Processed: tagging 995676

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 995676 + pending Bug #995676 [kmymoney] kmymoney FTBFS in bookworm. Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 995676: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995676

Processed: bug 984123 is forwarded to https://github.com/wojdyr/fityk/issues/37

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 984123 https://github.com/wojdyr/fityk/issues/37 Bug #984123 [src:fityk] fityk: ftbfs with GCC-11 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/wojdyr/fityk/issues/37'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#973905: marked as done (python-typing-inspect's autopkg test fails)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 03:33:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#973905: fixed in python-typing-inspect 0.7.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #973905, regarding python-typing-inspect's autopkg test fails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#972803: marked as done (python-typing-inspect fails tests with python3.9)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 03:33:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972803: fixed in python-typing-inspect 0.7.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #972803, regarding python-typing-inspect fails tests with python3.9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#980957: llvm-toolchain-12 autopkgtest segfaults on armhf

2021-10-11 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Gianfranco, On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 09:11:49PM +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: forwarded -1 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 > control: affects -1 src:binutils > > Invoking the clang with -V shows a failure in ld.bdf linker, a failure that > doesn't happen

Bug#995689: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#995689: python-reportlab breaks autopkgtest of python-biopython

2021-10-11 Thread Étienne Mollier
Control: reassign -1 src:python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-5 Control: affects -1 src:python-reportlab 3.5.67-2 Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi there, Graham Inggs, on 2021-10-04: > I noticed that python-biopython already has a Recommends on > python3-renderpm. One solution would be to bump this to a

Bug#996188: RuntimeError: populate() isn't reentrant

2021-10-11 Thread Kevin Otte
Package: graphite-web Version: 1.1.8-1 Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, Installed graphite-web on a fresh bullseye machine and migrated the apache virtualhost configuration from a running buster machine. Attempting to load the page results in the error listed in the subject. Full traceback:

Processed: bug 983996 is forwarded to https://github.com/DanielStutzbach/blist/issues/98

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 983996 https://github.com/DanielStutzbach/blist/issues/98 Bug #983996 [src:blist] blist: ftbfs with GCC-11 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/DanielStutzbach/blist/issues/98'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: Re: glibmm2.4: FTBFS on buildds / reproducible builds without network access

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 996171 2.64.2-2 Bug #996171 [src:glibmm2.4] glibmm2.4: FTBFS on buildds / reproducible builds without network access Marked as found in versions glibmm2.4/2.64.2-2. > tags 996171 bookworm sid Bug #996171 [src:glibmm2.4] glibmm2.4: FTBFS on

Bug#995689: marked as done (python-reportlab breaks autopkgtest of python-biopython)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:05:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995689: fixed in python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #995689, regarding python-reportlab breaks autopkgtest of python-biopython to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#995644: lebiniou: Fails to upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/lebiniou/etc/schemes.json'

2021-10-11 Thread Olivier Girondel
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 17:10:22 +0200 Kurt Roeckx wrote: Package: lbeibiou Version: 3.61.2-1 Severity: serious Hi, During an upgrade, I get the following: dpkg: considering deconfiguration of lebiniou-data, which would be broken by installation of lebiniou ... dpkg: yes, will deconfigure

Processed: affects 984399

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 984399 src:pcl Bug #984399 [src:vtk9] vtk9: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added indication that 984399 affects src:pcl > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 984399:

Processed: gcc 11 bug housekeeping

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > close 983976 Bug #983976 [src:ayatana-indicator-application] ayatana-indicator-application: ftbfs with GCC-11 Marked Bug as done > close 983980 Bug #983980 [src:ayatana-indicator-messages] ayatana-indicator-messages: ftbfs with GCC-11 Marked

Bug#996168: marked as done (retext does not start: xsettings.py:126 RuntimeError: ffi_prep_cif_var failed)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:28:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996168: fixed in retext 7.2.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996168, regarding retext does not start: xsettings.py:126 RuntimeError: ffi_prep_cif_var failed to be marked as done. This means that you

Processed: Re: surf-alggeo: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #984353 [src:surf-alggeo] surf-alggeo: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 984353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984353 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#984353: surf-alggeo: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-11 Thread Torrance, Douglas
Control: tags -1 patch On Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:17:45 + Matthias Klose wrote: > ../../../yaccsrc/Script.cc: In static member function ‘static void > Script::clearScreen()’: > ../../../yaccsrc/Script.cc:910:23: error: reference to ‘byte’ is ambiguous > 910 | *intensity =

Processed: Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#995689: python-reportlab breaks autopkgtest of python-biopython

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-5 Bug #995689 [src:python-reportlab, src:python-biopython] python-reportlab breaks autopkgtest of python-biopython Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-reportlab, src:python-biopython' to 'src:python-biopython'. No

Bug#993011: pulseaudio-module-bluetooth: no longer detects bluetooth headphones

2021-10-11 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hello, On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:08:03 +0200 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > After the upgrade to 15.0+dfsg1-2, pulseaudio no longer detects > my bluetooth headphones when I switch them on. As apparently there is a workaround and/or the problem is coming from bluez, do you think we should keep

Processed: Bug#996168 marked as pending in retext

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996168 [retext] retext does not start: xsettings.py:126 RuntimeError: ffi_prep_cif_var failed Added tag(s) pending. -- 996168: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996168 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#996168: marked as pending in retext

2021-10-11 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996168 in retext reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#996166 marked as pending in docker.io

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #996166 [docker.io] FTBFS: oci/devices_linux.go:15:16: undefined: configs.Device Added tag(s) pending. -- 996166: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996166 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#996166: marked as pending in docker.io

2021-10-11 Thread Shengjing Zhu
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #996166 in docker.io reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Bug#931345: nvchecker: autopkgtest regression in June 2019

2021-10-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Afif, On 10-10-2021 22:56, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >> The test if timing out nowadays too, so I'll block it from being tested >> to avoid stress on our infrastructure until this bug is fixed. > > This bug has been fixed for about a week now but nvchecker still appears > to be blocked from

Bug#996167: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file;

2021-10-11 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:17:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> Is there any good reason why the plocate group would disappear >> that you know of? > Not that… wait, doesn’t schroot copy groups? Let me see… > > AH! It does! And since my main system is now > bullseye, not sid,

Bug#996167: marked as done (dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file;)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:17:51 + (UTC) with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#996167: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file; has caused the Debian Bug report #996167, regarding dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:

Bug#996171: glibmm2.4: FTBFS on buildds / reproducible builds without network access

2021-10-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Source: glibmm2.4 Version: 2.66.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream ftbfs Justification: Debian Policy 4.9 According to Debian Policy 4.9: | For packages in the main archive, required targets must not attempt | network access, except, via the loopback interface, to services on the | build host

Bug#984407: marked as done (xva-img: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 18:07:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984407: fixed in xva-img 1.4.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984407, regarding xva-img: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#996167: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file;

2021-10-11 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 07:33:19PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Package: plocate > Version: 1.1.12-1 > Severity: critical > Justification: breaks unrelated software > X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de > > I'm encountering this: > > [... apt-get dist-upgrade ...] Can you say something about what

Bug#996170: linux: FTBFS if bpftool detects clang-bpf-co-re

2021-10-11 Thread Nathaniel Wesley Filardo
Source: linux Version: 5.10.70-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs patch upstream Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) X-Debbugs-Cc: nwfila...@gmail.com Dear Maintainer, Attempting to build kernel packages using the machinery of

Processed: Re: Bug#995392: ghostscript: ps2pdf trashes some characters

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 995392 - moreinfo Bug #995392 [ghostscript] ghostscript: ps2pdf trashes some characters Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 995392:

Bug#996167: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file;

2021-10-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Dixi quod… >dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: > unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file; the system group got > removed >before the override, which is most probably a packaging bug, to recover you >can remove the override manually with dpkg-statoverride Before I do that,

Bug#996168: retext does not start: xsettings.py:126 RuntimeError: ffi_prep_cif_var failed

2021-10-11 Thread Renzo Davoli
Package: retext Version: 7.2.1-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable X-Debbugs-Cc: re...@cs.unibo.it Dear Maintainer, This is the traceback of the error. ~$ retext Using configuration file: /home/renzo/.config/ReText project/ReText.conf Traceback (most recent call last):

Bug#996167: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unknown system group 'plocate' in statoverride file;

2021-10-11 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Package: plocate Version: 1.1.12-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@mirbsd.de I'm encountering this: [... apt-get dist-upgrade ...] Extracting templates from packages: 100%

Bug#993011: pulseaudio-module-bluetooth: no longer detects bluetooth headphones

2021-10-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: severity -1 minor On 2021-10-11 17:35:04 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:08:03 +0200 Vincent Lefevre > wrote: > > > After the upgrade to 15.0+dfsg1-2, pulseaudio no longer detects > > my bluetooth headphones when I switch them on. > > As apparently there is a

Processed: Re: pulseaudio-module-bluetooth: no longer detects bluetooth headphones

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 minor Bug #993011 [pulseaudio-module-bluetooth] pulseaudio-module-bluetooth: no longer detects bluetooth headphones Severity set to 'minor' from 'grave' -- 993011: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993011 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processed: [bts-link] source package src:cheesecutter

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # > # bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:cheesecutter > # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html > # https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/ > # > user

Bug#994457: marked as done (r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:09:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994457: fixed in r-cran-gnm 1.1-1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #994457, regarding r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: tagging 984220

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 984220 + confirmed Bug #984220 [src:lnav] lnav: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 984220: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984220

Processed: severity of 979462 is serious

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 979462 serious Bug #979462 [aplus-fsf] aplus-fsf: FTBFS against glibc 2.32 Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 979462:

Processed: tagging 979462

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 979462 + ftbfs bookworm sid Bug #979462 [aplus-fsf] aplus-fsf: FTBFS against glibc 2.32 Added tag(s) sid, bookworm, and ftbfs. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 979462:

Bug#994457: r-cran-gnm autopkgtest needs to be adapted for lapack 3.10

2021-10-11 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Dear Heather, Please find attached the patch that I am going to apply to r-cran-gnm in Debian. With this patch applied, the test now works with both lapack 3.9 and 3.10. Feel free to use it (or not) for the next release of gnm. Best wishes, Le lundi 27 septembre 2021 à 12:01 +0100, Heather

Bug#984206: libquazip: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-11 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Control: tags -1 patch The attached patch fixes the issue by updating the symbols file and overriding dh_makeshlibs to use the upstream version and not failing on changes to fix this permanently. Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146

Processed: libquazip: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch Bug #984206 [src:libquazip] libquazip: ftbfs with GCC-11 Added tag(s) patch. -- 984206: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984206 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#984240: marked as done (mpfi: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 17:01:22 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: mpfi: ftbfs with GCC-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #984240, regarding mpfi: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#995021: marked as done (osmnx: autopkgtest regression on armhf: iteration over a 0-d array)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:06:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995021: fixed in osmnx 1.1.1+ds-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #995021, regarding osmnx: autopkgtest regression on armhf: iteration over a 0-d array to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#996161: ruby-rmagick: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: LoadError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-rmagick Version: 2.16.0-7 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-rmagick was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996160: ruby-eventmachine: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-eventmachine Version: 1.3~pre20201020-b50c135-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-eventmachine was found to

Processed: Re: Bug#996146: r-cran-maotai FTBFS: dependencies 'labdsv', 'shapes', 'dbscan', 'RcppDist' are not available

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #996146 [src:r-cran-maotai] r-cran-maotai FTBFS: dependencies 'labdsv', 'shapes', 'dbscan', 'RcppDist' are not available Added tag(s) pending. > block -1 by 995723 Bug #996146 [src:r-cran-maotai] r-cran-maotai FTBFS: dependencies 'labdsv',

Bug#996146: r-cran-maotai FTBFS: dependencies 'labdsv', 'shapes', 'dbscan', 'RcppDist' are not available

2021-10-11 Thread Andreas Tille
Control: tags -1 pending Control: block -1 by 995723 Am Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 04:07:22PM +0300 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > I: Building using R version 4.1.1-2 > I: R API version: r-api-4.0 > I: Using built-time from d/changelog: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 15:52:01 +0200 > mkdir -p >

Bug#995678: Bug#995392: ghostscript: ps2pdf trashes some characters

2021-10-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Control: severity 995392 grave Control: severity 995678 normal Control: tags 995678 - moreinfo Please be careful with the bug numbers... On 2021-10-11 08:27:55 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: > Then, this is by far not a grave bug in TL. pdflatex is **not** > affected, since it generated pdf

Bug#996159: ruby-batch-loader: FTBFS: ERROR: Test "ruby2.7" failed: Failure/Error: result = schema.execute(query)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-batch-loader Version: 2.0.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-batch-loader was found to fail to

Processed: Re: Bug#995392: ghostscript: ps2pdf trashes some characters

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity 995392 grave Bug #995392 [ghostscript] ghostscript: ps2pdf trashes some characters Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > severity 995678 normal Bug #995678 [texlive-base] texlive-base: pdflatex in TeX Live 2021 potentially generates invalid PDF, making

Bug#996157: ruby-clean-test: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Error: test_any_symbol_works(TestAny): ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 0..1)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-clean-test Version: 1.0.0-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-clean-test was found to fail to build in

Bug#996156: ruby-ahoy-email: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-ahoy-email Version: 1.1.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-ahoy-email was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996155: origami-pdf: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 1)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: origami-pdf Version: 2.1.0-1~exp1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, origami-pdf was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996154: obexftp: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ld: final link failed: bad value

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: obexftp Version: 0.24-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, obexftp was found to fail to build in that situation. To

Bug#996152: libsemanage: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: secilc (>= 3.2)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: libsemanage Version: 3.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, libsemanage was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996028: #996028 InnoDB: corrupted TRX_NO after upgrading to 10.3.31

2021-10-11 Thread Jan Korbel
Maybe this: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=257728

Processed: Re: Bug#995223 closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Matthias Klose ) (Bug#995223: fixed in libffi 3.4.2-3)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #995223 {Done: Matthias Klose } [src:libffi] libffi: autoconf incompatibility causes baseline violation 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug

Bug#995223: closed by Debian FTP Masters (reply to Matthias Klose ) (Bug#995223: fixed in libffi 3.4.2-3)

2021-10-11 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Control: reopen -1 Hello! This did not fix the bug, unfortunately. libffi is still being built with "-mcpu=power8" on ppc64, see the full build log in [1]. We didn't need --enable-portable before, so this isn't the issue but I assume the problem is the new autoconf version which is not

Bug#996028: #996028 InnoDB: corrupted TRX_NO after upgrading to 10.3.31

2021-10-11 Thread Jan Korbel
Hello. Same here after mariadb update 1:10.3.29-0+deb10u1 -> 1:10.3.31-0+deb10u1 After downgrade there is no corruptions. We have i386 arch with amd64 kernel. Regards, JK 211010 17:47:31 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /var/lib/mysql 2021-10-10 17:47:31 0 [Note]

Bug#996147: ruby-capybara: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-capybara Version: 3.12.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-capybara was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996146: r-cran-maotai FTBFS: dependencies 'labdsv', 'shapes', 'dbscan', 'RcppDist' are not available

2021-10-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: r-cran-maotai Version: 0.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=r-cran-maotai=0.2.1-1 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/r-cran-maotai.html ... dh_auto_install --destdir=debian/r-cran-maotai/ -O--buildsystem=R

Bug#996145: ruby-byebug: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: "/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:85:in `require': cannot load such file -- byebug/byebug (LoadE

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-byebug Version: 11.1.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-byebug was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996142: ruby-buff-config: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: RuntimeError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-buff-config Version: 2.0.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-buff-config was found to fail to build in

Bug#996143: ruby-bunny: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: RuntimeError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-bunny Version: 2.14.4-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-bunny was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996141: ruby-bootsnap: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-bootsnap Version: 1.4.6-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-bootsnap was found to fail to build in that

Bug#995597: marked as done (FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 13:03:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995597: fixed in bsdgames 2.17-29 has caused the Debian Bug report #995597, regarding FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#996140: ruby-bogus: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: # ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-bogus Version: 0.1.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-bogus was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996139: ruby-bluefeather: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: NoMethodError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-bluefeather Version: 0.41-5.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-bluefeather was found to fail to build in

Bug#996138: ruby-bio: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Error: test_target(Bio::TestSiRNAPair): NoMethodError: undefined method `subseq' for "cuuucggugcggacguaaggagu":String

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-bio Version: 2.0.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-bio was found to fail to build in that situation.

Bug#996137: ruby-binding-of-caller: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: :85:in `require': cannot load such file --

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-binding-of-caller Version: 0.7.2+debian1-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-binding-of-caller was found to

Bug#996134: ruby-beaker-hostgenerator: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: NoMethodError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-beaker-hostgenerator Version: 1.1.22-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-beaker-hostgenerator was found

Bug#996136: ruby-bindex: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed.

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-bindex Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-bindex was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996135: ruby-benchmark-memory: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-benchmark-memory Version: 0.1.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-benchmark-memory was found to fail to

Bug#996133: ruby-barby: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: :85:in `require': cannot load such file -- sorted_set

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-barby Version: 0.6.8+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-barby was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996130: clickhouse FTBFS with gcc 11

2021-10-11 Thread Adrian Bunk
Source: clickhouse Version: 18.16.1+ds-7.2 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs bookworm sid https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=clickhouse=18.16.1%2Bds-7.2%2Bb2 ... /<>/dbms/src/IO/copyData.cpp: In function ‘void DB::copyData(DB::ReadBuffer&, DB::WriteBuffer&)’:

Bug#996132: ruby-backports: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/3.0.0/gems/rake-13.0.3/lib/rake/testtask.rb:130:in `block (3 levels) in define': Command failed with st

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-backports Version: 3.16.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-backports was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996129: ruby-axiom-types: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: RuntimeError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-axiom-types Version: 0.1.1-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-axiom-types was found to fail to build in

Bug#996128: ruby-awesome-print: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-awesome-print Version: 1.8.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-awesome-print was found to fail to build

Bug#996127: ruby-avl-tree: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Error: test_each_value(TestRedBlackTree): ArgumentError: tried to create Proc object without a block

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-avl-tree Version: 1.2.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-avl-tree was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996126: ruby-attr-encrypted: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 1)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-attr-encrypted Version: 3.1.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-attr-encrypted was found to fail to build

Bug#996125: ruby-arbre: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: RuntimeError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-arbre Version: 1.2.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-arbre was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996124: ruby-appraiser: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: No such file or directory @ rb_sysopen - http://rubygems.org/api/v1/gems/rails.json

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-appraiser Version: 0.2.0-3.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-appraiser was found to fail to build in that

Bug#996123: ruby-api-pagination: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-api-pagination Version: 4.8.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-api-pagination was found to fail to build

Bug#996122: ruby-addressable: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-addressable Version: 2.8.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-addressable was found to fail to build in

Bug#996121: ruby-acts-as-tree: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/activerecord-6.0.3.7/lib/active_record/associations/builder/association.rb:51:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-acts-as-tree Version: 2.8.0-1.1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-acts-as-tree was found to fail to build

Bug#995597: marked as pending in bsdgames

2021-10-11 Thread Stephen Kitt
Control: tag -1 pending Hello, Bug #995597 in bsdgames reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:

Processed: Bug#995597 marked as pending in bsdgames

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #995597 [src:bsdgames] FTBFS: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments Added tag(s) pending. -- 995597: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995597 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#996120: ruby-acts-as-list: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 3, expected 2)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-acts-as-list Version: 1.0.3-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-acts-as-list was found to fail to build in

Bug#996119: ruby-activerecord-nulldb-adapter: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: Failure/Error: Employee.create

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-activerecord-nulldb-adapter Version: 0.4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-activerecord-nulldb-adapter

Bug#996118: pry: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: NoMethodError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: pry Version: 0.13.1-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, pry was found to fail to build in that situation. To

Bug#996116: r10k: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: r10k Version: 3.7.0-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, r10k was found to fail to build in that situation. To

Bug#996117: ruby-active-model-serializers: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 3)

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: ruby-active-model-serializers Version: 0.10.10-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, ruby-active-model-serializers was

Bug#995223: marked as done (libffi: autoconf incompatibility causes baseline violation)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:34:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#995223: fixed in libffi 3.4.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #995223, regarding libffi: autoconf incompatibility causes baseline violation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#996114: atig: FTBFS with ruby3.0: ERROR: Test "ruby3.0" failed: NoMethodError:

2021-10-11 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Source: atig Version: 0.6.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ruby3.0 Hi, We are about to enable building against ruby3.0 on unstable. During a test rebuild, atig was found to fail to build in that situation. To

Bug#996113: libmodulemd: Please move Modulemd.py GObject introspection override to gir1.2-modulemd-2.0

2021-10-11 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Source: libmodulemd Version: 2.12.0-1 Severity: serious Hello, Without knowing all in and odds of libmodulemd, GObject introspection override files are runtime files, not development files. That means that the file must be moved to the gir1.2-modulemd-2.0 package (and the python3 dependency

Bug#984181: marked as done (htmlcxx: ftbfs with GCC-11)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:15:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#984181: fixed in htmlcxx 0.87-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #984181, regarding htmlcxx: ftbfs with GCC-11 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#994150: marked as done (licensecheck FTBFS: test failures)

2021-10-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 12:15:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#994150: fixed in licensecheck 3.2.13-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #994150, regarding licensecheck FTBFS: test failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#984249: muffin: ftbfs with GCC-11

2021-10-11 Thread Fabio Fantoni
Il 03/03/2021 17:15, Matthias Klose ha scritto: Package: src:muffin Version: 4.8.1-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid bookworm User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-11 [This bug is not targeted to the upcoming bullseye release] Please keep this issue open in the bug tracker for the

  1   2   >