Processed: src:directfb: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > close -1 1.7.7-10 Bug #1012383 [src:directfb] src:directfb: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf Marked as fixed in versions directfb/1.7.7-10. Bug #1012383 [src:directfb] src:directfb: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS

Bug#1012383: src:directfb: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on armel and armhf

2022-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: directfb Version: 1.7.7-9 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-CC: Andreas Beckmann Control: close -1 1.7.7-10 Tags: sid bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: out-of-sync Dear maintainer(s), Andreas, The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between

Bug#1012382: pktanon: autopkgtest fails on s390x with: wrong pcap file version: should be 2.4

2022-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: pktanon Version: 2~git20160407.0.2bde4f2+dfsg-9 Severity: serious Hi, Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails on s390x. I have attached the relevant piece of the log [1]. I'd like to note that s390x is big-endian. Maybe the check for the version fails somehow? Paul

Bug#1012279: php-horde-turba: CVE-2022-30287

2022-06-05 Thread Juri Grabowski
Hello together, On 2022-06-05 14:35 7, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: it looks that the force pushed commit two days ago adjusted two further create() -> createTrusted() stances in lib/Application.php, can you double check? functions backup and _restoreContact are only available on turba/master

Bug#1011420: marked as done (opencu: missing Breaks+Replaces: cu)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2022 02:34:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011420: fixed in opencu 3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011420, regarding opencu: missing Breaks+Replaces: cu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#996273: marked as done (dovecot: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:03:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#996273: fixed in dovecot 1:2.3.19+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #996273, regarding dovecot: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#1009872: marked as done (dovecot-core: postinst fails when snakeoil cert is removed)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:03:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009872: fixed in dovecot 1:2.3.19+dfsg1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009872, regarding dovecot-core: postinst fails when snakeoil cert is removed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#999620: marked as done (pktanon: autopkgtest regression on armhf)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2022 01:43:55 +0200 with message-id <0decacca-5d17-88b6-7185-00ca8e1c8...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#999620: pktanon: autopkgtest regression on armhf has caused the Debian Bug report #999620, regarding pktanon: autopkgtest regression on armhf to be marked as

Bug#1011763: marked as done (apt-listdifferences: FTBFS: patching file colordiff-git (read from /usr/bin/colordiff))

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 23:03:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011763: fixed in apt-listdifferences 1.20220605 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011763, regarding apt-listdifferences: FTBFS: patching file colordiff-git (read from /usr/bin/colordiff) to be marked as

Bug#1012275: closing 1012275

2022-06-05 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 14:42 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > Unfortunately, Firefox is not buildable due to depending on a version > of > Cargo not available in unstable. Shouldn't that be reopened then? I wouldn't be surprised if quite a number of people use the non ESR FF, probably also DDs/DMs.

Bug#1011042: marked as done (libica FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 21:33:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011042: fixed in libica 3.9.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1011042, regarding libica FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1010331: marked as done (src:vkd3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 21:19:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010331: fixed in vkd3d 1.2-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #1010331, regarding src:vkd3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Processed: your mail

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1010331 Bug #1010331 {Done: Paul Gevers } [src:vkd3d] src:vkd3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you

Bug#1012373: dulwich breaks breezy autopkgtest: command loaded forbidden modules ['shutil', 'ssl', 'tempfile']

2022-06-05 Thread Paul Gevers
Source: dulwich, breezy Control: found -1 dulwich/0.20.42-1 Control: found -1 breezy/3.2.2-2 Severity: serious Tags: sid bookworm User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: breaks needs-update Dear maintainer(s), With a recent upload of dulwich the autopkgtest of breezy fails in testing when

Processed: dulwich breaks breezy autopkgtest: command loaded forbidden modules ['shutil', 'ssl', 'tempfile']

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > found -1 dulwich/0.20.42-1 Bug #1012373 [src:dulwich, src:breezy] dulwich breaks breezy autopkgtest: command loaded forbidden modules ['shutil', 'ssl', 'tempfile'] Marked as found in versions dulwich/0.20.42-1. > found -1 breezy/3.2.2-2 Bug #1012373 [src:dulwich,

Bug#942737: libapache2-mod-gnutls: mod_gnutls consumes 100% cpu

2022-06-05 Thread Félix Arreola Rodríguez
Finally managed to write a patch. This patch applies ok on mod-gnutls 0.9.0 and not sure if it will work for buster. -- Atte. Félix Arreola Firmado con GPG 0x1e249ee4 Author: Félix Arreola Rodríguez Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2022 10:42:46 -0500 Subject: Fix a loop caused by timeout if mod_reqtimeout

Bug#1012279: php-horde-turba: CVE-2022-30287

2022-06-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Salvatore, On So 05 Jun 2022 14:35:03 CEST, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 12:02:54PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: Hi Juri, On Sa 04 Jun 2022 00:13:11 CEST, debian wrote: > Hello, > > here is draft for MR: >

Bug#1006581: marked as done (xmltooling: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 19:05:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1006581: fixed in xmltooling 3.2.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1006581, regarding xmltooling: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Processed (with 1 error): unarchiving 972084, forcibly merging 972084 1012352, archiving 972084

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 972084 > forcemerge 972084 1012352 Bug #972084 {Done: Stephen Kitt } [gweled] gweled: Display is glitching Bug #1012352 {Done: Stephen Kitt } [gweled] Glitches/artifacts in the window of Gweled Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'

Bug#981224: Proposing to replace ruby-uglifier with ruby-terser and remove ruby-uglifier

2022-06-05 Thread Andrej Shadura
Hi, On Sun, 5 Jun 2022, at 12:58, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On ബു, ജൂൺ 1 2022 at 07:32:00 വൈകു +05:30:00 > +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> Looks like upstreams moved already >> https://github.com/rails/sprockets/pull/713 >> https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/main/Gemfile#L33 > > $

Processed (with 2 errors): unarchiving 972084, merging 972084 1012352, archiving 972084

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > unarchive 972084 Bug #972084 {Done: Stephen Kitt } [gweled] gweled: Display is glitching Unarchived Bug 972084 > merge 972084 1012352 Bug #972084 {Done: Stephen Kitt } [gweled] gweled: Display is glitching Unable to merge bugs because: severity

Bug#1012361: New upstream version 4.2.2

2022-06-05 Thread Guido Günther
Package: electrum Version: 4.0.9-1 Severity: critical Hi, there's a new upstream version 4.2.2 available: https://electrum.org/#download Would be great to have that in Debian. Cheers, -- Guido

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#1011914: lsof: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:28: all] Error 1

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1011914 minor Bug #1011914 [src:lsof] lsof: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:28: all] Error 1 Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' > tags 1011914 = wontfix Bug #1011914 [src:lsof] lsof: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:28: all] Error 1 Added

Bug#1011914: lsof: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:28: all] Error 1

2022-06-05 Thread Andres Salomon
severity 1011914 minor tags 1011914 = wontfix retitle 1011914 lsof: FTBFS during unit tests when hostname cannot be resolved forward 1011914 https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/issues/61 thanks On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 11:13, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Hi Andres, [...] This is not related to the

Bug#1012279: php-horde-turba: CVE-2022-30287

2022-06-05 Thread Salvatore Bonaccorso
Hi, On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 12:02:54PM +, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Hi Juri, > > On Sa 04 Jun 2022 00:13:11 CEST, debian wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > here is draft for MR: > > https://salsa.debian.org/horde-team/php-horde-turba/-/merge_requests/1 > > I would look after it next time on sunday

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

2022-06-05 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Just a hunch, is it possible that your build environment did not have the package 'ca-certificates' present whereas mine does? I wonder whether I need to add 'ca-certificates' to "Build-Depends". What do you think? On Sun, Jun 5, 2022 at 7:10 AM Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Please find the

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

2022-06-05 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Please find the buildlog of my attempt attached to this email As far as I can tell, the tests are executing in the same way as in your logs, but I may be missing something. golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools_0.9.0+git20220423.g0105384-1_amd64-2022-06-05T02:02:05Z.build Description:

Bug#1009369: marked as done (frescobaldi: fails to start)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 11:03:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1009369: fixed in frescobaldi 3.2+ds1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1009369, regarding frescobaldi: fails to start to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#1012345: marked as done (librust-bytecount-dev: depends on missing package librust-packed-simd-2-0.3+default-dev)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 10:49:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012345: fixed in rust-bytecount 0.6.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #1012345, regarding librust-bytecount-dev: depends on missing package librust-packed-simd-2-0.3+default-dev to be marked as done.

Processed: Re: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1012221: rust-stdweb-internal-macros (build-)depends on old version of rust-sha1.

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 1012221 Bug #1012221 {Done: Sylvestre Ledru } [rust-stdweb-internal-macros] rust-stdweb-internal-macros (build-)depends on old version of rust-sha1. Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1012221 to the same values

Bug#1012221: [Pkg-rust-maintainers] Bug#1012221: rust-stdweb-internal-macros (build-)depends on old version of rust-sha1.

2022-06-05 Thread Peter Michael Green
reopen 1012221 thanks On 02/06/2022 13:29, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: 4. Remove the stdweb features in instant and parking-lot and allow stdweb to be removed from testing. I think I implemented this solution. Thanks, That solves the issue for instant, parking-lot and their reverse

Bug#1011914: lsof: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:28: all] Error 1

2022-06-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Andres, On 04/06/22 at 15:13 -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > Thanks for the report. I can't reproduce this, though. > > The code in question is this: > > > /* > * Get the host name and its IP address. Convert the IP address to dotted > * ASCII form. > */ >if (gethostname(hnm,

Bug#1009528: marked as done (node-temporary: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 2)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:05:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010006: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1009528, regarding node-temporary: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 2 to be

Bug#1009536: marked as done (node-connect-timeout: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:05:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010009: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1009536, regarding node-connect-timeout: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: /bin/sh -ex debian/tests/pkg-js/test returned exit code 1 to be

Bug#1010513: marked as done (node-lolex: FTBFS, deprecated, replaced by @sinonjs/fake-timers)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:01:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010512: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1010513, regarding node-lolex: FTBFS, deprecated, replaced by @sinonjs/fake-timers to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#1010505: marked as done (golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v31 autopkgtest failure with libgit2 1.3)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 09:00:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1010960: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1010505, regarding golang-gopkg-libgit2-git2go.v31 autopkgtest failure with libgit2 1.3 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#993355: marked as done (haskell-hgettext: autopkgtest regressed in August 2020)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:59:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011208: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #993355, regarding haskell-hgettext: autopkgtest regressed in August 2020 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#964826: marked as done (haskell-chell-quickcheck2: BD-Uninstallable)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:58:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011211: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #964826, regarding haskell-chell-quickcheck2: BD-Uninstallable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#964825: marked as done (haskell-chell: BD-Uninstallable)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:59:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011214: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #964825, regarding haskell-chell: BD-Uninstallable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#963748: marked as done (haskell-gitlib: FTBFS with ghc-8.8)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:57:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011213: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #963748, regarding haskell-gitlib: FTBFS with ghc-8.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#963072: marked as done (haskell-easytest: Does not build with hedgehog 1.x)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:58:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011212: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #963072, regarding haskell-easytest: Does not build with hedgehog 1.x to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#914353: marked as done (hdbc-odbc: Missing build-dependency on concurrent-extra)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:57:04 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011216: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #914353, regarding hdbc-odbc: Missing build-dependency on concurrent-extra to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#964824: marked as done (hdevtools: FTBFS with GHC 8.8)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:56:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011217: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #964824, regarding hdevtools: FTBFS with GHC 8.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#970453: marked as done (coq-float: FTBFS in sid)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:54:02 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011347: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #970453, regarding coq-float: FTBFS in sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#975464: marked as done (haskell-werewolf: Removal notice: broken and unmaintained)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:55:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011223: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #975464, regarding haskell-werewolf: Removal notice: broken and unmaintained to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#967102: marked as done (rss2irc: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: Depends: libghc-feed-dev (< 1.1) but 1.3.0.1-1 is to be installed)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:55:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011221: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #967102, regarding rss2irc: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: Depends: libghc-feed-dev (< 1.1) but 1.3.0.1-1 is to be

Bug#964842: marked as done (haskell-yesod-auth-oauth2: BD-Uninstallable)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:54:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011224: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #964842, regarding haskell-yesod-auth-oauth2: BD-Uninstallable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#964830: marked as done (haskell-icalendar: BD-Uninstallable)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:56:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011219: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #964830, regarding haskell-icalendar: BD-Uninstallable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#943479: marked as done (FTBFS with ghc-8.6.5)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:55:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011223: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #943479, regarding FTBFS with ghc-8.6.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#880879: marked as done (haskell-dpkg FTBFS: hlibrary.setup: parsing output of pkg-config --modversion failed)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:54:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011277: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #880879, regarding haskell-dpkg FTBFS: hlibrary.setup: parsing output of pkg-config --modversion failed to be marked as done. This

Bug#998351: marked as done (Should libdbd-sqlite2-perl be shipped in bookworm?)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:51:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011981: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #998351, regarding Should libdbd-sqlite2-perl be shipped in bookworm? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#959193: marked as done (libperl5i-perl: Test failures with Devel::Declare 0.006022-1)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:52:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011980: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #959193, regarding libperl5i-perl: Test failures with Devel::Declare 0.006022-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#936869: marked as done (libgnatcoll-bindings: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:50:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1011991: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #936869, regarding libgnatcoll-bindings: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#1002863: marked as done (node-react-audio-player: FTBFS with webpack5: Error: Invalid webpack options)

2022-06-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jun 2022 08:49:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1012304: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #1002863, regarding node-react-audio-player: FTBFS with webpack5: Error: Invalid webpack options to be marked as done. This means

Bug#1011875: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools: FTBFS unreproducible

2022-06-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Reinhard, On 04/06/22 at 22:05 -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Control: tags -1 = moreinfo unreproducible > Hi Lucas, > > Thank you for reaching out. I've been looking into this report and am a > bit confused. I'm trying to reproduce it on my laptop, but it builds just > fine for me. Can you

Bug#1012345: librust-bytecount-dev: depends on missing package librust-packed-simd-2-0.3+default-dev

2022-06-05 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Package: librust-bytecount-dev Version: 0.6.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 - Jonas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAmKcUsEACgkQLHwxRsGg