Processing control commands:
> tags 999331 + patch
Bug #999331 [src:cl-pubmed] cl-pubmed: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999331 + pending
Bug #999331 [src:cl-pubmed] cl-pubmed: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch
Control: tags 999331 + patch
Control: tags 999331 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-pubmed (versioned as 2.1.3-5.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-pubmed-2.1.3/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 999165 + patch
Bug #999165 [src:cl-umlisp-orf] cl-umlisp-orf: missing required debian/rules
targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999165 + pending
Bug #999165 [src:cl-umlisp-orf] cl-umlisp-orf: missing required debian/rules
targets
Control: tags 999165 + patch
Control: tags 999165 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-umlisp-orf (versioned as 3.3.2-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru cl-umlisp-orf-3.3.2/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 998994 + patch
Bug #998994 [src:cl-pipes] cl-pipes: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998994 + pending
Bug #998994 [src:cl-pipes] cl-pipes: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Control: tags 998994 + patch
Control: tags 998994 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-pipes (versioned as 1.2.1-5.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-pipes-1.2.1/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 998971 + patch
Bug #998971 [src:cl-xlunit] cl-xlunit: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998971 + pending
Bug #998971 [src:cl-xlunit] cl-xlunit: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch
Control: tags 998971 + patch
Control: tags 998971 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-xlunit (versioned as 0.6.3-2.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-xlunit-0.6.3/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 998959 + patch
Bug #998959 [src:cl-xptest] cl-xptest: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998959 + pending
Bug #998959 [src:cl-xptest] cl-xptest: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch
Control: tags 998959 + patch
Control: tags 998959 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-xptest (versioned as 1.2.4-3.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-xptest-1.2.4/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 998935 + patch
Bug #998935 [src:cl-umlisp] cl-umlisp: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998935 + pending
Bug #998935 [src:cl-umlisp] cl-umlisp: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch
Control: tags 998935 + patch
Control: tags 998935 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-umlisp (versioned as 1:2007ac.2-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru cl-umlisp-2007ac.2/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 999012 + patch
Bug #999012 [src:cl-photo] cl-photo: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999012 + pending
Bug #999012 [src:cl-photo] cl-photo: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Control: tags 999012 + patch
Control: tags 999012 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-photo (versioned as 0.14-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-photo-0.14/debian/changelog
Control: tags 999045 + patch
Control: tags 999045 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-lml (versioned as 2.5.7-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-lml-2.5.7/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 999079 + patch
Bug #999079 [src:cl-irc-logger] cl-irc-logger: missing required debian/rules
targets build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999079 + pending
Bug #999079 [src:cl-irc-logger] cl-irc-logger: missing required debian/rules
targets
Control: tags 999079 + patch
Control: tags 999079 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-irc-logger (versioned as 0.9.4-3.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-irc-logger-0.9.4/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 999045 + patch
Bug #999045 [src:cl-lml] cl-lml: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 999045 + pending
Bug #999045 [src:cl-lml] cl-lml: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Processing control commands:
> tags 998990 + patch
Bug #998990 [src:cl-lml2] cl-lml2: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998990 + pending
Bug #998990 [src:cl-lml2] cl-lml2: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Control: tags 998990 + patch
Control: tags 998990 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-lml2 (versioned as 1.6.6-4.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-lml2-1.6.6/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 998973 + patch
Bug #998973 [src:cl-pg] cl-pg: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998973 + pending
Bug #998973 [src:cl-pg] cl-pg: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch
and/or build-indep
Processing control commands:
> tags 998947 + patch
Bug #998947 [src:cl-modlisp] cl-modlisp: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998947 + pending
Bug #998947 [src:cl-modlisp] cl-modlisp: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch
Control: tags 998973 + patch
Control: tags 998973 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-pg (versioned as 1:20061216-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru cl-pg-20061216/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 998933 + patch
Bug #998933 [src:cgilib] cgilib: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or build-indep
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 998933 + pending
Bug #998933 [src:cgilib] cgilib: missing required debian/rules targets
build-arch and/or
Control: tags 998947 + patch
Control: tags 998947 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cl-modlisp (versioned as 0.6-7.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cl-modlisp-0.6/debian/changelog
Control: tags 998933 + patch
Control: tags 998933 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for cgilib (versioned as 0.6-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -u cgilib-0.6/debian/changelog cgilib-0.6/debian/changelog
---
Your message dated Wed, 02 Nov 2022 01:49:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1021314: fixed in hol88 2.02.19940316dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021314,
regarding hol88: license issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 1017711 emacs/1:28.2+1-3
Bug #1017711 [emacs-gtk] emacs-gtk: terminated with signal SIGABRT, 137 MB
coredump
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1017711 to the same values
previously set
> forwarded 1017711
Hello,
On Tue 01 Nov 2022 at 11:17PM +01, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2022-10-31 15:59:17 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2022-10-30 06:31:27 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > I've backported a couple of patches from upstream related to native
>> > compilation, now, so would you be
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #964540 [src:dropwatch] dropwatch build times out in the testsuite
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
964540: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964540
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: severity -1 normal
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 13:26:54 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
Package: src:dropwatch
Version: 1.5.3-1
dropwatch build times out in the testsuite, no output available in the build
log.
The 1.5.4-1 release built fine on the buildds for all release
architectures. But
Your message dated Wed, 02 Nov 2022 01:04:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023019: fixed in pyserial-asyncio 0.6-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023019,
regarding pyserial-asyncio FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1023299 ganeti-testsuite
Bug #1023299 [src:ganeti-testsuite] ganeti-testsuite: yaml.load in testsuite
needs to specify loader
Warning: Unknown package 'src:ganeti-testsuite'
Bug reassigned from package 'src:ganeti-testsuite' to
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:23:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019784: fixed in scorched3d 44+dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019784,
regarding scorched3d: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: jhead
Version: 1:3.06.0.1-3
Severity: grave
jhead version 1:3.06.0.1-3 deletes EXIF data when rotating images:
$ exiftool IMG_20221102_000230.jpg | wc -l
77
$ jhead -autorot IMG_20221102_000230.jpg
Nonfatal Error : 'IMG_20221102_000230.jpg' Command has invalid characters.
$
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:05:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023065: fixed in xuxen-eu-spell 3.0.20070215-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023065,
regarding xuxen-eu-spell: stop building hunspell-eu
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1019784 [src:scorched3d] scorched3d: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1019784: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1019784 in scorched3d reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Control: tags 967987 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for fuzz (versioned as 0.6-19.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru fuzz-0.6/debian/changelog fuzz-0.6/debian/changelog
--- fuzz-0.6/debian/changelog
Processing control commands:
> tags 967987 + pending
Bug #967987 [fuzz] fuzz: Removal of sys_errlist
Added tag(s) pending.
--
967987: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967987
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Andreas--
Thanks for this. I'm wrapping this up with a few other lintian fixes
and i should have a released version in unstable by later today or
tomorrow.
Thanks for helping out here!
--dkg
On Tue 2022-11-01 14:10:36 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2022-10-23 Andreas Metzler
On 2022-10-31 15:59:17 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-10-30 06:31:27 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > I've backported a couple of patches from upstream related to native
> > compilation, now, so would you be able to test again with the latest
> > upload? Thanks.
>
> If you mean
Source: linux
Version: 6.0.6-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Documenting the build failures on arm64 and armhf due to ABI changes:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=linux=arm64=6.0.6-2=1667324068=0
Source: ganeti-testsuite
Version: 3.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream ftbfs
Justification: fails to build from source
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Previously yaml.load did not require a loader to be specified:
load(stream, Loader=None)
Now it does (starting in pyyaml 6.0):
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 21:09:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1019792: fixed in springlobby 0.273-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019792,
regarding springlobby: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1019792 [src:springlobby] springlobby: Please transition to wxwidgets3.2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1019792: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019792
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1019792 in springlobby reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> close -1 1:28.2+1-3
Bug #1023297 [src:emacs] src:emacs: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
unresolved RC issues
Marked as fixed in versions emacs/1:28.2+1-3.
Bug #1023297 [src:emacs] src:emacs: fails to migrate to testing for too long:
unresolved RC issues
Source: emacs
Version: 1:27.1+1-3.1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1:28.2+1-3
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1017711 1020258
Dear maintainer(s),
[I know you probably know I understand the delay, but to be
Hi Picca,
I have just successfully cloned the git-repo. I have only got a warning
"[attr]our-c-style whitespace=tab-in-indent format.clang-format=9 n"
but I thinking it is not critical.
Please try to checkout it again. Maybe it was salsa issue?
Regards
Anton
Am Di., 1. Nov. 2022 um 10:18
Source: golang-raven-go
Version: 0.2.0+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
X-Debbugs-Cc: z...@debian.org, prav...@debian.org
Hi Pirate Praveen,
In 2018, you said we should not package golang-github-certifi-gocertifi[1],
as we should use the system CA bundles.
But why you include that in the
On 2022-10-23 15:21:14, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
>> # Fail the build if the tzdata package does not match TZVER.
>> grep -q '^# version 2022c$' /usr/share/zoneinfo/tzdata.zi
>> make[1]: *** [debian/rules:12: data/meta/2022c.json] Error 1
this looks like a failure
Source: libevent
Version: 2.0.21-stable-2+deb8u1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hello,
Since the upload of glibc 2.36 in unstable (2.36-3), libevent fails to
build from source:
dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols
file: see diff output below
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 1011977 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug #1011977 [src:htsjdk] FTBFS with OpenJDK 17: 5 failing tests
Added tag(s) fixed-in-experimental.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
1011977:
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 17:19:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022398: fixed in bladerf 0.2021.10-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022398,
regarding bladerf: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files, aborting
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 1022319 0.0~git20220518.5b14351-3
Bug #1022319 [src:gloo] gloo: FTBFS: ethtool.h:2088:17: error: flexible array
member ‘ethtool_link_settings::link_mode_masks’ not at end of ‘struct
gloo::getInterfaceSpeedGLinkSettings(int, ifreq*)::’
> > # Python3 bindings
> > python3 host/libraries/libbladeRF_bindings/python/setup.py install
> > --root=debian/tmp/ --prefix=/usr
...
> > Copying bladerf.egg-info to
> > debian/tmp/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/bladerf-1.2.1-py3.10.egg-info
> > running install_scripts
> > Installing
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022398 [src:bladerf] bladerf: FTBFS: dh_install: error: missing files,
aborting
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022398: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022398
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022398 in bladerf reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:49:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#994892: fixed in evdi 1.12.0+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #994892,
regarding evdi-dkms: fails to build for kernel 5.14.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:49:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1020028: fixed in cimg 3.1.6+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020028,
regarding cimg: FTBFS: ImfHeader.h:22:10: fatal error: ImathVec.h: No such file
or directory
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:49:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1017058: fixed in evdi 1.12.0+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1017058,
regarding evdi-dkms: failt to compile drm/drm_irq.h is missing - kernel
5.18.0-3-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 16:04:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016327: fixed in apertium-oci-fra 1.0.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016327,
regarding apertium-oci-fra: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:900: oci-fra.t1x.bin]
Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2022 16:54:41 +0100
with message-id <6aeba067-d103-62f9-44cf-b9bd6508c...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: golang-github-newrelic-go-agent-v3-dev: missing
Breaks+Replaces: golang-github-newrelic-go-agent-dev (<< 3.15.2-4)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020845,
Dear Adrian,
Thank you very much for digging deeper into this issue! If I understand
you correctly, this bug report can be closed now, since the next Debian
Stable release would rebuild the package anyway. Is this indeed the
case?
Best wishes,
Sebastian
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:05:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022486: fixed in healpy 1.16.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022486,
regarding healpy: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsSetupError: each element of
'ext_modules' option must be an Extension instance
Hmm. Other sssd packages are also affected by this.
Not only sssd-ad but sssd-ipa and sssd-ad-common.
Added the Breaks for these in Bullseye (and also in Ubuntu Jammy, which
has exactly the same problem). Will be in the next upload.
/mjt
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 15:04:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022488: fixed in azure-cosmos-python 3.1.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022488,
regarding azure-cosmos-python: FTBFS: TypeError: dist must be a Distribution
instance
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 14:44:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022390: fixed in python-enmerkar 0.7.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022390,
regarding python-enmerkar: FTBFS: tests failed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 14:39:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022291: fixed in blueprint-compiler 0.4.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022291,
regarding hydrapaper: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'gi'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 14:39:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022286: fixed in blueprint-compiler 0.4.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022286,
regarding gnome-shell-extension-manager: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No module
named 'gi'
to be marked as done.
This
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1022488 [src:azure-cosmos-python] azure-cosmos-python: FTBFS: TypeError:
dist must be a Distribution instance
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1022488: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022488
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1022488 in azure-cosmos-python reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1022290 https://github.com/dimitri/pgcopydb/pull/137
Bug #1022290 [src:pgcopydb] pgcopydb: FTBFS: ld: cannot find -lzstd: No such
file or directory
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/dimitri/pgcopydb/pull/137'.
>
On Sun, 30 Oct 2022, Adrian Bunk wrote:
haskell-gi-gtk has only once ever been built successfully on armel.
Unless someone has a better suggestion, my short-term Plan B would be
that I request the removal of haskell-gi-gtk and reverse dependencies
on armel.
I think that's probably a good
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2022 13:53:20 +
with message-id
and subject line re: rust-rustyline: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
librust-fd-lock-3+default-dev
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022280,
regarding rust-rustyline: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable:
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2022 13:40:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1023265: Test failures blocking migration of rust-libc
and several deps to testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023265,
regarding Test failures blocking migration of rust-libc and several deps to
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:34:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022425: fixed in picard 2.8.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022425,
regarding picard: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class
must subclass Command
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:34:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1016338: fixed in apertium-fra-frp 1.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016338,
regarding apertium-fra-frp: FTBFS: make[2]: *** [Makefile:885: fra-frp.t1x.bin]
Error 1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:22:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023258: fixed in pcalendar 3.4.1-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023258,
regarding uses com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serialize
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:22:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023260: fixed in sight 21.1.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023260,
regarding sightviewer: Instruction non permise (core dumped)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949570: fixed in dropwatch 1.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949570,
regarding dropwatch should not use the private binutils shared libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#949570: fixed in dropwatch 1.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #949570,
regarding dropwatch should not depend on the shared binutils libraries
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023172: fixed in dropwatch 1.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023172,
regarding dropwatch: not installable since dependency on outdated libbinutils
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
On 2022-10-23 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> Caused by new gpg-error dropping gpg-error-config, this works for me:
> --- libassuan-2.5.5/debian/rules2022-04-30 17:47:12.0 +0200
> +++ patched/libassuan-2.5.5.patched/debian/rules2022-10-23
> 18:23:40.505849321 +0200
> @@
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:11:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1023248: fixed in systemd 252-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1023248,
regarding systemd fails to install: Failed to resolve group 'systemd-journal'.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1023258 [pcalendar] uses com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.serialize
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1023258 in pcalendar reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Am 01.11.22 um 13:03 schrieb Andrea Pappacoda:
I'll fix it as soon as possible, possibly in the 4.0 release. I've already uploaded the latest release to mentors, but
it doesn't contain this fix.
For the 4.0 release you would have to clarify the license situation.
At least, the Unlicense has to
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 12:34:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1013648: fixed in apertium-nno-nob 1.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1013648,
regarding apertium-nno-nob: FTBFS: configure: error: Package requirements
(apertium-lex-tools >= 0.2.2) were not met
to be
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 1023178 https://github.com/jonasmr/microprofile/issues/81
Bug #1023178 [src:microprofile] microprofile: Contains non-free source
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://github.com/jonasmr/microprofile/issues/81'.
> thanks
Stopping
Package: rust-libc
Version: 0.2.137-1
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: plugw...@debian.org, wolfg...@silbermayr.at, infini...@debian.org
Migration of several other packages is blocked due to the issues listed
over at:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rust-libc
In particular, it has caused failures
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1023260 [sightviewer] sightviewer: Instruction non permise (core dumped)
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023260: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1023260 in fw4spl reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 11:02:55 +0100 Bastian Germann
wrote:
> The files src/microprofile*.html contain JavaScript code from
https://gist.github.com/mjackson/5311256
> which never got a license even though people have asked for it. So
please exclude them.
Hi Bastian, thank you for the report.
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #1023260 [sightviewer] sightviewer: Instruction non permise (core dumped)
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
--
1023260: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1023248 in systemd reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1023248 [systemd] systemd fails to install: Failed to resolve group
'systemd-journal'.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1023248: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1023248
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:59:11AM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
And this revealed one more issue here, now with samba 4.17. Where, the
same libndr.so again, has changed soname from libndr.so.2 to libndr.so.3!
And it looks like *this* is what you're talking about now, once 4.17 with
this new
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:19:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1022513: fixed in bdebstrap 0.4.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1022513,
regarding bdebstrap: FTBFS: distutils.errors.DistutilsClassError: command class
must subclass Command
to be marked as done.
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo