizardfs/lizardfs/issues/665'. > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: tagging 936955

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 936955 + upstream Bug #936955 [src:lizardfs] lizardfs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) upstream. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 936955:

Bug#937625: python-bz2file: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
patches, as i dont have access to that repo From 905138c2115b8055b19f8e1f7374cfb0f741d441 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sandro Tosi Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 01:16:04 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] releasing package python-bz2file version 0.98-3 --- debian/changelog | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2

Bug#948195: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver: Xorg fails to start with a kernel panic after the upgrade to 340.108-1

2020-01-04 Thread jim_p
Package: nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver Version: 340.108-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, After todays upgrade to 340.108, the system fails to boot in the desktop enviroment and dmesg reports a kernel panic, as seen on the paste here

Bug#948119: marked as done ([schroot] does not work for non-root user)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 06:08:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#948119: fixed in schroot 1.6.10-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #948119, regarding [schroot] does not work for non-root user to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 948180 4.1.2+dfsg-5 Bug #948180 [opencv] opencv: CVE-2019-5063 and CVE-2019-5064 There is no source info for the package 'opencv' at version '4.1.2+dfsg-5' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '4.1.2+dfsg-5'

Bug#921183: marked as done (python3-surfer: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-surfer (<< 0.9.0))

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 05:45:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#921183: fixed in pysurfer 0.9.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #921183, regarding python3-surfer: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-surfer (<< 0.9.0) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#948180: found 948180 in 4.1.2+dfsg-5, closing 948180

2020-01-04 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
found 948180 4.1.2+dfsg-5 close 948180 4.2.0+dfsg-1 thanks

Bug#937551: marked as done (pysurfer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 05:45:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937551: fixed in pysurfer 0.9.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #937551, regarding pysurfer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#948119: [schroot] does not work for non-root user

2020-01-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 12:06:41PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 09:35:27AM +0100, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > > I suspect the problem might be related to the fact that /usr/bin/schroot > > is not set-uid anymore, while it was before. Executing > > ... > I ran into this as

Bug#937551: marked as pending in pysurfer

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937551 in pysurfer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#937551 marked as pending in pysurfer

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #937551 [src:pysurfer] pysurfer: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 937551: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937551 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#921183: marked as pending in pysurfer

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #921183 in pysurfer reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#921183 marked as pending in pysurfer

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #921183 [python3-surfer] python3-surfer: missing Breaks+Replaces: python-surfer (<< 0.9.0) Added tag(s) pending. -- 921183: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=921183 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#937168: marked as done (numpydoc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 04:10:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937168: fixed in numpydoc 0.7.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #937168, regarding numpydoc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#937168: marked as pending in numpydoc

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937168 in numpydoc reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#937168 marked as pending in numpydoc

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #937168 [src:numpydoc] numpydoc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 937168: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937168 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: py2removal RC severity updates - 2020-01-05 03:36:25.066179+00:00

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2 > from bullseye > # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal > # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html > # See

Bug#938232: marked as done (python-txaio: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jan 2020 03:19:46 + with message-id and subject line Bug#938232: fixed in python-txaio 2.10.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #938232, regarding python-txaio: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#938232: marked as pending in python-txaio

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #938232 in python-txaio reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#938232 marked as pending in python-txaio

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #938232 [src:python-txaio] python-txaio: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 938232: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=938232 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: tagging 948074, tagging 948129, found 933631 in 2.6.1-1, tagging 948130, tagging 948128 ...

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 948074 + sid bullseye Bug #948074 [src:din] din FTBFS: cannot find X11/X.h Added tag(s) bullseye and sid. > tags 948129 + sid bullseye Bug #948129 [src:gnome-pie] gnome-pie FTBFS: vala error: Creation method of abstract class cannot be

Bug#809997: emscripten not installable on Debian/testing...

2020-01-04 Thread John Scott
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/5488 Control > The problem is that emscripten uses a fork of LLVM and I am reluctant to add > yet-a-new-version of llvm in the archive... > I have been waiting for the changes to be merged upstream and, with the > recent

Processed: Re: Bug#809997: emscripten not installable on Debian/testing...

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/5488 Bug #809997 [emscripten] emscripten: not installable in sid Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/5488'. -- 809997:

Bug#936481: Emscripten supports Python 3

2020-01-04 Thread John Scott
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/5950 Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream It appears it still supports Python 2 also for the time being https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/7198 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Processed: Emscripten supports Python 3

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/5950 Bug #936481 [src:emscripten] emscripten: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/5950'. > tags -1 fixed-upstream Bug

Processed: Emscripten violates font license

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/10146 Bug #851109 [src:emscripten] emscripten: violates font license Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/10146'. > block 939477 by -1 Bug #939477

Bug#851109: Emscripten violates font license

2020-01-04 Thread John Scott
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/10146 Control: block 939477 by -1 I've reported this upstream since they're still using it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Processed: severity of 947927 is important

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 947927 important Bug #947927 [mimedefang,spamassassin] mimedefang: Mimedefang is unable to start after upgrade of spamassassin Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#948186: openvdb: FTBFS against python3.8

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: openvdb Version: 6.2.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi, openvdb/experimental FTBFS against python3.8: -- -- Configuring OpenVDBPython

Bug#948165: marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 04/01/2020 23.35, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > https://salsa.debian.org/ceph-team/ceph/commit/c98ea073fc6ec1bfa2a15112616c8c04fb7b1a4b > > > Install bash-completion in /usr again. > > This change went missing somewhere during

Bug#948165: marked as done (ceph-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: ceph-base (<< 14.2.5))

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:53:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#948165: fixed in ceph 14.2.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #948165, regarding ceph-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: ceph-base (<< 14.2.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#948165: marked as done (ceph-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: ceph-base (<< 14.2.5))

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:51:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#948165: fixed in ceph 14.2.4-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #948165, regarding ceph-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: ceph-base (<< 14.2.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#947969: marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #947969 in ceph reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#947969 marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #947969 [ceph-mgr] ceph-mgr: indefinite queue growth causing commands to hang Added tag(s) pending. -- 947969: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=947969 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#948181: x2gothinclient-minidesktop: fails to install with lightdm installed

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: x2gothinclient-minidesktop Version: 1.5.0.1-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the

Processed: Re: opencv: CVE-2019-5063 and CVE-2019-5064

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 948180 4.2.0+dfsg-1 Bug #948180 [opencv] opencv: CVE-2019-5063 and CVE-2019-5064 There is no source info for the package 'opencv' at version '4.2.0+dfsg-1' with architecture '' Unable to make a source version for version '4.2.0+dfsg-1'

Processed: Re: [debian-mysql] Bug#943974: Bug#943974: mariadb-server-10.3: as "service mysql stop" fails, system refuse to shut down

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #943974 [mariadb-server-10.3] mariadb-server-10.3: as "service mysql stop" fails, system refuse to shut down Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #943974 [mariadb-server-10.3] mariadb-server-10.3: as "service mysql

Bug#943974: [debian-mysql] Bug#943974: Bug#943974: mariadb-server-10.3: as "service mysql stop" fails, system refuse to shut down

2020-01-04 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 moreinfo More info is needed if you want anybody to help out with this: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=943974

Bug#948179: gcc-8-doc: Build-Depends on no longer available texlive-generic-recommended

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Source: gcc-8-doc Version: 8.3.0-2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Justification: fails to build from source gcc-8-doc cannot be built in bullseye any longer since the obsolete package texlive-generic-recommended is no longer available in bullseye. Andreas

Bug#948180: opencv: CVE-2019-5063 and CVE-2019-5064

2020-01-04 Thread Markus Koschany
Package: opencv X-Debbugs-CC: t...@security.debian.org Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, The following vulnerabilities were published for opencv. CVE-2019-5064[0]: | An exploitable heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the data | structure persistence functionality of OpenCV, version

Bug#945697: marked as pending in mariadb-10.3

2020-01-04 Thread Otto Kekäläinen
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #945697 in mariadb-10.3 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#945697 marked as pending in mariadb-10.3

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #945697 [src:mariadb-10.3] mariadb-10.3: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 945697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945697 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#937140: marked as done (nibabel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:20:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937140: fixed in nibabel 2.5.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #937140, regarding nibabel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#947874: libdmapsharing-3.0-2: apt-get source -b libdmapsharing failed with dh_missing errors

2020-01-04 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Control: reassign -1 src:libdmapsharing 2.9.39-4 Control: severity -1 important Control: tag -1 moreinfo unreproducible Hi, On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 16:02:26 +0530 crvi wrote: > Package: libdmapsharing-3.0-2 > Version: 2.9.39-4 >debian/rules override_dh_missing > make[1]: Entering directory

Processed: Re: libdmapsharing-3.0-2: apt-get source -b libdmapsharing failed with dh_missing errors

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:libdmapsharing 2.9.39-4 Bug #947874 [src:libdmapsharing] libdmapsharing-3.0-2: apt-get source -b libdmapsharing failed with dh_missing errors Ignoring request to reassign bug #947874 to the same package Bug #947874 [src:libdmapsharing]

Bug#937557: marked as done (pyte: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:08:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937557: fixed in pyte 0.4.8-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #937557, regarding pyte: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#937550: marked as done (pysubnettree: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:08:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937550: fixed in pysubnettree 0.31-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #937550, regarding pysubnettree: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#937501: marked as done (pypandoc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:08:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937501: fixed in pypandoc 1.4+ds0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #937501, regarding pypandoc: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Processed: pyte: diff for NMU version 0.4.8-1.1

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 937557 + patch Bug #937557 [src:pyte] pyte: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) patch. -- 937557: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#937557: pyte: diff for NMU version 0.4.8-1.1

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tags 937557 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for pyte (versioned as 0.4.8-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. diff -Nru pyte-0.4.8/debian/changelog pyte-0.4.8/debian/changelog --- pyte-0.4.8/debian/changelog 2014-09-07 16:26:52.0 -0400 +++

Processed (with 1 error): your mail

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 936215 +1 pending Unknown tag/s: 1. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental potato

Processed: Bug#937550 marked as pending in pysubnettree

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #937550 [src:pysubnettree] pysubnettree: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 937550: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937550 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#937550: marked as pending in pysubnettree

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937550 in pysubnettree reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#947718: marked as done (fplll ftbfs on armel and mipsel (and m68k, powerpc and sh4))

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 22:34:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#947718: fixed in fplll 5.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #947718, regarding fplll ftbfs on armel and mipsel (and m68k, powerpc and sh4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#948165: marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #948165 in ceph reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#948165: marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #948165 in ceph reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#948165 marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #948165 [ceph-common] ceph-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: ceph-base (<< 14.2.5) Added tag(s) pending. -- 948165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948165 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#948165 marked as pending in ceph

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #948165 [ceph-common] ceph-common: missing Breaks+Replaces: ceph-base (<< 14.2.5) Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #948165 to the same tags previously set -- 948165: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948165 Debian Bug

Processed (with 1 error): your mail

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 936215 +1 peding Unknown tag/s: 1, peding. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible help security upstream pending confirmed ipv6 lfs d-i l10n newcomer a11y ftbfs fixed-upstream fixed fixed-in-experimental sid experimental

Bug#937514: marked as done (pyquery: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 22:22:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#937514: fixed in pyquery 1.2.9-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #937514, regarding pyquery: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#936215: marked as done (blessings: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 22:21:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#936215: fixed in blessings 1.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #936215, regarding blessings: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#937514: marked as pending in pyquery

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937514 in pyquery reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#937514 marked as pending in pyquery

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #937514 [src:pyquery] pyquery: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 937514: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937514 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Bug#936215 marked as pending in blessings

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #936215 [src:blessings] blessings: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 936215: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=936215 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#936215: marked as pending in blessings

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #936215 in blessings reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#937140: marked as pending in pynifti

2020-01-04 Thread Sandro Tosi
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #937140 in pynifti reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#937140 marked as pending in pynifti

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #937140 [src:nibabel] nibabel: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye Added tag(s) pending. -- 937140: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=937140 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#948085: marked as done (jengelman-shadow build depends on openjdk-8-jdk-headless)

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 04 Jan 2020 21:34:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#948085: fixed in jengelman-shadow 4.0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #948085, regarding jengelman-shadow build depends on openjdk-8-jdk-headless to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: py2removal RC severity updates - 2020-01-04 21:36:06.254632+00:00

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # This is an automated script, part of the effort for the removal of Python 2 > from bullseye > # * https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal > # * http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/index.html > # See

Bug#948085: marked as pending in jengelman-shadow

2020-01-04 Thread Tony Mancill
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #948085 in jengelman-shadow reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#948085 marked as pending in jengelman-shadow

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #948085 [src:jengelman-shadow] jengelman-shadow build depends on openjdk-8-jdk-headless Added tag(s) pending. -- 948085: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=948085 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#948159: mmdebstrap: autopkgtest issue: +libcrypt1:amd64 in chroot

2020-01-04 Thread Johannes Schauer
Hi Paul, Quoting Paul Gevers (2020-01-04 20:24:50) > With a recent upload of mmdebstrap the autopkgtest of mmdebstrap fails > in testing when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of > mmdebstrap from unstable. It passes when run with only packages from > testing. In tabular form: >

Processed: reassign 947927 to mimedefang,spamassassin, found 947927 in 3.4.2-1~deb9u2, found 947927 in 2.79-2

2020-01-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 947927 mimedefang,spamassassin Bug #947927 [mimedefang] mimedefang: Mimedefang is unable to start after upgrade of spamassassin Bug reassigned from package 'mimedefang' to 'mimedefang,spamassassin'. No longer marked as found in versions

  1   2   >