Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2022 05:04:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1006508: fixed in m2crypto 0.38.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1006508,
regarding m2crypto: FTBFS with OpenSSL 3.0
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2022 05:00:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000556: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #997472,
regarding flask-script: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: pybuild --test -i
python{version} -p 3.9 returned exit code 13
to be
Your message dated Tue, 21 Jun 2022 00:04:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1010764: fixed in openafs 1.8.8.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010764,
regarding openafs-modules-dkms: module fails to build for kernel 5.17.0-1-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:04:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1009437: fixed in ippsample 0.0~git20220607.72f89b3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1009437,
regarding ippsample: FTBFS: dh_auto_test: error: make -j8 test VERBOSE=1
returned exit code 2
to be marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 1012127 1008220
Bug #1012127 [src:flexbar] flexbar: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental
Bug #1012127 [src:flexbar] flexbar: FTBFS with onetbb/2021.5.0-8 in experimental
The source flexbar and version 3.5.0-4 do not appear to
Hi Christian,
After three NMUs, what do you think about adding yourself to Uploaders
and making these changes directly? :) I'm part of the Qt/KDE Team, but
don't maintain this package, and I've been importing your diffs with gbp
import-dsc.
Vcs-Git:
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 19:19:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#997302: fixed in django-pipeline 1.6.14-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #997302,
regarding django-pipeline: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot import name 'six' from
'django.utils'
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #997302 in django-pipeline reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #997302 [src:django-pipeline] django-pipeline: FTBFS: ImportError: cannot
import name 'six' from 'django.utils'
(/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/django/utils/__init__.py)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
997302:
On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 04:38 -0500, Daniel Lewart wrote:
> Ben,
>
> > I wrote a script to check for short signatures (and other unexpected
> > things) in detached signature files:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/kernel-team/-/blob/master/scripts/benh/check-sig-params
>
> Thank you for
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 18:56:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013218: fixed in rails 2:6.1.4.7+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013218,
regarding rails: ftbfs SyntaxError: Unexpected token 'export'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 18:00:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008272: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937312,
regarding postnews: Unversioned Python removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 18:00:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1008272: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #937312,
regarding postnews: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
tags 1010764 upstream fixed-upstream pending
thanks
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 01:55:00AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> The fix for this appears to have merged upstream in January, so
> could probably be backported in Salsa:
>
> https://gerrit.openafs.org/14882
Indeed, upstream has been getting
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1010764 upstream fixed-upstream pending
Bug #1010764 [openafs-modules-dkms] openafs-modules-dkms: module fails to build
for kernel 5.17.0-1-amd64
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream, upstream, and pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:20:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013179: fixed in likwid 5.2.1+dfsg1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013179,
regarding likwid: ships /usr/lib//libhwloc.so{,.5}
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: libbatik-java
Version: 1.12-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
Been using this kind of call against a Jessie install of this package for years:
java -jar /usr/share/java/batik-rasterizer.jar -m image/png
-scriptSecurityOff -w 1920
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:34:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999768: fixed in lintian 2.115.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #999768,
regarding lintian: false report: adopted-extended-field XS-Autobuild
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:34:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1003353: fixed in lintian 2.115.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003353,
regarding lintian: Cannot use brackets in suppression rules?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:34:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1003272: fixed in lintian 2.115.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1003272,
regarding lintian: chokes on overrides with "(" but no ")"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:34:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1000234: fixed in lintian 2.115.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000234,
regarding lintian: Compare Debhelper prerequisites accurately w/r/t multiarch
acceptor
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1003353 [lintian] lintian: Cannot use brackets in suppression rules?
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #1003353 to the same tags previously set
--
1003353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1003353 in lintian reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #994930 [guile-2.2] guile-2.2: FTBFS due to web-server.test error
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
994930: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994930
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: severity -1 important
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:19:54 +0530 Vignesh Raman
wrote:
> Package: guile-2.2
> Version: 2.2.7+1-6
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
> X-Debbugs-Cc: vignesh.ra...@collabora.com
>
> Dear
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:00:32 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1013258: autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed
with exit status: 1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013258,
regarding autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
to be marked
Control: tags -1 wontfix
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 1:39 PM Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> Am Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:38:12AM +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> > Source: openslide
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: ftbfs
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > It seems openslide does not build anymore. See for
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 wontfix
Bug #1013258 [src:openslide] autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with
exit status: 1
Added tag(s) wontfix.
--
1013258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Am Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:38:12AM +0200 schrieb Mathieu Malaterre:
> Source: openslide
> Severity: important
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> It seems openslide does not build anymore. See for instance:
>
> * https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/openslide/-/jobs/2899560
I wonder why you
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 19/06/2022 16.27, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > please explain what makes you think that this issue is present in
> > lintian 2.114.0 as currently in Debian Unstable.
>
> The BTS does not understand made up versions (i.e. versions not in the
> archive),
Yes,
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:04:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1004048: fixed in golang-github-komkom-toml
0.0~git20211215.3c8ee9d-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004048,
regarding golang-github-komkom-toml: autopkgtest regression on armhf/i386:
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1004048 in golang-github-komkom-toml reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1004048 [src:golang-github-komkom-toml] golang-github-komkom-toml:
autopkgtest regression on armhf/i386: -{"hex3":3735928559}, +{"hex3":-559038737}
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1004048: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004048
Ben,
> I wrote a script to check for short signatures (and other unexpected
> things) in detached signature files:
> https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/kernel-team/-/blob/master/scripts/benh/check-sig-params
Thank you for your excellent detective work!
I tried running your script, but it
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 1013258 grave
Bug #1013258 [src:openslide] autoreconf: error: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with
exit status: 1
Severity set to 'grave' from 'important'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
I raised the issue to the upstream developer, and he is working on it:
https://github.com/grke/burp/issues/904
He is very responsive and gentle.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 20:53:39 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> Source: burp
> Version: 2.4.0-3
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid bookworm
>
> burp's
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1013211 src:linux
Bug #1013211 [kernel] System freeze followed by kernel panic or blank screen
Warning: Unknown package 'kernel'
Bug reassigned from package 'kernel' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jun 2022 09:18:43 +0200
with message-id <283db8a509c43c26e3a932be0193ebc06c6f0076.ca...@gmail.com>
and subject line Fixed package migrated to testing: closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1012802,
regarding python3-ipykernel: breaks jupyter notebook
to be marked as
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 sid
Bug #1003353 [lintian] lintian: Cannot use brackets in suppression rules?
Added tag(s) sid.
--
1003353: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003353
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 sid
On 19/06/2022 16.27, Axel Beckert wrote:
please explain what makes you think that this issue is present in
lintian 2.114.0 as currently in Debian Unstable.
The BTS does not understand made up versions (i.e. versions not in the
archive), so this bug shows up e.g. as a RC
40 matches
Mail list logo
