Bug#987589: marked as done (sshguard: blocks the remote ssh client at 1st mistake regardless of THRESHOLD option value)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 04:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#928525: fixed in sshguard 2.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #928525, regarding sshguard: blocks the remote ssh client at 1st mistake regardless of THRESHOLD option value to be marked as done. This

Bug#928525: marked as done (sshguard: Default configuration does not work as intended, needs configuration update)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 04:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#928525: fixed in sshguard 2.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #928525, regarding sshguard: Default configuration does not work as intended, needs configuration update to be marked as done. This means

Bug#987588: marked as done (sshguard: blocks the remote ssh client at 1st mistake regardless of THRESHOLD option value)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 04:33:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#928525: fixed in sshguard 2.3.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #928525, regarding sshguard: blocks the remote ssh client at 1st mistake regardless of THRESHOLD option value to be marked as done. This

Processed: Out of bullseye

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #986474 [i2p-router] i2p-router: broken symlink: /usr/share/i2p/lib/ecj.jar -> ../../java/ecj.jar Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' -- 986474: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=986474 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#991064: marked as done (therion FTBFS with imagemagick with the #987504 change)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jul 2021 00:33:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991064: fixed in therion 5.5.7ds1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #991064, regarding therion FTBFS with imagemagick with the #987504 change to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Processed: severity of 991519 is normal, merging 989777 991519

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 991519 normal Bug #991519 [src:linux] linux-image-5.10.0-8-amd64: xHCI host not responding to stop endpoint command Severity set to 'normal' from 'critical' > merge 989777 991519 Bug #989777 [src:linux] Debian 10 & 11 with Kernel

Processed: found 910920 in 1.1~pre18-1

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 910920 1.1~pre18-1 Bug #910920 [tinc] tinc: fails to install: tinc.postinst: cannot create /etc/tinc/nets.boot: Directory nonexistent Marked as found in versions tinc/1.1~pre18-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Bug#989080: marked as done (cifs-utils: Fix for CVE-2021-20208 breaks cifs.upcall)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:33:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#989080: fixed in cifs-utils 2:6.11-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #989080, regarding cifs-utils: Fix for CVE-2021-20208 breaks cifs.upcall to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#991496: marked as done (libsndfile: CVE-2021-3246)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:18:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991496: fixed in libsndfile 1.0.31-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #991496, regarding libsndfile: CVE-2021-3246 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#989080: cifs-utils: diff for NMU version 2:6.11-3.1

2021-07-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for cifs-utils (versioned as 2:6.11-3.1). The diff is attached to this message. Regards. -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru cifs-utils-6.11/debian/changelog cifs-utils-6.11/debian/changelog --- cifs-utils-6.11/debian/changelog 2021-05-06 21:24:29.0

Bug#973599: nvidia-graphics-drivers-legacy-340xx: EoL driver should not be released with bullseye

2021-07-26 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On Wed, 05 May 2021 09:38:25 +0300 jim_p wrote: Because the package will remain in sid, I would like to ask if you will accept patches for future versions of the kernel, or, in a few words, if the package will continue to be upgraded. I'll try to keep the package updated in sid for supporting

Bug#991053: marked as done (ftgl FTBFS with imagemagick with the #987504 change)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:03:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991053: fixed in ftgl 2.4.0-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #991053, regarding ftgl FTBFS with imagemagick with the #987504 change to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#991088: librda: diff for NMU version 0.0.5-1.1

2021-07-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags 991088 + patch Control: tags 991088 + pending Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for librda (versioned as 0.0.5-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru librda-0.0.5/debian/changelog

Processed: librda: diff for NMU version 0.0.5-1.1

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 991088 + patch Bug #991088 [gir1.2-rda-1.0] gir1.2-rda-1.0 has empty Depends Added tag(s) patch. > tags 991088 + pending Bug #991088 [gir1.2-rda-1.0] gir1.2-rda-1.0 has empty Depends Added tag(s) pending. -- 991088:

Bug#991053: ftgl: diff for NMU version 2.4.0-2.1

2021-07-26 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ftgl (versioned as 2.4.0-2.1). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru ftgl-2.4.0/debian/changelog ftgl-2.4.0/debian/changelog --- ftgl-2.4.0/debian/changelog 2019-02-26 16:52:23.0 +0100 +++

Processed: bullseye-ignore

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # We're getting very close to the bullseye release. Although we'd > # (still) love to have these bugs fixed, let's focus on what absolutely > # needs fixing. > # I'm considering adding a release-notes section about some/most of > # these bugs >

Bug#991423: marked as done (xmltooling: autopkgtest regression since mid-July 2021)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:48:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#991423: fixed in xmltooling 3.2.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #991423, regarding xmltooling: autopkgtest regression since mid-July 2021 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#988456: atftp packaging on salsa

2021-07-26 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Hi everybody, the atftp packaging is now available on salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/atftp Hopefully the issues mentioned in this bug report can be addressed soon. So far I updated the sources and fixed some lintian warnigs. The next step is the integration with systemd. Any help is

Bug#982683: marked as done (mysql-workbench: Uses no-longer existing package for build, remove?)

2021-07-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:03:10 +1000 with message-id <3125600.RHtmz8Vdlm@deblab> and subject line Re: #982683 mysql-workbench: Uses no-longer existing package for build, remove? has caused the Debian Bug report #982683, regarding mysql-workbench: Uses no-longer existing package for

Bug#991451: redis breaks python-fakeredis autopkgtest: AssertionError

2021-07-26 Thread Jochen Sprickerhof
* Chris Lamb [2021-07-25 16:37]: Chris Lamb wrote: Sure thing -- I've forwarded this upstream here: https://github.com/redis/redis/issues/9273 Okay, so the latest reply there suggests that this is (now) the expected and behaviour of Redis going forward. I still don't quite grasp what it